June, 22 2021, 02:37pm EDT

WASHINGTON
A coalition of over 200 international civil society organizations, organized by Planned Parenthood Global and the International Planned Parenthood Federation, released a joint statement today calling for a permanent end to the U.S. global gag rule. The statement -- released as part of a week of action to end the global gag rule -- was released in Arabic, English, French, and Spanish, demonstrating the diversity of just some of the communities harmed by the rule over the past 37 years.
In addition to the over 200 organizations from 88 countries across six continents that signed the statement today -- and countless other people around the world -- 70% of Americans favor ending the global gag rule.
Tarah Demant, the director of the Gender, Sexuality, and Identity Program at Amnesty International USA:
"Ending the Gag rule forever is possible, it is urgent and it will make communities here at home as well as communities around the world much safer. It will also speed up the global recovery from COVID-19, advance global health, empower communities, and promote equity and human rights for all. Our lawmakers have an opportunity here and now to make certain that future presidents cannot reinstate the policy or interrupt life-saving health services ever again and now is the moment for them to seize that opportunity."
Dawn Laguens, interim executive director, Planned Parenthood Global:
"Study after study has demonstrated that the neocolonialist global gag rule devastates health care access for people around the world, especially those who already face systemic barriers to care. And yet, since 1984, the global gag rule has come and gone with each party shift in the White House. President Biden took an important step by ending this harmful rule for now, but real relief will not be felt until we can permanently end this devastating policy. The global community deserves true partnership from the U.S., but the threat that this destructive policy could reemerge undermines relationships and harms people around the globe. We come together today to tell the U.S. government: It's time to end the global gag rule once and for all."
Alvaro Bermejo, director general, International Planned Parenthood Federation:
"Since its inception, the global gag rule has been a constant threat to the lives of women and girls and their right to decide what happens to their bodies. Designed to deny people safe and legal abortion care, it has also caused unfathomable damage across the health care spectrum -- from HIV prevention and treatment to maternal health care. Our member associations on the front lines of care have witnessed this damage first hand. Whilst we applaud President Biden on rescinding the global gag rule, history has shown us that it is ready to be weaponized by coercive, anti-abortion administrations. We urge the U.S. government to break the violent cycle of the global gag rule permanently, so organizations like IPPF can provide life-saving health care without the fear of our ability to deliver being snatched away from us with the stroke of a pen. Together we can work toward a world where no one is left behind when it comes to their sexual and reproductive health and rights."
The global gag rule prohibits non-governmental organizations in other countries from receiving any U.S. global health assistance if they provide, refer, counsel or advocate for legal abortion in their country -- even if these activities are supported solely with non-U.S. funds. This cruel policy was originally imposed by the Reagan administration, before being rescinded in 1993 by President Clinton, and then reinstated in 2001 by President Bush on his first business day in office. President Obama rescinded the global gag rule in January 2009, but less than a decade later, President Trump reimposed and radically expanded the policy, extending its harm and devastation to even more women and communities. President Biden then rescinded the gag rule in a presidential memorandum signed on January 28, 2021.
Marginalized communities -- including women and girls, young people, and LGBTQ+ people -- have experienced the most devastating constraints on services as a result of the global gag rule. Tragically, this harm does not fully stop even when the policy is not in effect. According to the joint statement:
"The prospect of reinstatement under future administrations casts a long shadow and leaves the health and lives of millions of people vulnerable to the whims of future U.S. presidents... Even when presidents lift the global gag rule immediately upon taking office, high-quality health partners face long delays in resuming participation in U.S. global health programs. Permanent repeal of the policy is urgently needed to promote sustainable progress in global health and to build and maintain long-term partnerships between the U.S. government, local organizations, and the communities that they serve... Urgent action is needed to finally end the global gag rule once and for all and advance health, human rights, and gender equality across the globe."
