June, 22 2021, 02:37pm EDT

Global Coalition of Over 200 Groups Call for Permanent End to Global Gag Rule
A coalition of over 200 international civil society organizations, organized by Planned Parenthood Global and the International Planned Parenthood Federation, released a
WASHINGTON
A coalition of over 200 international civil society organizations, organized by Planned Parenthood Global and the International Planned Parenthood Federation, released a joint statement today calling for a permanent end to the U.S. global gag rule. The statement -- released as part of a week of action to end the global gag rule -- was released in Arabic, English, French, and Spanish, demonstrating the diversity of just some of the communities harmed by the rule over the past 37 years.
In addition to the over 200 organizations from 88 countries across six continents that signed the statement today -- and countless other people around the world -- 70% of Americans favor ending the global gag rule.
Tarah Demant, the director of the Gender, Sexuality, and Identity Program at Amnesty International USA:
"Ending the Gag rule forever is possible, it is urgent and it will make communities here at home as well as communities around the world much safer. It will also speed up the global recovery from COVID-19, advance global health, empower communities, and promote equity and human rights for all. Our lawmakers have an opportunity here and now to make certain that future presidents cannot reinstate the policy or interrupt life-saving health services ever again and now is the moment for them to seize that opportunity."
Dawn Laguens, interim executive director, Planned Parenthood Global:
"Study after study has demonstrated that the neocolonialist global gag rule devastates health care access for people around the world, especially those who already face systemic barriers to care. And yet, since 1984, the global gag rule has come and gone with each party shift in the White House. President Biden took an important step by ending this harmful rule for now, but real relief will not be felt until we can permanently end this devastating policy. The global community deserves true partnership from the U.S., but the threat that this destructive policy could reemerge undermines relationships and harms people around the globe. We come together today to tell the U.S. government: It's time to end the global gag rule once and for all."
Alvaro Bermejo, director general, International Planned Parenthood Federation:
"Since its inception, the global gag rule has been a constant threat to the lives of women and girls and their right to decide what happens to their bodies. Designed to deny people safe and legal abortion care, it has also caused unfathomable damage across the health care spectrum -- from HIV prevention and treatment to maternal health care. Our member associations on the front lines of care have witnessed this damage first hand. Whilst we applaud President Biden on rescinding the global gag rule, history has shown us that it is ready to be weaponized by coercive, anti-abortion administrations. We urge the U.S. government to break the violent cycle of the global gag rule permanently, so organizations like IPPF can provide life-saving health care without the fear of our ability to deliver being snatched away from us with the stroke of a pen. Together we can work toward a world where no one is left behind when it comes to their sexual and reproductive health and rights."
The global gag rule prohibits non-governmental organizations in other countries from receiving any U.S. global health assistance if they provide, refer, counsel or advocate for legal abortion in their country -- even if these activities are supported solely with non-U.S. funds. This cruel policy was originally imposed by the Reagan administration, before being rescinded in 1993 by President Clinton, and then reinstated in 2001 by President Bush on his first business day in office. President Obama rescinded the global gag rule in January 2009, but less than a decade later, President Trump reimposed and radically expanded the policy, extending its harm and devastation to even more women and communities. President Biden then rescinded the gag rule in a presidential memorandum signed on January 28, 2021.
Marginalized communities -- including women and girls, young people, and LGBTQ+ people -- have experienced the most devastating constraints on services as a result of the global gag rule. Tragically, this harm does not fully stop even when the policy is not in effect. According to the joint statement:
"The prospect of reinstatement under future administrations casts a long shadow and leaves the health and lives of millions of people vulnerable to the whims of future U.S. presidents... Even when presidents lift the global gag rule immediately upon taking office, high-quality health partners face long delays in resuming participation in U.S. global health programs. Permanent repeal of the policy is urgently needed to promote sustainable progress in global health and to build and maintain long-term partnerships between the U.S. government, local organizations, and the communities that they serve... Urgent action is needed to finally end the global gag rule once and for all and advance health, human rights, and gender equality across the globe."
