SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
Contact:
INTERNATIONAL
SOCFIN Agricultural Company Sierra Leone Ltd. (SAC), a subsidiary of SOCFIN, (Societe Financiere des Caoutchoucs), a Luxembourg-registered company controlled by the prominent
In May 2011, Green Scenery released a report on SAC's oil palm project in Sierra Leone, which highlighted inadequate compensation, corruption, and pressure on land owners and chiefs to sign agreements to give up their land.1
Earlier in 2011, SAC signed a 50-year lease with the Sierra Leonean government for 6,500 hectares (ha) on land used by more than 9,000 farmers in 24 villages in Pujehun District. The deal gave SAC an option to expand the leased area by an additional 5,000 ha.
The company responded by filing suit for defamation (known as a SLAPP suit) against the NGO and its Executive Director, Joseph Rahall, asking a Sierra Leonean court to order them to apologize, pay damages, and to stop publishing information that the company may consider defamatory. Yet, Green Scenery's report is consistent with the formal grievances filed by local communities opposed to the forceful takeover of their land and the destruction of their crops and forests by SOCFIN.2 In December 2012, 101 members of landholding families from 36 villages called on the national Human Rights Commission, civil society organizations, and the United Nations to support their struggle against the company.3
The allegations have also been corroborated by independent assessments on the ground conducted by several international organizations, including the Oakland Institute in February 20124] and Welthungerhilfe in May 2012.5
"Bollore and Fabri are using a defamation suit to silence local opposition and to intimidate an NGO whose only crime is to defend the basic rights of local farmers whose land is being taken away." says Frederic Mousseau of the Oakland Institute.
"Similar practices by SOCFIN subsidiaries have been reported in recent years in Liberia, Cameroon, and Cambodia,6 where Bollore or SOCFIN have used the threat of legal action against NGOs and the media to silence criticism," says Devlin Kuyek of GRAIN.
As organizations committed to defending basic human rights and promoting sustainable agriculture, we are as much concerned about the threat that SOCFIN's project poses to Sierra Leone's farmers as we are about the threat that intimidation maneuvers pose to the work of independent civil society organizations and, through them, democracy. This is why we are standing by Green Scenery.
Signed:
Oakland Institute (USA)
GRAIN (International)
Foi & Justice (Cameroon)
SHERPA (France)
Peuples Solidaires (France)
11.11.11 (Belgium)
Centre national de cooperation au developpement-11.11.11 (Belgium)
Action Solidarite Tiers Monde (Luxembourg)
SWISSAID (Switzerland)
Pain pour le prochain (Switzerland)
L'Autre Syndicat (Switzerland)
Plateforme pour une agriculture socialement durable (Switzerland)
Media contacts:
Sierra Leone:
Joseph Rahall, Green Scenery
+232 22 226 216 / +232 76 601 979
j.rahall@greenscenery.org
USA:
Frederic Mousseau, Oakland Institute
+1 510 512 54 58 / +33 6 78 58 51 03
fmousseau@oaklandinstitute.org
Indonesia:
Devlin Kuyek, GRAIN
+62 81 281 483 770
devlin@grain.org
Belgium:
Stephane Desgain, CNCD-11.11.11
+32 2 250 12 64 / +32 475 76 90 61
Stephane.Desgain@cncd.be
France:
Marie-Laure Guislain, SHERPA
+ 33 (0) 1 42 21 33 25
marie-laure.guislain@asso-sherpa.org
Luxembourg:
Marc Keup, Action Solidarite Tiers Monde
+352 400 427 20
marc.keup@astm.lu
Switzerland:
Yvan Maillard, Pain pour le prochain
+41(0)79 267 01 09
maillard@bfa-ppp.ch
LATEST NEWS
Global Protests Tell Trump and His Cronies: 'Hands Off Venezuela'
The US Mission to Mexico—one of several Latin American countries Trump threatened in the aftermath of the attack on Venezuela—warned in an alert issued Saturday that "a protest denouncing US actions against Venezuela continues to take place in front of the US Embassy in the Polanco neighborhood of Mexico City."
"Protestors have thrown rocks and painted vandalism on exterior walls," the alert read. "Social media posts about the protest have included anti-American sentiment. Embassy personnel have been advised to avoid the area."
Social and political organizations mobilized to the US Embassy in Mexico City, Mexico on January 3, 2026. (Photo by Miguel M. Caamano/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Hundreds gather in front of the US Embassy in Brussels, Belgium on January 4, 2025. (Photo by Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Demonstrators hold posters and chant slogans during a protest in front of the US Embassy on January 4, 2026 in Ankara, Turkey. (Photo by Serdar Ozsoy/Getty Images)
A photograph taken on January 4, 2026 shows an anti-war placard in Brussels during a demonstration against the US attack on Venezuela. (Photo by Nicolas Maeterlinck/Belga/AFP via Getty Images)
Protesters gather during a demonstration in front of the US Embassy on January 4, 2026 in Madrid, Spain. (Photo by Olmo Blanco/Getty Images)
The global demonstrations came as some world leaders, including top European officials, faced backlash for failing to adequately condemn—or condemn at all—the US attack on Venezuela and continued menacing of a sovereign nation.
Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, said she supports "a peaceful and democratic transition," without mentioning or denouncing the illegal abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and US bombings that reportedly killed at least 40 people, including civilians.
Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis declared that "this is not the time to comment on the legality of the recent actions" as protesters gathered in Athens in opposition to the US assault.
"If you still believe that the European Union cares about international law, then look no further," wrote Progressive International co-general coordinator David Adler, pointing to Mitsotakis' statement.
"We are outraged, but this moment demands more than outrage. It demands organized, coordinated resistance."
Mass protests and demands for international action to halt US aggression proliferated amid ongoing questions about how the Trump administration intends to carry out its stated plan to control Venezuela and exploit its oil reserves—objectives that experts say would run afoul of domestic and international law.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who played a central role in planning the Venezuela attack and has been chosen by Trump to manage the aftermath, said Sunday that the administration intends to keep in place a military "quarantine" around the South American nation—including the massive naval force amassed in the Caribbean in recent months—to pressure the country's leadership to bow to US demands.
"That's a tremendous amount of leverage that will continue to be in place until we see changes, not just to further the national interest of the United States, which is number one, but also that lead to a better future for the people of Venezuela," Rubio said in a television interview.
Rubio also suggested the president could deploy US troops to Venezuela and dodged questions about the legal authority the Trump administration has to intervene in the country. The administration has not sought congressional authorization for any of its attacks on vessels in the Caribbean or Venezuela directly.
US Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said Sunday that "in recent history, we've tried 'running' multiple countries in Latin America and the Middle East. It's been a disaster for us, and for them, every single time."
"Congress must pass a War Powers Resolution to get our military back to defending the US, instead of 'running' Venezuela," Casar added.
Progressive Democrats of America echoed that demand, saying in a statement that "this is militarized authoritarianism."
"We must act to stop it now, before it spreads to enflame the entire region, if not the entire globe, in a dangerous, unnecessary conflict," the group added. "We are outraged, but this moment demands more than outrage. It demands organized, coordinated resistance."
Most Popular