June, 22 2021, 02:37pm EDT

Global Coalition of Over 200 Groups Call for Permanent End to Global Gag Rule
A coalition of over 200 international civil society organizations, organized by Planned Parenthood Global and the International Planned Parenthood Federation, released a
WASHINGTON
A coalition of over 200 international civil society organizations, organized by Planned Parenthood Global and the International Planned Parenthood Federation, released a joint statement today calling for a permanent end to the U.S. global gag rule. The statement -- released as part of a week of action to end the global gag rule -- was released in Arabic, English, French, and Spanish, demonstrating the diversity of just some of the communities harmed by the rule over the past 37 years.
In addition to the over 200 organizations from 88 countries across six continents that signed the statement today -- and countless other people around the world -- 70% of Americans favor ending the global gag rule.
Tarah Demant, the director of the Gender, Sexuality, and Identity Program at Amnesty International USA:
"Ending the Gag rule forever is possible, it is urgent and it will make communities here at home as well as communities around the world much safer. It will also speed up the global recovery from COVID-19, advance global health, empower communities, and promote equity and human rights for all. Our lawmakers have an opportunity here and now to make certain that future presidents cannot reinstate the policy or interrupt life-saving health services ever again and now is the moment for them to seize that opportunity."
Dawn Laguens, interim executive director, Planned Parenthood Global:
"Study after study has demonstrated that the neocolonialist global gag rule devastates health care access for people around the world, especially those who already face systemic barriers to care. And yet, since 1984, the global gag rule has come and gone with each party shift in the White House. President Biden took an important step by ending this harmful rule for now, but real relief will not be felt until we can permanently end this devastating policy. The global community deserves true partnership from the U.S., but the threat that this destructive policy could reemerge undermines relationships and harms people around the globe. We come together today to tell the U.S. government: It's time to end the global gag rule once and for all."
Alvaro Bermejo, director general, International Planned Parenthood Federation:
"Since its inception, the global gag rule has been a constant threat to the lives of women and girls and their right to decide what happens to their bodies. Designed to deny people safe and legal abortion care, it has also caused unfathomable damage across the health care spectrum -- from HIV prevention and treatment to maternal health care. Our member associations on the front lines of care have witnessed this damage first hand. Whilst we applaud President Biden on rescinding the global gag rule, history has shown us that it is ready to be weaponized by coercive, anti-abortion administrations. We urge the U.S. government to break the violent cycle of the global gag rule permanently, so organizations like IPPF can provide life-saving health care without the fear of our ability to deliver being snatched away from us with the stroke of a pen. Together we can work toward a world where no one is left behind when it comes to their sexual and reproductive health and rights."
The global gag rule prohibits non-governmental organizations in other countries from receiving any U.S. global health assistance if they provide, refer, counsel or advocate for legal abortion in their country -- even if these activities are supported solely with non-U.S. funds. This cruel policy was originally imposed by the Reagan administration, before being rescinded in 1993 by President Clinton, and then reinstated in 2001 by President Bush on his first business day in office. President Obama rescinded the global gag rule in January 2009, but less than a decade later, President Trump reimposed and radically expanded the policy, extending its harm and devastation to even more women and communities. President Biden then rescinded the gag rule in a presidential memorandum signed on January 28, 2021.
Marginalized communities -- including women and girls, young people, and LGBTQ+ people -- have experienced the most devastating constraints on services as a result of the global gag rule. Tragically, this harm does not fully stop even when the policy is not in effect. According to the joint statement:
"The prospect of reinstatement under future administrations casts a long shadow and leaves the health and lives of millions of people vulnerable to the whims of future U.S. presidents... Even when presidents lift the global gag rule immediately upon taking office, high-quality health partners face long delays in resuming participation in U.S. global health programs. Permanent repeal of the policy is urgently needed to promote sustainable progress in global health and to build and maintain long-term partnerships between the U.S. government, local organizations, and the communities that they serve... Urgent action is needed to finally end the global gag rule once and for all and advance health, human rights, and gender equality across the globe."
The full joint statement can be found here and the full list of signatories is below:
- ABUBEF (Burundi)
- ACABEF (Central African Republic)
- Accountability International (South Africa)
- Action Against Hunger (United Kingdom)
- Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights (Canada)
- Advocates for Youth (United States)
- Afrihealth Optonet Association (CSOs Network) (Nigeria)
- AIDOS - Italian Association for Women in Development (Italy)
- Al Hameed educational society (India)
- Alliance of Women Advocating for Change (AWAC) (Uganda)
- Amnesty International (Global)
- AMPF - Mauritanie (Mauritania)
- AMPPF (Mali)
- AnA - Society for Feminist Analyses (Romania)
- APROSUVI (Guatemala)
- Asia Catalyst (Thailand)
- Asia Pacific Alliance for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (Thailand/ Asia Pacific)
- Asian Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW) (Malaysia)
- ASSOCIACAO GUINEENSE PARA O BEM ESTAR FAMILIAR (AGUIBEF) (Guinea-Bissau)
- Associacao Para o Planeamento da Familia (Portugal)
- Association Algerienne pour la Planification Familiale (Algeria)
- Association Beninoise pour la Promotion de la Famille ABPF (Benin)
- Association Burkinabe pour le Bien Etre Familial (ABBEF) (Burkina Faso)
- Association Centrafricaine pour le Bien Etre Familial ( ACABEF) Central African Republic)
- Association Ivoirienne pour le Bien Etre Familial (AIBEF) (Ivory Coast)
- Association Malienne pour la protection et la Promotion de la Famille (Mali)
- Association Marocaine de Planification Familiale (Morocco)
- Association Mauritanienne pour la Promotion de la Famille (Mauritania)
- Association Nigerienne Pour le Bien Etre Familial (ANBEF) (Niger)
- Association Tchadienne pour le Bien Etre Familiale (Chad)
- ASSOCIATION TOGOLAISE POUR LE BIEN ETRE FAMILIAL (ATBEF) (Togo)
- Association Tunisienne de la Sante de la Reproduction (ATSR) (Tunisia)
- ASTRA Network (CEE region/ Poland)
- ATHENA Network (Namibia)
- Aube Nouvelle pour l Femme et le Developpement (Democratic Republic of Congo)
- Austrian Family Planning Association (Austria)
- Bahrain Reproductive Health Association (Bahrain)
- Bandhu Social Welfare Society (Bangladesh)
- Barnabas Charity Outreach (Nigeria)
- Botswana Family Welfare Association (BOFWA) (Botswana)
- Bulgarian Family Planning and Sexual Health Association (BFPA) (Bulgaria)
- Burnet Institute (Australia)
- CARE USA (USA)
- Caribbean Family Planning Affiliation (Antigua & Barbuda)
- Catalysts for Change (United States)
- Catholics for Choice (United States)
- Catolicas pelo Direito de Decidir - Brasil (Brazil)
- Catolicas por el Derecho a Decidir - Colombia (Colombia)
- CEDES - Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedad (Argentina)
- Center for Health, Human Rights and Development (Uganda)
- Center for Reproductive Rights (USA/ Switzerland/ Global)
- Centro de Derechos de Mujeres (Honduras)
- Centro de Promocion y Defensa de los Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos - PROMSEX (Peru)
- CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality (Netherlands)
- CLADEM (Latin America)
- Corporacion MILES (Chile)
- Danish Family Planning Association (Denmark)
- Dr Uzo Adirieje Foundation (DUZAFOUND) (Nigeria)
- DSW (Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevolkerung) (Germany)
- Economic and Social Rights Centre - Hakijamii (Kenya)
- Egyptian family planning Association (EFPA) (Egypt)
- ELA - Equipo Latinoamericano de Justicia y Genero (Argentina)
- Equidad de Genero, Ciudadania, Trabajo y Familia (Mexico)
- Famia Planea Aruba (Aruba)
- Family Guidance Association of Ethiopia (FGAE) (Ethiopia)
- Family Health Association of Iran (Iran)
- Family Medical Point (Uganda)
- Family Planning Alliance Australia (Australia)
- Family Planning Association of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad & Tobago)
- FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MALAWI (Malawi)
- Family Planning Association of Nepal (Nepal)
- Family Planning Association Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka)
- Family Planning New Zealand (New Zealand)
- Family Planning NSW (Australia)
- Federacion Planificacion Familiar Estatal (Spain)
- Federation of Reproductive Health Associations, Malaysia (Malaysia)
- Feminist League (Kazakhstan)
- Feminist Task Force (United States)
- Fiji Women's Rights Movement (Fiji)
- FILIA Center (Romania)
- FLAMA Uganda (Uganda)
- FPA Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka)
- Friends Affected & Infected Together in Hand (FAITH) (Nepal)
- Front Association / Feminism-Romania (Romania)
- Fundacion Arcoiris por el respeto a la diversidad sexual (Mexico)
- FUNDACION CEMOPLAF (Ecuador)
- Fundacion Mexicana para la Planeacion Familiar, A. C. MEXFAM (Mexico)
- Fundacion para estudio e investigacion de la Mujer (Argentina)
- Fundacion Pro Salud Sabana Yegua FUNPROSSY (Dominican Republic)
- Futures Without Violence (United States)
- Gestos _HIV, Communication and Gender (Brazil)
- Girl Up Initiative Uganda (Uganda)
- Global Network of Women Peacebuilders (United States)
- GreeneWorks (United States)
- Grupo Multidisciplinario para la Defensa de los derechos sexuales y reproductivos en Guatemala (Guatemala)
- Guttmacher Institute (United States)
- Habitat Mujer Salud (Colombia)
- Haiti Adolescent Girls Network (Haiti)
- Health, Ethics and Law Institute of Forum for Medical Ethics Society (India)
- Heartland Alliance International (United States)
- Hesperian Health Guides (United States)
- HIV Legal Network (Canada)
- Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF) (Uganda)
- INPPARES (Peru)
- International Action Network for Gender Equity & Law (IANGEL) (United States)
- International Campaign for Women's Right to Safe Abortion (United Kingdom/ Global)
- International Center for Research on Women (ICRW) (USA)
- International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (United Kingdom)
- International Planned Parenthood Federation East and South East Asia and Oceania Region (ESEAOR) (Malaysia)
- Ipas (United States)
- International Planned Parenthood Federation (Global)
- Irish Family Planning Association (Ireland)
- Israel Family Planning Association (Open Door) (Israel)
- Jamaica Family Planning Association (Jamaica)
- John Snow, Inc. (JSI) (United States)
- JOICFP (Japanese Organization for International Cooperation in Family Planning) (Japan)
- Kenya Legal & Ethical Issues Network On HIV & AIDS (Kenya)
- Kenya Medical Association (Kenya)
- Kisumu Medical and Education Trust (KMET) (Kenya)
- Kyetume Community Based Health Care Programme (Uganda)
- L'ASSOCIATION DJIBOUTIENNE POUR L'EQUILIBRE ET LA PROMOTION DE LA FAMILLE (Djibouti)
- Latin American and Caribbean Women's Health Network (Latin America and the Caribbean)
- Le Planning familial (France)
- LI PRIDE (Liberia)
- Lobi Health Center Foundation (Suriname)
- LUNA vzw (Belgium)
- Marie Stopes International (Global)
- MSI Reproductive Choices (United Kingdom)
- Mujer Y Salud en Uruguay - MYSU (Uruguay)
- Network for Adolescent and Youth of Africa (Kenya)
- Observatorio de la Gobernanza para la Cooperacion y el Desarrollo A.C. (Mexico)
- OutRight Action International (United States)
- Palestinian Family Planning and Protection Association (PFPPA) (Palestine)
- Pathfinder International (United States)
- Plan International (United Kingdom)
- Plan International USA (United States)
- Plan International, Inc (Global)
- Planned Parenthood Association of Ghana (Ghana)
- Planned Parenthood Association of Thailand (Thailand)
- Planned Parenthood Association of Zambia (Zambia)
- Planned Parenthood Federation of Nigeria (Nigeria)
- Planned Parenthood Global (Global)
- Profamilia (Colombia)
- Queensway Institute of Technology and Business Studies (Kenya)
- Raks Thai Foundation (Thailand)
- RAWSA MENA NETWORK (Tunisia - for the MENA region)
- Red de Salud de las Mujeres Latinoamericanas y del Caribe (Latin America and the Caribbean)
- Red Latinoamericana y Caribena de jovenes por los Derechos Sexuales y Derechos Reproductivos REDLAC (Mexico)
- REDAAS - Red de Acceso al Aborto Seguro Argentina (Argentina)
- Regional Centre for International Development Cooperation (RCIDC) (Uganda)
- Reproductive Health Network Kenya (Kenya)
- Reproductive Health Training Center/Regional SRHR Coalition for EECA (Moldova/ Eastern Europe and Central Asia Regions)
- RFSU (Sweden)
- RHAC (Cambodia)
- Rutgers (Netherlands)
- SANTE SEXUELLE SUISSE (Switzerland)
- SCI Foundation (United Kingdom)
- Sendas (Ecuador)
- Sensoa (Belgium)
- SERAC-Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
- Sex og Politikk (IPPF Norway) (Norway)
- SEXUL vs BARZA / SEX vs The STORK Association (Romania)
- SFBSP-BURUNDI (Burundi)
- Society for Conservation and Sustainability of Energy and Environment in Nigeria (SOCSEEN) (Nigeria)
- Solidarity Sisters Network of Liberia (SoSNoL) (Liberia, West Africa)
- Solomon Island Planned Parenthood Association (Solomon Islands)
- Somaliland Family Health Association (Somaliland)
- Soroptimist International (United Kingdom)
- Space Allies (Japan)
- Stichting EqualA Foundation (Netherlands/ Thailand)
- Stichting Ultimate Purpose (Suriname)
- Stop AIDS in Liberia (SAIL) (Liberia)
- SUDAN Family Planning Association (SFPA) (Sudan)
- Sukaar Welfare Organization (Pakistan)
- Support for Women in Agriculture and Environment (SWAGEN) (Uganda)
- Syrian Family Planning Association (Syria)
- TAN UX'IL (Guatemala)
- TDJ-BURUNDI (Burundi)
- Teens Link Uganda (Uganda)
- The African Women's Development and Communication Network (FEMNET) (Kenya)
- The Lebanese Association for Family Health- SALAMA (Lebanon)
- The Lesbian and Gay Association of Liberia (LEGAL) (Liberia)
- The Society for Education on Contraception and Sexuality from Romania (Romania)
- Together for Girls (United States)
- Trust for Indigenous Culture and health (TICAH) (Kenya)
- Universal Access Project (United States)
- Urgent Action Fund for Women's Human Rights (United States)
- Vidhayak Trust (India)
- WGNRR AFRICA (Tanzania)
- William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (USA)
- Women Deliver (USA)
- Women Enabled International (USA)
- Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR) (Philippines)
- Women's Link Worldwide (Global)
- Women's Major Group (Global)
- Women's Refugee Commission (USA)
- Women'S Way Foundation Suriname (Suriname)
- Woodhull Freedom Foundation (United States)
- Yemeni Association for Reproductive Health (Yemen)
- YouAct - European Youth Network on Sexual and Reproductive Rights (United Kingdom)
- Young Feminist Europe (Belgium)
- Youth Association for Development (Pakistan)
- Youth Coalition for Sexual and Reproductive Rights (YCSRR) (Canada)
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
'A National Disgrace': 19 States to Raise Minimum Wage But Federal Rate Stuck at $7.25
One Fair Wage noted that "tipped workers can still legally be paid as little as $2.13 an hour, a system advocates describe as a direct legacy of slavery."
Dec 31, 2025
Over a third of US states are set to raise their minimum hourly wage in 2026, but worker advocates including Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday decried a federal minimum wage that's remained at $7.25 since 2009—and just $2.13 an hour for tipped workers for over three decades.
Minimum wage hikes are set to go into effect in 19 states on Thursday: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.
Increases range from 28 cents in Minnesota to $2 in Hawaii, with an average hike of 67 cents across all 19 states. More than 8.3 million workers will benefit from the increases, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI). The mean minimum wage in those 19 states will rise to $14.57 in 2026, up from $13.90 this year.
Three more states—Alaska, Florida, and Oregon—plus Washington, DC are scheduled to raise their minimum wages later in 2026.
In addition to the state hikes, nearly 50 counties and municipalities plan to raise their minimum wages in the coming year, according to the National Employment Law Project (NELP). These include San Diego, California—where the minimum wage for hospitality workers is set to rise to $25 an hour by 2030—and Portland, Maine, where all workers will earn at least $19 by 2028.
However, the federal minimum wage remains at $7.25, and the subminimum rate for tipped workers is $2.13, where it's been since 1991—and has lost more than half its purchasing power since then.
The federal minimum wage has stayed at $7.25 since 2009. In 2026, workers in 19 states and 49 cities and counties an increase. Alabama’s rate will stay at $7.25. 🔗 https://t.co/mrGfPAKba3 pic.twitter.com/EsokVIc6KP
— AL.com (@aldotcom) December 31, 2025
"Tipped workers can still legally be paid as little as $2.13 an hour, a system advocates describe as a direct legacy of slavery," the advocacy group One Fair Wage (OFW) said in a statement Tuesday.
Sanders (I-Vt.) said on social media on the eve of the hikes: "Congratulations to the 19 states raising the minimum wage in 2026. But let’s be clear: A $7.25 federal minimum wage is a national disgrace. No one who works full time should live in poverty. We must keep fighting to guarantee all workers a living wage—not starvation wages."
Yannet Lathrop, NELP's senior researcher and policy analyst, said earlier this month that "the upcoming minimum wage increases are incremental and won’t magically turn severely underpaid jobs into living-wage jobs, but they do offer a bit of relief at a time when every dollar matters for people."
“The bigger picture is that raising the minimum wage is just one piece of a much larger fight for a good jobs economy rooted in living wages and good benefits for every working person," Lathrop added. "That’s where we need to get to."
Numerous experts note that neither $7.25, nor even $15 an hour, is a livable wage anywhere in the United States.
"The gap between wages and real living costs is stark," OFW said. "According to the MIT Living Wage Calculator, there is no county in the United States where a worker can afford to meet basic needs on less than $25 an hour. Even in the nation’s least expensive counties, a worker with one child would need at least $33 an hour to cover essentials like rent, food, childcare, and transportation."
"Advocates argue that policies like President [Donald] Trump’s 'no tax on tips' proposal fail to address the underlying problem of poverty wages," OFW continued. "While the policy has drawn attention, they say it is a headline rather than a solution, particularly since nearly two-thirds of tipped workers do not earn enough to owe federal income taxes."
Frustrated by the long-unchanged $7.25 federal minimum wage, numerous states in recent years have let voters give themselves raises via ballot initiatives. Such measures have been successful even in some red states, including Missouri and Nebraska.
Rising minimum wages are a legacy of the union-backed #FightFor15 movement that began among striking fast-food workers in 2012. At least 20 states now have minimum wages of $15 or higher.
However, back then, "the buying power of a $15 minimum wage was substantially higher than it is today," EPI noted. "In 2025, a $15 minimum wage does not achieve economic security for working people in most of the country. This is particularly true in the highest cost-of-living cities."
In April, US senators voted down an amendment that would have raised the federal minimum wage to $17 an hour. Every Democratic and Independent upper chamber lawmaker voted in favor of the measure, while all Republicans except Sen. Josh Hawley (Mo.) rejected it.
As Trump administration and Republican policies and practices—such as passing healthcare legislation that does not include an extension of Affordable Care Act tax credits, which are set to expire on Wednesday and send premiums soaring—coupled with persistently high living costs squeeze workers, advocates say a living wage is more important than ever.
The issue is underscored by glaring income and wealth inequality in the US, as well as a roughly 285:1 CEO to worker pay gap among S&P 500 companies last year.
"Minimum wage doesn't cover the cost of living," Janae van De Kerk, an organizer with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Airport Workers union and Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport employee, said in a video posted Tuesday on social media.
"Minimum wage doesn't cover the cost of living. Many of my co-workers have to choose between food on the table or health insurance" Janae, Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport service worker No one should have to make that choice.
[image or embed]
— Airport Workers United (@goodairports.bsky.social) December 30, 2025 at 10:34 AM
"Many of my co-workers have to choose between food on the table or health insurance, or the choice between having food and paying the electric bill," van De Kerk—who advocates a $25 hourly minimum wage—continued.
"We shouldn't have to worry about those things," she added. "We shouldn't have to stress about those things. We're willing to work and we wanna work, and we should be paid for our work."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Says National Guard to Leave Chicago, LA, and Portland, But 'Will Come Back'
Accusing "a president desperate to be king" of using troops "as political pawns," California's attorney general noted the announcement followed "a stinging rebuke by the Supreme Court."
Dec 31, 2025
After a series of losses in court, President Donald Trump ended 2025 with an announcement that he is pulling the plug on legally contested National Guard deployments in three major US cities—but he also pledged that troops will return in the new year.
Trump initially sent thousands of California National Guard members to Los Angeles in June amid protests against his violent immigration operations. The remaining troops left the city earlier this month in response to a pair of orders from a district judge and the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
The president also tried to deploy National Guard members to the streets of two other Democrat-led cities—Portland, Oregon, and Chicago, Illinois—but those moves were blocked by lawsuits, including one that produced a US Supreme Court decision last week.
Throughout the president's push to deploy troops to these and other cities, he has circulated lies about crime rates. He did so again in the Wednesday announcement on his Truth Social platform, writing, "We are removing the National Guard from Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland, despite the fact that CRIME has been greatly reduced by having these great Patriots in those cities, and ONLY by that fact."
"Portland, Los Angeles, and Chicago were GONE if it weren’t for the Federal Government stepping in," Trump claimed. "We will come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form, when crime begins to soar again - Only a question of time! It is hard to believe that these Democrat Mayors and Governors, all of whom are greatly incompetent, would want us to leave, especially considering the great progress that has been made???"
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat expected to run for president in 2028, said on social media Wednesday that it is "about time Donald Trump admitted defeat. We've said it from day one: The federal takeover of California's National Guard is illegal."
Newsom and the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, challenged the LA deployment. In that case, the US Department of Justice on Tuesday filed a brief with the 9th Circuit withdrawing its motion to keep the California troops under federal control.
"For six months, CA National Guard troops have been used as political pawns by a president desperate to be king," Bonta said Wednesday. "Now, in the face of a stinging rebuke by the Supreme Court, the Trump administration is backing away from its effort to federalize and deploy CA National Guard troops."
Although that Supreme Court decision was not directly about California, the justices' rejection of the Trump administration's request to strike down a temporary restraining order that barred the Illinois deployment was expected to inform other cases.
Trump federalized Illinois and Texas national guard troops to patrol in Chicago, but Illinois quickly sued and won a court ruling keeping them out of the city. The troops did training exercises instead. Today, Trump claims that the guard "greatly reduced" crime in Chicago. Did they do it remotely?
[image or embed]
— Mark Jacob (@markjacob.bsky.social) December 31, 2025 at 4:24 PM
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, another Democrat who may run for the Oval Office in the next cycle, also pointed to the recent ruling in his response to the president on Wednesday: "Donald Trump's lying again. He lost in court when Illinois stood up against his attempt to militarize American cities with the National Guard. Now Trump is forced to stand down."
"Illinois and Chicago have reduced crime with smart investments in police and community violence reduction programs," he continued. "Meanwhile, Trump cut federal support for both. No matter how many lies he tells, we will keep standing up for truth and against his abuse of power."
Ahead of Trump's announcement, the New Republic's Greg Sargent said that the president and his deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, "are actually failing in crucial ways. Deportations are lagging behind their goals, courts are mostly functioning, and their fascist, ethnonationalist cruelties have unleashed a countermobilization of unexpected scope and power."
After the new Truth Social post, Sargent added: "Trump just announced that he's pulling the National Guard out of Chicago, LA, and Portland while pretending he won some kind of big victory. Here's the reality: Their authoritarian designs have faced massive civil and popular resistance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
New Year's Eve Dump: House Releases Video and Transcript of Jack Smith Deposition
"There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case," Smith told members of the House Judiciary Committee.
Dec 31, 2025
Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday released both the transcript and video of former special counsel Jack Smith's December 17 testimony about his criminal cases against President Donald Trump that were shut down last year after Trump won the 2024 presidential election.
The release, which occurred as millions of Americans were preparing to celebrate New Year's Eve, revealed fresh insights into Smith's investigation and prosecution of the president, who had been indicted on charges related to the unlawful retention of top-secret government documents and his bid to illegally remain in power after losing the 2020 presidential election.
Among other things, Smith testified that he believed that Trump's false claims about fraud in the 2020 election were not protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution because they were aimed at disrupting the certification of the election results on January 6, 2021, when Trump supporters violently stormed the US Capitol building and send lawmakers fleeing for their lives.
"There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case," Smith emphasized. "As we said in the indictment, he was free to say that he thought he won the election. He was even free to say falsely that he won the election. But what he was not free to do was violate federal law and use... knowingly false statements about election fraud to target a lawful government function."
Smith also testified that he and his team sought gag orders against Trump because the then-former president "was making statements that were endangering witnesses, intimidating witnesses, endangering members of my staff, endangering court staff."
Smith also said that he would "make no apologies" for requesting a gag order against Trump.
When asked about his decision to subpoena phone records of US senators during his investigation, Smith laid out why Trump had left him with no other option.
"I think who should be accountable for this is Donald Trump," he said. "These records are people, in the case of the senators, Donald Trump directed his co-conspirators to call these people to further delay the proceedings. He chose to do that. If Donald Trump had chosen to call a number of Democratic senators, we would have gotten toll records for Democratic senators. So responsibility for why these records, why we collected them... that lies with Donald Trump."
Commenting on the timing of the release, New York University law professor Ryan Goodman called it "an obvious attempt" by House Republicans to "bury" the information that Smith delivered during his testimony.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