The full joint statement can be found here and the full list of signatories is below:
- ABUBEF (Burundi)
- ACABEF (Central African Republic)
- Accountability International (South Africa)
- Action Against Hunger (United Kingdom)
- Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights (Canada)
- Advocates for Youth (United States)
- Afrihealth Optonet Association (CSOs Network) (Nigeria)
- AIDOS - Italian Association for Women in Development (Italy)
- Al Hameed educational society (India)
- Alliance of Women Advocating for Change (AWAC) (Uganda)
- Amnesty International (Global)
- AMPF - Mauritanie (Mauritania)
- AMPPF (Mali)
- AnA - Society for Feminist Analyses (Romania)
- APROSUVI (Guatemala)
- Asia Catalyst (Thailand)
- Asia Pacific Alliance for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (Thailand/ Asia Pacific)
- Asian Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW) (Malaysia)
- ASSOCIACAO GUINEENSE PARA O BEM ESTAR FAMILIAR (AGUIBEF) (Guinea-Bissau)
- Associacao Para o Planeamento da Familia (Portugal)
- Association Algerienne pour la Planification Familiale (Algeria)
- Association Beninoise pour la Promotion de la Famille ABPF (Benin)
- Association Burkinabe pour le Bien Etre Familial (ABBEF) (Burkina Faso)
- Association Centrafricaine pour le Bien Etre Familial ( ACABEF) Central African Republic)
- Association Ivoirienne pour le Bien Etre Familial (AIBEF) (Ivory Coast)
- Association Malienne pour la protection et la Promotion de la Famille (Mali)
- Association Marocaine de Planification Familiale (Morocco)
- Association Mauritanienne pour la Promotion de la Famille (Mauritania)
- Association Nigerienne Pour le Bien Etre Familial (ANBEF) (Niger)
- Association Tchadienne pour le Bien Etre Familiale (Chad)
- ASSOCIATION TOGOLAISE POUR LE BIEN ETRE FAMILIAL (ATBEF) (Togo)
- Association Tunisienne de la Sante de la Reproduction (ATSR) (Tunisia)
- ASTRA Network (CEE region/ Poland)
- ATHENA Network (Namibia)
- Aube Nouvelle pour l Femme et le Developpement (Democratic Republic of Congo)
- Austrian Family Planning Association (Austria)
- Bahrain Reproductive Health Association (Bahrain)
- Bandhu Social Welfare Society (Bangladesh)
- Barnabas Charity Outreach (Nigeria)
- Botswana Family Welfare Association (BOFWA) (Botswana)
- Bulgarian Family Planning and Sexual Health Association (BFPA) (Bulgaria)
- Burnet Institute (Australia)
- CARE USA (USA)
- Caribbean Family Planning Affiliation (Antigua & Barbuda)
- Catalysts for Change (United States)
- Catholics for Choice (United States)
- Catolicas pelo Direito de Decidir - Brasil (Brazil)
- Catolicas por el Derecho a Decidir - Colombia (Colombia)
- CEDES - Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedad (Argentina)
- Center for Health, Human Rights and Development (Uganda)
- Center for Reproductive Rights (USA/ Switzerland/ Global)
- Centro de Derechos de Mujeres (Honduras)
- Centro de Promocion y Defensa de los Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos - PROMSEX (Peru)
- CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality (Netherlands)
- CLADEM (Latin America)
- Corporacion MILES (Chile)
- Danish Family Planning Association (Denmark)
- Dr Uzo Adirieje Foundation (DUZAFOUND) (Nigeria)
- DSW (Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevolkerung) (Germany)
- Economic and Social Rights Centre - Hakijamii (Kenya)
- Egyptian family planning Association (EFPA) (Egypt)
- ELA - Equipo Latinoamericano de Justicia y Genero (Argentina)
- Equidad de Genero, Ciudadania, Trabajo y Familia (Mexico)
- Famia Planea Aruba (Aruba)
- Family Guidance Association of Ethiopia (FGAE) (Ethiopia)
- Family Health Association of Iran (Iran)
- Family Medical Point (Uganda)
- Family Planning Alliance Australia (Australia)
- Family Planning Association of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad & Tobago)
- FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MALAWI (Malawi)
- Family Planning Association of Nepal (Nepal)
- Family Planning Association Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka)
- Family Planning New Zealand (New Zealand)
- Family Planning NSW (Australia)
- Federacion Planificacion Familiar Estatal (Spain)
- Federation of Reproductive Health Associations, Malaysia (Malaysia)
- Feminist League (Kazakhstan)
- Feminist Task Force (United States)
- Fiji Women's Rights Movement (Fiji)
- FILIA Center (Romania)
- FLAMA Uganda (Uganda)
- FPA Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka)
- Friends Affected & Infected Together in Hand (FAITH) (Nepal)
- Front Association / Feminism-Romania (Romania)
- Fundacion Arcoiris por el respeto a la diversidad sexual (Mexico)
- FUNDACION CEMOPLAF (Ecuador)
- Fundacion Mexicana para la Planeacion Familiar, A. C. MEXFAM (Mexico)
- Fundacion para estudio e investigacion de la Mujer (Argentina)
- Fundacion Pro Salud Sabana Yegua FUNPROSSY (Dominican Republic)
- Futures Without Violence (United States)
- Gestos _HIV, Communication and Gender (Brazil)
- Girl Up Initiative Uganda (Uganda)
- Global Network of Women Peacebuilders (United States)
- GreeneWorks (United States)
- Grupo Multidisciplinario para la Defensa de los derechos sexuales y reproductivos en Guatemala (Guatemala)
- Guttmacher Institute (United States)
- Habitat Mujer Salud (Colombia)
- Haiti Adolescent Girls Network (Haiti)
- Health, Ethics and Law Institute of Forum for Medical Ethics Society (India)
- Heartland Alliance International (United States)
- Hesperian Health Guides (United States)
- HIV Legal Network (Canada)
- Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF) (Uganda)
- INPPARES (Peru)
- International Action Network for Gender Equity & Law (IANGEL) (United States)
- International Campaign for Women's Right to Safe Abortion (United Kingdom/ Global)
- International Center for Research on Women (ICRW) (USA)
- International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (United Kingdom)
- International Planned Parenthood Federation East and South East Asia and Oceania Region (ESEAOR) (Malaysia)
- Ipas (United States)
- International Planned Parenthood Federation (Global)
- Irish Family Planning Association (Ireland)
- Israel Family Planning Association (Open Door) (Israel)
- Jamaica Family Planning Association (Jamaica)
- John Snow, Inc. (JSI) (United States)
- JOICFP (Japanese Organization for International Cooperation in Family Planning) (Japan)
- Kenya Legal & Ethical Issues Network On HIV & AIDS (Kenya)
- Kenya Medical Association (Kenya)
- Kisumu Medical and Education Trust (KMET) (Kenya)
- Kyetume Community Based Health Care Programme (Uganda)
- L'ASSOCIATION DJIBOUTIENNE POUR L'EQUILIBRE ET LA PROMOTION DE LA FAMILLE (Djibouti)
- Latin American and Caribbean Women's Health Network (Latin America and the Caribbean)
- Le Planning familial (France)
- LI PRIDE (Liberia)
- Lobi Health Center Foundation (Suriname)
- LUNA vzw (Belgium)
- Marie Stopes International (Global)
- MSI Reproductive Choices (United Kingdom)
- Mujer Y Salud en Uruguay - MYSU (Uruguay)
- Network for Adolescent and Youth of Africa (Kenya)
- Observatorio de la Gobernanza para la Cooperacion y el Desarrollo A.C. (Mexico)
- OutRight Action International (United States)
- Palestinian Family Planning and Protection Association (PFPPA) (Palestine)
- Pathfinder International (United States)
- Plan International (United Kingdom)
- Plan International USA (United States)
- Plan International, Inc (Global)
- Planned Parenthood Association of Ghana (Ghana)
- Planned Parenthood Association of Thailand (Thailand)
- Planned Parenthood Association of Zambia (Zambia)
- Planned Parenthood Federation of Nigeria (Nigeria)
- Planned Parenthood Global (Global)
- Profamilia (Colombia)
- Queensway Institute of Technology and Business Studies (Kenya)
- Raks Thai Foundation (Thailand)
- RAWSA MENA NETWORK (Tunisia - for the MENA region)
- Red de Salud de las Mujeres Latinoamericanas y del Caribe (Latin America and the Caribbean)
- Red Latinoamericana y Caribena de jovenes por los Derechos Sexuales y Derechos Reproductivos REDLAC (Mexico)
- REDAAS - Red de Acceso al Aborto Seguro Argentina (Argentina)
- Regional Centre for International Development Cooperation (RCIDC) (Uganda)
- Reproductive Health Network Kenya (Kenya)
- Reproductive Health Training Center/Regional SRHR Coalition for EECA (Moldova/ Eastern Europe and Central Asia Regions)
- RFSU (Sweden)
- RHAC (Cambodia)
- Rutgers (Netherlands)
- SANTE SEXUELLE SUISSE (Switzerland)
- SCI Foundation (United Kingdom)
- Sendas (Ecuador)
- Sensoa (Belgium)
- SERAC-Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
- Sex og Politikk (IPPF Norway) (Norway)
- SEXUL vs BARZA / SEX vs The STORK Association (Romania)
- SFBSP-BURUNDI (Burundi)
- Society for Conservation and Sustainability of Energy and Environment in Nigeria (SOCSEEN) (Nigeria)
- Solidarity Sisters Network of Liberia (SoSNoL) (Liberia, West Africa)
- Solomon Island Planned Parenthood Association (Solomon Islands)
- Somaliland Family Health Association (Somaliland)
- Soroptimist International (United Kingdom)
- Space Allies (Japan)
- Stichting EqualA Foundation (Netherlands/ Thailand)
- Stichting Ultimate Purpose (Suriname)
- Stop AIDS in Liberia (SAIL) (Liberia)
- SUDAN Family Planning Association (SFPA) (Sudan)
- Sukaar Welfare Organization (Pakistan)
- Support for Women in Agriculture and Environment (SWAGEN) (Uganda)
- Syrian Family Planning Association (Syria)
- TAN UX'IL (Guatemala)
- TDJ-BURUNDI (Burundi)
- Teens Link Uganda (Uganda)
- The African Women's Development and Communication Network (FEMNET) (Kenya)
- The Lebanese Association for Family Health- SALAMA (Lebanon)
- The Lesbian and Gay Association of Liberia (LEGAL) (Liberia)
- The Society for Education on Contraception and Sexuality from Romania (Romania)
- Together for Girls (United States)
- Trust for Indigenous Culture and health (TICAH) (Kenya)
- Universal Access Project (United States)
- Urgent Action Fund for Women's Human Rights (United States)
- Vidhayak Trust (India)
- WGNRR AFRICA (Tanzania)
- William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (USA)
- Women Deliver (USA)
- Women Enabled International (USA)
- Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR) (Philippines)
- Women's Link Worldwide (Global)
- Women's Major Group (Global)
- Women's Refugee Commission (USA)
- Women'S Way Foundation Suriname (Suriname)
- Woodhull Freedom Foundation (United States)
- Yemeni Association for Reproductive Health (Yemen)
- YouAct - European Youth Network on Sexual and Reproductive Rights (United Kingdom)
- Young Feminist Europe (Belgium)
- Youth Association for Development (Pakistan)
- Youth Coalition for Sexual and Reproductive Rights (YCSRR) (Canada)
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
Thanedar Introduces 7 Articles of Impeachment Against Trump to Halt 'Authoritarian Power Grab'
"Always interesting to see how primary challenges affect members' behavior, though usually it's a bit more subtle than this," one journalist said of the Michigan Democrat.
Apr 28, 2025
Faced with two primary challengers and growing public support for impeaching U.S. President Donald Trump a historic third time, Congressman Shri Thanedar on Monday filed seven articles of impeachment against the second-term Republican.
"Donald Trump has repeatedly demonstrated that he is unfit to serve as president and represents a clear and present danger to our nation's constitution and our democracy," Thanedar (D-Mich.) said in a statement. "His unlawful actions have subverted the justice system, violated the separation of powers, and placed personal power and self-interest above public service. We cannot wait for more damage to be done. Congress must act."
Thanedar explained the seven articles of impeachment included in his resolution in a brief video, which he shared on social media.
As a statement from the congressman's office details, Trump's alleged constitutional violations are:
- Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Executive Power: Including denial of due process, unlawful deportations, defiance of court orders, and misuse of the Department of Justice.
- Usurpation of Appropriations Power: For dismantling congressionally established agencies and impounding federal funds.
- Abuse of Trade Powers and International Aggression: Including imposing economically damaging tariffs and threatening military invasion against sovereign nations.
- Violation of First Amendment Rights: Through retaliatory actions against critics, media, and attorneys exercising constitutionally protected speech.
- Creation of an Unlawful Office: By establishing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and unlawfully empowering Elon Musk to unilaterally violate the Constitution.
- Bribery and Corruption: Involving dismissing criminal cases, soliciting foreign emoluments, and extortionate settlements for personal and political gain.
- Tyrannical Overreach: Seeking to consolidate unchecked power, erode civil liberties, and defy constitutional limits on presidential authority
Earlier this month, Thanedar called for Trump's impeachment over his administration's failure to comply with a 9-0 Supreme Court ruling about facilitating the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a prison in El Salvador to the United States.
"We must take action now," he said at the time. "Donald Trump and members of his administration are deporting people with limited evidence and no due process to horrific megaprisons in a foreign nation. As a member of Congress, I have a responsibility to uphold the checks and balances that safeguard the integrity of our democracy and prevent a slide into authoritarianism. This must be a red line. Otherwise, we risk Donald Trump continuing to defy the Constitution in his own interest, rather than the interest of the nation."
"Enough is enough," Thanedar declared. "We can not allow this obvious authoritarian power grab to continue. I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to stand up for the Constitution and the American people and join the call for impeachment."
While Thanedar had expressed support for impeachment prior to Monday, his resolution came as a second primary challenger announced his candidacy for Michigan's 13th Congressional District. State Rep. Donavan McKinney (D-11) joined former state Sen. Adam Hollier (D-2), who has twice tried to oust the congressman and is trying to do so again next year.
McKinney is backed by the progressive group Justice Democrats, whose executive director Alexandra Rojas said in a statement earlier Monday that "Democratic voters in the face of unprecedented attacks on our livelihoods and liberties are fed up with a Democratic Party overrun by do-nothing career politicians who are totally unequipped to lead in this moment. Donavan represents the future the Democratic Party should be fighting: working-class people taking our power back from multimillionaires to deliver for everyday people."
After Thanedar announced the impeachment resolution, Business Insider senior politics reporter Bryan Metzger said on social media Monday that it is "always interesting to see how primary challenges affect members' behavior, though usually it's a bit more subtle than this."
Recent polling has found that a majority of voters disapprove of how Trump is handling his job and would support a historic third impeachment. In response to one survey, Free Speech for People's Alexandra Flores-Quilty—whose group is leading a nonpartisan Impeach Trump Again campaign—declared Friday that "it's up to Congress to do their job, defend the Constitution, and impeach and remove Donald Trump from office for his grave abuses of power."
Trump is the only president to be impeached twice by the House of Representatives—though in both cases during his first term, he was acquitted by the Senate. Republicans now narrowly control both chambers of Congress.
While Republicans haven't yet signaled a willingness to stand against the president, U.S. Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) told attendees of an early April anti-Trump rally that "within the next 30 days, I'm bringing articles of impeachment."
Axiosnoted Monday that "Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) also privately floated impeaching Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard over Signalgate."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Warren to Trump Treasury Chief: Did You Give Wall Street Execs Insider Info on Trade Talks?
"You owe Congress and the public an explanation for why you and other White House officials appear to be providing Wall Street insiders secret information on the tariffs," wrote Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
Apr 28, 2025
Democratic U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren is pressing Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for answers following reports that officials inside President Donald Trump's White House have been providing Wall Street executives with advance notice about potentially market-moving trade talks with other nations, including China and India.
In a letter to Bessent dated April 25, Warren points to a Bloombergstory noting that Bessent "told a closed-door investor summit" that the "tariff standoff with China cannot be sustained by both sides and that the world's two largest economies will have to find ways to de-escalate."
The summit, which took place last Tuesday, was hosted by the Wall Street behemoth JPMorgan Chase in Washington, D.C. Bloomberg observed that the S&P 500 rose nearly 3% after Bessent's comments were leaked.
CNN additionally reported that Bessent's private assessment of the U.S.-China standoff "gave a boost to a Wall Street rally that had taken shape earlier on Tuesday, with all three major U.S. stock indexes hitting their highest levels of the day after Bessent's remarks were made public."
"Chaos, confusion, economic damage, and opportunities for corruption have become the hallmark of President Trump's rollout of his tariff policies."
Warren wrote in her letter that the JPMorgan event "was not open to the public or media" and expressed concern that Bessent "provided a room full of wealthy investors and Wall Street executives exclusive, advance tips about the administration's trade policy, potentially creating the opportunity for insider trading or other financial profiteering by well-connected friends of the administration."
"Chaos, confusion, economic damage, and opportunities for corruption have become the hallmark of President Trump's rollout of his tariff policies," Warren continued. "President Trump's opaque decision-making on tariffs and frequent, seemingly random changes of course have created a scenario where wealthy investors and well-connected corporations can get special treatment, receiving inside information they can use to time the market, or obtaining tariff exemptions that are worth billions of dollars—while Main Street, small businesses, and America's families are left to clean up the damage."
"You owe Congress and the public an explanation for why you and other White House officials appear to be providing Wall Street insiders secret information on the tariffs, while withholding that information from the public," the senator added, demanding that Bessent answer a series of questions—including who attended the event and how much time passed between his private remarks and press reports on the event.
Warren sent the letter a day after Fox Business correspondent Charles Gasparino reported that unnamed officials inside the Trump White House have been "alerting Wall Street execs they are nearing an agreement in principle on trade with India," heightening concerns that the administration is effectively encouraging insider trading.
Trump told reporters Friday that he "can't imagine" anyone in his administration tipping off Wall Street executives about nonpublic trade developments.
"I have very honorable people, that I can say," the president said. "So I can't even imagine it."
On Monday, a group of congressional Democrats warned the White House of "potential violations of federal ethics and insider trading laws by individuals close to the president with access to nonpublic information."
The Democratic lawmakers pointed specifically to a spike in the volume of call options—essentially bets that a stock price will rise—shortly before Trump announced a partial tariff pause earlier this month.
"We therefore urgently request a full accounting of the periodic transaction reports for all senior White House and executive branch employees since the start of the administration, and we ask for your commitment to transmit all reports to the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) to be made public, as was done during the first Trump administration," the lawmakers wrote Monday. "By failing to take these steps, the administration would be withholding critical information from the American people regarding potential violations of federal ethics and insider trading laws."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The American People Do Not Want Oligarchy': Poll Shows Trump's Approval at Historic Low at 100-Day Mark
A whopping 72% of respondents said that they believe it is "likely" that Trump's policies will cause an economic recession in the short term.
Apr 28, 2025
As U.S. President Donald Trump nears the 100-day mark of his second term, a recent ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll shows that his approval rating now sits at a historic low of 39%, a nadir that prompted one prominent progressive to remark that the negative public sentiment comes as "the resistance is just beginning."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has mounted a highly successful "Fighting Oligarchy" tour across America in recent months, highlighted the findings of the poll on Sunday and wrote: "The American people do not want oligarchy, authoritarianism, or attacks on Social Security, Medicaid, or the VA," speaking of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
The poll, which conducted a random national sample of 2,464 adults in English and Spanish between April 18-22, found discontent among voters when it comes to Trump's handling of multiple policies issues, particularly on the economy.
A whopping 72% of respondents said that they believe it is "likely" that Trump's policies—such as sweeping tariffs—will cause an economic recession in the short term.
What's more, 53% say the economy is worse since Trump took office and 62% said that the prices for things they rely on have gone up.
Trump's overall approval on immigration policy, one of his core campaign issues, is also less than 50%. When it comes to his handling of immigration—an area where Trump has moved to roll back birthright citizenship, deported U.S. citizens, and invoked a rarely used wartime authority to deport Venezuelan nationals to a megaprison in El Salvador, among other measures—his approval rating sits at 46%, according to the ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll.
Additionally, over 55% of Americans say Trump is "going too far" when it comes to seeking to expand the power of the presidency, closing federal agencies, laying off federal employees to reduce the size of government, and taking measures agains this political foes.
Overall, his approval among Americans has dipped from 45% positive in February to 39% positive on the eve of the 100-day mark, which is on Tuesday.
According to The Washington Post's analysis of the poll results, Trump's approval at 100 days in both of his terms is lower than any other president's at or near the 100-day mark "since polls began." Polling data on this question stretches back to former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's (FDR) third term, per the Post, when his approval rating was at 68% at the 100-day point. ABC News' write up of the poll results says that "Trump has the lowest 100-day job approval rating of any president in the past 80 years."
Some have drawn parallels between Trump and FDR, whose first 15 weeks in office in 1933 were dominated by a push to work with Congress on economic recovery and relief for working people, the first phase of what's known as the "New Deal." However, historians have noted that in substance the two could not be more different.
In reporting piece published Monday, the Post noted that Roosevelt's push in the first 100 days led to major new laws, while Trump largely relies on executive order.
"Roosevelt spent an awful lot of time trying to craft constitutional justifications in legislation, and draft it in such a way that the courts might accept it," Anthony Badger, a historian and author of FDR: The First Hundred Days, told the Post. "He wasn't trying to do it by executive order."
The historian and author Eric Rauchway toldCNN recently that substantively Trump's policies are the "opposite of the New Deal."
Trump "seems to be taking apart regulatory mechanisms. He seems to be drawing down public investment in a variety of areas, including the arts and so forth. He seems to be, as far as I can tell, diminishing resources sent to the Social Security Administration, which of course is the central piece of the New Deal’s proto-welfare state," Racuhway told the outlet.
In a similar vein to Sanders, former Labor Secretary Robert Reich wrote Monday that Trump's actions in his first 100 days serves as a call to mobilization and to "loudly and boldly sound the alarm."
"The U.S. Constitution is in peril. Civil and human rights are being trampled upon. The economy is in disarray," wrote Reich. "At this rate, we won't make it through the second hundred days."
Reich suggested that that answer is for Americans to speak out and urge lawmakers in Congress, both chambers of which are currently GOP-controlled, to launch impeachment proceedings against Trump.
"Americans must be mobilized into such a huge wave of anger and disgust that members of the House are compelled to impeach Trump (for the third time) and enough senators are moved to finally convict him," he concluded.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular