February, 01 2011, 08:29am EDT

Iraq: Secret Jail Uncovered in Baghdad
Detainees Describe Torture at Another Facility Also Run by Elite Security Forces
BAGHDAD
Elite security forces controlled by the military office of Prime
Minister Nuri al-Maliki of Iraq are operating a secret detention site in
Baghdad, Human Rights Watch said today. The elite forces are also
torturing detainees with impunity at a different facility in Baghdad,
Human Rights Watch said.
Beginning on November 23, 2010, and continuing over the next three to
four days, Iraqi authorities transferred more than 280 detainees to a
secret site within Camp Justice, a sprawling military base in northwest
Baghdad, interviews and classified government documents obtained by
Human Rights Watch reveal. The Army's 56th Brigade, also known as the
Baghdad Brigade, and the Counter-Terrorism Service, both under the
authority of the prime minister's office, control this secret site. The
hurried transfers took place just days before an international
inspection team was to examine conditions at the detainees' previous
location at Camp Honor in the Green Zone. Human Rights Watch has also
obtained a list of more than 300 detainees held at Camp Honor just
before the transfer to Camp Justice. Almost all were accused of
terrorism.
"Revelations of secret jails in the heart of Baghdad completely
undermine the Iraqi government's promises to respect the rule of law,"
said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. "The
government needs to close these places or move them under control of the
justice system, improve conditions for detainees, and make sure that
anyone responsible for torture is punished."
The Iraqi government should immediately close the facilities or
regularize their position and make them open for inspections and visits,
Human Rights Watch said.
Approximately 80 of the 280 detainees are being held by the 56th
Brigade at the secret site at Camp Justice and have had no access to
lawyers or family members. Prison inspectors are not permitted to
conduct visits to the section of the facility controlled by the 56th
brigade, prompting fresh concerns that the brigade may be torturing
detainees. According to government sources, the Counter-Terrorism
Service is holding the 200 remaining transferred detainees, although the
56th Brigade maintains primary responsibility for security at the site
in Baghdad's Kadhmiya neighborhood.
In one of the 18 documents obtained by Human Rights Watch, a letter
from the prosecutor's office of the Higher Judicial Council asks the
Office of the Prime Minister to instruct officials at the Camp Justice
site to stop preventing prison inspectors and relatives from visiting
detainees. The letter, dated December 6, 2010, says such a refusal
"meets neither legal nor humanitarian standards, unless [the refusal is]
specifically ordered by a judge at a specialized court."A second
letter, dated January 13, 2011, from the justice minister to the Office
of the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, through which the prime
minister controls Iraqi security forces, stated that a 56th Brigade
officer prevented prison inspectors from the Human Rights Ministry from
visiting the site.
The secret detention site is located within a legitimate Justice
Ministry detention facility at Camp Justice, known as Justice 2 (Sijn
al-Adaleh 2), which holds just over 1,000 other detainees. Camp Justice
is the site of the former "Fifth Department" (al-Sha'ba al-Khamsa)
intelligence office notorious during the rule of Saddam Hussein for
torture and disappearances. The former dictator was executed there in
2006.
Camp Honor, from which the detainees were transferred, became the subject of media scrutiny on January 23, after the Los Angeles Times
uncovered abuse there and described the conditions as "miserable." The
article said detainees were held in cramped windowless cells that reeked
of human excrement.
Recent interviews by Human Rights Watch of more than a dozen former
detainees from Camp Honor had documented how detainees are held
incommunicado and in inhumane conditions, often for months at a time.
Detainees described in detail the wide ranging abuses they endured
during interrogation sessions at the facility, usually to extract false
confessions. They said interrogators beat them, hung them upside down
for hours at a time, administered electric shocks to various body parts,
including the genitals, and asphyxiated them repeatedly with plastic
bags put over their heads until they passed out.
In interviews with Human Rights Watch in December, former detainees described the abuse at Camp Honor:
- One detainee said on December 26 that: "The cell was so crowded that
we had to take turns standing and lying down, and would try to let
someone lie down if they were an old man, or especially if they had just
been brought back from interrogation. Then we usually could not stand."
- Another said on December 18 that: "I was blindfolded and put on the
floor, face-down with my hands tied tightly behind my back. The
interrogator stepped on my arms, and put more and more weight down on
them until I was screaming."
- A third detainee, who had been held in Camp Honor the summer of
2010, said in a December 27 interview that: "My hands were tied over my
head and my feet were put in water, then they shocked me in my head and
my neck and my chest. The interrogators beat me repeatedly and told me
that they would go to my house and rape my sister if I did not sign a
confession, so I did. I did not even know what I was confessing to."
In response to the Los Angeles Times article, which said
Camp Honor is run by the 56th Brigade and the Counter-Terrorism Service,
Iraq's deputy justice minister, Busho Ibrahim, told Agence
France-Presse on January 24 that his ministry alone controlled the site.
"It is my responsibility, and I deny all these accusations - they are
all lies," he said. "Families can visit their sons or husbands, lawyers
can visit them regularly. It's like any other prison run by the Justice
Ministry."
He reiterated, "It is not true that it follows Maliki's orders - it is run by the Justice Ministry."
However, documents obtained by Human Rights Watch refute government
claims that Camp Honor is controlled by the Justice Ministry. In one
classified document dated August 2, 2010, the former justice minister,
Dara Nour al-Din, requested that his staff obtain approval from the
Office of the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces to transfer
detainees from Camp Honor, demonstrating the ministry's subordinate role
at the facility.
In the note to his staff, the justice minister asks them to write a
letter to the Office of the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces
"requesting permission for custody of the prisoners to be turned over"
to the ministry so they can be transferred elsewhere. The document
indicates that the issue arose after Deputy Justice Minister Ibrahim
acknowledged that his ministry could not transfer detainees due to
external interference, particularly from military interrogators.
Another document, from October 2010, signed by Ibrahim himself, says
the ministry "has no objection to allowing lawyers and families to visit
detainees" at Camp Honor but that, "it is only the tough security
measures implemented by the Defense Ministry/56th Brigade section [of
the prison] and the Counter-Terrorism administration section, and also
the location of the prison in the Green Zone, that has prevented this."
In response to the Los Angeles Times article, Ibrahim also
said that the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) had
visited the Camp Honor prison. But when contacted by Human Rights Watch,
the ICRC spokesperson, Graziella Leite Piccolo, said that ICRC had not
been able to visit Camp Honor because the government had not met the
organization's criteria for such site visits, including access to the
entire facility and its detainees.
"It is important to note that, even if we had been able to visit, a
visit alone is not a certificate of validation, but part of a process,"
she said. Government sources told Human Rights Watch that authorities
have prevented the Human Rights Ministry from conducting any prison
inspections at Camp Honor for more than a year.
Several government sources said that although the 56th Brigade, and
its sibling, the 54th Brigade, technically fall under Defense Ministry
administration, the brigades' chain of command bypass the ministry. They
do not report to the defense minister or army chief of staff, but
instead to Maliki through the Office of the Commander in Chief of the
Armed Forces. Through this office, the prime minister also controls the
Counter-Terrorism Service, which falls under no ministry and is not
governed by any legislation. The Counter-Terrorism Service works closely
with US Special Forces.
Military officers and officials from both the Defense and Interior
ministries told Human Rights Watch that the 56th Brigade and the
Counter-Terrorism Service routinely conduct operations, including mass
arrests and detentions, without notifying the security ministries. A
high-level Interior Ministry officer told Human Rights Watch on December
18 that these units "create confusion and a dangerous atmosphere where
special units who have a separate authority storm in and take people."
The official said that regular security forces were afraid of these
elite forces.
Another official, from the Defense Ministry, told Human Rights Watch
on January 23 that contrary to the usual practice, in which security
forces process detainees through the main prison system, the 56th and
54th Brigades often refuse to give up their prisoners.
"Their families and lawyers cannot visit them," he said, "and sometimes cannot even find out if they are dead or alive."
Defense Ministry officials interviewed by Human Rights Watch said
there is close cooperation between the 56th and 54th Brigades, commonly
referred to by military and police as "Maliki's forces." Prisoners
arrested and initially held in the prison run by one brigade are often
transferred to the prison run by the other.
An Interior Ministry official told Human Rights Watch on January 13
that "people come to police stations or prisons looking for their family
members who have been arrested. If we find out they were taken by
Maliki's forces, we don't get any information about them or have
jurisdiction to do anything."
Last year, the Human Rights Ministry uncovered a secret prison run by
the 54th Brigade, with the assistance of the 56th Brigade, in the old
Muthanna airport in Western Baghdad. In April, Human Rights Watch
interviewed 42 detainees who had been tortured at this facility over a
period of months. The secret prison held about 430 detainees who had no
access to their families or lawyers. The prisoners said security forces
personnel kicked, whipped, and beat them, asphyxiated them, gave them
electric shocks, burned them with cigarettes, and pulled out their
fingernails and teeth. They said that interrogators sodomized some
detainees with sticks and pistol barrels. Some young men said they had
been forced to perform oral sex on interrogators and guards, and that
interrogators forced detainees to molest one another sexually.
A US Embassy cable viewed by the Los Angeles Times stated
that 56th Brigade interrogators had been sent to Muthanna from Camp
Honor. A separate cable said the brigade "reports directly to the prime
minister's office."
At the time, Maliki described the prison at Muthanna as a transit site under the control of the Defense Ministry.
However, a high-ranking Defense Ministry official distanced his
ministry from the allegations of torture at Muthanna. In a classified
letter to the Human Rights Ministry dated May 3, 2010, and seen by Human
Rights Watch, Saleh Sarhan, general secretary to the defense minister,
wrote: "Our ministry has no relationship with those military
investigation committees nor to the Sur Ninewa [Muthanna] Detention
Center, because both are attached to the Office of the Commander in
Chief of the Armed Forces."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Critics Warn of ‘Catastrophic’ Threat If Netflix Acquires Warner Bros.
"The threat of this merger in any form is an alarming escalation in a consolidation crisis that threatens the entire entertainment industry, the public it serves, and—potentially—the First Amendment itself," warned actress Jane Fonda.
Dec 05, 2025
Netflix announced a deal Friday to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s film studio and streaming business for $83 billion, a merger that—if approved by the Trump administration—would create a media behemoth that critics say threatens industry competition, higher costs for consumers, the rights of entertainment workers, and democracy.
Netflix, the largest streaming company in the world, and Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD), owner of the third-largest streaming platform HBO Max, unveiled the proposed agreement after a closely watched bidding war that included Paramount Skydance, the company that the Trump administration reportedly favored to acquire WBD. Paramount is owned by David Ellison, the son of billionaire Republican megadonor Larry Ellison—a close ally of President Donald Trump.
David Ellison reportedly met with Trump administration officials on Thursday to "press his case" against Netflix's pending acquisition of WBD. An unnamed senior official told CNBC on Friday that the Trump administration is treating the Netflix-WBD deal with "heavy skepticism."
While some expressed relief that Paramount appears—at least for now—to have lost the bid for Warner Bros., antitrust advocates argued such a view overlooks the much broader and more serious threat of corporate consolidation.
"Does anyone think Netflix won’t do what Trump wants to get their deal through?" asked Matt Stoller, director of research at the American Economic Liberties Project. "The threat to democracy isn’t the Ellisons, it’s media consolidation."
The American Prospect's David Dayen expressed a similar sentiment, writing on social media: "Keeping WBD out of Paramount's hands is good. Putting it in Netflix's is still unlawful consolidation though. This is the #1 streamer merging with #3. State enforcers should speak up."
"If we don’t speak now, we may have no industry—and no democracy—left to defend."
In a newsletter post following news of the merger agreement, Stoller argued the Netflix-WBD deal is plainly illegal under the Clayton Antitrust Act and "a recipe for monopolization."
"The ideal scenario now is a trial that puts the secrets of Hollywood executives and financiers on display, and crushes the financiers who think mergers are the only move in business," Stoller wrote. "Then Hollywood can get back to the business of making good TV shows and movies."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said that "this deal looks like an anti-monopoly nightmare."
"A Netflix-Warner Bros. would create one massive media giant with control of close to half of the streaming market," said Warren. "It could force you into higher prices, fewer choices over what and how you watch, and may put American workers at risk."
"Under Donald Trump, the antitrust review process has also become a cesspool of political favoritism and corruption," the senator continued. "The Justice Department must enforce our nation’s anti-monopoly laws fairly and transparently—not use the Warner Bros. deal review to invite influence-peddling and bribery."
Ahead of the announcement, major figures in the entertainment industry sounded alarm over the possibility of a Netflix takeover of WBD. In a letter to members of Congress on Thursday, a group of film producers warned that Neflix would "effectively hold a noose around the theatrical marketplace" if it acquired WBD.
The Writers’ Guild of America, which represents film and TV writers, has said it would oppose WBD merging with any "major studio or streamer," warning it "would be a disaster for writers, for consumers, and for competition."
"Merger after merger in the media industry has harmed workers, diminished competition and free speech, and wasted hundreds of billions of dollars better invested in organic growth," the union said in a recent statement.
Jane Fonda, the renowned actress and activist, wrote Thursday that "the threat of this merger in any form is an alarming escalation in a consolidation crisis that threatens the entire entertainment industry, the public it serves, and—potentially—the First Amendment itself."
"Consolidation at this scale would be catastrophic for an industry built on free expression, for the creative workers who power it, and for consumers who depend on a free, independent media ecosystem to understand the world," Fonda wrote. "It will mean fewer jobs, fewer opportunities to sell work, fewer creative risks, fewer news sources, and far less diversity in the stories Americans get to hear."
"If we don’t speak now, we may have no industry—and no democracy—left to defend," she added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
National Park Service Grants Free Access on Trump's Birthday—And Ends It for Juneteenth, MLK Day
Critics have ripped the decisions as "truly disgusting" and "literally the sort of thing dictators do."
Dec 05, 2025
"Why is MLK Day not worthy of a fee-free day anymore?"
That's what Kati Schmidt, communications director for the National Parks Conservation Association, wondered in an email to SFGATE, which reported Thursday on the National Park Service's recently announced free admission days for 2026.
"That has become a day of service throughout the country as well as celebrating an American hero who has several park units celebrating his legacy," Schmidt noted of the federal holiday honoring Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. each January.
In addition to MLK Day, three other previously free days were left off the US Department of the Interior's announcement last week about "resident-only patriotic fee-free days." Visitors will now have to pay park fees on National Public Lands Day, the anniversary of the Great American Outdoors Act—which President Donald Trump signed in 2020—and Juneteenth.
cool that the official position of the administration appears to be that black people don’t really count as americans
[image or embed]
— jamelle (@jamellebouie.net) December 5, 2025 at 8:20 AM
In 2021, Congress passed and then-President Joe Biden signed legislation designating Juneteenth as a federal holiday to commemorate the end of slavery in the United States. After returning to the White House in January, Trump declined to recognize it on this past June 19.
As SFGATE reported:
"This policy shift is deeply concerning," said Tyrhee Moore, the executive director of Soul Trak Outdoors, a nonprofit that connects urban communities of color to the outdoors. "Removing free-entry days on MLK Day and Juneteenth sends a troubling message about who our national parks are for. These holidays hold profound cultural and historical significance for Black communities, and eliminating them as access points feels like a direct targeting of the very groups who already face systemic barriers to the outdoors."
Moore told SFGATE that his organization works to push back against "these kinds of systemic attempts that disguise exclusion as administrative or political decisions."
"Policies like this reinforce inequalities around access and visibly show how systems can create obstacles that keep communities of color from feeling welcomed in public spaces," he said.
Olivia Juarez, public land program director at the advocacy group GreenLatinos, said in a statement that "we condemn the omission of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, Juneteenth, National Public Lands Day, and the anniversary of the Great American Outdoors Act from the list of free entrance days."
"The Great American Outdoors Act permanently funded the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which enhances outdoor recreation access for all people from national public lands to neighborhood parks," she pointed out. "These observances are patriotic days that celebrate freedom and safety in the outdoors. They should be celebrated as such by removing a simple cost barrier that can make parks more accessible to low-income households."
Other critics have ripped the free day decisions as "truly disgusting" and "literally the sort of thing dictators do."
Journalist Jennifer Schulze said: "I love our national parks but don't go on his birthday. Find a state park to visit instead."
Along with the free admission changes, the Trump administration is under fire for putting the president's face on the new "America the Beautiful" annual passes—a display that may be illegal—and for hiking prices for foreign visitors to national parks.
Utah-based Juarez and GreenLatinos California state program manager Pedro Hernández both denounced price hikes for noncitizens—a move that notably comes as the administration pursues Trump's promise of mass deportations.
"By imposing higher fees on people without state-issued ID," Hernández said, "the Trump administration is advancing a xenophobic policy that disproportionately harms vulnerable populations like international students, newly arrived immigrants, and families seeking asylum."
"This approach eviscerates the true meaning of public lands and sends a clear, exclusionary message that our most cherished national parks have become yet another pay-to-play system," he added. "People should be welcomed—not priced out from our public lands."
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Pretty Explicit White Nationalism’: Trump National Security Strategy Document Leaves Critics Aghast
One critic described the document as "a pretty explicit defense of using the state as a means of enforcing white supremacy."
Dec 05, 2025
The Trump administration on Thursday released its official National Security Strategy, and many critics noted that it was loaded with rhetoric frequently used by white nationalists.
Some of the most inflammatory rhetoric in the document is aimed at US-allied European countries that supposedly face "the real and more stark prospect of civilizational erasure" within the next 20 years.
In particular, the document accuses the European Union of enacting policies "that undermine political liberty and sovereignty, migration policies that are transforming the continent and creating strife, censorship of free speech and suppression of political opposition, cratering birthrates, and loss of national identities and self-confidence."
The document goes on to claim that "should present trends continue, the continent will be unrecognizable in 20 years or less," while emphasizing that US policy is to help "Europe to remain European, to regain its civilizational self-confidence, and to abandon its failed focus on regulatory suffocation."
Jon Henley, Europe correspondent for the Guardian, noted in a Friday report that the document "appears to espouse the racist 'great replacement' conspiracy theory, saying several countries risk becoming 'majority non-European.'" Henley added that the document "underscores the Trump administration's clear alignment with Europe’s far-right nationalist parties, whose policies centre on attacking supposed EU overreach and excessive non-EU migration."
Scott Horton, legal affairs and national security contributor to Harper's and an adjunct professor at Columbia Law School, wrote on Bluesky that the document "reads like something written by Vladimir Putin," given its depiction of Europe as being "degenerate and... racially adulterated through the in-migration of dark-skinned people."
Progressive activist Max Berger argued that the document "contains some pretty explicit white nationalism." He pointed to the document's support for dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as a way to restore "a culture of competence."
Berger also flagged a section in the document that named "ending mass migration" as the top US national security priority, which he described as "a pretty explicit defense of using the state as a means of enforcing white supremacy."
Edmund Luce, a columnist for the Financial Times, also took note of the administration's emphasis on "competence and merit" in the document. This is ironic, Luce continued, because "this administration personifies the opposites" of those traits.
Journalist Michael Weiss argued in a post on X that the document shows that it is now official US policy to promote and assist far-right parties in Europe.
"[US Vice President] JD Vance's intervention in Germany's election, on behalf of [far-right party Alternative für Deutschland], was not a one-off," he wrote. "It is now ingrained in the U.S. National Security Strategy... Europe is be treated as enemy terrain to be destabilized by America's enabling of far-right parties."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


