January, 27 2011, 02:17pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
AIUSA media office,Email:,media@aiusa.org,Phone: 202-544-0200 x302
Amnesty International Reveals Security Forces in Tunisia Shot at Protesters from Behind as They Fled
Doctors Testimony Show Others Killed by Single Shots Suggesting Deliberate Intent to Kill
LONDON
Amnesty International today revealed
disturbing new evidence of the brutal methods used by Tunisian security
forces to stop anti-government protests, including doctors' testimonies
that demonstrators were shot from behind and others felled by single shots
suggesting deliberate intent to kill.
An Amnesty International research team returning
from Tunisia found that security forces used disproportionate force
to disperse protesters and in some cases fired on fleeing protesters and
bystanders.
Doctors' testimonies seen by the Amnesty
International research team show that some protesters in Kasserine and
Thala were shot from behind, indicating that they were fleeing. Others
in Kasserine, Thala, Tunis and Regueb were killed by single shots to the
chest or head, suggesting deliberate intent to kill.
"This shocking evidence confirms that the
Tunisian security forces were using lethal methods to quell discontent
and to deter protesters," said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, deputy director
of Amnesty International's Middle East North Africa Program.
"The fact that some of those killed were
clearly running away shows flagrant disregard for the people's lives.
It must be an urgent priority for the authorities to ensure that those
under their command show restraint and respect for public safety."
The organization also found evidence that
many of those arrested in connection with the unrest were tortured or otherwise
ill-treated in custody. Detainees were beaten with batons or kicked, while
others were forced to kneel facing walls for hours.
The research team found that while some protesters
acted violently, security forces used disproportionate force to disperse
protesters and resorted to lethal force when it was not strictly necessary.
Tear gas, rubber bullets and live ammunition were widely used even when
protesters were peaceful, and protesters were beaten with batons.
Witnesses told Amnesty International that
some of those killed could not have possibly posed a threat to the lives
of security forces. Other victims were not involved in the protests at
all.
Manal Bou'alagi, 26, the mother of
two, was shot in the chest on January 9 in the city of Regueb in central
Tunisia as she returned home from visiting her mother. A doctor who examined
her told Amnesty International that the angle of her bullet wounds
suggested she was shot by a sniper from a nearby building.
Manal's mother, Chadia, is determined to
see justice: "I have lost a daughter and my grandchildren have been orphaned.
I want the people responsible for Manal's killing to face real justice
for what they have done to us."
A 21-year-old man who wished to remain anonymous
told Amnesty International that after he was arrested in Tunis on January
14, he was detained in the Ministry of Interior with 30 others, including
10 young women.
He told an Amnesty International researcher
that security forces beat him with batons all over his body. He was eventually
released without charge but was warned not to take part in any more protests.
Former president Ben Ali had by this time already left the country.
Amnesty International has welcomed the caretaker
government's announcement of an independent commission to investigate
human rights violations committed by the security forces during recent
weeks.
But the organizationcalled this week
in a "Human Rights Agenda for Change" document for other urgent and far-reaching
action by the authorities, including fundamentally overhauling the country's
repressive security apparatus and justice system.
"The families of those killed must have
access to justice, which can only be achieved by a proper investigation
with the power to compel officials to testify," said Sahraoui.
"In the meantime, any official reasonably
suspected of human rights violations should be suspended from duties. Tunisians
need to see that the culture of abuse is a thing of the past."
Background
An Amnesty International delegation visited
Tunisia from January 14-22, meeting with families of those killed in the
unrest, individuals injured during protests, other witnesses, and former
detainees, as well as lawyers, human rights defenders, unionists and medical
professionals. Researchers travelled to Hammamat, Bizerte, Regueb, Thala
and Kasserine. The majority of the cases documented in this report took
place between January 8 and 13. The full report detailing their mission
will be released in February.
Amnesty International on January 24 released
its Tunisia:
Human Rights Agenda for Change,
calling on the Tunisian authorities to make fundamental and lasting reforms
and to break with Ben Ali's legacy of decades of abuse.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400LATEST NEWS
Sanders Champions Those Fighting Back Against Water-Sucking, Energy-Draining, Cost-Boosting Data Centers
Dec 10, 2025
Americans who are resisting the expansion of artificial intelligence data centers in their communities are up against local law enforcement and the Trump administration, which is seeking to compel cities and towns to host the massive facilities without residents' input.
On Wednesday, US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) urged AI data center opponents to keep up the pressure on local, state, and federal leaders, warning that the rapid expansion of the multi-billion-dollar behemoths in places like northern Virginia, Wisconsin, and Michigan is set to benefit "oligarchs," while working people pay "with higher water and electric bills."
"Americans must fight back against billionaires who put profits over people," said the senator.
In a video posted on the social media platform X, Sanders pointed to two major AI projects—a $165 billion data center being built in Abilene, Texas by OpenAI and Oracle and one being constructed in Louisiana by Meta.
The centers are projected to use as much electricity as 750,000 homes and 1.2 million homes, respectively, and Meta's project will be "the size of Manhattan."
Hundreds gathered in Abilene in October for a "No Kings" protest where one local Democratic political candidate spoke out against "billion-dollar corporations like Oracle" and others "moving into our rural communities."
"They’re exploiting them for all of their resources, and they are creating a surveillance state,” said Riley Rodriguez, a candidate for Texas state Senate District 28.
In Holly Ridge, Lousiana, the construction of the world's largest data center has brought thousands of dump trucks and 18-wheelers driving through town on a daily basis, causing crashes to rise 600% and forcing a local school to shut down its playground due to safety concerns.
And people in communities across the US know the construction of massive data centers are only the beginning of their troubles, as electricity bills have surged this year in areas like northern Virginia, Illinois, and Ohio, which have a high concentration of the facilities.
The centers are also projected to use the same amount of water as 18.5 million homes normally, according to a letter signed by more than 200 environmental justice groups this week.
And in a survey of Pennsylvanians last week, Emerson College found 55% of respondents believed the expansion of AI will decrease the number of jobs available in their current industry. Sanders released an analysis in October showing that corporations including Amazon, Walmart, and UnitedHealth Group are already openly planning to slash jobs by shifting operations to AI.
In his video on Wednesday, Sanders applauded residents who have spoken out against the encroachment of Big Tech firms in their towns and cities.
"In community after community, Americans are fighting back against the data centers being built by some of the largest and most powerful corporations in the world," said Sanders. "They are opposing the destruction of their local environment, soaring electric bills, and the diversion of scarce water supplies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Protest in Oslo Denounces Nobel Peace Prize for Right-Wing Machado
"No peace prize for warmongers," said one of the banners displayed by demonstrators, who derided Machado's support for President Donald Trump's regime change push in Venezuela.
Dec 10, 2025
As President Donald Trump issued new threats of a possible ground invasion in Venezuela, protesters gathered outside the Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo on Tuesday to protest the awarding of the prestigious peace prize to right-wing opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, whom they described as an ally to US regime change efforts.
“This year’s Nobel Prize winner has not distanced herself from the interventions and the attacks we are seeing in the Caribbean, and we are stating that this clearly breaks with Alfred Nobel’s will," said Lina Alvarez Reyes, the information adviser for the Norwegian Solidarity Committee for Latin America, one of the groups that organized the protests.
Machado's daughter delivered a speech accepting the award on her behalf on Wednesday. The 58-year-old engineer was unable to attend the ceremony in person due to a decade-long travel ban imposed by Venezuelan authorities under the government of President Nicolás Maduro.
Via her daughter, Machado said that receiving the award "reminds the world that democracy is essential to peace... And more than anything, what we Venezuelans can offer the world is the lesson forged through this long and difficult journey: that to have a democracy, we must be willing to fight for freedom."
But the protesters who gathered outside the previous day argue that Machado—who dedicated her acceptance of the award in part to Trump and has reportedly worked behind the scenes to pressure Washington to ramp up military and financial pressure on Venezuela—is not a beacon of democracy, but a tool of imperialist control.
As Venezuelan-American activist Michelle Ellner wrote in Common Dreams in October after Machado received the award:
She worked hand in hand with Washington to justify regime change, using her platform to demand foreign military intervention to “liberate” Venezuela through force.
She cheered on Donald Trump’s threats of invasion and his naval deployments in the Caribbean, a show of force that risks igniting regional war under the pretext of “combating narco-trafficking.” While Trump sent warships and froze assets, Machado stood ready to serve as his local proxy, promising to deliver Venezuela’s sovereignty on a silver platter.
She pushed for the US sanctions that strangled the economy, knowing exactly who would pay the price: the poor, the sick, the working class.
The protesters outside the Nobel Institute on Tuesday felt similarly: "No peace prize for warmongers," read one banner. "US hands off Latin America," read another.
The protest came on the same day Trump told reporters that an attack on the mainland of Venezuela was coming soon: “We’re gonna hit ‘em on land very soon, too,” the president said after months of extrajudicial bombings of vessels in the Caribbean that the administration has alleged with scant evidence are carrying drugs.
On the same day that Machado received the award in absentia, US warplanes were seen circling over the Gulf of Venezuela. Later, in what Bloomberg described as a "serious escalation," the US seized an oil tanker off the nation's coast.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Princeton Experts Speak Out Against Trump Boat Strikes as 'Illegal' and Destabilizing 'Murders'
"Deploying an aircraft carrier and US Southern Command assets to destroy small yolas and wooden boats is not only unlawful, it is an absurd escalation," said one scholar.
Dec 10, 2025
Multiple scholars at the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs on Wednesday spoke out against the Trump administration's campaign of bombing suspected drug boats, with one going so far as to call them acts of murder.
Eduardo Bhatia, a visiting professor and lecturer in public and international affairs at Princeton, argued that it was "unequivocal" that the attacks on on purported drug boats are illegal.
"They violate established maritime law requiring interdiction and arrest before the use of lethal force, and they represent a grossly disproportionate response by the US," stressed Bhatia, the former president of the Senate of Puerto Rico. "Deploying an aircraft carrier and US Southern Command assets to destroy small yolas and wooden boats is not only unlawful, it is an absurd escalation that undermines regional security and diplomatic stability."
Deborah Pearlstein, director of the Program in Law and Public Policy at Princeton, said that she has been talking with "military operations lawyers, international law experts, national security legal scholars," and other experts, and so far has found none who believe the administration's boat attacks are legal.
Pearlstein added that the illegal strikes are "a symptom of the much deeper problem created by the purging of career lawyers on the front end, and the tacit promise of presidential pardons on the back end," the result of which is that "the rule of law loses its deterrent effect."
Visiting professor Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, argued that it was not right to describe the administration's actions as war crimes given that a war, by definition, "requires a level of sustained hostilities between two organized forces that is not present with the drug cartels."
Rather, Roth believes that the administration's policy should be classified as straight-up murder.
"These killings are still murders," he emphasized. "Drug trafficking is a serious crime, but the appropriate response is to interdict the boats and arrest the occupants for prosecution. The rules governing law enforcement prohibit lethal force except as a last resort to stop an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury, which the boats do not present."
International affairs professor Jacob N. Shapiro pointed to the past failures in the US "War on Drugs," and predicted more of the same from Trump's boat-bombing spree.
"In 1986, President Ronald Reagan announced the 'War on Drugs,' which included using the Coast Guard and military to essentially shut down shipment through the Caribbean," Shapiro noted. "The goal was to reduce supply, raise prices, and thereby lower use. Cocaine prices in the US dropped precipitously from 1986 through 1989, and then dropped slowly through 2006. Traffickers moved from air and sea to land routes. That policy did not work, it's unclear why this time will be different."
The scholars' denunciation of the boat strikes came on the same day that the US seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela in yet another escalatory act of aggression intended to put further economic pressure on the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular