May, 18 2010, 12:11pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Lisa Nurnberger, Media Director, lnurnberger@ucs.org
800 VA Scientists, Academic Leaders Tell Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli to Stop Harassing Climate Scientist
WASHINGTON
More than 800 scientists and academics in Virginia, including nearly 300 from the University of Virginia (UVA), today sent a letter
(pdf) to Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, urging him to drop
his investigation of former UVA Professor Michael Mann's scientific
research.
"This letter shows that much of Virginia's
scientific and academic community is appalled that their attorney
general has launched such a blatantly political investigation," said
Francesca Grifo, director of the Scientific Integrity Program at the
Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), which facilitated the organizing
of the letter.
UVA has until Thursday, May 27, to decide
whether it will contest the attorney general's "civil investigative
demand," which essentially subpoenaed documents related to state grants
Mann received. Cuccinelli, who has said he does not believe climate
change is caused by human activity, is investigating Mann under the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, which makes it illegal to "knowingly" present a "false or fraudulent" claim to the state to obtain compensation.
"Labeling
scientific findings 'fraudulent' sets a disturbing precedent for
attacking peer-reviewed science in the legal system," said Grifo.
The
attorney general's action is just the most recent unjustified attack
against climate science and scientists, but the letter signers fear it
could have a much more lasting and damaging effect.
"Science
is a search for the truth," said Jeff Holt, an associate professor in
UVA's Department of Neuroscience, one of the 810 people who signed the
letter. "If scientists are hassled, reprimanded or sued based on their
data or their findings, it will dissuade scientists in their search for
the truth. This lawsuit harkens back to the Dark Ages when scientists
were tried for heresy when their findings ran contrary to the dogma of
the day."
Another letter signatory, Amato Evan, an assistant
professor in UVA's Department of Environmental Sciences, is worried
about who could be targeted next. "As long as Virginia Attorney General
Ken Cuccinelli is in office, in the back of my head I'll be wondering
if my work on global climate change is going to fall under the same
senseless attacks as Dr. Mann's has," he said. "This feels like
harassment, plain and simple, and is wasting the time of the other
faculty and staff members in my department. I sincerely hope enough
pressure is put on the Virginia attorney general to halt this absurd inquisition."
The letter makes it clear that a criminal
investigation of scientific research is inappropriate: "Fortunately,
there are numerous safeguards within science that root out scientific
misconduct," it states. "It is entirely appropriate for scientific
institutions to review the work of scientists and hold them accountable
for their actions. But scientists who face unwarranted legal
intimidation will be less able to make new discoveries that can protect
our health, safety, and environment."
In addition, the letter
points out that historically, scientific discovery is held back when
government officials harass scientists.
Cuccinelli's office has
demanded that the university turn over what amounts to reams of
documents, including correspondence between Mann and other climate
scientists whose names appear in emails stolen from Britain's
University of East Anglia that generated media attention late last
year.
In the emails, scientists expressed frustration with
relentless attacks on their data and research methods. Every
investigation conducted to date of the email contents has concluded
that they have no bearing on climate science, which remains robust. A
number of investigations over the last few years also have vindicated
Mann's data and research methods.
Scientists "are searching
for cures for diseases, measuring the toxicity of environmental
contaminants, and developing new technologies that will keep America
strong," the letter states. If scientists are to serve the public good,
wrote the scientists, "they must have the freedom to explore ideas
without fearing that any individual statement or email will be taken
out of context."
Scientists and academics from most of
Virginia's major higher education institutions signed the letter,
including Christopher Newport University (5), College of William and
Mary (38), George Mason University (85), James Madison University (31),
Old Dominion University (19), Radford University (15), Randolph-Macon
College (30), University of Mary Washington (21), University of
Richmond (26), UVA (296), Virginia Commonwealth University (30),
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (68).
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.
LATEST NEWS
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
ICE Goons Pepper Spray Congresswoman Adelita Grijalva During Tucson Raid
"If federal agents are brazen enough to fire pellets directly at a member of Congress, imagine how they behave when encountering defenseless members of our community," Grijalva said.
Dec 05, 2025
In what Arizona's attorney general slammed as an "unacceptable and outrageous" act of "unchecked aggression," a federal immigration officer fired pepper spray toward recently sworn-in Congresswoman Adelita Grijalva during a Friday raid on a Tucson restaurant.
Grijalva (D-Ariz.) wrote on social media that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers "just conducted a raid by Taco Giro in Tucson—a small mom-and-pop restaurant that has served our community for years."
"When I presented myself as a member of Congress asking for more information, I was pushed aside and pepper sprayed," she added.
Grijalva said in a video uploaded to the post that she was "sprayed in the face by a very aggressive agent, pushed around by others, when I literally was not being aggressive, I was asking for clarification, which is my right as a member of Congress."
The video shows Grijalva among a group of protesters who verbally confronted federal agents over the raid. Following an order to "clear," an agent is seen firing what appears to be a pepper ball at the ground very near the congresswoman's feet. Video footage also shows agents deploying gas against the crowd.
"They're targeting small mom-and-pop businesses that don't have the financial resources to fight back," Grijalva told reporters after the incident. "They're targeting small businesses and people that are helping in our communities in order to try to fill the quota that [President Donald] Trump has given them."
Mocking the incident on social media, Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin contended that Grijalva "wasn’t pepper sprayed."
"She was in the vicinity of someone who *was* pepper sprayed as they were obstructing and assaulting law enforcement," she added. "In fact, two law enforcement officers were seriously injured by this mob that [Grijalva] joined."
McLaughlin provided no further details regarding the nature of those injuries.
Democrats in Arizona and beyond condemned Friday's incident, with US Sen. Ruben Gallego writing on social media that Grijalva "was doing her job, standing up for her community."
"Pepper spraying a sitting member of Congress is disgraceful, unacceptable, and absolutely not what we voted for," he added. "Period."
Democratic Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said on social media: "This is unacceptable and outrageous. Enforcing the rule of law does not mean pepper spraying a member of Congress for simply asking questions. Effective law enforcement requires restraint and accountability, not unchecked aggression."
Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) also weighed in on social media, calling the incident "outrageous."
"Rep. Grijalva was completely within her rights to stand up for her constituents," she added. "ICE is completely lawless."
Friday's incident follows federal agents' violent removal of Sen. Alexa Padilla (D-Calif.) from a June press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
Congresswoman LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) was federally indicted in June for allegedly “forcibly impeding and interfering with federal officers" during an oversight visit at a privately operated migrant detention center in Newark, New Jersey and subsequent confrontation with ICE agents outside of the lockup in which US Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez, both New Jersey Democrats, were also involved.
Violent assaults by federal agents on suspected undocumented immigrants—including US citizens—protesters, journalists, and others are a regular occurrence amid the Trump administration's mass deportation campaign.
"If federal agents are brazen enough to fire pellets directly at a member of Congress, imagine how they behave when encountering defenseless members of our community," Grijalva said late Friday on social media. "It’s time for Congress to rein in this rogue agency NOW."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


