January, 21 2011, 09:26am EDT
John Cornyn Runaway Winner of "Biggest Hypocrite on Immigration" Award for Remarks at Hispanic Leadership Conference
Ruben Navarrette Receives “Telling it Like it Is” Award for Speaking Truth About GOP Need to Get Right on Immigration
WASHINGTON
Last week's Republican-backed Hispanic Leadership Network conference
in South Florida overflowed with chatter about how the GOP needs to
improve its positioning with Latino voters. Amidst all the discussion,
however, few voices at the conference admitted the simple truth that appealing to Latino voters
will not simply require a change in "tone" when it comes to the
immigration issue, but a change in policies advocated by the GOP. At
the conference, one speaker stood out in particular for his rank
hypocrisy on immigration, continuing an unprecedented effort to portray
himself as a supporter of common sense immigration reform while
consistently working to derail issue. So without further adieu, and in
the spirit of Hollywood's awards season, America's Voice would like to
honor Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) with the prestigious award of "Biggest
Hypocrite on Immigration, January 2011."
According to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America's Voice, "It's
truly a dishonor and far from a privilege to present this award to
Senator Cornyn. While he continues to talk a good game about the need
for common sense immigration reform, every single time it's mattered,
Senator Cornyn has voted the wrong way. It's incredible that he
continues to blame Democrats for the lack of progress on immigration
solutions, when Senator Cornyn has consistently opposed reform in
Congress."
At the Hispanic Leadership Network conference, Senator Cornyn portrayed himself as a dedicated advocate for immigration reform and blamed the lack of progress on Democrats. According
to POLITICO, Cornyn "reiterated his commitment to overhauling
immigration, saying a broken system serves neither 'our interests or our
values.'" Senator Cornyn said that "It is easy to be skeptical about
the prospects of immigration reform when both the White House and the
United States Senate have been in hands of Democratic leaders who make
promises they have not fulfilled...We can't simply kick the can down the
road."
Cornyn knows from whence he speaks. Having voted against comprehensive
immigration reform and the DREAM Act each twice during his Senate
career, Cornyn is a master of "kick the can" politics. He has also
mastered the art of triangulation, claiming to support comprehensive
immigration reform, but insisting that the border should be "secured"
before other elements of reform are taken up. Given the fact that a
Democrat occupies the White House and is in charge of immigration
enforcement, we're betting that Cornyn and others in the GOP are not
planning to declare the border "secure" before 2013 at the earliest.
The fact is, the federal government has dramatically bolstered border security and spending, and crimes along the border have actually decreased.
The missing piece of the puzzle is a fair and practical way of dealing
with the 11 million undocumented immigrants in our country today,
something that Cornyn claims to support but consistently votes against.
Thankfully, as a counterbalance to Senator Cornyn, another conference
attendee stood out for actually speaking the truth. Syndicated
conservative columnist Navarrette wins the "Telling It Like It Is" award
for voicing an uncomfortable truth to many of his fellow conservatives:
namely, that they are in a deep rut of denial regarding Latino outreach
if they think that they can fix their "Latino problem" through a few
simple changes in rhetoric. Said
Navarrette at the conference, "If you come away thinking that this is
all about language and tone, you will miss the point... You are always
going to be number two...The problem is not the tone. It is the message
itself-it is offensive, racist. You've got to fix the product." In his
syndicated column following the conference, entitled
"GOP Needs an Exorcist," Navarrette noted, "When it comes to
immigration, the Republican message is toxic. There is too much
dishonesty, too much racism and too many simplistic solutions to what is
a complicated problem. If the GOP wants to make a serious play for
Hispanic voters in 2012 and beyond, this has to change. The party is
struggling with demons. It doesn't need a publicist. It needs an
exorcist."
According to Sharry, "Perhaps Cornyn really believes that he can have
it both ways on immigration, and that Latino voters won't bother to
check his rhetoric against his voting record. But the fact is that when
it comes to common sense immigration reform, Sen. Cornyn has far more
in common with Lamar Smith, Steve King, and the anti-immigrant zealots
that are steering the Republican Party off a political cliff than he
does the Bush brothers. Here's hoping responsible Republicans actually
listen to what Navarrette and Latino voters have been saying, end the
blame game on immigration reform, and work together on a real solution."
Read America's Voice Memo on the Republican Party and Immigration
Watch Video of Senator Cornyn at the Hispanic Leadership Conference
Watch Video of Ruben Navarrette at the Hispanic Leadership Conference
America's Voice -- Harnessing the power of American voices and American values to win common sense immigration reform. The mission of America's Voice is to realize the promise of workable and humane comprehensive immigration reform. Our goal is to build the public support and create the political momentum for reforms that will transform a dysfunctional immigration system that does not work into a regulatory system that does.
LATEST NEWS
Pentagon Weighed Sending Boat Strike Survivors to Salvadoran Prison to Avoid Defending Bombings in Court
One former Navy lawyer said the Trump administration "might not want to get into the messy issues involving detention and habeas corpus lawsuits.”
Dec 10, 2025
Pentagon officials asked about sending survivors of US boat strikes in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean to a notorious maximum security prison in El Salvador in a bid to keep them out of American courts—where the Trump administration's high seas extrajudicial killing spree would be subject to legal scrutiny.
New details published Tuesday by the New York Times revealed that attorneys at the US Department of Defense inquired about whether two survivors of an October 16 strike on a boat allegedly smuggling drugs in the southern Caribbean could be sent to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), where the Trump administration has shipped ihundreds of mostly Venezuelan victims of its mass deportation campaign.
The prison—the centerpiece of right-wing Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele’s war on crime—has been plagued by allegations of torture and other abuse.
One Trump administration official speaking on condition of anonymity told the Times that State Department lawyers were "stunned" by the query. The two boat strike survivors were ultimately returned to Colombia and Ecuador, their home countries.
Other unnamed officials told the newspaper that repatriations—either to survivors' home countries or to third nations—would become the administration's default plan for dealing with anyone who lived through the US attacks.
The goal, the officials said, was to avoid trying boat strike survivors in US courts, where the discovery process would compel the Trump administration—which has offered no concrete evidence to support its claims that the targeted vessels were carrying drugs—to provide legal justification for attacks that experts say are illegal.
The Pentagon's inquiry followed a September 2 "double-tap" strike on a vessel carrying 11 passengers. Two men survived the initial bombing but were killed in a second strike. Since then, at least 76 other people have been killed in 23 boat strikes reported by the Trump administration.
In addition to the two men who initially survived the September 2 strike and the two repatriated survivors of the October 16 attack, one other person who lived through a boat bombing was left adrift at sea and is presumed dead.
Some observers have noted similarities between the Trump administration's goal of keeping boat strike survivors out of US courtrooms and War on Terror policies and practices—first implemented during the George W. Bush administration—such as extraordinary rendition, the use of Central Intelligence Agency "black sites," and imprisonment of terrorism suspects at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba—designed to circumvent the law.
While the Trump administration previously sent migrants captured during its crackdown to Guantánamo, sending boat strike survivors to the lockup allow their lawyers to sue for habeas corpus, a right granted by the US Supreme Court in its 2008 Boumediene v. Bush decision.
The Trump administration has revived the term "unlawful enemy combatant"—which was used by the Bush administration to classify people caught up in the War on Terror in a way that skirts the law—to apply to boat strike survivors. The Pentagon has also called such survivors "distressed mariners," a term that normally applies to civilians stranded at sea.
“If we’re in a war, they should be using the term ‘shipwrecked survivors,’” Mark Nevitt, a former Navy lawyer who is now a law professor at Emory University, told the Times. “My theory is they might not want to get into the messy issues involving detention and habeas corpus lawsuits.”
Relatives of men killed in the strikes, as well as officials in Venezuela and Colombia, say that at least some of the victims were fishermen who were not linked to the illicit drug trade. One expert said last month that even in cases of vessels that were involved in drug trafficking, the bombings were "the equivalent of straight-up massacring 16-year-old drug dealers on US street corners.”
Even if the men targeted in the boat strikes were running drugs, "the appropriate response is to interdict the boats and arrest the occupants for prosecution," former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth said Wednesday.
"The rules governing law enforcement prohibit lethal force except as a last resort to stop an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury," he added, "which the boats do not present."
Keep ReadingShow Less
New DHS Database Suggests That Less Than 5% of Those Arrested by ICE Are the ‘Worst of the Worst’
The database contains just 9,738 total people, a tiny fraction of the more than 220,000 ICE data says the agency arrested between January 21 and October 15.
Dec 10, 2025
In response to criticism of its aggressive and often lawless "mass deportation" campaign—which has entailed sweeping raids by masked agents, the use of squalid detention centers rife with torture, overt racial profiling, and the near-total abrogation of due process—the Trump administration has often fallen back on a familiar refrain: that the immigrants it targets are "the worst of the worst" dangerous criminals.
Immigration data published throughout the second Trump administration has already undermined this claim. Last month, David J. Bier of the Cato Institute published new data showing that between October 1 and November 15, only 5% of those booked into ICE detention had violent criminal convictions, while 73% had no convictions at all. It mirrored previous data published by Cato in June, which showed that 65% arrested had no criminal convictions of any kind, while 93% had no violent convictions.
Justice Department data published last month, meanwhile, showed that of the at least 614 people snatched up in the Operation Midway Blitz crackdown in Chicago, just 16 had criminal records of any kind.
On Monday, the Department of Homeland Security published its own "Worst of the Worst" database seeking to reverse the narrative, but it seems to have done the opposite.
"DHS has launched WOW.DHS.GOV for Americans to see the criminal illegal aliens that we are arresting, what crimes they committed, and what communities we removed them from," read a post from the agency on social media.
The post leads to a website containing the names, photos, and nationalities of those arrested by ICE. It also lists alleged past criminal convictions. In many cases, the only documentation of the allegations, if any is provided at all, is a DHS press release rather than official court records.
"Under Secretary [Kristi] Noem's leadership, the hardworking men and women of DHS and ICE are fulfilling President Trump's promise and carrying out mass deportations—starting with the worst of the worst—including the illegal aliens you see here," a header on the website reads.
Among those listed are people who DHS says have been convicted of heinous crimes, ranging from attempted murder to child abduction to domestic battery.
But the database contains just 9,738 total people, a tiny fraction of the more than 220,000 ICE data says the agency arrested between January 21 and October 15.
"So DHS is implicitly admitting that less than 5% of the people it arrests are people they believe are 'the worst of the worst,'" said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council.
Moreover, even some of those listed among the "Worst of the Worst" have only nonviolent offenses to their name, like drug possession, shoplifting, or disorderly conduct.
Reichlin-Melnick also noted that while immigration law does not require a criminal conviction for a person to be removed, "it matters because the administration talks as if these cases are the majority."
"There are definitely bad people on there who deserve deportation, but plenty of others on the list have nothing worse than a misdemeanor," he said. “If the administration were to actually focus its resources on people who were serious public safety threats or fugitives, there would be less of an outcry. But data shows that the big focus has been on boosting numbers by going after people no previous administration, Republican or Democrat, prioritized.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Escalates in Venezuela With 'Illegal' US Seizure of Oil Tanker
“Millions of civilians will be at risk if the economy deteriorates and tensions rise," warned one anti-war group.
Dec 10, 2025
The US military on Wednesday seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela in the latest act of aggression against a nation that President Donald Trump has been openly threatening for several weeks.
Bloomberg, which described the move as a "serious escalation" in tensions between the US and Venezuela, reported that the seizure of the tanker by US forces "may make it much harder for Venezuela to export its oil, as other shippers are now likely to be more reluctant to load its cargoes."
The seizure was described to Bloomberg by a Trump administration official as a "judicial enforcement action on a stateless vessel" that had been docked in Venezuela.
Shortly after the seizure occurred, Trump boasted about it during a meeting with business leaders at the White House, declaring that the tanker was the "largest one ever seized."
Trump: "It's been an interesting day from the standpoint of news. As you probably know, we've just seized a tanker on the coast of Venezuela. Largest one ever seized actually. And other things are happening." pic.twitter.com/wyOYMKCJTT
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) December 10, 2025
Just Foreign Policy, a progressive think tank and advocacy group, condemned the seizure of the tanker, describing it as an "illegal US move to take control of Venezuela's natural resources and strangle the economy, which is already struggling under indiscriminate US sanctions," and warning that "millions of civilians will be at risk if the economy deteriorates and tensions rise."
The seizure of the oil tanker is just one of many aggressive maneuvers that the Trump administration has been making around Venezuela.
Starting in September, the administration began a series of murders of people aboard boats in the Caribbean Sea off the coast of Venezuela and in the Pacific Ocean.
The Trump administration has claimed those targeted for extrajudicial killing are drug smugglers and accused Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of leading an international drug trafficking organization called the Cartel de los Soles, despite many experts saying that they have seen no evidence that such an organization formally exists.
Trump late last month further escalated tensions with Venezuela when he declared that airspace over the nation was “closed in its entirety,” even though he lacks any legal authority to enforce such a decree. Trump has also hinted that strikes against purported drug traffickers on Venezuelan soil would occur in the near future.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular