October, 07 2020, 12:00am EDT
Advocacy Groups, Indigenous Leaders Critique Procter & Gamble's 'Our Home' Climate Initiative
Concerns over company’s destructive forestry and poor labor practices come as company executives face important shareholder vote on resolution calling for better sourcing.
WASHINGTON
On Wednesday, October 7, advocacy groups Stand.earth, NRDC, Friends of the Earth, Rainforest Action Network, David Suzuki Foundation, and Wildlands League, joined by youth activists, and Indigenous and frontline leaders from Canada and Southeast Asia hosted a global webcast that uncovered what P&G forgot to tell the world during the launch of its "Our Home" climate initiative -- exposing the ways Indigenous and frontline communities have been historically impacted by destructive forestry and poor labor practices in the boreal forest of Canada as well as tropical forests in Malaysia and Indonesia, and calling for Procter & Gamble to stop greenwashing and start taking responsible action.
A recording of the webinar is available at facebook.com/standearth.
This important webinar could not be more perfectly timed, as Procter & Gamble executives face mounting pressure from green investor groups to implement better forest sourcing practices, including a shareholder resolution (page 78) that will be voted on at the company's upcoming shareholder meeting on Tuesday, October 13. See what activists are planning on the ground at P&G's HQ in Cincinnati, Ohio, in the week leading up to the annual meeting.
Procter & Gamble is one of the largest companies in the world. Unfortunately, the company causes significant harm to climate-critical forests, endangered species, and Indigenous and frontline communities for the products we all use -- like toilet paper, soap, and beauty products. When launching its "Our Home" climate initiative earlier this year to become "carbon neutral" in its direct operations, Procter & Gamble conveniently downplayed the massive impacts it has on the places it sources its fiber and palm oil, focusing instead on funding flashy projects like restoring mangroves and planting trees.
In Canada, Procter & Gamble's flagship brands like Charmin toilet paper and Bounty paper towels are driving the loss and fragmentation of the boreal forest -- a climate-critical ecosystem known as the "Amazon of the north" that stores more carbon per hectare than just about any other forest on Earth.
Despite pressure from environmental advocates and Indigenous communities, Procter & Gamble has continually failed to set time-bound goals to stop sourcing from Canadian suppliers that fail to meet federal habitat 65% intactness guidelines established to advance the survival of caribou -- a threatened species. The company turned a blind eye when caribou, an important species that indicates the broader health of the boreal forest, were listed as threatened due to habitat loss and fragmentation. The company is also failing to require its suppliers to adhere to the principles of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent when sourcing from traditional territories of First Nations.
Representing the critical perspective of Indigenous peoples living in the boreal forest, Joe Fobister of Asubpeeschoseewagong (Grassy Narrows) First Nation in Ontario, Canada said: "Procter & Gamble needs to require its suppliers to uphold Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) when operating in Indigenous territories wherever the operate." Grassy Narrows First Nation used tribal sovereignty to successfully implement a resource extraction ban on their lands.
"I'm astonished that we're still witnessing ancient and intact ecosystems and threatened species habitat in the traditional territories of many First Nations -- areas of the boreal forest in Canada that have never been industrial logged -- get logged for Procter & Gamble products like Bounty and Charmin," said Tzeporah Berman, International Program Director at Stand.earth.
"Procter & Gamble makes its tissue products entirely from virgin forest fiber, including a significant portion from Canada's boreal forest. Its actions create reputational, regulatory, and operational risk. Procter & Gamble has the resources and the responsibility to change its practices, and the company should do so as quickly as possible for the sake of our forests, our communities, and our planet," said Shelley Vinyard, Boreal Corporate Campaign Manager at NRDC.
"Canada doesn't know it, but it has a deforestation problem. We have exposed a massive and ignored footprint of industrial logging on Ontario's public lands. These are vast areas of treeless, barren logging scars that are persisting for decades in the boreal forest. We need to restore these logging scars and companies like Procter & Gamble need to step up and demand the same from their suppliers," said Dave Pearce, Forest Conservation Manager at Wildlands League.
"The primary cause of boreal caribou decline is habitat loss and degradation, primarily at the hands of industrial activities -- things like logging roads and clear cuts. In 2012, the federal government directed provinces to maintain or restore a minimum 65% of undisturbed habitat in each range. But industry rallied to fight back against the requirement, copying the tactics of climate change deniers," said Rachel Plotkin, Ontario Science Campaigns Manager at David Suzuki Foundation.
Speaking both virtually and from Cincinnati, Ohio, where activists are leading a multi-day vigil to highlight Procter & Gamble's bad behavior and encourage a "yes" vote on the shareholder resolution, local community leaders and youth forest advocates chimed in to the webinar with powerful messages:
"Procter & Gamble's actions in Canada are impacting not just the people who are local there, and not just those of us who are in Cincinnati, but it has a ripple effect throughout the entire world. We have learned what happens when we ignore science, and when people put greed and profit over care for our earth and the people in the world. Climate change and a loss of biodiversity are a threat to our future, and addressing them is a moral and spiritual imperative," said Rev. Nelson Pierce Jr of Beloved Community Church in Cincinnati, Ohio.
"If I want to have any shot at having a future, I need to be here, in P&G's house every single day, until they decide to stop flushing our forests, until they decide to respect Indigenous sovereignty, until they decide to get critical caribou habitat out of their supply chains," said Yousuf Munir of the Young Activists Coalition in Cincinnati, Ohio.
"I have a stake in the decisions that this company makes. We have a responsibility because Procter & Gamble is right here in our backyard. In a world that often makes us feel powerless, where corporations like Procter & Gamble loot Indigenous land and take the resources and leave a path of destruction behind them, we have been left with two choices: Either we give up entirely and walk in defeat, or we fight like hell to protect our people and our planet," said Jen Mendoza, a Cincinnati community activist and Forest Campaigner at Stand.earth.
"Procter & Gamble's direct operations directly impact vulnerable communities like Indigenous communities, not to mention their disastrous impacts on wildlife and other ecosystems. It really makes you wonder...why does Procter & Gamble continue to harm the environment? I understand the importance of climate-critical ecosystems like the boreal forest, because my generation is going to have to solve climate change," said Trison Braithwaite, a youth activist and YouTube star.
In Indonesia and Malaysia, Procter & Gamble brands including Ivory soap and Oil of Olay can be linked to palm oil suppliers that are known to be actively causing or contributing to deforestation and human rights violations in their commodity production or processing operations. Earlier this month, an Associated Press investigation revealed that P&G sources from palm oil suppliers who use forced labor and other horrific labor practices in Malaysia.
"It's not just the climate and biodiversity that's at risk. What we're seeing is that frontline and Indigenous communities are also being truly hurt by Procter & Gamble's unsustainable and unjust sourcing policies," said Brihannala Morgan, Senior Forest Campaigner at RAN.
"Broad tariff enforcement and blocking the import of controversial palm oil is only the first step to ending forced labor. We need binding agreements that include buyers, suppliers, and worker organizations. Voluntary promises by companies to stop forced labor in their supply chains -- which are not enforceable and are sometimes called 'corporate social responsibility' -- does not work," said Esmeralda Lopez, Legal and Policy Director at Global Labor Justice-International Labor Rights Forum.
"In order to be able to clear massive areas of primary forest for their plantations, companies need to first get control over the land. How do they do that? Through what we call land grabbing -- establishing false permits and committing direct acts of violence against the communities," Jeff Conant, Senior International Forests Program Manager at Friends of the Earth U.S.
"Astra Agro Lestari has never shown proof that it has a legal permit to use our land. My message to the company is: Even though you direct thousands of terrors at us, and send court summons against us repeatedly, we are not afraid," said Hemsi, a farmer in central Sulawesi, Indonesia who has been arrested numerous times for defending his community's land. Astra Agro Lestari is a primary supplier of palm oil to P&G.
"Right now we are doing advocacy in regard to the corruption and pollution by a subsidiary of Golden Agri Resources, whose palm oil is bought by Procter & Gamble. We call on P&G to stop buying palm oil from GAR. We also call onProcter & Gamble to urge Golden Agri Resources to stop deforestation, land grabbing, and environmental pollution in Indonesia," said Dimas Harton the Executive Director of Walhi Central Kalimantan in Indonesia.
Stand.earth (formerly ForestEthics) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with offices in Canada and the United States that is known for its groundbreaking research and successful corporate and citizens engagement campaigns to create new policies and industry standards in protecting forests, advocating the rights of indigenous peoples, and protecting the climate. Visit us at
LATEST NEWS
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'One Step Closer': Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
"With a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever," one state campaigner said of a November ballot measure.
Apr 24, 2024
Three Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday joined with Democrats to advance legislation that would repeal an 1864 ban on abortion—a development rights advocates welcomed while stressing that the fight is far from over.
The 32-28 vote on House Bill 2677—with GOP Reps. Tim Dunn (25), Matt Gress (4), and Justin Wilmeth (2) voting in favor—was the third attempt in as many weeks to pass repeal legislation since the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the ban.
"The state Senate could vote on the repeal as early as next Wednesday, after the bill comes on the floor for a 'third reading,' as is required under chamber rules," according toNBC News. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday toldThe Washington Post that "I am hopeful the Senate does the right thing and sends it to my desk so I can sign it."
Applauding the House passage of H.B. 2677, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona president and CEO Angela Florez said that "today, Arizona is one step closer to repealing the state's Civil War-era total abortion ban. While the repeal still must pass the Senate, this is a major win for reproductive freedom."
"We must celebrate today's vote in support of abortion rights and harness our enthusiasm to spread the word and urge lawmakers in the Senate to support this necessary repeal bill," she continued. "Despite this step forward, Arizonans cannot stop fighting."
Florez noted that "even with the repeal of the Civil War-era ban, the state will still have a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that denies people access to critical care. And lawmakers continue to attack Arizonans' ability to access reproductive healthcare. Our right to control our bodies and lives is hanging on by a thread."
"Thankfully, voters will have the opportunity to take back control if the Arizona Abortion Access Act is on the ballot this November," she added. "Abortion bans are out-of-step with the will of Arizonans and will force pregnant people to leave their communities for essential healthcare. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona will continue fighting to ensure everyone has the right to make decisions about their health and futures."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prevent many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient.
The coalition supporting the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access, highlighted on social media that the House-approved bill "did not include the emergency clause required to stop the 1864 ban from taking effect on June 8," meaning H.B. 2677 wouldn't apply until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.
Coalition campaign manager Cheryl Bruce said that "with a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever. We remain committed to taking these decisions out of the hands of extremist politicians."
Arizona is one of multiple states where rights advocates are promoting abortion rights ballot measures this cycle. Reproductive freedom is also dominating political races at all levels, including the presidential contest. Democratic President Joe Biden is set to face former Republican President Donald Trump in November.
"Donald Trump is responsible for Arizona's abortion ban. Women in the state are still living under a ban with no exceptions for rape or incest and have been stripped of the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions," said Julie Chávez Rodriguez, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' reelection campaign manager.
While the presumptive GOP nominee has tried to distance himself from the Arizona Supreme Court's reinstatement of a 160-year-old abortion ban, he has also campaigned on his three appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped reverse Roe v. Wade.
"Trump brags that he is 'proudly' the person responsible for these bans and if he retakes power, the chaos and cruelty he has created will only get worse in all 50 states," Chávez Rodriguez said. "President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only candidates who will stop him."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Dodges Growing Calls for Probe of Mass Graves at Gaza Hospitals
"Somehow I don't think the U.S. State Department would defer to Russia as a credible source to investigate itself if a mass grave were discovered in Ukrainian territory it had occupied," said one legal expert.
Apr 24, 2024
While continuing to give Israel billions of dollars in support to wage war on the Gaza Strip, the Biden administration this week has declined to join the growing global demands for an international probe into mass graves discovered at hospitals in the besieged Palestinian enclave.
Two journalists on Tuesday questioned Vedant Patel, a spokesperson for the U.S. State Department, about the administration's response to the hundreds of bodies found at Gaza City's al-Shifa Hospital and Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis as well as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk's call for an independent investigation.
"Would you support such an independent investigation?" Said Arikat asked during a press briefing. Patel responded, "Right now, Said, we are asking for more information... That is squarely where we are leaving the conversation."
Patel added that "I don't have any details to match, confirm, or offer as it relates to that. We're aware of those reports, and we have asked the government of Israel for additional clarity and information. And that's where I'm at."
When Said asked a follow-up about potential U.S. support for a probe, Patel reiterated that the administration is awaiting information from the Israeli government.
Later, Niall Stanage asked Patel to explain U.S. "resistance" to supporting a probe, the spokesperson insisted that "it's not about resistance to this particular situation, it is me not wanting to speak in detail about something which Said posed as a hypothetical question when, from the United States' perspective, I don't have any additional information on this aside from the public reporting."
After Patel again stressed that the administration has asked Israel for more information, Stanage inquired, "And do you believe the government of Israel is a credible source in enlightening you?"
The spokesperson interrupted Stanage to say, "We do."
While supporting the six-month Israeli assault on Gaza that the International Court of Justice has found to be plausibly genocidal, the Biden administration is also arming Ukrainians' resistance to a Russian invasion. Brian Finucane, a senior adviser for the Crisis Group's U.S. program and a former legal adviser at the State Department, pointed to the latter.
"Somehow I don't think the U.S. State Department would defer to Russia as a credible source to investigate itself if a mass grave were discovered in Ukrainian territory it had occupied," Finucane said on social media in response to Stanage's questioning.
Meanwhile, European Union spokesperson Peter Stano made clear Tuesday that the E.U. supports an independent probe.
"This is something that forces us to call for an independent investigation of all the suspicions and all the circumstances, because indeed it creates the impression that there might have been violations of international human rights committed," Stano said. "That's why it's important to have independent investigation and to ensure accountability."
Human rights groups around the world joined the call for an independent investigation on Wednesday, as the official death toll in Gaza hit 34,262 with 77,229 people injured and thousands more missing and presumed dead beneath the rubble.
In an Arabic statement translated by Al Jazeera, the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor said that the number of bodies found in the mass graves is "alarming, and requires urgent international action, including the formation of an independent international investigation committee."
The group added that some of those killed were subjected to "premeditated murder as well as arbitrary and extrajudicial executions while they were detained and handcuffed."
Amnesty International senior director of research, advocacy, policy, and campaigns Erika Guevara Rosas said in a statement that "the harrowing discovery of these mass graves underscores the urgency of ensuring immediate access for human rights investigators, including forensic experts, to the occupied Gaza Strip to ensure that evidence is preserved and to carry out independent and transparent investigations with the aim of guaranteeing accountability for any violations of international law."
"Lack of access for human rights investigators to Gaza has hampered effective investigations into the full scale of the human rights violations and crimes under international law committed over the past six months, allowing for the documentation of just a tiny fraction of these abuses," she noted. "Without proper investigations to determine how these deaths took place or what violations may have been committed, we may never find out the truth of the horrors behind these mass graves."
Guevara Rosas continued:
Mass grave sites are potential crime scenes offering vital and time-sensitive forensic evidence; they must be protected until professional forensic experts with the necessary skills and resources can safely carry out adequate exhumations and accurate identification of remains.
The absence of forensic experts and the decimation of Gaza's medical sector as a result of the war and Israel's cruel blockade, along with the lack of availability of the necessary resources for the identification of bodies such as DNA testing, are huge obstacles to the identifications of remains. This denies those killed the opportunity to have a dignified burial and deprives families with relatives missing or forcibly disappeared the right to know and to justice—leaving them in a limbo of uncertainty and anguish.
Noting that the International Court of Justice directed Israel to preserve evidence in its initial genocide case order, Guevara Rosas said that "amid a total vacuum of accountability and mounting evidence of war crimes in Gaza, Israeli authorities must ensure they comply with the ICJ ruling by granting immediate access to independent human rights investigators and ensuring that all evidence of violations is preserved."
"Third states must pressure Israel to comply with the ICJ orders by allowing the immediate entry into the Gaza Strip of independent human rights investigators and forensic experts, including the U.N.-appointed Commission of Inquiry and investigators of the International Criminal Court," she added. "There can be no truth and justice without proper, transparent independent investigations into these deaths."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular