December, 01 2021, 01:42pm EDT

New Poll: Gen Z & Millennials Want Accountability From Companies for Donations to Anti-Abortion Political Candidates
New poll from UltraViolet and GQR shows millennials across the political spectrum agree that if a company that does not share their values on abortion they will not share values on other issues.
WASHINGTON
With oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Mississippi's contenious 15 week abortion underway (HB 1510), a new poll released today shows statistical data that members of Generation Z (ages 18-21), Millennials (ages 22-40), and Generation X (ages 40-44) want to hold corporations accountable for political donations to political candidates who oppose reproductive rights.
Commissioned by the gender justice advocacy group UltraViolet and GQR, some of the poll's top finds are:
-Over 50% of young consumers are concerned by anti-choice donations
-Nearly three-quarters (74%) agree companies should help push for social change, including LGBTQ+ rights, women's rights, and racial equity.
-50% of young consumers are both pro-choice and willing to boycott companies whose donations do not support their abortion views.
-65% of young consumers across the political spectrum (conservative, moderate, and liberal) agree that companies who do not share their values on abortion likely do not share their values on other issues.
VIEW POLLING RESULTS HERE: https://weareultraviolet.org/young-consumers-want-accountability-for-corporate-anti-choice-donations/
For months, UltraViolet has campaigned amplifying how corporate political giving from companies like AT&T have facilitated right-wing leadership in states with draconian anti-abortion laws, including Mississippi and Texas. As a result, the passage laws such as Mississippi's 15 week abortion ban, which will be argued before SCOTUS tomorrow, and SB8 in Texas, have made the threat of legal abortion ending for millions ever more real.
Additional new data from UltraViolet highlights that corporate donations of $544,800.00 through 2021 to Mississippi politicians who voted in favor of HB1510, the anti-abortion law at issue in the Supreme Court today. These officials include Republican Governor Tate Reeves, who signed HB1510 into law. Of those companies, AT&T was the largest single corporate donor in the state at $117,100.
VIEW DATA ON CORPORATE GIVING TO ANTI-ABORTION POLITICIANS HERE: https://weareultraviolet.org/corporate-anti-abortion-political-giving-data-for-the-5th-circuit/
"Corporations like AT&T helped fuel and legitimize politicians who run on platforms and pass policies once in power to harm workers and consumers alike. said Sonja Spoo, director of reproductive rights campaigns at UltraViolet. "Today's oral arguments at the Supreme Court are the consequences of corporate dollars that ignore the dangerous and even deadly impact of their political giving byd funding politicians who want to gut Roe v. Wade and rollback decades of progress on our civil rights.. At this moment, we need companies to wake up from their business as usual approach to political giving and reckon with the increasingly extreme politicians they are supporting."
Last night, activists also staged an "Abortion is Freedom" light brigade to urging the Supreme Court to protect abortion access and strike down the Mississippi law at issue in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which bans abortion after 15 weeks. The event was organized by UltraViolet and several advocacy groups outside of the United States Supreme Court building in Washington, DC.
VIEW THE PHOTOS HERE: https://dam.gettyimages.com/paid-assignments-full-takes/full-take-activists-hold-light-brigade-urging-abor
UltraViolet is a powerful and rapidly growing community of people mobilized to fight sexism and create a more inclusive world that accurately represents all women, from politics and government to media and pop culture.
LATEST NEWS
Demanding Action From Congress, Khanna Says 'The American People Are Tired of Regime Change Wars'
"We don't want to be at war with a country of 90 million people in the Middle East," said Democratic US Rep. Ro Khanna.
Feb 28, 2026
US Rep. Ro Khanna on Saturday demanded swift action from Congress to stop the Trump administration's unauthorized military assault on Iran, saying in a video posted to social media that "the American people are tired of regime change wars that cost us billions of dollars and risk our lives."
"We don't want to be at war with a country of 90 million people in the Middle East," said Khanna (D-Calif.), calling on Congress to reconvene for a vote on Monday.
"Every member of Congress should go on record today on how they will vote on Thomas Massie and my War Powers resolution," Khanna added, referring to the Kentucky Republican who is co-leading the measure.
If passed, the resolution would require the president "to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran or any part of its government or military, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran."
Watch Khanna's remarks:
Trump has launched an illegal regime change war in Iran with American lives at risk. Congress must convene on Monday to vote on @RepThomasMassie & my WPR to stop this. Every member of Congress should go on record this weekend on how they will vote. pic.twitter.com/tlRi3Vz849
— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) February 28, 2026
Days prior to the US-Israeli attack on Iran, the House Democratic leadership announced it would force a vote next week on the Khanna-Massie War Powers resolution following reports that top Democrats were slowwalking the measure behind closed doors.
Senate Democrats also said they planned to vote next week on a War Powers resolution led by Sens. Tim Kaine of Virginia.
In a statement on Saturday, Kaine called the US attacks on Iran "illegal" and said that "every single senator needs to go on the record about this dangerous, unnecessary, and idiotic action."
“Has President Trump learned nothing from decades of US meddling in Iran and forever wars in the Middle East? Is he too mentally incapacitated to realize that we had a diplomatic agreement with Iran that was keeping its nuclear program in check, until he ripped it up during his first term?" Kaine asked. "These strikes are a colossal mistake, and I pray they do not cost our sons and daughters in uniform and at embassies throughout the region their lives. The Senate should immediately return to session and vote on my War Powers resolution."
The chances of a War Powers resolution getting through the Republican-controlled Congress are virtually nonexistent, even though the American public overwhelmingly opposes US military action against Iran. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) both issued statements applauding Trump for the unauthorized Saturday attacks.
Cavan Kharrazian, senior policy adviser to the advocacy group Demand Progress, said that "Trump has no authority to launch another war on his own."
"The Constitution is clear. The need for a War Powers resolution is clear. Congress decides when this country goes to war, not the president," said Kharrazian. "Next week, every member of Congress will have to choose. Side with illegal, endless war, or side with the American people and reject yet another regime change war in the Middle East. Like with Iraq, the choice they make will echo loudly for years to come.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Behavior of Rogue States': Global Revulsion as US and Israel Launch War on Iran
"The attacks on Iran by Israel and the United States are illegal, unprovoked, and unjustifiable," said Jeremy Corbyn, an independent member of the UK Parliament.
Feb 28, 2026
Elected officials, activists, and experts around the world voiced horror and outrage Saturday as US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu jointly launched an illegal war on Iran with the explicit goal of toppling the nation's government, sparking chaos throughout the Middle East.
The wave of bombings, expected to mark the beginning of a wider assault, spurred airspace closures and flight cancellations across the region as countries braced for the fallout. While European leaders offered milquetoast responses to the unlawful military attack and Canadian and Australian officials openly endorsed it, leftist politicians and others unequivocally condemned the US and Israel as the aggressors.
"The attacks on Iran by Israel and the United States are illegal, unprovoked, and unjustifiable," said Jeremy Corbyn, an independent member of the British Parliament and former leader of the UK Labour Party. "Peace and diplomacy was possible. Instead, Israel and the United States chose war."
"This is the behavior of rogue states—and they have jeopardized the safety of humankind around the world with this catastrophic act of aggression," Corbyn added. "Our government must condemn this flagrant breach of international law, and urgently pursue a foreign policy based on justice, sovereignty, and peace."
Progressive International co-founder Yanis Varoufakis, the former finance minister of Greece, echoed Corbyn's criticism of the US and Israel as "rogue states."
"Israel and the USA," he wrote on social media, "have started a war not against Iran but against the whole world. We stand with Iranians, with humanity, against the notion that Israel and the US can bomb anyone their fancy takes them to bomb."
Badr Albusaidi, the foreign minister of Oman and the mediator of recent US-Iran talks, said he was "dismayed" by news of the US-Israel attacks on Iran, which were quickly followed by reports of horrific atrocities. Albusaidi said hours before the bombs started falling on Iran that a diplomatic resolution was within reach.
"Active and serious negotiations have yet again been undermined," Albusaidi lamented on Saturday. "Neither the interests of the United States nor the cause of global peace are well served by this. And I pray for the innocents who will suffer. I urge the United States not to get sucked in further."
Leftist Colombian President Gustavo Petro said he believes "President Donald Trump has made a mistake today" and implored the "helpless United Nations" to "convene immediately" in response to the US-Israel attacks and retaliation by Iran and allied groups in the region.
Iran vowed a "crushing" response to the US-Israeli onslaught, firing drones and missiles at Israel and pledging to hit US military installations in the region.
Al Jazeera reported that "Iran has targeted United States assets across the Gulf Arab states in retaliation for a huge joint attack on Iran by the US and Israel, as the region’s worst fears of being ignited in the flames of a sustained war loom."
"The Iranian government on Saturday confirmed its attacks on several targets, according to the Fars news agency, including Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, where US airbases are hosted," the outlet noted.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Oman's Foreign Minister Said US-Iran Deal Was 'Within Our Reach.' Then Trump Started Bombing
"The Omani FM decided to go public," suggested one observer, "so that the American people knew that peace was within reach when Trump instead opted for war."
Feb 28, 2026
Hours before President Donald Trump announced his decision to bomb Iran and pursue the overthrow of its government, the foreign minister of Oman appeared, in person, on one of the most prominent US television news programs to declare that a diplomatic breakthrough was possible.
"I can see that the peace deal is within our reach," Badr Albusaidi, the mediator of recent talks between the US and Iran, told "Face the Nation" host Margaret Brennan on Friday. "I'm asking to continue this process because we have already achieved quite a substantial progress in the direction of a deal. And the heart of this deal is very important, and I think we have captured that heart."
Pressed for specifics, Albusaidi said that Iran committed during the talks to renounce the possibility of amassing "nuclear material that will create a bomb"—a pledge that Trump claimed Iran refused to make as part of his justification for Saturday's strikes.
"This is something that is not in the old deal that was negotiated during President Obama's time," Albusaidi said, referring to the 2015 nuclear accord that Trump ditched during his first term in the White House. "This is something completely new. It really makes the enrichment argument less relevant, because now we are talking about zero stockpiling. And that is very, very important, because if you cannot stockpile material that is enriched, then there is no way you can actually create a bomb, whether you enrich or don't enrich. And I think this is really something that has been missed a lot by the media, and I want to clarify that from the standpoint of a mediator."
"There is no accumulation, so there would be zero accumulation, zero stockpiling, and full verification," the Omani foreign minister continued. "Full and comprehensive verification by the [International Atomic Energy Agency]."
In a social media post following the interview, Albusaidi reiterated that a deal "is now within reach" and implored all parties to "support the negotiators in closing the deal." Prior to Saturday's attacks, additional US-Iran talks were scheduled for next week.
Watch the full segment, which critics highlighted as evidence that the US-Israeli attacks on Saturday were aimed at forestalling a diplomatic resolution:
Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the US-based Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, wrote in response to Albusaidi's remarks that "the Omanis are famously cautious."
"The Omani FM going on CBS to reveal what has actually been achieved in the negotiations is quite unprecedented. And what has been achieved is significant—Trump can indeed declare victory. Listen to this segment—it goes way beyond what Obama achieved," Parsi wrote. "But everything indicates that Trump won't take yes for an answer. That he will start a war of choice very soon."
"Which is probably why the Omani FM decided to go public," Parsi added. "So that the American people knew that peace was within reach when Trump instead opted for war."
According to one survey released earlier this month, just 21% of Americans support "the United States initiating an attack on Iran under the current circumstances."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


