September, 23 2021, 02:57pm EDT
Over 300 State and Local Leaders Call on Biden, Congress to Take Bold Action on Nuclear Weapons
Officials across 41 states support back from the brink campaign.
WASHINGTON
Today, the Back from the Brink campaign released a letter signed by over 300 local, county and state officials representing 41 states, calling on President Joe Biden and Congress to reduce and eliminate the threat nuclear weapons pose to their communities and the world. The letter includes representatives from diverse communities across the United States, from Portland, Oregon to Portland, Maine, and Alaska to Florida. The letter remains open for other local leaders to sign.
"Defense budgets and the threat of nuclear war are certainly not topics debated at the County Council," said Dee Durham, a member of the New Castle County Council in Delaware - President Biden's home county - and a signatory of the letter. "However, in a very real way, nothing matters unless we work together to prevent the greatest threat to our very existence. We have a platform to express our voice on matters that impact our constituents, including the use of taxpayer monies not just locally, but globally."
The Back from the Brink campaign calls for five common sense policy changes to make the U.S. and world safer from nuclear weapons by:
- Actively pursuing a verifiable agreement among nuclear-armed states to eliminate their nuclear arsenals;
- Renouncing the option of using nuclear weapons first;
- Ending the sole, unchecked authority of any president to launch a nuclear attack;
- Taking U.S. nuclear weapons off hair-trigger alert; and
- Cancelling the plan to replace the entire U.S. arsenal with enhanced weapons at a cost of more than $1 trillion over the next 30 years.
According to these local leaders, the nuclear arms race robs their communities of needed resources to address pressing problems of human security, such as COVID-19 recovery, racial and economic inequity and housing and food insecurity.
"We need to shift our valuable resources to important endeavors that actually keep people safe like affordable housing, environmental sustainability and equitable job opportunities," said Baltimore City Comptroller Bill Henry. "That is our only path towards peace."
The U.S. spends over $70 billion taxpayer dollars annually to build and maintain nuclear weapons. The country is currently on track to spend $1.7 trillion over the next 30 years - the equivalent of total U.S. student debt - on new, enhanced and unnecessary nuclear weapons.
"Local leaders around the country understand that nuclear weapons are the greatest threat to public health that we face," said Dr. Ira Helfand, co-founder and past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR). "We have to understand that these weapons do not make us safe; they are the greatest threat to our security and we need a fundamental change in US nuclear policy based on that reality."
"The elected officials who signed this letter understand that nuclear weapons are a local issue in the same way that a global pandemic or the climate crisis are local issues," said Denise Duffield, associate director of PSR's Los Angeles chapter. "Unfortunately, there is no vaccine, adaptation or mitigation strategies that can protect us from nuclear war. As this campaign continues to grow, I'm confident that Congress can expect to hear from more local elected officials, more municipalities and states, and more concerned constituents about the urgent need to abolish nuclear weapons."
The letter signers hope to influence the Biden administration's Nuclear Posture Review, the document that sets U.S. nuclear policy. As the administration crafts the document, security experts are warning that the danger of nuclear war is greater than it has ever been, and recent scientific studies have shown that even a limited nuclear war would cause catastrophic worldwide climate disruption and global famine.
"Local leaders from across the country recognize the clear risk nuclear weapons pose to their communities," said David Combs, senior campaign coordinator for the Union of Concerned Scientists' (UCS) Global Security Program. "President Biden has worked to reduce the threat of nuclear war throughout his career. He now has the opportunity to make his vision of a safer world a reality by listening to local and state representatives from across the country and adopting the Back from the Brink policies."
The Back From the Brink platform has been endorsed by 53 municipalities and six state legislative bodies, including Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., and over 380 health, environmental, faith and peace organizations including UCS, PSR, Sierra Club, Indivisible, Hip Hop Caucus, Friends of the Earth, Veterans for Peace, Presbyterian Church U.S.A, 350.org, and Pax Christi U.S.A.
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.
LATEST NEWS
'Troublemakers' Block Amazon HQ Over Plan to Link Data Centers With Gas Pipeline
"Amazon is breaking its Climate Pledge by powering new data centers with fracked gas," said one member of the new activist group. "So we came to demand that they honor the pledge."
Mar 27, 2024
A recently formed group of climate activists on Wednesday shut down entrances to Amazon's downtown Seattle headquarters to protest the tech titan's plans to link some of its data centers with an upgraded fracked gas pipeline.
Members of the Troublemakers—who describe themselves as "an ever-growing community of people who are committed to taking action for life on Earth"—blockaded the doors to the Day 1 Building on 7th Ave. in opposition to Amazon Web Services' (AWS) plan to connect three data centers near Boardman, Oregon to TC Energy's Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) XPress Project.
As Common Dreamsreported last October, GTN XPress, which has been approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, would upgrade compressor stations in Kootenai County, Idaho; Sherman County, Oregon; and Walla Walla County, Washington. TC Energy plans to boost the 60-year-old pipeline's capacity by 150 million cubic feet of fracked gas by increasing the conduit's pressure.
"The decision to use fracked gas from the GTN XPress adds to Amazon's carbon emissions problems," the Troublemakers said in a statement. "Amazon's 2022 carbon emissions totaled 71.27 million metric tons, marking an 18% rise from 2020 and a 40% surge since 2019, the year Amazon unveiled its Climate Pledge. This alarming trend is in stark contrast to the global imperative to halve emissions by 2030."
The group wrote in a March 19 letter to Amazon CEO Andy Jassy:
Amazon prides itself on innovation. Using fossil fuel is not innovation... It is relying on a dying technology that is killing the planet. Utilizing GTN XPress would increase Amazon's carbon footprint and contribute greatly to climate change... We urge you to publicly commit to financing solar or wind projects to provide clean energy for Amazon's operations, and reject the GTN XPress.
The Troublemakers are calling on Amazon to:
- Publicly renounce the plan to connect to GTN XPress;
- Commit to not powering AWS data centers with fossil fuels; and
- Commit to using 100% renewable energy in each operation while funding wind and solar generation, storage, and distribution.
"We see Amazon's greenwashing every time we pass by Climate Pledge Arena," said Troublemaker Valerie Costa, who was referring to the home of the Seattle Kraken and Seattle Storm professional sports franchises. "Until Amazon drops its plan to buy fracked gas from GTN XPress, we'll keep showing up. Every fossil fuel project in the [Pacific Northwest] will be met with fierce resistance."
Leonard Sklar, a scientist and Troublemaker, asserted that "Amazon is breaking its Climate Pledge by powering new data centers with fracked gas. So we came to demand that they honor the pledge."
"We know they have the power to be 100% renewable energy," he added, "and that's what this moment requires."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Over Apple's Objections, Oregon Governor Signs Nation's Strongest Right to Repair Law
"Oregon becomes the first state to ban 'parts pairing,' which let companies like Apple decide when and how you replace parts."
Mar 27, 2024
In a move that advocates said will save Oregon residents money while supporting small businesses and reducing waste of electronic devices, Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek on Wednesday signed the Right to Repair Act, a law that passed earlier this month despite Apple's lobbying efforts.
The Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), applauded the signing of the bill, which requires manufacturers to provide Oregonians and small repair businesses with access to the parts, tools, and information needed to fix personal electronics and household appliances.
Manufacturers like Apple frequently require consumers to go to their stores or authorized service providers for repairs, making them expensive for customers and difficult to access for people who live far from the providers.
Charlie Fisher, state director of Oregon PIRG, said the law means Oregon is "moving forward on an innovation even more critical than a new gadget: the right to fix our electronic devices."
"By eliminating manufacturer restrictions, the right to repair will make it easier for Oregonians to keep their personal electronics running," said Fisher. "That will conserve precious natural resources and prevent waste. It's a refreshing alternative to a 'throwaway' system that treats everything as disposable."
The Right to Repair Act, which will go into effect on January 1, 2025, was supported by roughly 100 small businesses that provide repairs across the state, as well as recycling nonprofit organizations.
Apple testified against the bill, saying it opposed a provision against "parts pairing." The practice requires consumers or independent repair businesses to purchase parts from Apple and have them validated by the company.
John Perry, a senior security manager at Apple, told state senators that the provision would "undermine the security, safety, and privacy of Oregonians by forcing device manufacturers to allow the use of parts of unknown origin and consumer devices."
State Rep. Courtney Neron (D-26) cited a letter from the Federal Trade Commission when she told her colleagues that Apple's parts paring requirements "drive up the price that consumers must pay to fix a device and cause consumers to purchase a new device before the end of its useful life."
"Manufacturer repair restrictions also make it more challenging for small repair businesses to compete and contribute to unnecessary e-waste," she said.
Pro-labor media organization More Perfect Union called Kotek's signing of the bill "a major loss for Apple."
"Oregon has a proud history of passing forward thinking policies that help Oregonians steward and respect the resources that go into making the products we use everyday," said Celeste Meiffren-Swango, state director of Environment Oregon, "and we are building on that legacy with the Right to Repair Act."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Biden's Bid to Tax the Rich Could Be the 2024 Lift the President Needs
New polling finds a majority of Americans across party lines support raising taxes on billionaires.
Mar 27, 2024
During his State of the Union address, U.S. President Joe Biden declared that he wants to raise taxes on the rich, and polling results published Tuesday show that both Democratic and Republican voters in important swing states support doing so.
The polling firm Morning Consult reports that 69% of registered voters in seven swing states say they support raising taxes on billionaires. That includes states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.
One of the most consistently popular policy proposals, across parties, is raising taxes on the rich. https://t.co/1fwJK5z0EN
— David Roberts (@drvolts) March 26, 2024
The poll found 58% of Republicans, 83% of Democrats, and 66% of independents support raising taxes on billionaires. The poll also found similar numbers of voters support raising taxes on people who make more than $400,000 per year.
Biden's 2025 budget plan includes a hike in taxes on the rich that would generate significant revenue for the federal government.
"Biden proposes to raise $503 billion over the next decade by imposing a 25% tax on people who claim more than $100 million in assets—a source of wealth that has long been beyond the reach of the [Internal Revenue Service]," The Washington Postreports.
In a New York Times opinion piece that was published on Wednesday, Felicia Wong, president and chief executive of the progressive advocacy organization Roosevelt Forward, outlined how opinions have changed about how much wealth is too much and if it should be more heavily taxed.
"Should we have trillionaires? Should we even have billionaires? According to at least one recent analysis, the economy is on track to mint its first trillionaire—that is 1,000 billion—within a decade. Such staggering accumulations of wealth are made possible in large part by the fact that America's federal tax burden is so comparatively light," Wong wrote. "After a long period of seeming to venerate the 1 %, or the 1% of 1% of 1%, American sentiment is swinging hard against this imbalance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular