

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Ben Bienstock, browndivest@gmail.com, +1(917)304-0206, Tal Frieden, tal.frieden@gmail.com, +1(315)480-3976
On December 2nd, 2019, the Advisory Committee on Corporate Responsibility in Investment Policies (ACCRIP) at Brown University voted in favor of divestment from companies "facilitating human rights violations in Palestine." The committee voted six in favor, with two alumni voting no, and one abstaining from the vote.
The vote comes after eight months of deliberation, starting in April 2019, when 69% of student voters in a Brown undergraduate referendum voted in favor of the same motion. Following a statement by the Brown University president criticizing the referendum, over 100 faculty members authored a letter in favor of the student referendum. Since then, members of the Brown Divest student coalition have presented their case to ACCRIP on multiple occasions, as have Brown Students for Israel. Brown Divest is a coalition of student groups including Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine, as well as other groups.
Brown Divest states: "We are elated that the University committee responsible for divestment has finally joined the calls for divestment from human rights violations in Palestine. Today, ACCRIP made Brown the first Ivy League University to officially call for divestment from companies that are facilitating the Occupation and its human rights abuses in the West Bank and Gaza. We look forward to other universities joining the movement for dignity and human rights for Palestinians.
"Going forward, the Brown community expects the Brown Corporation to divest from companies facilitating human rights violations in Palestine, as demanded by Brown students, who voted for the University to divest, as has ACCRIP, the committee responsible for recommending University divestment."
One member of Brown University Divest said: "As a Palestinian student at Brown, I can't feel comfortable on this campus knowing that my university is literally profiting off the suffering of my family. When Brown invests in companies that provide materials that help demolish their houses and promote an apartheid regime against them, I cannot be silent about this. I cannot be complicit in the suffering of my very own family."
Tal Frieden, another member of Jewish Voice for Peace and Brown University Divest, said: "As Jews, as US citizens, as Brown students, and as people of conscience, it is our responsibility to speak up for Palestinian human rights and to denounce complicity in Palestinian suffering. We will continue to hold the University accountable to this vote."
Background:
On December 2nd, nine members of ACCRIP met at Brown University and heard presentations from faculty opposed to divestment, as well as those in favor. After the presentations, a motion was put forth to vote on whether the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories constitutes social harm. Seven members voted yes, while two alumni abstained. At the end of the meeting, members of the committee motioned to vote on the following language:
"We recommend that the Brown Corporation exclude from Brown's direct investments, and require Brown's separate account investment managers to exclude from their direct investments, companies identified as facilitating human rights violations in Palestine. In addition, the Investment Office will share with all investment managers the University's desire to adhere to this investment philosophy. We recommend that the Corporation and Brown's separate account investment managers maintain the withdrawal of investments from said companies until they cease to engage in social harm"
For the final vote on divestment, six members voted in favor, two opposed, and one abstained. Companies that have been identified for divestment based on their involvement in social harm in Palestine include Caterpillar, Hewlett-Packard, Oaktree Capital Management, AB Volvo, Motorola, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, United Technologies, and G4S.
Jewish Voice for Peace is a national, grassroots organization inspired by Jewish tradition to work for a just and lasting peace according to principles of human rights, equality, and international law for all the people of Israel and Palestine. JVP has over 200,000 online supporters, over 70 chapters, a youth wing, a Rabbinic Council, an Artist Council, an Academic Advisory Council, and an Advisory Board made up of leading U.S. intellectuals and artists.
(510) 465-1777Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth attacked reporters who publish stories based on leaks as "incredibly irresponsible and unpatriotic."
Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth lobbed his latest threat against the American press during a briefing on Friday, telling reporters to "think twice" about publishing stories containing classified information—a common journalistic practice that has brought to light mass surveillance, war crimes, and other government abuses.
Hegseth said Friday that the Pentagon takes "leaking very seriously here" and blasted reporting based on leaks containing classified information as "incredibly irresponsible and unpatriotic." He went on to "encourage members of the press to think twice about the lives they're affecting when they publish things in their publications like the New York Times."
Q: I’m with O'Keefe media group. Earlier this week, James O'Keefe published a story on a department of army nuclear chief who revealed top secret national security information to a stranger he met on a dating app. Will you defer him for termination and prosecution?
Hegseth: He… pic.twitter.com/P9o6cweW2i
— Acyn (@Acyn) April 24, 2026
Hegseth's Pentagon—and the Trump administration more broadly—has been aggressive in attempting to curtail press freedoms, particularly amid the US war of choice in Iran. President Donald Trump said earlier this month that his administration would attempt to jail journalists who reported leaked information pertaining to a US fighter jet recently shot down in Iran.
Last month, the Pentagon temporarily barred press photographers from media briefings on the war because Hegseth's staff was reportedly displeased with "unflattering" pictures of the Pentagon chief.
The Pentagon has also attempted to force journalists to promise not to publish or even solicit information that the department has not specifically authorized for release—with violators forced to surrender their press passes. A federal judge has blocked that policy and rebuked the Pentagon earlier this month for attempting to reimpose the policy with insubstantial changes.
Seth Stern, chief of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, noted in a recent column for The Intercept that "the Pentagon’s legal filings imply that reporters who don’t follow the rules risk more than their press passes."
"The government argued that although journalists may lawfully ask questions of 'authorized' Pentagon personnel, 'a journalist does solicit the commission of a criminal act, and that solicitation is not protected by the First Amendment, when he or she solicits … non-public information from individuals who are legally obligated not to disclose that information,'" Stern wrote. "The government’s argument would have turned countless Pulitzer-winning national security reporters into criminals."
"The Trump administration is barging through the door the Biden administration left wide open, when, despite warnings from First Amendment advocates, it extracted a plea deal from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Espionage Act charges for obtaining and publishing government records, including about Iraq war crimes," Stern added.
"Gas prices are skyrocketing because of Trump's war," said the Democratic House whip. "If just a few Republicans are willing to choose the American people over Trump, we can stop this reckless war today."
With the national average price for a gallon of gasoline sitting at $4.059 on Friday, a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that fuel costs "are a very big concern" for 78% of Americans, and 77% blame President Donald Trump for the recent price spikes.
Fossil fuel prices worldwide have soared since Trump and Israel launched an illegal war on Iran in February, and the Iranian government responded by restricting traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a key trade route, particularly for oil and liquefied natural gas.
Among the 3,577 registered voters polled by Reuters/Ipsos last week and early this week, 82% of Democrats, 79% of Independents, and 73% of Republicans said fuel prices are a major concern. Although there's some disagreement when it comes to blame, clear majorities—95% of Democrats, 82% of Independents, and 55% of Republicans—point the finger at the president.
An overall majority, 58%, also said they would be "less likely" to vote for a candidate who supports Trump's approach to the Iran war in the November midterm elections—in which Democrats hope to seize control of the US Senate and House of Representatives. That included 90% of Democrats, 68% of Independents, and 19% of Republicans.
According to Reuters, Sarah Chamberlain, a strategist and president of the Republican Main Street Partnership, which advocates for conservative lawmakers, acknowledged that the war is turning into a liability for the party.
"Right now, it's bad. People are upset," Chamberlain said. "Republicans are obviously very concerned about maintaining the House, but if we can get through the Iran situation by summertime and gas prices drop back down, or at least go down maybe not to quite the level they were prior to the war, then I think we have a really good shot."
As AAA explained Thursday: "Drivers are getting a bit of relief at the pump as the national average went down by 6 cents since last week to $4.03. Crude oil prices have come down below $100/barrel, helping drive down the cost of gasoline for consumers. But how long the downward trend will last is uncertain with continued instability along the Strait of Hormuz."
After Trump announced earlier this month that he'd agreed to a ceasefire with Iran, which has since been extended, the international climate group 350.org warned that "'fossilflation'—or inflation caused by volatile and rising prices of oil and gas—is still likely to continue," due to the fragility of the deal and extensively damaged infrastructure in the waterway.
Trump has repeatedly dismissed consumer concerns about fuel costs—but also suggested that his own energy secretary, former fracking executive Chris Wright, was wrong that gas prices may not drop below $3 per gallon until next year. He's also continued a blockade of Iranian ports during the ceasefire and claimed Thursday that the United States has "total control over the Strait of Hormuz. No ship can enter or leave without the approval of the United States Navy. It is 'Sealed up Tight.'"
However, that claim notably came after Iran seized two container ships in the strait on Wednesday, and The Washington Post reported that during a classified briefing for members of the House Armed Services Committee on Tuesday, a Pentagon official said that it could take six months to fully clear the waterway of the Iranian military's mines.
"Gas prices are skyrocketing because of Trump's war," House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) said on social media Thursday. "After weeks of lies and broken promises, the GOP still has no exit plan or strategy. If just a few Republicans are willing to choose the American people over Trump, we can stop this reckless war today."
There have been three failed votes on war powers resolutions aimed at ending Trump's Iran war in the House, and five in the Senate. Three Congressional Progressive Caucus members—Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.)—separately introduced more resolutions this week. Khanna explained that he introduced the bill in coordination with the CPC "just so that we can continue to have options to have votes."
Hegseth once again chided US allies for not getting involved in the war, which has created severe shortage of jet fuel and forced European airlines to enact mass flight cancelations.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Friday once again suggested the international community should show gratitude for President Donald Trump's illegal war with Iran, which has led to a global oil supply shock and created the potential for food shortages in the coming months.
Speaking with reporters at the Pentagon, Hegseth defended the president's decision to launch a war of choice with Iran that so far has cost US taxpayers an estimated $60 billion.
"It's a bold and dangerous mission," said Hegseth. "A gift to the world. Historic. Courtesy of a bold and historic president."
Hegseth: "It's a bold and dangerous mission. A gift to the world. Historic. Courtesy of a bold and historic president." pic.twitter.com/AR0zs6Djd4
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 24, 2026
Hegseth also chided US allies for not getting involved in the war, which Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched in late February without any consultation or coordination with Europe.
"America and the free world deserve allies who are capable, who are loyal, and who understand being an ally is not a one-way street," he said. "We are not counting on Europe, but they need the Strait of Hormuz much more than we do, and might want to start doing less talking and having less fancy conferences in Europe, and get in a boat. This is much more their fight than ours."
Hegseth: "We are not counting on Europe, but they need the Strait of Hormuz much more than we do, and might want to start doing less talking and having less fancy conferences in Europe and get in a boat. This is much more their fight than ours." pic.twitter.com/OUnt3n9TfV
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 24, 2026
In reality, there is little reason for the world to feel gratitude to the US and Israel for the war.
As reported by Barron's on Friday, the war has created a global shortage of jet fuel that has led to airlines canceling flights, with Europe being particularly hard hit.
German airline Lufthansa, for instance, has announced it's cutting 20,000 flights through October, and even US airlines such as Delta have been announcing cuts to save money thanks to the increase in jet fuel prices.
South China Morning Post reported on Wednesday that Asian nations are bracing for food shortages, as the Iran War has led to a shortage of fertilizer for crops during the planting season throughout much of the world.
In addition to citing the effects of the Iran War on global food supplies, the South China Morning Post pointed to scientists' warnings of a "super El Niño" that could lead to lower than average rainfall.
“It is very concerning because this year is supposed to be a super El Niño, and you are getting into the planting season,” Gnanasekar Thiagarajan, founder of India-based financial research and advisory firm Commtrendz Research, told South China Morning Post. "This is going to be widespread across South and Southeast Asia. There will be dryness everywhere."
Jorge Moreira da Silva, executive director of the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS), warned on Tuesday that there is a real risk of a global food crisis if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed to shipments of fertilizer.
“The planting season has already started, and in most countries in Africa it will end in May," the UN official explained. "So, if we don’t get some solution immediately, the crisis will be very significant and severe, particularly for the poorest countries and for the poorest citizens."