June, 03 2013, 11:35am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
INTERNATIONAL
SOCFIN Agricultural Company Sierra Leone Ltd. (SAC), a subsidiary of SOCFIN, (Societe Financiere des Caoutchoucs), a Luxembourg-registered company controlled by the prominent
In May 2011, Green Scenery released a report on SAC's oil palm project in Sierra Leone, which highlighted inadequate compensation, corruption, and pressure on land owners and chiefs to sign agreements to give up their land.1
Earlier in 2011, SAC signed a 50-year lease with the Sierra Leonean government for 6,500 hectares (ha) on land used by more than 9,000 farmers in 24 villages in Pujehun District. The deal gave SAC an option to expand the leased area by an additional 5,000 ha.
The company responded by filing suit for defamation (known as a SLAPP suit) against the NGO and its Executive Director, Joseph Rahall, asking a Sierra Leonean court to order them to apologize, pay damages, and to stop publishing information that the company may consider defamatory. Yet, Green Scenery's report is consistent with the formal grievances filed by local communities opposed to the forceful takeover of their land and the destruction of their crops and forests by SOCFIN.2 In December 2012, 101 members of landholding families from 36 villages called on the national Human Rights Commission, civil society organizations, and the United Nations to support their struggle against the company.3
The allegations have also been corroborated by independent assessments on the ground conducted by several international organizations, including the Oakland Institute in February 20124] and Welthungerhilfe in May 2012.5
"Bollore and Fabri are using a defamation suit to silence local opposition and to intimidate an NGO whose only crime is to defend the basic rights of local farmers whose land is being taken away." says Frederic Mousseau of the Oakland Institute.
"Similar practices by SOCFIN subsidiaries have been reported in recent years in Liberia, Cameroon, and Cambodia,6 where Bollore or SOCFIN have used the threat of legal action against NGOs and the media to silence criticism," says Devlin Kuyek of GRAIN.
As organizations committed to defending basic human rights and promoting sustainable agriculture, we are as much concerned about the threat that SOCFIN's project poses to Sierra Leone's farmers as we are about the threat that intimidation maneuvers pose to the work of independent civil society organizations and, through them, democracy. This is why we are standing by Green Scenery.
Signed:
Oakland Institute (USA)
GRAIN (International)
Foi & Justice (Cameroon)
SHERPA (France)
Peuples Solidaires (France)
11.11.11 (Belgium)
Centre national de cooperation au developpement-11.11.11 (Belgium)
Action Solidarite Tiers Monde (Luxembourg)
SWISSAID (Switzerland)
Pain pour le prochain (Switzerland)
L'Autre Syndicat (Switzerland)
Plateforme pour une agriculture socialement durable (Switzerland)
Media contacts:
Sierra Leone:
Joseph Rahall, Green Scenery
+232 22 226 216 / +232 76 601 979
j.rahall@greenscenery.org
USA:
Frederic Mousseau, Oakland Institute
+1 510 512 54 58 / +33 6 78 58 51 03
fmousseau@oaklandinstitute.org
Indonesia:
Devlin Kuyek, GRAIN
+62 81 281 483 770
devlin@grain.org
Belgium:
Stephane Desgain, CNCD-11.11.11
+32 2 250 12 64 / +32 475 76 90 61
Stephane.Desgain@cncd.be
France:
Marie-Laure Guislain, SHERPA
+ 33 (0) 1 42 21 33 25
marie-laure.guislain@asso-sherpa.org
Luxembourg:
Marc Keup, Action Solidarite Tiers Monde
+352 400 427 20
marc.keup@astm.lu
Switzerland:
Yvan Maillard, Pain pour le prochain
+41(0)79 267 01 09
maillard@bfa-ppp.ch
LATEST NEWS
Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage
Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.
“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”
The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law - the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.
Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River.
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont
(Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)
Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Most Popular