

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
We may have to get progressive talk shows put on the Endangered Species List,
now that the president has reinstated it. Otherwise there won't be any voices on the
air except the voices of the right, whether "centrist" (corporate) or explicitly far-right
(corporate). As Brad Friedman notes in his report on Peter B. Collins's forced
departure, the economic crash is threatening to finish off those last few
figures who have managed somehow to resist the oligopolistic tide that has by now
all but submerged the US media.
That purge, now near-complete, has actually been in the works for years. It was the
purpose of the vast "de-regulation" of the media begun by Reagan back in '87
(soon after the corporate press obligingly refused to look too deeply into Iran/contra)
and continued by Bill Clinton nine years later (and a fat lot of good it did him.)
Those grand strokes were the eventual result of a big semi-covert effort that had
started up much earlier, when, in the early Seventies, the US Chamber of Commerce
and the top tier of its membership (some dare call it "the ruling class") resolved to
take the country back from all those citizens who had been acting up against the war,
for civil rights for all, for the environment, etc. Such was the groundwork for the
Reagan/Clinton hand-off of our airwaves (and the cable system) to the likes of GE, News Corporation,
Disney and Time Warner, and the aptly named Clear Channel. With that network
in charge, and quite absolved of any public obligation, those trying to tell some truth
out loud soon found that they were struggling to be heard.
So now Rush Limbaugh's voice -- along with those of Hannity, O'Reilly, Ingraham
and the aptly self-named "Michael Savage," among others -- bellows inescapably
from coast to coast, while those who are at least as talented, but honest, rational and
well-informed, have got to work like hell to find, and build, their audience (which is,
increasingly, on-line).
This can be done: Thom Hartmann, having now left the implosive Air America, is
doing it and Mike Malloy is doing it. (Now Randi Rhodes is also off the air.) That
such talents have to work that way, while all those lethal gas-bags come in loud and
clear, is a clear sign that the US media is in dire need of change, of just the sort that
Team Obama promised us last year.
For the dominance of all those rightist blowhards is not based on the market, although
their fans keep saying that it is, in countless fuming posts and letters to the editor. Contrary
to that talking point, the crackpot views of Rush et al. have only fringe appeal -- as
we, and all the world, saw clearly on Election Day, and as we see especially clearly
now that the economy's collapsed. Most people out there were quite thrilled to see
Jon Stewart clean Jim Cramer's clock. So where is that big audience for Glenn Beck,
and Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, and all the other hirelings out there channeling
Herbert Hoover?
Let's face it: There's been no such big audience for quite a while. When sharp
progressive talkers have been able to compete, they've done quite well -- just
ask Phil Donohue, who lost his show five years ago despite the fact that it was
MSNBC's top-rated offering. (Internal memos shortly made it clear that he was
dumped because he was against Bush/Cheney's war.) And now that network has
Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow in prime time, with Joe Scarborough
shunted to the mornings. Meanwhile, Thom Hartmann has been besting Rush
in markets where he's had the chance -- but, by and large, he hasn't had the
chance; and neither has Peter B. Collins, or any other able dissident.
So what this country needs, ASAP, is media reform; because the media culture
now in place is not a genuine expression of our real opinions or desires, but a
gigantic corporate imposition on us all. For far too long we have assumed that
what we see and hear (and read) comes mostly from the right because Americans
are mostly on the right: not just throughout the "heartland," but, ludicrously even
in New York, L.A,, Chicago, San Francisco. Thus we must reform the US media
-- break the oligopoly, restore the broadcast code, and build a genuinely non-
commercial public system) so that we'll know not just what's really going on, but
also, even more important, who we really are.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
We may have to get progressive talk shows put on the Endangered Species List,
now that the president has reinstated it. Otherwise there won't be any voices on the
air except the voices of the right, whether "centrist" (corporate) or explicitly far-right
(corporate). As Brad Friedman notes in his report on Peter B. Collins's forced
departure, the economic crash is threatening to finish off those last few
figures who have managed somehow to resist the oligopolistic tide that has by now
all but submerged the US media.
That purge, now near-complete, has actually been in the works for years. It was the
purpose of the vast "de-regulation" of the media begun by Reagan back in '87
(soon after the corporate press obligingly refused to look too deeply into Iran/contra)
and continued by Bill Clinton nine years later (and a fat lot of good it did him.)
Those grand strokes were the eventual result of a big semi-covert effort that had
started up much earlier, when, in the early Seventies, the US Chamber of Commerce
and the top tier of its membership (some dare call it "the ruling class") resolved to
take the country back from all those citizens who had been acting up against the war,
for civil rights for all, for the environment, etc. Such was the groundwork for the
Reagan/Clinton hand-off of our airwaves (and the cable system) to the likes of GE, News Corporation,
Disney and Time Warner, and the aptly named Clear Channel. With that network
in charge, and quite absolved of any public obligation, those trying to tell some truth
out loud soon found that they were struggling to be heard.
So now Rush Limbaugh's voice -- along with those of Hannity, O'Reilly, Ingraham
and the aptly self-named "Michael Savage," among others -- bellows inescapably
from coast to coast, while those who are at least as talented, but honest, rational and
well-informed, have got to work like hell to find, and build, their audience (which is,
increasingly, on-line).
This can be done: Thom Hartmann, having now left the implosive Air America, is
doing it and Mike Malloy is doing it. (Now Randi Rhodes is also off the air.) That
such talents have to work that way, while all those lethal gas-bags come in loud and
clear, is a clear sign that the US media is in dire need of change, of just the sort that
Team Obama promised us last year.
For the dominance of all those rightist blowhards is not based on the market, although
their fans keep saying that it is, in countless fuming posts and letters to the editor. Contrary
to that talking point, the crackpot views of Rush et al. have only fringe appeal -- as
we, and all the world, saw clearly on Election Day, and as we see especially clearly
now that the economy's collapsed. Most people out there were quite thrilled to see
Jon Stewart clean Jim Cramer's clock. So where is that big audience for Glenn Beck,
and Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, and all the other hirelings out there channeling
Herbert Hoover?
Let's face it: There's been no such big audience for quite a while. When sharp
progressive talkers have been able to compete, they've done quite well -- just
ask Phil Donohue, who lost his show five years ago despite the fact that it was
MSNBC's top-rated offering. (Internal memos shortly made it clear that he was
dumped because he was against Bush/Cheney's war.) And now that network has
Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow in prime time, with Joe Scarborough
shunted to the mornings. Meanwhile, Thom Hartmann has been besting Rush
in markets where he's had the chance -- but, by and large, he hasn't had the
chance; and neither has Peter B. Collins, or any other able dissident.
So what this country needs, ASAP, is media reform; because the media culture
now in place is not a genuine expression of our real opinions or desires, but a
gigantic corporate imposition on us all. For far too long we have assumed that
what we see and hear (and read) comes mostly from the right because Americans
are mostly on the right: not just throughout the "heartland," but, ludicrously even
in New York, L.A,, Chicago, San Francisco. Thus we must reform the US media
-- break the oligopoly, restore the broadcast code, and build a genuinely non-
commercial public system) so that we'll know not just what's really going on, but
also, even more important, who we really are.
We may have to get progressive talk shows put on the Endangered Species List,
now that the president has reinstated it. Otherwise there won't be any voices on the
air except the voices of the right, whether "centrist" (corporate) or explicitly far-right
(corporate). As Brad Friedman notes in his report on Peter B. Collins's forced
departure, the economic crash is threatening to finish off those last few
figures who have managed somehow to resist the oligopolistic tide that has by now
all but submerged the US media.
That purge, now near-complete, has actually been in the works for years. It was the
purpose of the vast "de-regulation" of the media begun by Reagan back in '87
(soon after the corporate press obligingly refused to look too deeply into Iran/contra)
and continued by Bill Clinton nine years later (and a fat lot of good it did him.)
Those grand strokes were the eventual result of a big semi-covert effort that had
started up much earlier, when, in the early Seventies, the US Chamber of Commerce
and the top tier of its membership (some dare call it "the ruling class") resolved to
take the country back from all those citizens who had been acting up against the war,
for civil rights for all, for the environment, etc. Such was the groundwork for the
Reagan/Clinton hand-off of our airwaves (and the cable system) to the likes of GE, News Corporation,
Disney and Time Warner, and the aptly named Clear Channel. With that network
in charge, and quite absolved of any public obligation, those trying to tell some truth
out loud soon found that they were struggling to be heard.
So now Rush Limbaugh's voice -- along with those of Hannity, O'Reilly, Ingraham
and the aptly self-named "Michael Savage," among others -- bellows inescapably
from coast to coast, while those who are at least as talented, but honest, rational and
well-informed, have got to work like hell to find, and build, their audience (which is,
increasingly, on-line).
This can be done: Thom Hartmann, having now left the implosive Air America, is
doing it and Mike Malloy is doing it. (Now Randi Rhodes is also off the air.) That
such talents have to work that way, while all those lethal gas-bags come in loud and
clear, is a clear sign that the US media is in dire need of change, of just the sort that
Team Obama promised us last year.
For the dominance of all those rightist blowhards is not based on the market, although
their fans keep saying that it is, in countless fuming posts and letters to the editor. Contrary
to that talking point, the crackpot views of Rush et al. have only fringe appeal -- as
we, and all the world, saw clearly on Election Day, and as we see especially clearly
now that the economy's collapsed. Most people out there were quite thrilled to see
Jon Stewart clean Jim Cramer's clock. So where is that big audience for Glenn Beck,
and Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, and all the other hirelings out there channeling
Herbert Hoover?
Let's face it: There's been no such big audience for quite a while. When sharp
progressive talkers have been able to compete, they've done quite well -- just
ask Phil Donohue, who lost his show five years ago despite the fact that it was
MSNBC's top-rated offering. (Internal memos shortly made it clear that he was
dumped because he was against Bush/Cheney's war.) And now that network has
Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow in prime time, with Joe Scarborough
shunted to the mornings. Meanwhile, Thom Hartmann has been besting Rush
in markets where he's had the chance -- but, by and large, he hasn't had the
chance; and neither has Peter B. Collins, or any other able dissident.
So what this country needs, ASAP, is media reform; because the media culture
now in place is not a genuine expression of our real opinions or desires, but a
gigantic corporate imposition on us all. For far too long we have assumed that
what we see and hear (and read) comes mostly from the right because Americans
are mostly on the right: not just throughout the "heartland," but, ludicrously even
in New York, L.A,, Chicago, San Francisco. Thus we must reform the US media
-- break the oligopoly, restore the broadcast code, and build a genuinely non-
commercial public system) so that we'll know not just what's really going on, but
also, even more important, who we really are.