

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Jeff Miller, Center for Biological Diversity, (510) 499-9185
The
National
Marine Fisheries Service today finalized Endangered Species Act
regulations to
protect the southern population of green sturgeon from "take" and other
harmful
activities. The take prohibitions make it unlawful to kill or harm
southern
green sturgeon and could require changes in operations of dams and water
diversions, commercial and recreational fisheries, dredging operations,
and
pesticide applications to protect the green sturgeon, an ancient and
imperiled
migratory fish species that has survived since the Jurassic
era.
"The
southern
green sturgeon population has fallen to precariously low numbers, and
these
regulations should help protect the few remaining spawning sturgeon from
the
Sacramento River from harm by water projects,
overfishing, and pesticides," said Jeff Miller, conservation advocate
with the
Center for Biological Diversity.
The new regulations,
created under
section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act, prohibit all unauthorized
"take" of
southern green sturgeon throughout their spawning and rearing range in
the
Sacramento, Feather, and lower Yuba rivers, as
well as in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and San Francisco Bay.
Because of the similarity of
appearance between southern and northern green sturgeon, any green
sturgeon in
marine environments, including the mouths of coastal rivers, estuaries,
and
marine waters in California, Oregon, and Washington, are protected from
take.
The
green
sturgeon, Acipenser medirostris, is one of the most ancient fish
species
in the world, remaining unchanged in appearance since it first emerged
200
million years ago. Green sturgeon are among the largest and
longest-living fish
species found in freshwater, living for as long as 70 years, reaching
7.5 feet
in length, and weighing as much as to 350 pounds. Sturgeon have a prehistoric appearance, with a skeleton
consisting of mostly cartilage and rows of bony plates for scales. They
have
snouts like shovels and mouths like vacuum cleaners that are used to
siphon
shrimp and other food from sandy depths.
For
more
information about the
green sturgeon, visit:
www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/fish/North_American_green_sturgeon/index.html
Background
In
response to
a 2001 Center listing petition and a subsequent lawsuit, the Fisheries
Service
in 2006 listed the southern green sturgeon population - fish in the San
Francisco Bay and Delta that spawn in the Sacramento River basin, but
migrate
along much of the west coast from Mexico to Canada - as a threatened
species
under the Endangered Species Act. In 2009, the Fisheries Service
designated
broad areas of river, estuarine, bay, and coastal marine habitats in
California, Oregon, and
Washington as
critical habitat for the southern population of green
sturgeon.
Killing, injuring,
harassing,
hunting, capturing, or collecting green sturgeon without a federal
permit under
the Endangered Species Act are now activities considered "take,'' as is
harm
from significant habitat modification or degradation that impairs
sturgeon
breeding, spawning, rearing, migrating, feeding, or sheltering. The 4(d)
rule
discusses specific activities likely to take or harm green sturgeon,
including
commercial and recreational fisheries, habitat-altering activities,
impeded
migration from dams and water diversions, entrainment during water
diversions or
dredging, application of pesticides and pollutants, and nonnative
species
introductions. Exemptions to the 4(d) rule allow for continued tribal
fisheries,
scientific research and monitoring
activities, emergency rescue
and salvage activities, and habitat restoration projects that are not
considered
to threaten green sturgeon.
In order to comply with the
4(d)
rule, state commercial and recreational fisheries must submit fisheries
management and evaluation plans to the
federal Fisheries Service that prohibit retention of green sturgeon
(zero
bag limit), with measures to minimize incidental take of sturgeon. In
2007,
California and Washington revised fishing regulations to prohibit
retention of green sturgeon, and Oregon
prohibited retention of green sturgeon in lower Columbia
River recreational fisheries. For commercial fisheries, the
retention of green sturgeon has been prohibited in the Columbia River
since 2006
and statewide in Washington since 2007. California has prohibited
commercial fishing for sturgeon since 1917. American Indian fisheries
for green
sturgeon will be required to develop tribal resource-management plans
for
sturgeon. The only tribal take of southern green sturgeon is as bycatch
in
salmon and white sturgeon fisheries conducted by the Quinault tribe in
coastal
Washington
waters. In 2006, the Quinault tribe implemented zero retention of green
sturgeon
for their Grays Harbor fishery. The Yurok and
Hoopa tribes harvest green sturgeon in the Klamath River in California,
but most fish
are believed to be from the northern population, which is not federally
protected. Overall, the take of green sturgeon in tribal fisheries has
been low
compared to that of nontribal fisheries.
Like
salmon,
sturgeon are anadromous, migrating to the ocean and returning to
freshwater to
spawn. Only three known green sturgeon spawning grounds remain, in the
Sacramento and Klamath rivers in California and the Rogue River in
Oregon. Between four and
seven spawning populations have already been eliminated in California
and Oregon. The estimated abundance of green
sturgeon in the Sacramento River plummeted by 95 percent between
2001 and
2006, with only an estimated 50 pairs of spawning fish remaining. Severe declines in both green and white sturgeon
parallel the collapse of other fish species in the Sacramento-San
Joaquin
Delta, such as delta smelt, longfin
smelt,
Sacramento splittail, threadfin shad, and striped bass, due to the
combined
effects of Delta water diversions and exports, pesticides and pollution,
and
introduced species.
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252Those arrested in the recent surge include a 56-year-old Catholic nun from Nigeria.
Ordered by the Trump White House to aggressively increase arrest rates, federal immigration officials have reportedly detained more than 10,000 people in just the last five days, intensifying fear in communities across the United States.
The New York Times, which was first to report the new detention figures late Wednesday, noted that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials were "told that 2,000 arrests a day was the new standard for enforcement." The agency, flush with cash following President Donald Trump's signing of a reconciliation package containing another $70 billion for immigration enforcement, has been instructed to assign 80% of its officers to "arrest operations," according to the Times.
The Trump administration claims to be targeting the "worst of the worst," but available data shows that the percentage of people arrested by ICE despite having no criminal convictions has tended to rise during the agency's mass detention efforts. On Sunday, ICE briefly detained a 56-year-old nun from Nigeria as she walked to church in McAllen, Texas.
"The geniuses at ICE just arrested a Catholic nun, who practices as a nurse, as she was walking to church," Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) wrote in response to Sister Leticia Ugboaja's detention. "Our Republican colleagues think they need even more money. Had enough?"
The Times reported that immigration attorneys across the US "have been on alert" as ICE arrests surge, though much more quietly than earlier blitzes in Minneapolis—where federal immigration agents killed two US citizens—and other major cities, where groups of armed and masked officers roamed the streets and menaced neighborhoods.
"Cindy Blandon, an immigration attorney in Miami, said that one of her clients, a Nicaraguan father of two children, had an immigration court hearing set for 2027, but was arrested by ICE on Monday during a routine check-in," the Times reported. "And in Utah, Ysabel Lonazco, an immigration attorney, has noticed an uptick as well... One of her clients, Arturo, a 48-year-old Mexican man, was arrested in Salt Lake City on his way to a soccer game on Sunday, according to his wife, Veronica. She said the arrest had shattered their family."
ICE also appears to be ignoring a federal judge's order last week curtailing arrests at immigration courthouses. According to The Intercept:
On Thursday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrested an Ecuadorian man at a court at 26 Federal Plaza and a man from the Dominican Republic at another court at 290 Broadway, both in Lower Manhattan. The arrests continued on Monday, when ICE agents detained a third man, originally from Guatemala, at 290 Broadway.
In legal filings challenging the detentions of the men taken Thursday, advocates with the nonprofit Make the Road New York accused ICE of not only violating their clients’ right to due process, but also of brazenly flouting a federal court order.
Murad Awawdeh, president and CEO of the New York Immigration Coalition, told The Intercept that "we’re witnessing ICE, yet again, operate in a lawless and rogue fashion and not following court orders."
“We’re supposedly a nation under the rule of law, and our judicial branch has said that this agency must stop engaging in this lawless behavior, and they continue to do so," said Awawdeh.
ICE is currently headed by Acting Director David Venturella, a former private prison executive. A record number of people have died in ICE custody under the second Trump administration.
Last week, Trump announced that he intends to nominate former Oklahoma state trooper Lance Schroyer to lead ICE in a permanent capacity.
Marcos Charles, the head of ICE’s deportation wing, cheered the recent arrest surge in an email to agency personnel earlier this week. On Saturday, ICE officers arrested 2,400 people.
“I want to personally thank each of you for your extraordinary efforts this past weekend,” Charles wrote, according to the Times. “Through your dedication, professionalism, and unwavering commitment to our mission, enforcement and removal operations achieved remarkable operational results."
Environmental and public health advocates on Wednesday ripped the US Environmental Protection Agency's fifth approval of a "forever chemical" pesticide during the current term of President Donald Trump, who campaigned on a promise to "Make America Healthy Again."
Despite that pledge, Trump's second administration—much like his first—has served the pesticide industry in various ways, including by putting out a MAHA report that echoes industry talking points, installing a former industry lobbyist in a key EPA post, backing Bayer-owned Monsanto over cancer patients at the US Supreme Court, and issuing an executive order that mandates the production of glyphosate.
Under Trump, the EPA has also approved or reapproved various controversial pesticides, from atrazine and dicamba to trifludimoxazin, which was approved late Tuesday. Like diflufenican and epyrifenacil, which were authorized by the EPA earlier Tuesday, as well as cyclobutrifluram and isocycloseram, which got a green light from the agency last November, trifludimoxazin is what some scientists and campaigners call a forever chemical pesticide.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—which have been used in not only pesticides but also fabrics, firefighting foam, nonstick cookware, and other household products—are widely known as forever chemicals because they don't break down naturally. They're also linked to a range of health issues, including various cancers.
"This is the PFAS presidency brought to you by Donald Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin," Nathan Donley, environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity, declared Wednesday.
As with his Tuesday critique of the Trump EPA approving diflufenican and epyrifenacil, Donley pointed to the Supreme Court's recent ruling in favor of Trump-backed Bayer, rather than the thousands of Americans who argue that Monsanto's glyphosate-based weedkiller Roundup caused their cancer.
"Waiting to open the floodgates on new pesticide approvals until after the Supreme Court granted immunity to pesticide companies takes a special kind of callousness," he said.
Bill Freese, science director at Center for Food Safety (CFS), similarly said Wednesday that "with yesterday's pesticide approvals, the Trump administration's EPA is once again showing its disdain for Americans' health and the natural world."
"The EPA's pesticide division is seemingly no longer able to recognize evidence that a pesticide causes cancer, even when it's the pesticide company's own studies that show it," he continued. "And as per usual, EPA dismisses out of hand incriminating independent studies by scientists not affiliated with the pesticide industry."
In addition to the PFAS pesticides, the EPA is under fire this week for approving new uses for chlormequat, a non-PFAS pesticide tied to reproductive issues, and the fungicide fluoxapiprolin.
CFS co-executive director Sylvia Wu pointed out that the agency dismissed studies showing that fluoxapiprolin and epyrifenacil both produce tumors in laboratory rodents and classified both as "not likely to be carcinogenic to humans."
"The EPA's illegitimate rejection of the evidence that these two pesticides cause cancer is very similar to the tricks it pulled in denying glyphosate could cause cancer," Wu said. "These blatant violations of the agency's own cancer guidelines are unacceptable."
As for chlormequat, Freese said that "EPA should never have approved this endocrine-disrupting pesticide, particularly since its persistence and potential for widespread use on wheat and other widely consumed grains will mean universal exposure."
Already, "chlormequat is found in the urine of 90% of Americans, thought to come mostly from residues on imported foods where the pesticide has been used," the Center for Biological Diversity noted Wednesday. Like Freese, the group warned that "approval of its use on US wheat and oats ensures that exposure to the US population will increase dramatically."
“USPS’ plan was unwise, unlawful, and a threat to the millions of voters who rely on mailed ballots to participate in our democracy," said one case litigant.
In a ruling hailed by democracy defenders, a federal court on Wednesday halted the US Postal Service's implementation of President Donald Trump's March executive order targeting mail-in ballots as part of his administration's broader attack on voting rights.
Judge Emmet Sullivan of the US District Court for the District of Columbia granted a request by the NAACP to enforce a 2021 settlement agreement requiring the USPS to protect mail-in voting and prioritize delivery of mail related to elections through 2028.
The request followed the Postal Service's publication last month of a proposed rule that would block the delivery of mail-in ballots to voters in states where election officials refused to provide certain information to USPS or use a specific envelope design. That proposal came after Trump's March executive order directing federal agencies to create a nationwide list of eligible voters using federal data.
The directive also requires the Postal Service to verify that mail-in ballots are sent and returned only by eligible voters, preserve election-related records for a longer period, and exercise heightened oversight of mailed ballots.
The Public Citizen Litigation Group and Legal Defense Fund (LDF) filed a motion on behalf of the NAACP asserting that the proposed rule "manifests USPS’ intent not to deliver certain mail-in ballots, establishing a process that directly violates its obligations under the agreement."
“The court today correctly recognized that USPS’ plan to create roadblocks to mail-in voting was inconsistent with its commitment to timely deliver election mail,” Public Citizen Litigation Group director Allison Zieve said in a statement following Sullivan's ruling. “USPS’ plan was unwise, unlawful, and a threat to the millions of voters who rely on mailed ballots to participate in our democracy.”
🚨BREAKING: In the latest blow to President Donald Trump’s anti-voting agenda, a federal court on Wednesday granted the NAACP’s request to halt the U.S. Postal Service’s (USPS) implementation of his executive order against mail voting. www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/...
[image or embed]
— Marc Elias (@marcelias.bsky.social) July 1, 2026 at 1:41 PM
LDF associate director-counsel Sam Spital said, “Today’s decision recognizes that USPS cannot disregard its legal obligation to timely deliver mail-in ballots to all voters."
"We are glad that the court blocked a blatant attempt to renege on this commitment through a proposed rule that ran the risk of undermining the fairness of our national elections, creating particular dangers for Black voters," Spital continued. "LDF will continue to defend our democracy and combat unlawful restrictions of the right to vote.”
Anthony P. Ashton, senior associate general counsel at the NAACP, called the decision "a critical step in protecting the rights of voters who rely on the timely delivery of mail-in ballots to participate in our democracy."
Ashton continued:
The proposed USPS changes would have created unnecessary and unlawful barriers, in direct violation of the USPS’ mandate to prioritize election mail. Those barriers could have disproportionately harmed Black voters, who are more likely to rely on mail voting due to long-standing inequities in access. Put simply, the use of mail-in voting helps reduce voter intimidation at the polls and election day dirty tricks. This decision makes clear that access to the ballot cannot be tied to arbitrary requirements. The NAACP will continue to hold this government accountable when it attempts to undermine fair and equal access to the electoral process.
Wednesday's order—from a judge who's been appointed to various positions by Republican and Democratic presidents throughout his career—is the latest in a string of federal court rulings against Trump's attacks on voting rights, crowned by Monday's Watson v. Republican National Committee US Supreme Court decision, in which the justices affirmed that states may count ballots received after Election Day if they were postmarked in time.
Last week, a federal judge in Massachusetts sided with Democratic state attorneys who challenged Trump's March 2025 executive order that requires Americans to show proof of citizenship when registering to vote, while another judge in the same district blocked parts of the president's March 2026 order, which included the USPS directive.