February, 10 2022, 10:01am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Melissa Valliant, 410.829.0726, mvalliant@oceana.org
Dustin Cranor, 954.348.1314, dcranor@oceana.org
8 in 10 American Voters Support National Action to Reduce Single-Use Plastic
Oceana Releases New Poll, Calls on Congress to Pass Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act
WASHINGTON
Today, Oceana released the results of a new nationwide poll revealing that 81% of American voters support national, state, and local policies that reduce single-use plastic. The vast majority of registered voters reported being concerned about plastic pollution, and there is widespread bipartisan support for policies that reduce the use of single-use plastic products, including plastic bags, foam foodware, takeout containers, and packaging from online shopping.
"Americans have spoken: They are worried about the unnecessary plastic choking our oceans and want real policy change on the national level -- so we need lawmakers to enact policies that actually stop pollution at the source," said Christy Leavitt, Oceana's plastics campaign director. "The good news is the U.S. already has the blueprint for change. Americans are counting on their leaders to reduce the use of single-use plastic, and the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act would do just that by phasing out single-use plastic products and putting a pause on new plastic facilities nationwide. Federal lawmakers need to get on board with the American public and the cities and states that have been leading the way for years on regulating single-use plastics, before this becomes a crisis we can't reverse."
The Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act (S. 984 and H.R. 2238) -- introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., and Rep. Alan Lowenthal, D-Calif. -- would continue the momentum initiated by cities, counties, and states across America. This comprehensive federal bill would phase out unnecessary single-use plastic products; protect fenceline communities by putting a moratorium on new and expanded plastic production facilities across the country; and hold companies accountable for their plastic waste. In addition to Congress passing this legislation, the Biden administration has the opportunity to reduce plastic pollution by eliminating the sale and distribution of single-use plastic products in national parks, a move supported by 82% of American voters, according to an Oceana poll released last month.
"Plastic pollution has become one of our planet's greatest threats and, as this poll shows, Americans overwhelmingly support policies to reduce the use of single-use plastic. Yet the United States is behind other countries in combating this crisis through single-use plastic regulation," Leavitt said. "The plastics industry uses its money and influence to prevent change that would preserve a livable world for future generations. It's time our country's leaders prioritize people and planet and pass the kind of nationwide reductions of single-use plastic we're seeing across the globe."
The United States generates more plastic waste than any other country and exports much of this waste to developing countries that lack adequate waste-management systems. Only 9% of the plastic waste ever created has been recycled, yet the plastics industry continues to tout recycling as a panacea while increasing plastic production and pushing new plastic products onto the market.
Over 90 countries have either banned plastic bags or placed fees on them. Several countries have gone further, banning a combination of single-use plastic products, including utensils, straws, stirrers, plates, cups, and plastic foam containers. Oceana's survey results indicate the American public would support the U.S. following in the footsteps of countries that have led the way in single-use plastic reduction.
Key findings among surveyed registered voters include:
- 84% are concerned about plastic pollution and its impact on the environment and our oceans.
- 86% are concerned about single-use plastic products.
- 81% support national policies that reduce single-use plastic.
- 81% support local and state policies that reduce single-use plastic.
- Registered voters support policies that reduce the use of specific single-use items, including plastic bags (74%), foam foodware (73%), takeout containers (73%), plastic packaging from online shopping (73%), beverage bottles (72%), food wrappers (71%), and straws (68%).
- 77% agree that companies need to stop producing and using so much single-use plastic.
- 78% agree that companies should offer them plastic-free options.
- 78% agree the United States has a responsibility to reduce its contribution to the global plastic pollution problem.
- Republicans and Democrats were both overwhelmingly concerned about plastic pollution and had widespread support for policies that reduce single-use plastic products:
- 93% of Democrats and 78% of Republicans are concerned about single-use plastic products.
- 93% of Democrats and 74% of Republicans are concerned about plastic pollution and its impact on the environment and our oceans.
- 91% of Democrats and 71% of Republicans support local and state policies that reduce single-use plastic.
- 92% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans support national policies that reduce single-use plastic.
The national online poll, conducted by the nonpartisan polling company Ipsos, surveyed 1,005 American adults from across the U.S. between Nov. 5 and 9, 2021.
In addition to threatening marine life and entering our food, air, and water, plastic greatly contributes to climate change. In fact, plastic is set to outpace coal's greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. Plastic production also disproportionately affects low-income communities and communities of color by polluting their air, water, and soil. With plastic production growing at a rapid rate, increasing amounts of plastic can be expected to flood our blue planet with devastating consequences.
To learn more about Oceana's campaign to stop plastic pollution, please visit usa.oceana.org/plastics
Please use this link to share the release: https://bit.ly/3B9mOog
Oceana is the largest international ocean conservation and advocacy organization. Oceana works to protect and restore the world's oceans through targeted policy campaigns.
LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Urges 'Maximum Restraint' as India-Pakistan Tensions Flare After Kashmir Massacre
"Any issues between Pakistan and India, we believe can be and should be resolved peacefully through meaningful mutual engagement," said a spokesperson for U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres.
Apr 24, 2025
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres on Thursday led calls for India and Pakistan to "exercise maximum restraint" as the nuclear-armed neighbors took tit-for-tat measures against each other in the wake of Tuesday's massacre of 26 people in Indian-occupied Kashmir.
Pakistan warned India that it was committing an "act of war" by suspending the landmark Indus Waters Treaty, which allows both countries to share the vital river system's flow. Pakistan announced the suspension of trade and closed its airspace to Indian flights. Both countries closed border ports of entry, canceled visas, and took other measures against each other.
India said it was downgrading relations with Pakistan, whom it blamed for supporting "cross-border terrorism" after gunmen killed 25 Indians and one Nepali and wounded at least 17 others at a popular vacation spot in Pahalgam, Kashmir on Tuesday.
"May sanity prevail between both nations."
A front group of the Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba claimed responsibility for the attack, which killed mostly tourists.
Pakistani Defense Minister Khawaja Asif countered that his country's government believes "very strongly" that the attack "was a false flag operation."
Speaking Thursday, Stephane Dujarric, Guterres' spokesperson,
said that "we very much appeal to both the governments of Pakistan and India to exercise maximum restraint, and to ensure that the situation and the developments we've seen do not deteriorate any further."
"Any issues between Pakistan and India, we believe can be and should be resolved peacefully through meaningful mutual engagement," he added.
Progressives from both sides of the border echoed calls for restraint.
"We, the people of Kashmir, have already suffered so much over the years—and now, more than ever, we want peace to prevail in our homeland," Kashmiri social activist Jasib Shabir Bhat said on social media Wednesday. "We stand united for peace, for humanity, and for a better future for all."
Pakistani authori and activist Ehtesham Hassan wrote that "as a Pakistani who visited India and received immense love, I am devastated by the news from Pahalgam."
"I wish peace for the common people of India and Pakistan regardless of religion," Hassan added. "May sanity prevail between both nations."
Keep ReadingShow Less
In 'Victory for the People,' Judge Blocks Parts of Trump's Attack on Voting Rights
"The president's attempted takeover of federal elections is a blatant overreach to seize power that doesn't belong to him," said lawyers for one coalition challenging the executive order.
Apr 24, 2025
Voting rights advocates on Thursday welcomed a federal judge's move to block some of U.S. President Donald Trump's "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections" executive order, which critics called an "authoritarian power grab."
The temporary decision stems from a trio of legal challenges to Trump's March order: one from groups including the League of United Latin American Citizens; another from the Democratic National Committee and other party entities; and a third from organizations including the League of Women Voters (LWV) Education Fund.
Plaintiff coalitions "contend that under our Constitution and the relevant law, the president has no role in regulating federal elections," explained U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton.
"Their motions do not call upon the court to decide whether the president's executive order reflects good policy choices or even whether the policies it describes would be legal if implemented," she wrote. "Rather, this court's task is to decide whether the president can dictate those policies unilaterally, or whether that power is reserved to Congress and the states alone."
"The many defendants in these consolidated cases—federal officers and agencies—say little about that question," the Washington, D.C.-based judge noted. "They have offered almost no defense of the president's order on the merits. Instead, they argue that these suits have been brought by the wrong plaintiffs at the wrong time."
Kollar-Kotelly granted a preliminary injunction to pause provisions including the addition of a proof-of-citizenship requirement to the federal voter registration form. However, she declined to halt Trump's restrictions on voting by mail or his directive to the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Government Efficiency to review state voter lists.
"President Trump's attempt to impose a documentary proof of citizenship requirement on the federal voter registration form is an unconstitutional abuse of power," said Sophia Lin Lakin, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, in a Thursday statement. "If implemented, it would place serious and unnecessary burdens on everyday Americans and strain already overburdened election officials."
"This executive order is part of a broader attack on our democratic elections by promoting baseless nativist conspiracy theories," she continued. "Today, the court blocked a key strategy of this attack. And we will keep fighting to ensure every eligible voter can make their voice heard without interference or intimidation."
The national and D.C. arms of the ACLU are among the legal groups representing the LWV coalition. In a joint statement, the lawyers said:
The court's decision today provides crucial protections for eligible voters, and the organizations that help them register to vote, while the fight continues against this illegal executive order. Millions of U.S. citizens lack easy access to a passport or other documents proving citizenship, and that shouldn't interfere with their ability to register to vote.
The president's attempted takeover of federal elections is a blatant overreach to seize power that doesn't belong to him. Under the Constitution, that power belongs to the U.S. Congress and states. The president lacks authority to rewrite the country's election rules on his own by weaponizing an independent, bipartisan commission to harm eligible voters. The order should ultimately be struck down.
Our clients are conducting voter registration using the federal form on an ongoing basis, including for elections scheduled for this summer and fall. Not only would our clients be harmed by the mandate to include this unnecessary and cumbersome requirement but the voters they serve would be too.
Other voting rights advocates also welcomed the development. Common Cause president and CEO Virginia Kase Solomón said in a statement that "today is a victory for the people in the ongoing fight to protect voting rights. We said in March that presidents don't set election law, and now a district judge has reaffirmed that fact."
"While today is a victory for the people, we know it is not the last battle in the fight for the ballot," she added. "Common Cause and our members will continue to protect the vote, whether attacks come from a president, Congress, or in the states. Voting is a right for the many, and we will fight for as long as we need to ensure it."
The Associated Pressreported Thursday that "other lawsuits against Trump's order are still pending. In early April, 19 Democratic attorneys general asked the court to reject Trump's executive order. Washington and Oregon, which both hold all-mail elections, followed with their own lawsuit against the order."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Workers in 600+ US Cities to Protest 'Billionaire Takeover' on May Day
"Billionaires are attacking unions and immigrants because they fear our collective power. But we're not afraid."
Apr 24, 2025
As labor unions and rights advocacy groups announced a mass mobilization planned for May 1, or May Day, one leader said the protests aim to "send a loud and clear message" to U.S. President Donald Trump, his adviser Elon Musk, "and the rest of the billionaire oligarchs trying to destroy our democracy."
"There will be no business as usual while they are disappearing people off the street, slashing critical services, and taking away our freedoms," said Saqib Bhatti, executive director of Bargaining for the Common Good. "They're causing a crisis in our communities. We're going to bring that crisis directly to their doorsteps."
The protests will take place in over 600 cities in all 50 states, said organizers, with advocates demanding an end to Trump's "billionaire agenda"—one characterized by plans to slash Head Start, Medicaid, and Social Security in order to secure $4.5 trillion in tax cuts for the richest Americans.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who Trump named to lead his Department of Government Efficiency, has provoked nationwide outrage with his cuts to more than 280,000 federal jobs, while the president's push to root out pro-Palestinian advocacy—which his administration has explicitly conflated with antisemitism and support for terrorism—has resulted in the arrests of several student organizers.
The president's deal with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, under which he has expelled hundreds of migrants—many of whom had no criminal records—to a notorious prison, has also garnered outrage among Americans and human rights groups.
"Our communities are mobilizing for May Day because we want a world where it's workers, students, immigrants, and working-class communities who thrive."
"Billionaires are attacking unions and immigrants because they fear our collective power. But we're not afraid," said Jade Kelly, president of Communication Workers of America (CWA) 7799, a coalition of unions in Colorado. "Our labor movement is building something stronger than fear. May Day isn't a holiday, it's a call to action for workers across the world. Across the nation, we're reclaiming May Day in the spirit it was born, in solidarity with immigrants, in defense of all working people who make our schools run, our hospitals heal, our trains move, and our cities thrive."
The May Day protests will call for:
- An end to the billionaire takeover and corruption under the Trump administration;
- Full funding for public schools, healthcare, and housing for all;
- Protection and expansion of Medicaid, Social Security, and other critical social programs;
- An immediate halt to attacks on immigrants, Black, Indigenous, trans, and other targeted communities; and
- Union protections, fair wages, and dignity for all workers.
Rallies are planned in New York, the District of Columbia, Chicago, and Atlanta, among other cities.
Loan Tran, co-director of Rising Majority, said Trump and the billionaires who will benefit from his policies want Americans "to abandon our neighbors in favor of a future where only the ultra wealthy and political elites profit."
"Our communities are mobilizing for May Day because we want a world where it's workers, students, immigrants, and working-class communities who thrive; and a democracy where activists like Mahmoud Khalil can exercise their free speech while advocating for a cease-fire in Gaza or demanding that our government invest in housing, education, and healthcare for all instead of weapons and bombs," said Tran.
"On May Day," Tran added, "these attacks will be met with our people power, and we will fight for a real democracy in the U.S. that prioritizes the well-being of all people and the planet."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular