September, 12 2024, 11:14am EDT
PREPARED REMARKS: Sanders Leads Bipartisan Hearing on Steward Health, CEO Ralph de la Torre, & Private Equity Influence in American Health Care
This was the first subpoena issued by the HELP Committee since 1981. Despite the subpoena, Dr. de la Torre failed to appear today for the hearing.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), today led the committee in a hearing titled “Examining the Bankruptcy of Steward Health Care: How Management Decisions Have Impacted Patient Care.”
Ahead of the hearing, the committee authorized a subpoena in a bipartisan vote to compel Steward CEO Dr. Ralph de la Torre to appear today as a witness and provide testimony. This was the first subpoena issued by the HELP Committee since 1981. Despite the subpoena, Dr. de la Torre failed to appear today for the hearing.
Sanders’ remarks, as prepared for delivery, are below and can be watched live HERE:
The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions will come to order.
In America today, we have a health care system that is broken, dysfunctional and cruel.
Too often it is a system that is designed not to make patients well, but to make health care executives and stockholders extraordinarily wealthy.
There could not be a clearer example of that than private equity billionaires on Wall Street who are making billions by purchasing hospitals throughout our country, stripping all of their assets and loading them up with debt that they could never afford to pay back.
Perhaps more than anyone else in America, Ralph de la Torre, the CEO of Steward Health Care, is the poster child for the type of outrageous corporate greed that is permeating throughout our for-profit health care system.
Working in partnership with the private equity firm Cerberus, Dr. de la Torre became obscenely wealthy by loading up hospitals from Massachusetts to Arizona with billions of dollars in debt and selling the land underneath these hospitals to real estate executives at Medical Properties Trust who charged unsustainably high rent.
As a result of Dr. de la Torre’s elaborate financial scheme, Steward Health Care, and the more than 30 hospitals it owns in 8 states, declared bankruptcy with some $9 billion in debt.
But let’s be clear: Steward’s severe financial problems did not happen overnight. They have been going on for more than a decade.
It has been estimated that at least 15 patients at hospitals owned by Steward died as a result of a lack of medical equipment or staffing shortages and that at least 2,000 other patients were put in serious risk according to federal regulators.
Since 2019, federal inspectors have cited Steward-owned hospitals over 30 times for putting patients in “immediate jeopardy” – meaning that patients died, were put at “grave risk” or were injured.
In 2014, Steward shut down the Quincy Medical Center in Massachusetts with the exception of its Emergency Room – which it shut down six years later. Today, Quincy is the largest city in Massachusetts without an Emergency Room.
In 2018, Steward shut down the Northside Regional Medical Center in Youngstown, Ohio closing the only labor and delivery unit in that city for pregnant women and their babies and laying off 468 health care workers in the process.
Last year, Steward shut down the Texas Vista Medical Center, the main health care option for San Antonio's south side after it missed over $650,000 in payments to medical suppliers leaving the hospital with a severe shortage of respiratory masks among many other things.
Last month, state regulators required Steward to shut down St. Luke’s Behavioral Center in Phoenix, Arizona after they found that it had been without air conditioning as temperatures soared past 100 degrees putting more than 70 patients at risk of heat exposure.
Steward has also shut down pediatric wards in Massachusetts and Louisiana, closed neonatal units in Florida and Texas, and eliminated maternity services at a hospital in Florida.
We know that Steward has gone bankrupt. We know that several of its hospitals have already been forced to close their doors because they ran out of money.
But how is Dr. de la Torre doing financially? While hospitals shut down, while patients go without care, while health care workers lose their jobs, how has Dr. De La Torre been doing financially?
The reality is that Dr. de la Torre is doing phenomenally well.
While Steward was busy shutting down hospitals,
the companies he owns received $250 million in compensation over a 4-year period. Let me repeat, he personally received hundreds of millions of dollars, some of which he used to purchase this $40 million yacht. (Chart 1: Yacht.)
While Steward’s hospitals were severely understaffed, Dr. de la Torre was able to afford this $15 million custom-made, luxury fishing boat. (Chart 2: Luxury fishing boat.)
While Steward-owned hospitals could not afford to pay for life-saving medical supplies, it had enough money to purchase a $62 million private jet and, incredibly, a $33 million backup jet that Dr. de la Torre and his family used for non-business trips throughout the world. (Charts 3 and 4: Private jets.)
While Steward’s hospitals were laying off hundreds of workers, Dr. de la Torre made a $10 million charitable contribution to an exclusive prep school in Dallas that was fully paid for by Steward Health Care, not his own personal funds.
How many of Steward’s hospitals could have been prevented from closing down, how many lives could have been saved, how many health care workers would still have their jobs if Dr. de la Torre spent $160 million on high-quality health care at the hospitals he managed instead of a yacht, two private jets, a luxury fishing boat and a massive contribution to a wealthy prep school?
Today, we will be hearing from nurses in Massachusetts and from public officials in Louisiana who have first hand knowledge of the harm Steward has caused to patients, health care workers and the communities in which they live. I look forward to hearing from them soon.
As the Chairman of this Committee, I look forward to working with Ranking Member Cassidy, Senator Markey and every Senator to hold Dr. de la Torre accountable for his financial mismanagement and his greed.
But let’s be clear: Dr. de la Torre did not act alone.
Who else besides Dr. de la Torre benefitted financially as a result of Steward’s bankruptcy?
Cerberus, the private equity firm he partnered with, made an estimated $800 million profit from its investments in Steward Health Care.
From 2017 through 2021, the CEO of Medical Properties Trust received about $70 million in bonuses, stock awards and salary. How much of his total compensation came as a result of its financial arrangements with Steward?
The collapse of Steward Health Care is just one extreme example of the damaging role private equity is having on our health care system.
Private equity firms have bought up hundreds of hospitals, thousands of nursing homes, and tens of thousands of medical practices – saddling them up with unsustainable debt – and stripping their assets to make huge profits for their executives and investors.
Study after study has shown that, on average, when a private equity firm takes over a hospital, a nursing home or another medical provider, the price of health care goes up, the quality of health care goes down, and health care workers are asked to do much more work with fewer and fewer staff.
The issue of private equity in health care is an issue this Committee must look into. We cannot allow wealthy private equity executives to treat our health care system as their own personal piggy bank.
Health care in America must be a fundamental human right for all, not a privilege for the wealthy few.
Senator Cassidy, you are recognized for an opening statement.
LATEST NEWS
Trump Tariffs Have Cost Average US Family Nearly $1,200 So Far
"The president’s tax on American families is simply making things more expensive.”
Dec 11, 2025
As President Donald Trump persistently claims the economy is working for Americans, Democrats in the US House and Senate on Thursday released an analysis that puts a number to the recent polling that's found many Americans feel squeezed by higher prices: $1,200.
That's how much the average household in the US has paid in tariff costs over the past 10 months, according to the Joint Economic Committee—and costs are expected to continue climbing.
The Democrats, including Ranking Member Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM), and Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.), analyzed official US Treasury Department data on the amount of tariff revenue collected since the beginning of Trump's second term as he's imposed tariffs across the European Union and on dozens of other countries—some as high as 50%.
The White House has insisted the tariffs on imports will "pry open foreign markets" and force exporters overseas to pay more, resulting in lower prices for US consumers.
But the JEC combined the Treasury data with independent estimates of the percent of each tariff dollar that is paid by consumers, as companies pass along their higher import prices to them.
At first, US families were paying an average of less than $60 in tariff costs when Trump began the trade war in February and March.
But that amount shot up to more than $80 per family in April when he expanded the tariffs, and monthly costs have steadily increased since then.
In November, a total of $24.04 billion was paid by consumers in tariff costs—or $181.29 per family.
“While President Trump promised that he would lower costs, this report shows that his tariffs have done nothing but drive prices even higher for families."
From February-November, families have paid an average of $1,197.50 each, according to the JEC analysis.
“While President Trump promised that he would lower costs, this report shows that his tariffs have done nothing but drive prices even higher for families,” said Hassan.
If costs remain as high as they were over the next 12 months, families are projected to pay $2,100 per year as a result of Trump's tariffs.
The analysis comes a week after Republicans on a House Ways and Means subcommittee attempted to avoid the topic of tariffs—which have a 61% disapproval rating among the public, according to Pew Research—at a hearing on global competitiveness for workers and businesses.
"Rep. Jimmy Gomez [D-Calif.] read several quotes from [former Rep. Kevin] Brady [R-Texas] during his time in Congress stating that tariffs are taxes that impede economic growth. Brady, who chaired the Ways and Means Committee and drafted Trump’s first tax law in 2017 (and now works as a lobbyist), had no desire to discuss those quotes or the topic of tariffs," wrote Steve Warmhoff, federal policy director at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. "Nor did Republicans address the point made by the Democrats’ witness, Kimberly Clausing, when she explained that Trump’s tariffs are the biggest tax increase on Americans (measured as a share of the economy) since 1982."
Clausing estimated that the tariffs will amount "to an annual tax increase of about $1,700 for an average household" if they stay at current levels, while Trump's decision to lower tariffs on goods such as meat, vegetables, fruits, and coffee last month amounted to just $35 in annual savings per household.
The JEC has also recently released analyses of annual household electricity costs under Trump, which were projected to go up by $100 for the average family despite the president's campaign pledge that "your energy bill within 12 months will be cut in half."
Last month the panel found that the average household is spending approximately $700 more per month on essentials like food, shelter, and energy since Trump took office.
“At a time when both parties should be working together to lower costs," said Hassan on Thursday, "the president’s tax on American families is simply making things more expensive.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Tlaib Rips Lawmakers Who 'Drool at the Opportunity to Fund War' While Opposing Healthcare for All
"They’re gutting healthcare and food assistance to pay for bombs and weapons. It’s a sick vicious cycle," said Rep. Rashida Tlaib.
Dec 11, 2025
"Imagine if our government funded our communities like they fund war."
That was Rep. Rashida Tlaib's (D-Mich.) response to the House's bipartisan passage Wednesday of legislation that authorizes nearly $901 billion in military spending for the coming fiscal year, as tens of millions of Americans face soaring health insurance premiums and struggle to afford basic necessities amid the nation's worsening cost-of-living crisis.
Tlaib, who voted against the military policy bill, had harsh words for her colleagues who "drool at the opportunity to fund war and genocide, but when it comes to universal healthcare, affordable housing, and food assistance, they suddenly argue that we simply can’t afford it."
"Congress just authorized nearly a trillion dollars for death and destruction but cut a trillion dollars from Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act," said Tlaib, referring to the budget reconciliation package that Republicans and President Donald Trump enacted over the summer.
"They’re gutting healthcare and food assistance to pay for bombs and weapons. It’s a sick vicious cycle," Tlaib continued. "Another record-breaking military budget is impossible to justify when Americans are sleeping on the streets, unable to afford groceries to feed their children, and racking up massive amounts of medical debt just for getting sick."
House passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) came as Republicans in both chambers of Congress pushed healthcare proposals that would not extend enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits that are set to expire at the end of the year, resulting in massive premium hikes for millions.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that a Senate Democratic plan to extend the ACA subsidies for three years would cost around $85 billion—a fraction of the military spending that House lawmakers just authorized.
The NDAA, which is expected to clear the Senate next week, approves $8 billion more in military spending than the Trump White House asked for in its annual budget request.
According to the National Priorities Project, that $8 billion "would be more than enough" to restore federal nutrition assistance to the millions expected to lose it due to expanded work requirements included in the Trump-GOP budget law.
"Our priorities are disgustingly misplaced," Tlaib said Wednesday.
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Don't Give the Pentagon $1 Trillion,’ Critics Say as House Passes Record US Military Spending Bill
"From ending the nursing shortage to insuring uninsured children, preventing evictions, and replacing lead pipes, every dollar the Pentagon wastes is a dollar that isn't helping Americans get by," said one group.
Dec 10, 2025
US House lawmakers on Wednesday approved a $900.6 billion military spending bill, prompting critics to highlight ways in which taxpayer funds could be better spent on programs of social uplift instead of perpetual wars.
The lower chamber voted 312-112 in favor of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2026, which will fund what President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans call a "peace through strength" national security policy. The proposal now heads for a vote in the Senate, where it is also expected to pass.
Combined with $156 billion in supplemental funding included in the One Big Beautiful Bill signed in July by Trump, the NDAA would push military spending this fiscal year to over $1 trillion—a new record in absolute terms and a relative level unseen since World War II.
The House is about to vote on authorizing $901 billion in military spending, on top of the $156 billion included in the Big Beautiful Bill.70% of global military spending already comes from the US and its major allies.www.stephensemler.com/p/congress-s...
[image or embed]
— Stephen Semler (@stephensemler.bsky.social) December 10, 2025 at 1:16 PM
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) led opposition to the bill on Capitol Hill, focusing on what lawmakers called misplaced national priorities, as well as Trump's abuse of emergency powers to deploy National Guard troops in Democratic-controlled cities under pretext of fighting crime and unauthorized immigration.
Others sounded the alarm over the Trump administration's apparent march toward a war on Venezuela—which has never attacked the US or any other country in its nearly 200-year history but is rich in oil and is ruled by socialists offering an alternative to American-style capitalism.
"I will always support giving service members what they need to stay safe but that does not mean rubber-stamping bloated budgets or enabling unchecked executive war powers," CPC Deputy Chair Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said on social media, explaining her vote against legislation that "pours billions into weapons systems the Pentagon itself has said it does not need."
"It increases funding for defense contractors who profit from global instability and it advances a vision of national security rooted in militarization instead of diplomacy, human rights, or community well-being," Omar continued.
"At a time when families in Minnesota’s 5th District are struggling with rising costs, when our schools and social services remain underfunded, and when the Pentagon continues to evade a clean audit year after year, Congress should be investing in people," she added.
The Congressional Equality Caucus decried the NDAA's inclusion of a provision banning transgender women from full participation in sports programs at US military academies:
The NDAA should invest in our military, not target minority communities for exclusion.While we're grateful that most anti-LGBTQI+ provisions were removed, the GOP kept one anti-trans provision in the final bill—and that's one too many.We're committed to repealing it.
[image or embed]
— Congressional Equality Caucus (@equality.house.gov) December 10, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Advocacy groups also denounced the legislation, with the Institute for Policy Studies' National Priorities Project (NPP) noting that "from ending the nursing shortage to insuring uninsured children, preventing evictions, and replacing lead pipes, every dollar the Pentagon wastes is a dollar that isn't helping Americans get by."
"The last thing Congress should do is deliver $1 trillion into the hands of [Defense] Secretary Pete Hegseth," NPP program director Lindsay Koshgarian said in a statement Wednesday. "Under Secretary Hegseth's leadership, the Pentagon has killed unidentified boaters in the Caribbean, sent the National Guard to occupy peaceful US cities, and driven a destructive and divisive anti-diversity agenda in the military."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular