SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Egyptian authorities should immediately disclose the fate and
whereabouts of Mohamed Saad Tork, who disappeared in July 2009 with
strong indications that he was being held by the authorities, and
prosecute those responsible, Human Rights Watch said today. Tork's case
highlights the continuing practice of enforced disappearances by Egypt's
State Security Investigations agency.
"The brutal practice of 'disappearing' people is a terrible blight on
Egypt's human rights record," said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East
director at Human Rights Watch. "Authorities should immediately reveal
Mohamed Tork's whereabouts and prosecute those responsible for his
disappearance."
On July 26, 2009, Tork, a 23-year-old second-year dentistry student
at Alexandria University, told his family he was going for a walk. When
they had heard nothing more from him for 48 hours, his family filed a
missing person report at the Rashid police station, in the Beheira
governorate. Five days later, Mohamed's father, Saad Tork, received a
summons from the head of the police station's criminal investigations
division.
"I went to the police station and the officer in charge asked me if
Mohamed was ok or had health problems," Saad Tork told Human Rights
Watch. "I explained that he'd had depression and was taking medication.
The officer went on to ask me exactly what medication he was taking,
what the dose was and who his doctor was. He then relayed all this
information over the phone to another person.
"A week after that I went to the Damanhour State Security offices,
and the guards told me that Mohamed had been moved to Rashid. When I
went to the Rashid office, they told me they didn't know anything about
him and that I was not to come back."
The family sent complaints to the Interior Ministry, public
prosecutor and other government offices. After a year without any
response, in July 2010, the family decided to take the case to human
rights organizations and to publicize it to the media.
The Association for Human Rights Legal Aid and the Arab Network for
Human Rights Information filed a disappearance complaint before the
Office of the Public Prosecutor on August 8, 2010. Gamal Eid, the
lawyer who filed the complaint, told Human Rights Watch that the
prosecution said it was still investigating the complaint and had made
inquiries to the State Security Investigations agency (SSI), the
internal security branch of the Interior Ministry.
Tork's family said they are not aware of any reason why SSI would
want to detain him. The agency had summoned him to its Rashid office in
April 2009, and questioned him about his university activities, in
particular his participation in a demonstration at the university at the
time of the Gaza war a few months earlier. They released him after an
hour, the family said.
The long silence about Tork's whereabouts raises serious concerns
about his well-being, Human Rights Watch said. State Security detention
is frequently incommunicado, but usually lasts for about two months.
"The extreme anguish inflicted on relatives of the disappeared who
have to deal with the pain of not knowing the fate of their loved one
makes the family direct victims of the violation as well," Stork said.
"Mohamed Tork's family have a right to know where he is and in what
condition."
State Security incommunicado detention, which can amount to enforced
disappearance, is common for political detainees. The agency routinely
detains suspects in high-profile cases before bringing them to the state
security prosecutor to face official charges.
In 2009, the agency held incommunicado for up to two months 25 men
accused of membership in a terrorist organization in connection with a
robbery in Cairo's Zeitoun district and alleged plans to attack Suez
Canal shipping. In February 2009, the SSI detained a blogger, Diaa Eddin
Gad, for 50 days before releasing him without charge. Gad was among a
number of bloggers and activists arrested in relation to protests over
the Gaza war, in December 2008 and January 2009. More recently, on March
25, the SSI detained Tarek Khedr, a member of the April 6 youth
activist group, for 80 days.
Incommunicado detention and enforced disappearance are illegal under
Egyptian law, which stipulates that police must bring detainees before a
prosecutor within 24 hours. The only legal places of detention under
Egyptian law are police stations and prisons, both of which are subject
to visits by the prosecution. Detention in State Security offices and
without a prosecutor's detention order is illegal under both Egyptian
and international law.
As a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, Egypt has an obligation to provide an accessible, effective,
and enforceable remedy - including justice, truth, and adequate
reparations - after a disappearance violation has occurred. Under
international law, victims and their families have a right to know the
truth about violations they suffered. On March 12, the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, said that under
international law, "The right to the truth implies knowing the full and
complete truth about events that transpired ... In cases of enforced
disappearance and missing persons, the right also implies the right to
know the fate and whereabouts of the victim."
In December 2006, the UN opened for signature the International
Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced
Disappearance. The convention defines the grave and serious violation of
human rights of an enforced disappearance as "the arrest, detention,
abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the
State or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization,
support or acquiescence of the State, followed by a refusal to
acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or
whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside
the protection of the law."
So far, 83 states have signed the convention and in August, Paraguay
became the 19th state to ratify it. One more ratification is needed for
the convention to come into force. Egypt has not signed the convention.
"This week millions of families around the world marked International
Day of the Disappeared," Stork said. "The Egyptian government should
sign and ratify the convention to signal that it will end this
practice."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
"People can't afford childcare," said Sen. Bernie Sanders. "And this guy, in addition to giving tax breaks to billionaires, now wants to spend another $200 billion on a war that should never have been fought."
US Sen. Bernie Sanders said Thursday that it is absurd for the Trump administration to demand another $200 billion from Congress for an illegal war on Iran after lawmakers already approved $1 trillion in military spending for the year—and while millions of people across the nation are struggling to afford basic necessities.
"You got people all over this country, 20% of households, spending 50% of their income on housing," Sanders (I-Vt.) said in an appearance on MS NOW. "People can't afford healthcare. People can't afford childcare. And this guy, in addition to giving tax breaks to billionaires, now wants to spend another $200 billion on a war that should never have been fought."
The senator's remarks came as President Donald Trump, who has not yet formally requested the funds from Congress, suggested another $200 billion would be a "small price to pay" as the US-Israeli war on Iran heads toward its fourth week with no end in sight.
"I think the Trump people are in a bit of panic," Sanders said Thursday. "They're losing ground. Gas prices are soaring. There is massive discontent against this war. It's got to end, and we've got to make sure that Trump is neutered in 2026."
With the Trump administration considering a plan to deploy thousands of additional troops to the Middle East amid widespread fears of a ground invasion of Iran—which would explode the price tag of an already costly war—the National Priorities Project (NPP) released an analysis highlighting where the $200 billion requested by the Pentagon could be better spent.
The group estimated that $200 billion would be enough for all of the following this year:
"Pete Hegseth would rather the US bomb Iranian families than feed American families," wrote NPP's Lindsay Koshgarian, referring to the Pentagon secretary. "We should remember the lies that led us into war in Iraq a generation ago. That war ultimately cost nearly $3 trillion. We must not go down that path again. Our tax dollars should be helping struggling Americans, not feeding new forever wars."
One advocacy group leader highlighted that "$200 billion is enough to materially change the lives of Americans," from establishing universal pre-K education to building over 100,000 housing units.
As US President Donald Trump on Thursday confirmed reporting that he's seeking $200 billion more from Congress to continue waging his unpopular war of choice on Iran, Rep. Ilhan Omar was among those forcefully pushing back.
"We're told there's no money for universal healthcare or to end hunger in this country. But somehow $200 billion more for war will likely move through Congress without question," said the progressive Minnesota Democrat, who fled civil war in Somalia as a child. "Not another penny for another endless war."
Since Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu started bombing Iran late last month—creating a spiraling crisis that has now killed and injured thousands of people across the Middle East, plus damaged civilian infrastructure in multiple countries—anti-war lawmakers and organizations have delivered similar messages.
"While they kick 17 million Americans off their healthcare, Republicans want to spend billions on Trump's reckless war of choice," Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in early March. "Hell no."
Last week, shortly after Pentagon officials told Congress that just the first six days cost Americans more than $11.3 billion, over 250 groups collectively told lawmakers on Capitol Hill to "vote against any additional funding for Trump's unconstitutional war."
At the time, the reported figure was a quarter of what it is now: $50 billion. The coalition noted that the funding "would be enough to restore food assistance for 4 million Americans that was taken away in the tax and budget reconciliation bill, establish universal pre-K education, and pay for the annual construction of more than 100,000 units of housing, among other possible priorities."
After Trump confirmed that he wants four times more than expected, one coalition member, the Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) Policy Project, took to social media to highlight other ways the money could be spent to improve the lives of working Americans, from school meals and paid leave to funding all levels of education.
Another coalition member, Public Citizen, released a Thursday statement in which co-president Robert Weissman ripped Trump's spending request as "grotesque beyond words."
According to Weissman:
It should properly be understood not just as a request to replenish supplies, but to expand, escalate, and perpetuate the illegal, unconstitutional, unpopular and devastating war on Iran. Congress should understand that approving any portion of this funding opens the gates for one, two, and potentially many more war funding requests in the future.
How dare the administration propose this gargantuan sum to expand an illegal war of choice at the same time it has rammed through deep cuts in healthcare and food assistance, refuses to spend foreign assistance at a cost of millions of lives, and has cut spending on protecting clean air, maintaining our national parks, investing in health research, protecting consumers from fraud, and so much more.
$200 billion is enough to materially change the lives of Americans and truly make our country stronger. It would be enough to restore food assistance to the 4 million Americans and Medicaid to the 15 million Americans who will lose those crucial supports under the Republican reconciliation bill; establish universal pre-K education; pay for the annual construction of more than 100,000 units of housing; double the budget of the Environmental Protection Agency; and expand Medicare to cover dental, vision, and hearing.
Weissman argued that "every member of Congress should announce, right now, that they will reject this monstrous war funding proposal, before it is formalized."
Despite rising casualties across the Middle East and polls showing that the US assault on Iran is unpopular, even with Trump voters, a few Democrats voted with nearly all Republicans in the Senate and House of Representatives earlier this month to reject war powers resolutions intended to end Trump's Operation Epic Fury. The upper chamber blocked a similar effort late Wednesday.
Berlin says it needs to focus on its defense in a separate ICJ case in which Nicaragua accuses Germany of supporting Israel's genocidal war on Gaza.
Germany said Wednesday that it will drop its planned intervention in the International Court of Justice genocide against Israel so that it can better focus on its own defense in a separate ICJ case filed by Nicaragua accusing Berlin of enabling Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza via arms sales.
Deputy German Foreign Minister Josef Hinterseher said during a press conference in Berlin that his country "will not intervene" on Israel's side in the South Africa v. Israel genocide case filed at the Hague-based tribunal in December 2023.
This is a marked departure from Germany's January 2024 announcement that it would intervene on behalf of Israel in the case, arguing that the genocide allegation made by South Africa had "no basis whatsoever."
Nearly two dozen nations, most recently the Netherlands, Namibia, and Iceland, have either formally intervened on the side of South Africa or announced their intent to do so. The Herero and Nama peoples of modern-day Namibia suffered a genocide during the region's colonization by Germany in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
A handful of countries including the United States, Hungary, and Fiji have also intervened on behalf of Israel.
In 2024, Nicaragua filed a case against Germany at the ICJ, arguing that the European nation “has not only failed to fulfill its obligation to prevent the genocide committed and being committed against the Palestinian people... but has contributed to the commission of genocide in violation" of the Genocide Convention.
Germany has provided financial, military, diplomatic, and political support to Israel. It also temporarily halted financial contributions to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) based on unsubstantiated Israeli claims that a dozen of its worjers were involved in the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023.
Unlike Germany, the US and Israel are not members of the ICJ. The US quit the tribunal after it ruled against the Reagan administration in Nicaragua v. United States, a 1984 ruling that determined the US illegally supported Contra terrorists and mined Nicaraguan harbors.
However, under the court's territorial jurisdiction powers, countries that are not members of the court can still be brought before it for crimes committed in member states.
Further complicating matters, Germany is one of numerous countries which have intervened in Gambia v. Myanmar, which the African nation filed at the ICJ in 2019 amid the Burmese junta's ongoing genocide against Rohingya Muslims.
The ICJ has issued several provisional orders in South Africa v. Israel, including directives to prevent genocidal acts and allow aid into the besieged Gaza Strip amid a burgeoning famine. Israel has been accused of ignoring these orders.
The US under the Biden and Trump administrations pressured ICJ members to refrain from intervening on behalf of South Africa. The Trump administration has also sanctioned members of the International Criminal Court (ICC)‚ which in 2024 issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza.
In Germany, as in several other Western nations, authorities have cracked down on pro-Palestine protests, free expression of support for Palestinian rights, and criticism of Israel. Critics say the persistent framing of German national identity around enduring guilt for the Nazis' wholesale slaughter of 6 million Jews during the Holocaust is driving overzealous policing of dissent and conflation of pro-Palestinian activism with antisemitism.
This perceived moral burden, say observers, risks stifling legitimate political debate, curtailing free speech, and criminalizing solidarity with Palestinians under the pretext of historical responsibility. This has driven German actions from secretly funding Israel's development of nuclear weapons over half a century ago to brutally assaulting and arresting pro-Palestine protesters—including women, elders, minors, and people with disabilities—after the October 2023 attack.
German police punch an anti-genocide woman in front of the cameras.
[image or embed]
— Antifa_Ultras (@antifa-ultras.bsky.social) October 7, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Amnesty International's latest annual human rights report on Germany notes "excessive use of force by police during peaceful protests by climate activists and supporters of Palestinians’ rights," as well as Berlin's "irresponsible arms transfers" to not only Israel but also Saudi Arabia.