SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
No Soul, No Regret: George W. Bush's Non-Mea-Culpa Tour 2009
Jan 13, 2009
George W. Bush the wise and somber presidential veteran.
Spare me. But as Bush prepares to leave office, he's trying to
strike that sort of tone. I suppose it's easier to pontificate about
the office of the presidency than to say, "Boy, did I screw up, I'm
outta here." So at a press conference on Monday morning--probably his
final as president--Bush discussed the burdens of presidential
leadership and noted there will come a moment next Tuesday when Barack
Obama, after taking the oath of office and watching the parade, settles
into the Oval Office and says to himself, "Oh, my." (Maybe he will add,
"Is this my beautiful house?")
But being president is really not that bad, Bush said. According to Fox News, he remarked: "Disappointments will be clearly a minority irritant." (Was that a Freudian slip? Or just another Bushism? According to the official transcript of the press conference, Bush actually said, "minor irritant.")
But the most surprising (I suppose) element of his non-mea-culpa is his insistence that he is unpopular because he did the right thing. For instance, he said
that it would have been wrong for him to back the Kyoto global warming
treaty just to be popular. Of course. But that doesn't mean trashing it
was the correct thing to do. Bush seems to believe that popular disgust with some of his actions is a signal that he made the hard and right choice. See Iraq.
On Fox News Sunday, Bush had this telling exchange with Brit Hume:
HUME: People who come to see you here and meet with you,
from the outside, are continually taken by surprise by your evident
good humor and good mood and the fact that with low poll ratings and
various troubles besetting the country and all you've been through,
that you're not down -- that you're fine. And everybody remarks on it.
How do you explain that?
G.W. BUSH: Well, I'm better than fine. I am proud of the
accomplishments of this administration. I am thankful for the people
that have worked so hard to serve our country. I know I gave it my all
for eight years. And I did not sell my soul for the sake of popularity.
And so when I get back home and look in the mirror I will be proud of
what I see.
At the press conference, while discussing what he might have done to be more "popular," Bush defended his handling
of Hurricane Katrina: "Don't tell me the federal response was slow when
there was 30,000 people pulled off...after the storm passed....It's a
pretty quick response."
What cable news was he watching at the time? Even Fox News reporters
and anchors were then decrying the administration's handling of the
catastrophe. Bush lost an American city, and he appears to believe that
he responded adequately. And should he have done a better job just to
be popular?
At the press conference, he also said:
"I strongly disagree with the assessment that our moral
standing has been damaged. It may be damaged amongst some of the elite.
But people still understand America stands for freedom; that America is
a country that provides such great hope."
But poll after poll shows people abroad have a more negative view of
the United States than before Bush invaded Iraq. Is he delusional?
(That's a rhetorical question.)
On Fox, asked about his Republican Party and its recent losses, Bush
remarked, "Look, obviously we got whipped in 2008. And there will be a
new wave of leadership arriving on the scene." But it was his
leadership that led to the whipping--and to many of the problems the
nation faces today. Bush clearly has not processed all this.
At his Monday face-off with reporters, Bush said that when gets back
to Texas he will be able to look into the mirror every day without
regret. How nice. Is it disturbing (or harrowing or frightening) that
this nation, during such consequential times, had as a leader a man
with so little depth? After all, only people without much soul have no
regrets.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Mother Jones
George W. Bush the wise and somber presidential veteran.
Spare me. But as Bush prepares to leave office, he's trying to
strike that sort of tone. I suppose it's easier to pontificate about
the office of the presidency than to say, "Boy, did I screw up, I'm
outta here." So at a press conference on Monday morning--probably his
final as president--Bush discussed the burdens of presidential
leadership and noted there will come a moment next Tuesday when Barack
Obama, after taking the oath of office and watching the parade, settles
into the Oval Office and says to himself, "Oh, my." (Maybe he will add,
"Is this my beautiful house?")
But being president is really not that bad, Bush said. According to Fox News, he remarked: "Disappointments will be clearly a minority irritant." (Was that a Freudian slip? Or just another Bushism? According to the official transcript of the press conference, Bush actually said, "minor irritant.")
But the most surprising (I suppose) element of his non-mea-culpa is his insistence that he is unpopular because he did the right thing. For instance, he said
that it would have been wrong for him to back the Kyoto global warming
treaty just to be popular. Of course. But that doesn't mean trashing it
was the correct thing to do. Bush seems to believe that popular disgust with some of his actions is a signal that he made the hard and right choice. See Iraq.
On Fox News Sunday, Bush had this telling exchange with Brit Hume:
HUME: People who come to see you here and meet with you,
from the outside, are continually taken by surprise by your evident
good humor and good mood and the fact that with low poll ratings and
various troubles besetting the country and all you've been through,
that you're not down -- that you're fine. And everybody remarks on it.
How do you explain that?
G.W. BUSH: Well, I'm better than fine. I am proud of the
accomplishments of this administration. I am thankful for the people
that have worked so hard to serve our country. I know I gave it my all
for eight years. And I did not sell my soul for the sake of popularity.
And so when I get back home and look in the mirror I will be proud of
what I see.
At the press conference, while discussing what he might have done to be more "popular," Bush defended his handling
of Hurricane Katrina: "Don't tell me the federal response was slow when
there was 30,000 people pulled off...after the storm passed....It's a
pretty quick response."
What cable news was he watching at the time? Even Fox News reporters
and anchors were then decrying the administration's handling of the
catastrophe. Bush lost an American city, and he appears to believe that
he responded adequately. And should he have done a better job just to
be popular?
At the press conference, he also said:
"I strongly disagree with the assessment that our moral
standing has been damaged. It may be damaged amongst some of the elite.
But people still understand America stands for freedom; that America is
a country that provides such great hope."
But poll after poll shows people abroad have a more negative view of
the United States than before Bush invaded Iraq. Is he delusional?
(That's a rhetorical question.)
On Fox, asked about his Republican Party and its recent losses, Bush
remarked, "Look, obviously we got whipped in 2008. And there will be a
new wave of leadership arriving on the scene." But it was his
leadership that led to the whipping--and to many of the problems the
nation faces today. Bush clearly has not processed all this.
At his Monday face-off with reporters, Bush said that when gets back
to Texas he will be able to look into the mirror every day without
regret. How nice. Is it disturbing (or harrowing or frightening) that
this nation, during such consequential times, had as a leader a man
with so little depth? After all, only people without much soul have no
regrets.
George W. Bush the wise and somber presidential veteran.
Spare me. But as Bush prepares to leave office, he's trying to
strike that sort of tone. I suppose it's easier to pontificate about
the office of the presidency than to say, "Boy, did I screw up, I'm
outta here." So at a press conference on Monday morning--probably his
final as president--Bush discussed the burdens of presidential
leadership and noted there will come a moment next Tuesday when Barack
Obama, after taking the oath of office and watching the parade, settles
into the Oval Office and says to himself, "Oh, my." (Maybe he will add,
"Is this my beautiful house?")
But being president is really not that bad, Bush said. According to Fox News, he remarked: "Disappointments will be clearly a minority irritant." (Was that a Freudian slip? Or just another Bushism? According to the official transcript of the press conference, Bush actually said, "minor irritant.")
But the most surprising (I suppose) element of his non-mea-culpa is his insistence that he is unpopular because he did the right thing. For instance, he said
that it would have been wrong for him to back the Kyoto global warming
treaty just to be popular. Of course. But that doesn't mean trashing it
was the correct thing to do. Bush seems to believe that popular disgust with some of his actions is a signal that he made the hard and right choice. See Iraq.
On Fox News Sunday, Bush had this telling exchange with Brit Hume:
HUME: People who come to see you here and meet with you,
from the outside, are continually taken by surprise by your evident
good humor and good mood and the fact that with low poll ratings and
various troubles besetting the country and all you've been through,
that you're not down -- that you're fine. And everybody remarks on it.
How do you explain that?
G.W. BUSH: Well, I'm better than fine. I am proud of the
accomplishments of this administration. I am thankful for the people
that have worked so hard to serve our country. I know I gave it my all
for eight years. And I did not sell my soul for the sake of popularity.
And so when I get back home and look in the mirror I will be proud of
what I see.
At the press conference, while discussing what he might have done to be more "popular," Bush defended his handling
of Hurricane Katrina: "Don't tell me the federal response was slow when
there was 30,000 people pulled off...after the storm passed....It's a
pretty quick response."
What cable news was he watching at the time? Even Fox News reporters
and anchors were then decrying the administration's handling of the
catastrophe. Bush lost an American city, and he appears to believe that
he responded adequately. And should he have done a better job just to
be popular?
At the press conference, he also said:
"I strongly disagree with the assessment that our moral
standing has been damaged. It may be damaged amongst some of the elite.
But people still understand America stands for freedom; that America is
a country that provides such great hope."
But poll after poll shows people abroad have a more negative view of
the United States than before Bush invaded Iraq. Is he delusional?
(That's a rhetorical question.)
On Fox, asked about his Republican Party and its recent losses, Bush
remarked, "Look, obviously we got whipped in 2008. And there will be a
new wave of leadership arriving on the scene." But it was his
leadership that led to the whipping--and to many of the problems the
nation faces today. Bush clearly has not processed all this.
At his Monday face-off with reporters, Bush said that when gets back
to Texas he will be able to look into the mirror every day without
regret. How nice. Is it disturbing (or harrowing or frightening) that
this nation, during such consequential times, had as a leader a man
with so little depth? After all, only people without much soul have no
regrets.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.