For Immediate Release
Reynolds Graves, Lawyers’ Committee, RGraves@LawyersCommittee.org, 202-662-8375
Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Responds to Supreme Court Argument Regarding 2020 Census
WASHINGTON - Today the United States Supreme Court heard 90 minutes of argument in one of the current term’s most consequential cases, Department of Commerce v. New York, et al, a challenge to the Trump administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. Following the argument, Kristen Clarke President and Executive Director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, released the following statement:
“The argument made clear that Secretary Wilbur Ross’s decision to add the citizenship question defies science, evidence and data. The judicial and administrative record in this case demonstrates that the citizenship question would result in a significant undercount among communities of color. Overwhelming evidence was laid to bare for the justices demonstrating that facilitating enforcement of the Voting Rights Act was a mere pretextual justification for action that would otherwise jeopardize the ability to capture a fair and accurate count of the population. As Justice Sotomayor observed, this was a 'solution in search of a problem."
Clarke continued, “In many respects, the Court’s ruling in this case may also shape the legacy of the Roberts Court for years to come. While some justices stretched to find reasons outside the record to preserve the citizenship question, with 2 justices going so far as to reference the practice of other countries, any faithful examination of the record in this case could lead to only one reasonable conclusion -- the question must be struck."
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Never Miss a Beat.
Get our best delivered to your inbox.
The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law secured a favorable ruling from a federal district court in California that found the citizenship question both unlawful and unconstitutional. The lawsuit was on behalf of the City of San Jose and the Black Alliance for Just Immigration. The Lawyers’ Committee filed an amicus brief on April 17, 2018, that argued that the citizenship question violated the Enumeration Clause of the United States Constitution and the Administrative Procedures Act. You can read the amicus brief here.
The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, was formed in 1963 at the request of President John F. Kennedy to involve the private bar in providing legal services to address racial discrimination. Now in its 56th year, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is continuing its quest to “Move America Toward Justice.” The principal mission of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is to secure, through the rule of law, equal justice for all, particularly in the areas of criminal justice, fair housing and community development, economic justice, educational opportunities, and voting rights.
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.
Please select a donation method:
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, was formed in 1963 at the request of President John F. Kennedy to involve the private bar in providing legal services to address racial discrimination. The principal mission of the Lawyers' Committee is to secure, through the rule of law, equal justice under law.