The full joint statement can be found here and the full list of signatories is below:
- ABUBEF (Burundi)
- ACABEF (Central African Republic)
- Accountability International (South Africa)
- Action Against Hunger (United Kingdom)
- Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights (Canada)
- Advocates for Youth (United States)
- Afrihealth Optonet Association (CSOs Network) (Nigeria)
- AIDOS - Italian Association for Women in Development (Italy)
- Al Hameed educational society (India)
- Alliance of Women Advocating for Change (AWAC) (Uganda)
- Amnesty International (Global)
- AMPF - Mauritanie (Mauritania)
- AMPPF (Mali)
- AnA - Society for Feminist Analyses (Romania)
- APROSUVI (Guatemala)
- Asia Catalyst (Thailand)
- Asia Pacific Alliance for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (Thailand/ Asia Pacific)
- Asian Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW) (Malaysia)
- ASSOCIACAO GUINEENSE PARA O BEM ESTAR FAMILIAR (AGUIBEF) (Guinea-Bissau)
- Associacao Para o Planeamento da Familia (Portugal)
- Association Algerienne pour la Planification Familiale (Algeria)
- Association Beninoise pour la Promotion de la Famille ABPF (Benin)
- Association Burkinabe pour le Bien Etre Familial (ABBEF) (Burkina Faso)
- Association Centrafricaine pour le Bien Etre Familial ( ACABEF) Central African Republic)
- Association Ivoirienne pour le Bien Etre Familial (AIBEF) (Ivory Coast)
- Association Malienne pour la protection et la Promotion de la Famille (Mali)
- Association Marocaine de Planification Familiale (Morocco)
- Association Mauritanienne pour la Promotion de la Famille (Mauritania)
- Association Nigerienne Pour le Bien Etre Familial (ANBEF) (Niger)
- Association Tchadienne pour le Bien Etre Familiale (Chad)
- ASSOCIATION TOGOLAISE POUR LE BIEN ETRE FAMILIAL (ATBEF) (Togo)
- Association Tunisienne de la Sante de la Reproduction (ATSR) (Tunisia)
- ASTRA Network (CEE region/ Poland)
- ATHENA Network (Namibia)
- Aube Nouvelle pour l Femme et le Developpement (Democratic Republic of Congo)
- Austrian Family Planning Association (Austria)
- Bahrain Reproductive Health Association (Bahrain)
- Bandhu Social Welfare Society (Bangladesh)
- Barnabas Charity Outreach (Nigeria)
- Botswana Family Welfare Association (BOFWA) (Botswana)
- Bulgarian Family Planning and Sexual Health Association (BFPA) (Bulgaria)
- Burnet Institute (Australia)
- CARE USA (USA)
- Caribbean Family Planning Affiliation (Antigua & Barbuda)
- Catalysts for Change (United States)
- Catholics for Choice (United States)
- Catolicas pelo Direito de Decidir - Brasil (Brazil)
- Catolicas por el Derecho a Decidir - Colombia (Colombia)
- CEDES - Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedad (Argentina)
- Center for Health, Human Rights and Development (Uganda)
- Center for Reproductive Rights (USA/ Switzerland/ Global)
- Centro de Derechos de Mujeres (Honduras)
- Centro de Promocion y Defensa de los Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos - PROMSEX (Peru)
- CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality (Netherlands)
- CLADEM (Latin America)
- Corporacion MILES (Chile)
- Danish Family Planning Association (Denmark)
- Dr Uzo Adirieje Foundation (DUZAFOUND) (Nigeria)
- DSW (Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevolkerung) (Germany)
- Economic and Social Rights Centre - Hakijamii (Kenya)
- Egyptian family planning Association (EFPA) (Egypt)
- ELA - Equipo Latinoamericano de Justicia y Genero (Argentina)
- Equidad de Genero, Ciudadania, Trabajo y Familia (Mexico)
- Famia Planea Aruba (Aruba)
- Family Guidance Association of Ethiopia (FGAE) (Ethiopia)
- Family Health Association of Iran (Iran)
- Family Medical Point (Uganda)
- Family Planning Alliance Australia (Australia)
- Family Planning Association of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad & Tobago)
- FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MALAWI (Malawi)
- Family Planning Association of Nepal (Nepal)
- Family Planning Association Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka)
- Family Planning New Zealand (New Zealand)
- Family Planning NSW (Australia)
- Federacion Planificacion Familiar Estatal (Spain)
- Federation of Reproductive Health Associations, Malaysia (Malaysia)
- Feminist League (Kazakhstan)
- Feminist Task Force (United States)
- Fiji Women's Rights Movement (Fiji)
- FILIA Center (Romania)
- FLAMA Uganda (Uganda)
- FPA Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka)
- Friends Affected & Infected Together in Hand (FAITH) (Nepal)
- Front Association / Feminism-Romania (Romania)
- Fundacion Arcoiris por el respeto a la diversidad sexual (Mexico)
- FUNDACION CEMOPLAF (Ecuador)
- Fundacion Mexicana para la Planeacion Familiar, A. C. MEXFAM (Mexico)
- Fundacion para estudio e investigacion de la Mujer (Argentina)
- Fundacion Pro Salud Sabana Yegua FUNPROSSY (Dominican Republic)
- Futures Without Violence (United States)
- Gestos _HIV, Communication and Gender (Brazil)
- Girl Up Initiative Uganda (Uganda)
- Global Network of Women Peacebuilders (United States)
- GreeneWorks (United States)
- Grupo Multidisciplinario para la Defensa de los derechos sexuales y reproductivos en Guatemala (Guatemala)
- Guttmacher Institute (United States)
- Habitat Mujer Salud (Colombia)
- Haiti Adolescent Girls Network (Haiti)
- Health, Ethics and Law Institute of Forum for Medical Ethics Society (India)
- Heartland Alliance International (United States)
- Hesperian Health Guides (United States)
- HIV Legal Network (Canada)
- Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF) (Uganda)
- INPPARES (Peru)
- International Action Network for Gender Equity & Law (IANGEL) (United States)
- International Campaign for Women's Right to Safe Abortion (United Kingdom/ Global)
- International Center for Research on Women (ICRW) (USA)
- International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (United Kingdom)
- International Planned Parenthood Federation East and South East Asia and Oceania Region (ESEAOR) (Malaysia)
- Ipas (United States)
- International Planned Parenthood Federation (Global)
- Irish Family Planning Association (Ireland)
- Israel Family Planning Association (Open Door) (Israel)
- Jamaica Family Planning Association (Jamaica)
- John Snow, Inc. (JSI) (United States)
- JOICFP (Japanese Organization for International Cooperation in Family Planning) (Japan)
- Kenya Legal & Ethical Issues Network On HIV & AIDS (Kenya)
- Kenya Medical Association (Kenya)
- Kisumu Medical and Education Trust (KMET) (Kenya)
- Kyetume Community Based Health Care Programme (Uganda)
- L'ASSOCIATION DJIBOUTIENNE POUR L'EQUILIBRE ET LA PROMOTION DE LA FAMILLE (Djibouti)
- Latin American and Caribbean Women's Health Network (Latin America and the Caribbean)
- Le Planning familial (France)
- LI PRIDE (Liberia)
- Lobi Health Center Foundation (Suriname)
- LUNA vzw (Belgium)
- Marie Stopes International (Global)
- MSI Reproductive Choices (United Kingdom)
- Mujer Y Salud en Uruguay - MYSU (Uruguay)
- Network for Adolescent and Youth of Africa (Kenya)
- Observatorio de la Gobernanza para la Cooperacion y el Desarrollo A.C. (Mexico)
- OutRight Action International (United States)
- Palestinian Family Planning and Protection Association (PFPPA) (Palestine)
- Pathfinder International (United States)
- Plan International (United Kingdom)
- Plan International USA (United States)
- Plan International, Inc (Global)
- Planned Parenthood Association of Ghana (Ghana)
- Planned Parenthood Association of Thailand (Thailand)
- Planned Parenthood Association of Zambia (Zambia)
- Planned Parenthood Federation of Nigeria (Nigeria)
- Planned Parenthood Global (Global)
- Profamilia (Colombia)
- Queensway Institute of Technology and Business Studies (Kenya)
- Raks Thai Foundation (Thailand)
- RAWSA MENA NETWORK (Tunisia - for the MENA region)
- Red de Salud de las Mujeres Latinoamericanas y del Caribe (Latin America and the Caribbean)
- Red Latinoamericana y Caribena de jovenes por los Derechos Sexuales y Derechos Reproductivos REDLAC (Mexico)
- REDAAS - Red de Acceso al Aborto Seguro Argentina (Argentina)
- Regional Centre for International Development Cooperation (RCIDC) (Uganda)
- Reproductive Health Network Kenya (Kenya)
- Reproductive Health Training Center/Regional SRHR Coalition for EECA (Moldova/ Eastern Europe and Central Asia Regions)
- RFSU (Sweden)
- RHAC (Cambodia)
- Rutgers (Netherlands)
- SANTE SEXUELLE SUISSE (Switzerland)
- SCI Foundation (United Kingdom)
- Sendas (Ecuador)
- Sensoa (Belgium)
- SERAC-Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
- Sex og Politikk (IPPF Norway) (Norway)
- SEXUL vs BARZA / SEX vs The STORK Association (Romania)
- SFBSP-BURUNDI (Burundi)
- Society for Conservation and Sustainability of Energy and Environment in Nigeria (SOCSEEN) (Nigeria)
- Solidarity Sisters Network of Liberia (SoSNoL) (Liberia, West Africa)
- Solomon Island Planned Parenthood Association (Solomon Islands)
- Somaliland Family Health Association (Somaliland)
- Soroptimist International (United Kingdom)
- Space Allies (Japan)
- Stichting EqualA Foundation (Netherlands/ Thailand)
- Stichting Ultimate Purpose (Suriname)
- Stop AIDS in Liberia (SAIL) (Liberia)
- SUDAN Family Planning Association (SFPA) (Sudan)
- Sukaar Welfare Organization (Pakistan)
- Support for Women in Agriculture and Environment (SWAGEN) (Uganda)
- Syrian Family Planning Association (Syria)
- TAN UX'IL (Guatemala)
- TDJ-BURUNDI (Burundi)
- Teens Link Uganda (Uganda)
- The African Women's Development and Communication Network (FEMNET) (Kenya)
- The Lebanese Association for Family Health- SALAMA (Lebanon)
- The Lesbian and Gay Association of Liberia (LEGAL) (Liberia)
- The Society for Education on Contraception and Sexuality from Romania (Romania)
- Together for Girls (United States)
- Trust for Indigenous Culture and health (TICAH) (Kenya)
- Universal Access Project (United States)
- Urgent Action Fund for Women's Human Rights (United States)
- Vidhayak Trust (India)
- WGNRR AFRICA (Tanzania)
- William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (USA)
- Women Deliver (USA)
- Women Enabled International (USA)
- Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR) (Philippines)
- Women's Link Worldwide (Global)
- Women's Major Group (Global)
- Women's Refugee Commission (USA)
- Women'S Way Foundation Suriname (Suriname)
- Woodhull Freedom Foundation (United States)
- Yemeni Association for Reproductive Health (Yemen)
- YouAct - European Youth Network on Sexual and Reproductive Rights (United Kingdom)
- Young Feminist Europe (Belgium)
- Youth Association for Development (Pakistan)
- Youth Coalition for Sexual and Reproductive Rights (YCSRR) (Canada)
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
'Insane This Is Legal': Bettors Make Huge Profits From Suspiciously Timed Wagers on Iran War
"Reminder that Donald Trump Jr. sits on Polymarket's advisory board and his firm invested double-digit millions into the platform last year."
Mar 01, 2026
Bettors on the prediction platform Polymarket made a killing with suspiciously timed wagers that the United States would attack Iran by February 28, the day President Donald Trump announced a bombing campaign against the Middle East nation.
Bloomberg reported that six accounts on Polymarket, all newly created this month, "made around $1 million in profit" by betting on the timing of the US attack on Iran. The accounts, according to Bloomberg, "had only ever placed bets on when US strikes might occur," and "some of their shares were purchased, in some cases at roughly a dime apiece, hours before the first explosions were reported in Tehran."
One account with the name Magamyman raked in over $515,000 by betting roughly $87,000 that the "US strikes Iran by February 28, 2026."
The lucrative bets quickly drew scrutiny from lawmakers. US Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) wrote on social media that "it’s insane this is legal."
"People around Trump are profiting off war and death," Murphy alleged. "I’m introducing legislation ASAP to ban this."
Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.) wrote that "prediction markets cannot be a vehicle for profiting off advance knowledge of military action" and demanded "answers, transparency, and oversight."
"Reminder that Donald Trump Jr. sits on Polymarket's advisory board and his firm invested double-digit millions into the platform last year," Levin wrote, referring to the president's eldest son. "The [Justice Department] and [Commodity Futures Trading Commission] both had active investigations into Polymarket that were dropped after Trump took office."
There's no concrete evidence that Trump administration officials or staffers were behind the hugely profitable bets, but the wagers heightened concerns about the possibility of insider trading using increasingly popular prediction market platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi. Last month, bettors used Polymarket to make big profits on suspiciously timed wagers on when the US would oust Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Polymarket currently allows users to bet on when Iran will have a new supreme leader, when the US and Iran will reach a ceasefire agreement, and when the US will invade Iran.
The celebrity news tabloid TMZ reported Saturday that "a group at a Washington, DC restaurant was talking openly in the bar area Friday afternoon about a national secret that was about to literally explode hours later—the bombing of Iran."
As journalist David Bernstein noted, that—if true—leaves open the possibility that "these 'insider' bets have been placed by any rich person with good ears in DC."
"Not to mention that for all we know these administration clowns were probably gossiping about it on a text chain with half a dozen people they accidentally invited," Bernstein added. "This is hardly the locked lips brigade we’re dealing with."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Experts Pillory Trump Case for War on Iran: 'Flimsiest Excuse for Initiating a Major Attack' in Decades
"What they posed as the threat they were trying to preempt—an attack by Iran against US forces—is so extremely implausible, it is also laughable," said one analyst.
Mar 01, 2026
Senior Trump administration officials attempted during a briefing with reporters on Saturday to make their case for the joint US-Israeli military assault on Iran that has so far killed hundreds and plunged the Middle East into chaos.
According to experts who listened to the briefing, which was conducted on background, the justification for war was incredibly weak. Daryl Kimball, president of the Arms Control Association, told Laura Rozen of the Diplomatic newsletter that the administration's argument was "the flimsiest excuse for initiating a major attack on another country without congressional authorization, in violation of the UN Charter, in many decades."
During his early Saturday remarks announcing the attacks, President Donald Trump claimed that "imminent threats from the Iranian regime" against "the American people" drove him to act. But Kimball said that administration officials "provided absolutely no evidence" to back that assertion during the briefing.
"What they posed as the threat they were trying to preempt—an attack by Iran against US forces—is so extremely implausible, it is also laughable," said Kimball.
Following the start of Saturday's assault, which Trump explicitly characterized as a war aimed at overthrowing the Iranian government, unnamed administration officials began leaking the claim that Trump feared an Iranian attack on the massive US military buildup in the Middle East, prompting him to greenlight the bombing campaign in coordination with Israel and with a nudge from Saudi Arabia.
Kimball, in a social media post, took members of the US media to task for echoing the administration's narrative. "Reporters need to do more than stenography," he wrote in response to Punchbowl's Jake Sherman.
"The American people were lied to about Iraq. The American people are being lied to again today—and once again, it is ordinary people who will pay the price."
Trump and top administration officials also repeated the longstanding claim from US warhawks that Iran is bent on developing a nuclear weapon, something Iranian leaders have publicly denied—including during recent diplomatic talks. Neither US intelligence assessments nor international nuclear watchdogs have produced evidence indicating that Iran is moving rapidly in the direction of nukes, as claimed by the administration.
Rozen noted that some remarks from administration officials during Saturday's briefing "suggested Trump’s negotiators"—a team that included Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff—"may not have had the expertise or experience to understand the Iranian proposal to curb its nuclear program." Rozen reported that one administration official kept misstating the acronym for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN nuclear watchdog.
Trump administration officials, according to Rozen, seemed astonished that Iranian negotiators would not accept the US offer to provide free nuclear fuel "forever" for Iran's peaceful energy development, viewing the rejection as a suspicious indication that Iran was opposed to a diplomatic resolution—even though, according to Oman's foreign minister, Iran had already made concessions that went well beyond the terms of the 2015 nuclear accord that Trump abandoned during his first stint in the White House.
Experts said it should be obvious—particularly given Trump's decision to ditch the previous nuclear accord—why Iran would not trust the US to stick by such a commitment.
The administration's inability to provide a coherent justification for war tracks with the rapidly shifting narrative preceding Saturday's strikes—an indication, according to some observers, that Trump had made the decision to attack Iran even in the face of diplomatic progress and left officials to try to cobble together a rationale after the fact.
In a lengthy social media post, Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth insisted war was necessary because Iran "refused to make a deal" and because the Iranian government "has targeted and killed Americans," hardly the claim of an imminent threat push by the president and other administration officials.
Brian Finucane, a senior adviser to the US Program at the International Crisis Group, noted in response that the Trump administration has "sidelined anyone who could articulate... a coherent argument, partly because expertise is deep state and woke and partly because they just don't care."
The result is another potentially catastrophic war that runs roughshod over US and international law, puts countless civilians at risk, and threatens to spark a region-wide conflict.
"President Trump, along with his right-wing extremist Israeli ally Benjamin Netanyahu, has begun an illegal, premeditated, and unconstitutional war," US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement on Saturday. "Tragically, Trump is gambling with American lives and treasure to fulfill Netanyahu's decades-long ambition of dragging the United States into armed conflict with Iran."
"The American people were lied to about Vietnam. The American people were lied to about Iraq," Sanders added. "The American people are being lied to again today—and once again, it is ordinary people who will pay the price."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Democratic Leaders Face Backlash Over 'Cowardly' Responses to Trump War on Iran
"As we plunge headlong into another catastrophic war, Sen. Schumer and Rep. Jeffries’ throat-clearing and process critique only serves Trump and the war machine."
Mar 01, 2026
The top Democrats in the US Congress, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, faced backlash on Saturday over what critics described as tepid, equivocal responses to President Donald Trump's illegal assault on Iran—and for slowwalking efforts to prevent the war before the bombing began.
While both Democratic leaders chided Trump for failing to seek congressional authorization and not adequately briefing lawmakers on the details of Saturday's attacks, neither offered a full-throated condemnation of a military assault that has killed hundreds so far, including dozens of children, and hurled the Middle East into chaos.
Schumer (D-NY)—who infamously worked to defeat the 2015 nuclear deal that Trump later abandoned during his first White House term, setting the stage for the current crisis—said he "implored" US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to "be straight with Congress and the American people about the objectives of these strikes and what comes next."
"Iran must never be allowed to attain a nuclear weapon," he added, "but the American people do not want another endless and costly war in the Middle East when there are so many problems at home."
Jeffries (D-NY), a beneficiary of AIPAC campaign cash, said in his response to the massive US-Israeli assault that "Iran is a bad actor and must be aggressively confronted for its human rights violations, nuclear ambitions, support of terrorism, and the threat it poses to our allies like Israel and Jordan in the region."
"The Trump administration must explain itself to the American people and Congress immediately, provide an ironclad justification for this act of war, clearly define the national security objective, and articulate a plan to avoid another costly, prolonged military quagmire in the Middle East," said Jeffries.
The Democratic leaders' responses bolstered the view that their objections to Trump's attack on Iran are based on procedure, not opposition to war.
This is a disgusting and cowardly statement handwringing about process and the need for a briefing.
No you idiot. This war is a horror and a disaster and must be directly opposed. Any Democrat who can’t say that needs to resign and ESPECIALLY the ones in leadership. https://t.co/CdZoEyNkOy
— Krystal Ball (@krystalball) February 28, 2026
Claire Valdez, a New York state assemblymember who is running for Congress, said that "as we plunge headlong into another catastrophic war, Sen. Schumer and Rep. Jeffries’ throat-clearing and process critique only serves Trump and the war machine."
"Democrats should speak clearly and with one voice: no war," Valdez added.
Schumer and Jeffries both committed to swiftly forcing votes on War Powers resolutions in their respective chambers. But reporting last week by Aída Chávez of Capital & Empire indicated that top Democrats worked behind the scenes to slow momentum behind the resolutions, helping ensure they did not come to a vote before Trump launched the war.
"The preferred outcome of many AIPAC-aligned Senate Democrats, according to a senior foreign policy aide to Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, is that Trump acts unilaterally, weakening Iran while absorbing the domestic backlash ahead of the midterms," Chávez wrote.
Neither Schumer nor Jeffries backed legislation last year aimed at forestalling US military intervention in Iran.
The top Democrats' responses to Saturday's US-Israeli attacks on Iran, which Trump said would continue "uninterrupted" even after the killing of the nation's supreme leader, contrasted sharply with statements of rank-and-file congressional Democrats—and even some members of leadership—who condemned the president for shredding the Constitution and driving the US into another deadly war that the American public opposes.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who has been floated as a possible 2028 challenger to Schumer, said Saturday that "the American people are once again dragged into a war they did not want by a president who does not care about the long-term consequences of his actions."
"This war is unlawful. It is unnecessary. And it will be catastrophic," said Ocasio-Cortez. "This is a deliberate choice of aggression when diplomacy and security were within reach. Stop lying to the American people. Violence begets violence. We learned this lesson in Iraq. We learned this lesson in Afghanistan. And we are about to learn it again in Iran. Bombs have yet to create enduring democracies in the region, and this will be no different."
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), a vice chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was more blunt.
"Congress must stop the bloodshed by immediately reconvening to exert its war powers and stop this deranged president," she said. "But let’s be clear: Warmongering politicians from both parties support this illegal war, and it will take a mass anti-war movement to stop it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


