September, 03 2010, 02:00pm EDT
Egypt: Disclose Fate of 'Disappeared' Student
Reveal Whereabouts of Youth and Prosecute Those Responsible
CAIRO
Egyptian authorities should immediately disclose the fate and
whereabouts of Mohamed Saad Tork, who disappeared in July 2009 with
strong indications that he was being held by the authorities, and
prosecute those responsible, Human Rights Watch said today. Tork's case
highlights the continuing practice of enforced disappearances by Egypt's
State Security Investigations agency.
"The brutal practice of 'disappearing' people is a terrible blight on
Egypt's human rights record," said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East
director at Human Rights Watch. "Authorities should immediately reveal
Mohamed Tork's whereabouts and prosecute those responsible for his
disappearance."
On July 26, 2009, Tork, a 23-year-old second-year dentistry student
at Alexandria University, told his family he was going for a walk. When
they had heard nothing more from him for 48 hours, his family filed a
missing person report at the Rashid police station, in the Beheira
governorate. Five days later, Mohamed's father, Saad Tork, received a
summons from the head of the police station's criminal investigations
division.
"I went to the police station and the officer in charge asked me if
Mohamed was ok or had health problems," Saad Tork told Human Rights
Watch. "I explained that he'd had depression and was taking medication.
The officer went on to ask me exactly what medication he was taking,
what the dose was and who his doctor was. He then relayed all this
information over the phone to another person.
"A week after that I went to the Damanhour State Security offices,
and the guards told me that Mohamed had been moved to Rashid. When I
went to the Rashid office, they told me they didn't know anything about
him and that I was not to come back."
The family sent complaints to the Interior Ministry, public
prosecutor and other government offices. After a year without any
response, in July 2010, the family decided to take the case to human
rights organizations and to publicize it to the media.
The Association for Human Rights Legal Aid and the Arab Network for
Human Rights Information filed a disappearance complaint before the
Office of the Public Prosecutor on August 8, 2010. Gamal Eid, the
lawyer who filed the complaint, told Human Rights Watch that the
prosecution said it was still investigating the complaint and had made
inquiries to the State Security Investigations agency (SSI), the
internal security branch of the Interior Ministry.
Tork's family said they are not aware of any reason why SSI would
want to detain him. The agency had summoned him to its Rashid office in
April 2009, and questioned him about his university activities, in
particular his participation in a demonstration at the university at the
time of the Gaza war a few months earlier. They released him after an
hour, the family said.
The long silence about Tork's whereabouts raises serious concerns
about his well-being, Human Rights Watch said. State Security detention
is frequently incommunicado, but usually lasts for about two months.
"The extreme anguish inflicted on relatives of the disappeared who
have to deal with the pain of not knowing the fate of their loved one
makes the family direct victims of the violation as well," Stork said.
"Mohamed Tork's family have a right to know where he is and in what
condition."
State Security incommunicado detention, which can amount to enforced
disappearance, is common for political detainees. The agency routinely
detains suspects in high-profile cases before bringing them to the state
security prosecutor to face official charges.
In 2009, the agency held incommunicado for up to two months 25 men
accused of membership in a terrorist organization in connection with a
robbery in Cairo's Zeitoun district and alleged plans to attack Suez
Canal shipping. In February 2009, the SSI detained a blogger, Diaa Eddin
Gad, for 50 days before releasing him without charge. Gad was among a
number of bloggers and activists arrested in relation to protests over
the Gaza war, in December 2008 and January 2009. More recently, on March
25, the SSI detained Tarek Khedr, a member of the April 6 youth
activist group, for 80 days.
Incommunicado detention and enforced disappearance are illegal under
Egyptian law, which stipulates that police must bring detainees before a
prosecutor within 24 hours. The only legal places of detention under
Egyptian law are police stations and prisons, both of which are subject
to visits by the prosecution. Detention in State Security offices and
without a prosecutor's detention order is illegal under both Egyptian
and international law.
As a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, Egypt has an obligation to provide an accessible, effective,
and enforceable remedy - including justice, truth, and adequate
reparations - after a disappearance violation has occurred. Under
international law, victims and their families have a right to know the
truth about violations they suffered. On March 12, the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, said that under
international law, "The right to the truth implies knowing the full and
complete truth about events that transpired ... In cases of enforced
disappearance and missing persons, the right also implies the right to
know the fate and whereabouts of the victim."
In December 2006, the UN opened for signature the International
Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced
Disappearance. The convention defines the grave and serious violation of
human rights of an enforced disappearance as "the arrest, detention,
abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the
State or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization,
support or acquiescence of the State, followed by a refusal to
acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or
whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside
the protection of the law."
So far, 83 states have signed the convention and in August, Paraguay
became the 19th state to ratify it. One more ratification is needed for
the convention to come into force. Egypt has not signed the convention.
"This week millions of families around the world marked International
Day of the Disappeared," Stork said. "The Egyptian government should
sign and ratify the convention to signal that it will end this
practice."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Listen Live: US Supreme Court Hears Outrageous Argument That Trump Is Above the Law
"The American people deserve a Supreme Court that does not hesitate to declare that no one is above the law, including a former president," said one campaigner.
Apr 25, 2024
After months of delay, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday will hear oral arguments in a closely watched case on whether former President Donald Trump should be immune from criminal charges stemming from his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss—an argument that legal experts say is both absurd and dangerous.
Listen live to the oral arguments, which are set to begin at 10:00 am ET:
Thursday's proceedings mark the high court's final argument of its current term, and pro-democracy campaigners are calling on the justices to quickly reject the former president's sweeping immunity claim so he can face trial on federal election subversion charges before his November rematch with President Joe Biden.
As Bloomberg's Greg Stohr noted earlier this week, Thursday's oral arguments give "Special Counsel Jack Smith only a narrow window to put the former president in front of a Washington jury before voters go to the polls on November 5."
"With the trial on hold until the high court rules," Stohr added, "Smith needs a clear-cut victory, and he needs it quickly."
Sean Eldridge, founder and president of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said in a statement Thursday that "the Supreme Court's right-wing majority has already handed Trump a temporary victory by stalling this case for months, allowing him to delay accountability for his criminal attempts to cling to power."
"With so much at stake for our democracy, the Supreme Court should rule swiftly and decisively in this case," said Eldridge. "Accountability delayed could mean accountability denied."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular