SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Egyptian authorities should immediately disclose the fate and
whereabouts of Mohamed Saad Tork, who disappeared in July 2009 with
strong indications that he was being held by the authorities, and
prosecute those responsible, Human Rights Watch said today. Tork's case
highlights the continuing practice of enforced disappearances by Egypt's
State Security Investigations agency.
"The brutal practice of 'disappearing' people is a terrible blight on
Egypt's human rights record," said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East
director at Human Rights Watch. "Authorities should immediately reveal
Mohamed Tork's whereabouts and prosecute those responsible for his
disappearance."
On July 26, 2009, Tork, a 23-year-old second-year dentistry student
at Alexandria University, told his family he was going for a walk. When
they had heard nothing more from him for 48 hours, his family filed a
missing person report at the Rashid police station, in the Beheira
governorate. Five days later, Mohamed's father, Saad Tork, received a
summons from the head of the police station's criminal investigations
division.
"I went to the police station and the officer in charge asked me if
Mohamed was ok or had health problems," Saad Tork told Human Rights
Watch. "I explained that he'd had depression and was taking medication.
The officer went on to ask me exactly what medication he was taking,
what the dose was and who his doctor was. He then relayed all this
information over the phone to another person.
"A week after that I went to the Damanhour State Security offices,
and the guards told me that Mohamed had been moved to Rashid. When I
went to the Rashid office, they told me they didn't know anything about
him and that I was not to come back."
The family sent complaints to the Interior Ministry, public
prosecutor and other government offices. After a year without any
response, in July 2010, the family decided to take the case to human
rights organizations and to publicize it to the media.
The Association for Human Rights Legal Aid and the Arab Network for
Human Rights Information filed a disappearance complaint before the
Office of the Public Prosecutor on August 8, 2010. Gamal Eid, the
lawyer who filed the complaint, told Human Rights Watch that the
prosecution said it was still investigating the complaint and had made
inquiries to the State Security Investigations agency (SSI), the
internal security branch of the Interior Ministry.
Tork's family said they are not aware of any reason why SSI would
want to detain him. The agency had summoned him to its Rashid office in
April 2009, and questioned him about his university activities, in
particular his participation in a demonstration at the university at the
time of the Gaza war a few months earlier. They released him after an
hour, the family said.
The long silence about Tork's whereabouts raises serious concerns
about his well-being, Human Rights Watch said. State Security detention
is frequently incommunicado, but usually lasts for about two months.
"The extreme anguish inflicted on relatives of the disappeared who
have to deal with the pain of not knowing the fate of their loved one
makes the family direct victims of the violation as well," Stork said.
"Mohamed Tork's family have a right to know where he is and in what
condition."
State Security incommunicado detention, which can amount to enforced
disappearance, is common for political detainees. The agency routinely
detains suspects in high-profile cases before bringing them to the state
security prosecutor to face official charges.
In 2009, the agency held incommunicado for up to two months 25 men
accused of membership in a terrorist organization in connection with a
robbery in Cairo's Zeitoun district and alleged plans to attack Suez
Canal shipping. In February 2009, the SSI detained a blogger, Diaa Eddin
Gad, for 50 days before releasing him without charge. Gad was among a
number of bloggers and activists arrested in relation to protests over
the Gaza war, in December 2008 and January 2009. More recently, on March
25, the SSI detained Tarek Khedr, a member of the April 6 youth
activist group, for 80 days.
Incommunicado detention and enforced disappearance are illegal under
Egyptian law, which stipulates that police must bring detainees before a
prosecutor within 24 hours. The only legal places of detention under
Egyptian law are police stations and prisons, both of which are subject
to visits by the prosecution. Detention in State Security offices and
without a prosecutor's detention order is illegal under both Egyptian
and international law.
As a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, Egypt has an obligation to provide an accessible, effective,
and enforceable remedy - including justice, truth, and adequate
reparations - after a disappearance violation has occurred. Under
international law, victims and their families have a right to know the
truth about violations they suffered. On March 12, the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, said that under
international law, "The right to the truth implies knowing the full and
complete truth about events that transpired ... In cases of enforced
disappearance and missing persons, the right also implies the right to
know the fate and whereabouts of the victim."
In December 2006, the UN opened for signature the International
Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced
Disappearance. The convention defines the grave and serious violation of
human rights of an enforced disappearance as "the arrest, detention,
abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the
State or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization,
support or acquiescence of the State, followed by a refusal to
acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or
whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside
the protection of the law."
So far, 83 states have signed the convention and in August, Paraguay
became the 19th state to ratify it. One more ratification is needed for
the convention to come into force. Egypt has not signed the convention.
"This week millions of families around the world marked International
Day of the Disappeared," Stork said. "The Egyptian government should
sign and ratify the convention to signal that it will end this
practice."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
"Our schools are starved for resources with a $32.7 billion surplus, yet Gov. Abbott has no problem spending $1,841 per person for a political stunt," said one Texan.
Since April 2022, Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has spent over $221 million in taxpayer money transporting nearly 120,000 migrants to six Democrat-led cities outside of the state, the Washington Examinerrevealed Thursday.
"That's roughly $1,841 per person," noted Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council who has previously criticized Abbott's "dehumanizing" bus scheme and other elements of the governor's Operation Lone Star.
"By comparison, a bus ticket to New York costs about $215, while a flight costs about $350," he highlighted. "It would have WAY cheaper to just give migrants money for tickets. Abbott's effort not only made it a political stunt, it lined a contractor's pocket."
As the conservative Examiner reported:
A public information request filed to the Texas Division of Emergency Management showed that the state made more than 750 payments totaling $221,705,637 to transportation companies since the start of operations in April 2022 and August 2024.
Nearly all of the costs were picked up by the state's 30 million residents, with a small portion, $460,196, donated from outside parties. Less than 1% of the $221 million was picked up by nontaxpayers.
The Examiner noted that the almost 120,000 migrants bused north are a "small number" of the more than 5.3 million people who crossed the southern border illegally but have been allowed to remain in the United States since January 2021, according to a U.S. House Judiciary Committee draft report the outlet exclusively obtained earlier this year.
While the busing reportedly stopped earlier this summer due to lack of demand, Abbott's office said last month that since 2022, his taxpayer-funded scheme had transported over 45,900 migrants to New York City, 36,900 to Chicago, 19,200 to Denver, 12,500 to Washington, D.C., 3,400 to Philadelphia, and 1,500 to Los Angeles.
"The overwhelming majority of migrants didn't want to stay in Texas. They wanted to go elsewhere. So if the question was the most efficient way to help them leave the state, the answer would be just buy them tickets and not pay millions to bus them to NYC," Reichlin-Melnick said Thursday. "They are able to live wherever they want while they go through the court process. It's just that many people used up every last cent to get here, so a free bus from Abbott was a very enticing option."
"I've been on record saying that most migrants were extremely happy with the free buses. Despite a lot of lies out there about migrants being bought tickets, the reality is that nearly all migrants have to purchase transportation away from the border, making free buses a godsend," he added. "The problem with the buses has always been that they weaponized migrants by going to only a small handful of politically charged locations (regardless of where migrants wanted to go), and that they were a big waste of money given the cheaper option of donating bus/plane tickets."
In addition to the busing stunt, Abbott has come under fire in recent years for installing razor wire and buoys—which critics called "death traps"—in the Rio Grande as well as signing a pair of anti-migrant bills that Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, described as "deeply harmful and unconstitutional."
According to a New York Times investigation published in July, over half of the migrants bused out Texas were initially from Venezuela—a South American nation enduring not only ongoing political turmoil but also U.S. economic sanctions that, as hundreds of legal experts and groups wrote last month, "extensively harm civilian populations" and "often drive mass migration."
"Opponents of democracy are terrified that they will lose again at the ballot box in November and are rushing to right-wing judges to hamstring democratic governance," said one observer.
A Republican-appointed U.S. federal judge in Georgia raised eyebrows and objections Thursday after taking what observers called the "unprecedented" step of blocking a rule that hasn't even been finalized in order to stop the Biden administration from implementing a plan to deliver promised debt relief to millions of student borrowers.
U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Georgia James Randal Hall issued an order blocking the Biden administration's proposed federal student debt relief rule. Hall—an appointee of former President George W. Bush—granted a motion by a coalition of right-wing state attorneys general to preempt the rule's eventual implementation.
"The court is substituting its judgment for those elected to serve the public," American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten said in response to the ruling. "It subverts the democratic process and denies relief to student loan borrowers, many of whom rely on debt relief programs already advanced by the Biden-Harris administration."
"This court's unprecedented decision to block a rule that does not yet exist is not only bad for the 30 million borrowers who were relying on the administration to deliver much-needed relief," she continued. "It's a harbinger of the chaos and corruption right-wing judges seek to force on the American people."
Mike Pierce, executive director of the Student Borrower Protection Center—which called the ruling "dangerous and unprecedented"—denounced Hall for preventing the Biden administration from delivering student debt relief "even though no plan has been finalized."
"This is an extraordinary break with precedent and a brazen move by the conservative movement to shift even more power to unelected, unaccountable red-state judges," he said. "Opponents of democracy are terrified that they will lose again at the ballot box in November and are rushing to right-wing judges to hamstring democratic governance."
"This is the clearest sign yet that Project 2025 is already terrorizing student loan borrowers through a slow-moving judicial coup," Pierce added, referring to a conservative coalition's agenda for a far-right takeover of the federal government—which critics warn would worsen the U.S. student debt crisis.
Biden's proposal would forgive some or all student debt for around 30 million borrowers who have been repaying undergraduate loans for at least 20 years, or graduate loans for 25 years.
Hall's order is based on what he said was the plaintiffs' "substantial likelihood of success on the merits given the rule's lack of statutory authority" and U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona's "attempt to implement a rule contrary to normal procedures."
"This is especially true in light of the recent rulings across the country striking down similar federal student loan forgiveness plans," he added.
The U.S. Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority last year struck down Biden's initial plan to relieve up to $20,000 in federal scholastic debt for around 40 million borrowers, and last month the justices kept in place a sweeping suspension of the administration's Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) program, which aims to lower monthly repayments and hasten loan forgiveness.
"We're here for you and your children," one campaigner told a police officer who was arresting her. "We're here for our world."
Closing out a "historic" summer of civil disobedience—but with no plans to back off their demands that Wall Street divest from planet-heating fossil fuels—the "Summer of Heat" campaign blockaded the entrance of Citibank's headquarters in New York for an hour on Thursday.
At the 32nd protest held by Stop the Money Pipeline, New York Communities for Change, and other groups since June 10, organizers said 50 people were arrested, including climate scientists and an advocate dressed as an orca—a reference to numerous cases of whales ramming and sinking luxury yachts in recent years.
"The water is too damn hot!" said the costumed protester. "Stop funding fossil fuels."
Summer of Heat has targeted Citibank due to its status as Wall Street's largest funder of methane gas extraction since 2016 and the second-worst funder of oil, coal, and gas projects in recent years, spending $396.3 billion from 2016-23.
For an hour, roughly 1,000 Citibank employees were barred from entering the building as protesters blocked the doors.
"I've been studying climate change since 1982 and no one is listening to the data," said biologist and anti-fracking advocate Sandra Steingraber—who has joined multiple Summer of Heat actions—as she was arrested. "So today they're going to have to listen to my body blocking the doors of the world's largest funder of new fossil fuel projects."
More than 5,000 people have joined Summer of Heat protests since June, and there have been more than 600 arrests. Citibank's response to the demonstrators has escalated to violence at times, with a security guard punching one protester in the building's lobby last month.
One woman told police arresting her on Thursday that her grandson suffers from asthma resulting from wildfire smoke, which climate scientists have linked to fossil fuel extraction and planetary heating.
"We're here for you and your children," she told an officer. "We're here for our world."
As the campaigners blocked the Citibank entrance, cellist John Mark Rozendaal and Stop the Money Pipeline director Alec Connon were preparing to attend a court hearing on Friday regarding assault and criminal contempt charges. Connon has said he was "falsely accused of assault by Citibank security so they could get a restraining order" keeping him from returning to protests at the headquarters.
Mary Lawlor, United Nations special rapporteur on human rights defenders, expressed "strong concern at the charges" and said she would be "closely following" the trial.