

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Tony Blair is to interdependence and international community and George W. Bush is to compassionate conservative.
Meaning: It's just rhetoric, not action.
In 1999, at a speech before the Chicago Economic Club, Tom Blair unveiled his "Doctrine of International Community":
"Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community. By this I mean the explicit recognition that today more than ever before we are mutually dependent, that national interest is to a significant extent governed by international collaboration and that we need a clear and coherent debate as to the direction this doctrine takes us in each field of international endeavour. Just as within domestic politics, the notion of community -- the belief that partnership and co-operation are essential to advance self-interest -- is coming into its own; so it needs to find its own international echo."
And then he went to war in Iraq.
David Brooks has argued that Blair's support for the Iraq war is a natural extension of his internationalist views. If one believes in shared, universal values, Brooks argues, then one believes in imperialist wars to impose those values on others.
Kind of misses the point of shared, universal values. The belief that everyone should have enough to eat, that children should get a quality education, that the environment should be clean and free from pollution, that people have a right to express themselves, that we should all be free from violence -- to say these are shared, universal values suggests that are endemic to the human condition and need to be unshackled and nurtured, not tyrannically imposed. These deep values, enshrined in human rights doctrines and expressed in every community and every family around the world, are like oxygen. Breathing them in is automatic.
War, on the other hand, takes our breath away. It steps on the chests of those who are occupied and killed and tears the moral fiber of those in whose name it is fought. War doesn't impose shared values. It crushes them. A political agenda that embraces interdependence and shared values helps support other nations, not obliterate them.
Tony Blair's former best friend, Bill Clinton, once said, "It is better to be strong and wrong than weak and right." Clearly, President Bush, the stubborn decider, agrees. And Blair? Blair should not be remembered as someone who espoused human rights and global justice but somehow fell short, dragged down into the muck of war by an arm-twisting US. Instead, Blair should be remembered as an unremarkable link in the British chain of empire, who hid behind a mask of lofty ideals to conceal his inherent imperialism.
Sally Kohn is director of the New York-based Movement Vision Project, working with grassroots organizations across the United States to advance our shared values of family, community and humanity. She has interviewed progressive leaders across the country on their vision for the future.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Tony Blair is to interdependence and international community and George W. Bush is to compassionate conservative.
Meaning: It's just rhetoric, not action.
In 1999, at a speech before the Chicago Economic Club, Tom Blair unveiled his "Doctrine of International Community":
"Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community. By this I mean the explicit recognition that today more than ever before we are mutually dependent, that national interest is to a significant extent governed by international collaboration and that we need a clear and coherent debate as to the direction this doctrine takes us in each field of international endeavour. Just as within domestic politics, the notion of community -- the belief that partnership and co-operation are essential to advance self-interest -- is coming into its own; so it needs to find its own international echo."
And then he went to war in Iraq.
David Brooks has argued that Blair's support for the Iraq war is a natural extension of his internationalist views. If one believes in shared, universal values, Brooks argues, then one believes in imperialist wars to impose those values on others.
Kind of misses the point of shared, universal values. The belief that everyone should have enough to eat, that children should get a quality education, that the environment should be clean and free from pollution, that people have a right to express themselves, that we should all be free from violence -- to say these are shared, universal values suggests that are endemic to the human condition and need to be unshackled and nurtured, not tyrannically imposed. These deep values, enshrined in human rights doctrines and expressed in every community and every family around the world, are like oxygen. Breathing them in is automatic.
War, on the other hand, takes our breath away. It steps on the chests of those who are occupied and killed and tears the moral fiber of those in whose name it is fought. War doesn't impose shared values. It crushes them. A political agenda that embraces interdependence and shared values helps support other nations, not obliterate them.
Tony Blair's former best friend, Bill Clinton, once said, "It is better to be strong and wrong than weak and right." Clearly, President Bush, the stubborn decider, agrees. And Blair? Blair should not be remembered as someone who espoused human rights and global justice but somehow fell short, dragged down into the muck of war by an arm-twisting US. Instead, Blair should be remembered as an unremarkable link in the British chain of empire, who hid behind a mask of lofty ideals to conceal his inherent imperialism.
Sally Kohn is director of the New York-based Movement Vision Project, working with grassroots organizations across the United States to advance our shared values of family, community and humanity. She has interviewed progressive leaders across the country on their vision for the future.
Tony Blair is to interdependence and international community and George W. Bush is to compassionate conservative.
Meaning: It's just rhetoric, not action.
In 1999, at a speech before the Chicago Economic Club, Tom Blair unveiled his "Doctrine of International Community":
"Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community. By this I mean the explicit recognition that today more than ever before we are mutually dependent, that national interest is to a significant extent governed by international collaboration and that we need a clear and coherent debate as to the direction this doctrine takes us in each field of international endeavour. Just as within domestic politics, the notion of community -- the belief that partnership and co-operation are essential to advance self-interest -- is coming into its own; so it needs to find its own international echo."
And then he went to war in Iraq.
David Brooks has argued that Blair's support for the Iraq war is a natural extension of his internationalist views. If one believes in shared, universal values, Brooks argues, then one believes in imperialist wars to impose those values on others.
Kind of misses the point of shared, universal values. The belief that everyone should have enough to eat, that children should get a quality education, that the environment should be clean and free from pollution, that people have a right to express themselves, that we should all be free from violence -- to say these are shared, universal values suggests that are endemic to the human condition and need to be unshackled and nurtured, not tyrannically imposed. These deep values, enshrined in human rights doctrines and expressed in every community and every family around the world, are like oxygen. Breathing them in is automatic.
War, on the other hand, takes our breath away. It steps on the chests of those who are occupied and killed and tears the moral fiber of those in whose name it is fought. War doesn't impose shared values. It crushes them. A political agenda that embraces interdependence and shared values helps support other nations, not obliterate them.
Tony Blair's former best friend, Bill Clinton, once said, "It is better to be strong and wrong than weak and right." Clearly, President Bush, the stubborn decider, agrees. And Blair? Blair should not be remembered as someone who espoused human rights and global justice but somehow fell short, dragged down into the muck of war by an arm-twisting US. Instead, Blair should be remembered as an unremarkable link in the British chain of empire, who hid behind a mask of lofty ideals to conceal his inherent imperialism.
Sally Kohn is director of the New York-based Movement Vision Project, working with grassroots organizations across the United States to advance our shared values of family, community and humanity. She has interviewed progressive leaders across the country on their vision for the future.