May, 05 2011, 12:38pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Kevin Kamps, Beyond Nuclear, (240) 462-3216
Alice Hirt, Don’t Waste Michigan, Holland, (616) 218-6511
Kathy Barnes, Don’t Waste Michigan, Sherwood, (517) 677-8312Terry Lodge, Attorney, (419) 205-7084
Michael Keegan, Don’t Waste Michigan, Monroe, (734) 770-1441
Â
Citizen Watchdogs Accuse Entergy Nuclear and NRC of Breaking Safety Promises at Palisades Atomic Reactor
Reactor and Radioactive Waste Risks Cited in Light of Chernobyl and Fukushima
SOUTH HAVEN, Mich.
At today's U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) annual meeting on the performance of the Palisades atomic reactor, Beyond Nuclear and Don't Waste Michigan will charge that Entergy Nuclear has indefinitely postponed several major safety repairs, putting the region at severe risk. The anti-nuclear watchdogs will also assert that Palisades' high-level radioactive waste storage facilities remain at serious risk of releasing their deadly contents into the environment, including Lake Michigan. The NRC meeting will begin at 6 p.m. at Lake Michigan College, 125 Veterans Blvd., South Haven, Michigan 49090. Palisades is located on the Lake Michigan shoreline in Covert, Michigan, about five miles south of South Haven.
On March 24th, the 44 year old Palisades nuclear power plant began its 20 year license extension. Palisades received license extension approval from NRC in 2007. Don't Waste Michigan, the statewide anti-nuclear watchdog coalition, led the resistance to the extension from 2005 to 2007, citing major safety concerns such as severe embrittlement of the pressure vessel. Pressurized thermal shock (PTS) could lead to a loss of coolant accident in the reactor core: upon activation of the emergency core cooling system, the vessel, made brittle by four decades of neutron radiation, could rupture like a hot glass under cold water.
"Palisades first violated NRC's pressurized thermal shock regulations in 1981, just ten years into operations," said Michael Keegan of Coalition for a Nuclear-Free Great Lakes in Monroe. "Rather than deal with its embrittlement or else shut down, Palisades has instead successfully pressured NRC to weaken the safety regulations time and again in order to allow it to keep operating, despite the risks," he added.
Keegan's history of PTS risks at Palisades is posted online at https://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/licensing/071805pressurizedthermalshockpotentialpalisades.pdf.
"The list of major safety repairs that have gone undone for over five years is a long one," said Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear, a national environmental watchdog based in Takoma Park, Maryland. "In 2006, the previous owner, Consumers Energy, listed reactor lid replacement, a second steam generator transplant, an upgrade of vital reactor cooling water sumps, and enforcement of fire protections as all needing immediate attention. Entergy has made none of these urgently needed safety repairs, and NRC has allowed them to get away with it," he added.
"Any one of these many neglected repairs could lead to a Chernobyl- or Fukushima-scale radioactive release in the heart of the Great Lakes at Palisades," Kamps added.
The 25th annual commemoration of the Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe took place on April 26, 2011. Chernobyl, and the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe in Japan which began March 11, 2011, are the two worst nuclear power catastrophes in human history.
A 2006 Consumers Energy presentation to the Michigan Public Service Commission acknowledged these needed repairs at Palisades. This document is posted online at https://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/licensing/kampsconsbrifeinf051806.htm(see page 2).
"High-level radioactive waste risks also plague Palisades," said Alice Hirt of Don't Waste Michigan's Holland chapter. "Its outdoor dry cask storage pad, just 100 yards from the water of Lake Michigan, is in violation of NRC earthquake safety regulations, and its indoor pool lacks any emergency backup power in case the electrical grid's supply is disrupted for any reason," she added.
Retired NRC dry cask storage inspector, Dr. Ross Landsman of the NRC Region III office near Chicago, first warned of the seismic risks at Palisades dry cask storage facility in 1994 (see https://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/licensing/021794rosslandsmanltrnrcchairmanselin.pdf). He repeated his warning as recently as 2005 (see https://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/licensing/landsmandec.pdf.)
Beyond Nuclear recently petitioned the NRC to force the installation of emergency backup diesel generators and batteries on high-level radioactive waste storage pools at 24 U.S. reactors identical in design to Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant Units 1 to 4 (the General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Mark 1 design; see https://www.beyondnuclear.org/home/2011/4/20/beyond-nuclear-submits-emergency-enforcement-petition-to-nrc.html.) Beyond Nuclear will soon follow up with a petition to NRC urging the extension of emergency backup power to other boiling water reactor pools, as well as to pressurized water reactor pools, such as at Palisades, which also lack it.
"Whether due to a tornado, an ice storm, or a tree branch touching a power line, the loss of the electrical grid to run the cooling water circulation pumps at the densely packed high-level radioactive waste storage pool at Palisades could cause boiling to begin within hours, and the high-level radioactive waste could catch on fire within a day or two," said Kathy Barnes of Don't Waste Michigan's Sherwood chapter. "This is exactly what happened at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant's Unit 4 in Japan, releasing catastrophic amounts of hazardous radioactivity directly into the environment," she added.
"Entergy Nuclear is infamous for buying old, degraded atomic reactors on the cheap, and then running them into the ground," said Terry Lodge, Toledo based attorney for intervenors against the Palisades license extension. "Such behavior has earned Entergy the wrath of the governors of New York and Vermont, both of whom are actively opposing license extensions at Entergy atomic reactors in their states."
Documentation pertaining to the environmental coalition's resistance to Palisades' license extension is posted online at https://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/licensing/palisades.htm.
Based on severe accident risks, environmental intervenor Pilgrim Watch in Massachusetts has resisted the proposed 20 year license extension at Entergy's Pilgrim atomic reactor in Plymouth, Massachusetts for well over five years, the longest such proceeding in NRC history.
NRC's media release announcing the May 5th meeting is posted online at https://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1111/ML111110559.pdf
LATEST NEWS
As ExxonMobil Moves In, Venezuela Boosts Forces Along Disputed Border With Guyana
"The current border impasse between Guyana and Venezuela is yet another example of United States imperialism's design to expand and usurp countries' natural resources around the world," said one observer.
Feb 09, 2024
As increased U.S. military aid to Guyana and ExxonMobil's oil exploration in contested waters exacerbate a territorial row between Venezuela and Guyana, satellite images made public on Friday purportedly showed increased Venezuelan military activity near the two countries' disputed border.
The Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), a Washington, D.C.-based foreign policy think tank partly funded by the U.S. government and a bevy of Pentagon contractors, published satellite photos showing what the institution says is an "escalatory" buildup of Venezuelan land and naval forces near the Guyanese border.
Venezuelan Vice President Delcy RodrÃguez on Thursday blamed the United States and U.S.-based ExxonMobil for inflaming tensions in contested Essequibo region after the Biden administration said earlier this week that it would help Guyana purchase new aircraft, helicopters, drones, and radar technology.
"The imperialist powers want unrestricted access and material and political control of the area and its resources."
RodrÃguez condemned the "warmongering U.S. influence" and "the energy multinational [that] not only usurps the sovereignty of Guyana... but also seeks to protect its illicit operations in a sea that is pending demarcation."
ExxonMobil—which has been active in the region for more than 15 years—announced this week that it would ramp up exploration in an offshore area claimed by both Venezuela and Guyana. The Venezuelan government refuted a claim made Wednesday by Guyanese Foreign Minister Robert Persaud that the area to be explored by ExxonMobil "is within established Guyana waters in a fully demarcated area."
RodrÃguez said these developments are clear violations of the Argyle Declaration, a December 2023 agreement between Caracas and Georgetown to renounce threats or use of force and settle disputes peacefully according to international law. The two countries reaffirmed their commitment to "peaceful resolution" during a summit in Brazil last month.
Venezuela has long claimed Essequibo, a resource-rich region along South America's northeastern coast that makes up around two-thirds of Guyana's territory that in 1899 was awarded by U.S., British, and Russian arbitrators to what was then the colony of British Guyana.
As AndreÃna Chávez Alava explained Thursday at Venezuela Analysis:
In recent months, Caracas has repeatedly denounced U.S. interference and military threats as the territorial dispute with Guyana escalated. In December, [U.S. Southern Command] carried out flight operations with the Guyana Defence Force and a British warship arrived in Guyanese waters for open sea defense exercises. In response, Venezuela held large-scale military drills of its own.
The December 3 Essequibo referendum held in Venezuela likewise raised tensions between the countries as Guyana interpreted the move as an attempt to forcefully annex the region. Voters overwhelmingly supported the country's sovereignty claim over the Essequibo and [Venezuelan President Nicolás] Maduro ordered the creation of a new Venezuelan state called Guayana Esequiba as well as civil and military institutions for the disputed area.
Anti-imperialist voices have argued that Guyana is being used as a "pawn" by the United States. The U.S. has had a long history of meddling in Venezuelan affairs in service of its strategic and economic interests.
"The current border impasse between Guyana and Venezuela is yet another example of United States imperialism's design to expand and usurp countries' natural resources around the world and reinforce its geopolitical agenda," author Richard S. Dunn wrote Thursday for Covert Action.
"With the discovery of oil in the Essequibo region, the imperialist powers want unrestricted access and material and political control of the area and its resources," Dunn added. "The United States, Britain, France, and Canada are 'piling up' over each other for control of the oil-rich Essequibo."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Feds 'All F—king Tied Up in Knots' Over How to Handle Election Threats
Top CIA, DHS, DOJ, and FBI officials recently gathered to discuss simulations on deepfakes and violence at the polls—and, as one journalist put it, "the results weren't encouraging."
Feb 09, 2024
Just nine months away from the U.S. general election, reporting published Friday by CNN suggests the federal government is poorly prepared to respond to "nightmare scenarios," from violence at the polls to disinformation created with artificial intelligence.
One U.S. official familiar with a previously unreported meeting at the White House Situation Room in December told CNN's Sean Lyngaas that in terms of a coordinated federal response to an election-related threat, "we're all f—king tied up in knots."
Citing four unnamed sources, Lyngaas reported that leaders from the Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and departments of Homeland Security and Justice gathered for a first-of-its-kind drill featuring two simulations: "What if Chinese operatives created a fake AI-generated video showing a Senate candidate destroying ballots? And how should federal agencies respond if violence erupts at polling stations on Election Day?"
According to Lyngaas:
The participants opted for state election officials, and not the federal government, to lead any public messaging to counter disinformation spread by the fake video in their jurisdictions, two of the sources said. Officials also discussed options for notifying Congress. No one at the table raised their hand offering to be the lead federal agency to tell the public about the deepfake.
As for violence at the polls, the federal officials decided not to dispatch federal agents to support local police because they did not have the jurisdiction to do so.
The reporting comes as Democratic President Joe Biden seeks reelection. Based on polling and the GOP primaries and caucuses so far, he is expected to face former President Donald Trump, despite arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday that states should be able to remove the Republican front-runner from ballots because he engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021.
"People from across the political spectrum and from all walks of life—from former members of Congress to constitutional scholars to everyday Americans—have come together in this exceptional and fragile moment in the history of American democracy to reinforce the Constitution's very purpose in safeguarding our democracy from insurrectionists," said Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a watchdog representing Colorado voters in the case before the high court. "On January 6th we saw what it looked like when Trump tried to tear down the foundations of our democracy."
After months of denying his 2020 loss to Biden, Trump told a crowd on January 6 that "we're going to the Capitol, and... we're going to try and give our Republicans... the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country." Although Trump didn't join his supporters, their deadly Capitol attack delayed the certification of the election results.
Since Trump's "Big Lie" about the 2020 contest and incitement of insurrection, fears have been mounting about election safety—elevated by Trump's fascist comments on the campaign trail, such as his threat to "root out" those he described as "radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country" if he is elected in November.
A September report from the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law and Giffords—founded by a former congresswoman who survived being shot in the head—details changes in gun control legislation in response to a right-wing U.S. Supreme Court ruling, how disinformation has fueled political violence, and increases in extremism and shootings.
"Though American elections have remained safe and secure, both political and gun violence pose significant risks to the safety of voters and people bravely conducting our elections," report co-author Allison Anderman of Giffords Law Center warned last year. "The 2024 presidential election brings an unprecedented confluence of factors that heighten these risks."
While the groups' report largely focuses on the lies that Trump and his allies spread after he lost in 2020, other campaigners, experts, journalists, and policymakers have been sounding the alarm about the dangers of AI-driven disinformation.
Just weeks after New Hampshire residents received robocalls featuring a fake message with Biden's voice telling them not to vote in the state's primary, the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday declared such calls illegal under U.S. law. The Federal Election Commission is weighing new rules for deepfake content, which has already been used in 2024 campaign materials, but the agency recently said that a decision is likely several months away—a timeline critics called "intolerable."
Concerns about AI, disinformation, and democracy aren't limited to the United States—as demonstrated by The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' statement last month about why the Doomsday Clock remains at 90 seconds to midnight, a signal for how close the world is to catastrophe.
"AI has great potential to magnify disinformation and corrupt the information environment on which democracy depends," the Bulletin said. "AI-enabled disinformation efforts could be a factor that prevents the world from dealing effectively with nuclear risks, pandemics, and climate change."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'When We Fight, We Win': California Fast Food Workers Launch Union
Workers have shown "when they come together what kind of power they can have to really take on massive corporations like Starbucks, McDonald's, and Burger King," said one labor leader.
Feb 09, 2024
With plans to win annual raises and other labor protections for fast food cooks and cashiers across California, hundreds of workers in the industry gathered in Los Angeles on Friday to mark the launch of a first-of-its kind union.
Part of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the new California Fast Food Workers Union represents workers at companies including McDonald’s, Pizza Hut, and Jack in the Box, and organizers hope to eventually expand its membership to other employees in the industry in addition to cooks and cashiers.
The union was formed after fast food workers, the SEIU, and the Fight for $15 movement fought for the passage of a California law last year that created a fast food council, allowing labor unions and companies to negotiate over minimum wages and work conditions—a first for the industry.
The SEIU reached a deal with several chains to raise the minimum pay for 500,000 fast food workers to $20 per hour starting in April.
"California fast food workers have powered through and we've been winning against one of the largest industries in the world," said one worker in a video posted on social media by the union to celebrate the launch.
Joseph Bryant, international executive vice-president of the SEIU, noted that the push for labor protections and higher wages in the industry has "been led in California over the last decade by primarily Black and Latino cooks and cashiers."
The workers "have been fighting and have been able to show when they come together what kind of power they can have to really take on massive corporations like Starbucks, McDonald's, and Burger King, which have done everything to crush their workers and crush the idea of them pulling together a union," Bryant told The Guardian.
The union plans to push for a 3.5% increase of the minimum wage over the next three years, protections to ensure companies have "just cause" to fire workers, rules to ensure that employees are scheduled to work enough hours to sustain themselves, and protections against retaliation for organizing.
Fight for $15 called the launch "an historic day."
"Fast food workers have worked for more than a decade to come to this point," said the nationwide grassroots organization. "We're so excited to be here, and even more excited for what's to come."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular