April, 21 2010, 10:37am EDT
House Hears Testimony On Juvenile Justice Legislation
The
House Education and Labor Committee met today to hear testimony on
reforming the juvenile justice system. Witnesses included a juvenile
court judge, a juvenile corrections officer and a woman whose child
committed suicide while being held in an adult penitentiary.
House Education and Labor Committee met today to hear testimony on
reforming the juvenile justice system. Witnesses included a juvenile
court judge, a juvenile corrections officer and a woman whose child
committed suicide while being held in an adult penitentiary.
WASHINGTON
The
House Education and Labor Committee met today to hear testimony on
reforming the juvenile justice system. Witnesses included a juvenile
court judge, a juvenile corrections officer and a woman whose child
committed suicide while being held in an adult penitentiary.
House Education and Labor Committee met today to hear testimony on
reforming the juvenile justice system. Witnesses included a juvenile
court judge, a juvenile corrections officer and a woman whose child
committed suicide while being held in an adult penitentiary.
Currently,
there is an important bill awaiting a floor vote in the Senate that
would reauthorize standards set by the original Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (JJDPA) and would continue funding
to protect the rights of juveniles in the criminal justice system. The
bill, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization
Act, was passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee in December. The
House has yet to introduce any legislation addressing the JJDPA.
there is an important bill awaiting a floor vote in the Senate that
would reauthorize standards set by the original Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (JJDPA) and would continue funding
to protect the rights of juveniles in the criminal justice system. The
bill, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization
Act, was passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee in December. The
House has yet to introduce any legislation addressing the JJDPA.
"The
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act has provided states and
localities with standards and funding for improving juvenile justice
for over 35 years," said Laura W. Murphy, Director of the American
Civil Liberties Union Washington Legislative Office. "It is a crucial
law that needs the full support of Congress. The House should follow
the Senate's lead and move quickly on legislation to reauthorize the
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. We must ensure that we
do a better job of protecting and reforming America's at-risk youth."
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act has provided states and
localities with standards and funding for improving juvenile justice
for over 35 years," said Laura W. Murphy, Director of the American
Civil Liberties Union Washington Legislative Office. "It is a crucial
law that needs the full support of Congress. The House should follow
the Senate's lead and move quickly on legislation to reauthorize the
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. We must ensure that we
do a better job of protecting and reforming America's at-risk youth."
Throughout
the country, children who are prosecuted through juvenile courts for
status offenses - offenses that would not be criminal but for the age
of the offender - remain subject to boilerplate conditions of release
and, unfortunately, the circumstances that lead a particular child to
commit his or her first status offense often go unaddressed.
Predictably, the child often commits the same offense again, landing in
secure detention as a result. The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention Reauthorization Act would phase out those boilerplate
conditions, ensuring that many juveniles could avoid ending up in the
"school to prison pipeline."
the country, children who are prosecuted through juvenile courts for
status offenses - offenses that would not be criminal but for the age
of the offender - remain subject to boilerplate conditions of release
and, unfortunately, the circumstances that lead a particular child to
commit his or her first status offense often go unaddressed.
Predictably, the child often commits the same offense again, landing in
secure detention as a result. The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention Reauthorization Act would phase out those boilerplate
conditions, ensuring that many juveniles could avoid ending up in the
"school to prison pipeline."
The
current juvenile justice system also routinely and disproportionately
affects girls, who represent a small number of delinquent children in
custody but almost half of status offenders in custody.
current juvenile justice system also routinely and disproportionately
affects girls, who represent a small number of delinquent children in
custody but almost half of status offenders in custody.
"Our
current juvenile justice system is not serving our youth well, and this
is especially true for many girls for whom incarceration is not only
the inappropriate answer but is also a cruel one for those attempting
to escape unstable or abusive home environments when they run away,"
said Jennifer Bellamy, ACLU Legislative Counsel. "It is crucial that we
address the root of these issues rather than continuing the punitive
cycle that so many of America's youth are currently enduring. We
encourage the House to introduce legislation promptly to address these
issues."
current juvenile justice system is not serving our youth well, and this
is especially true for many girls for whom incarceration is not only
the inappropriate answer but is also a cruel one for those attempting
to escape unstable or abusive home environments when they run away,"
said Jennifer Bellamy, ACLU Legislative Counsel. "It is crucial that we
address the root of these issues rather than continuing the punitive
cycle that so many of America's youth are currently enduring. We
encourage the House to introduce legislation promptly to address these
issues."
To read the ACLU's letter of support for the JJDPA, go to:
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
Fury as South Korea's Conservative Party Thwarts Impeachment Vote
"Today, citizens witnessed democracy taking a step backward," said the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions.
Dec 07, 2024
A bid to impeach South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol over his short-lived imposition of martial law failed Saturday after lawmakers from his conservative party left the National Assembly chamber and refused to take part in the vote.
Supporters of impeachment needed at least eight members of Yoon's People Power Party (PPP) to support removing the president, who apologized to the nation in a one-minute-long address Saturday morning but refused to step down after he briefly instituted martial law in a stated attempt to "eradicate shameful pro-North Korea" forces, plunging the country into a political crisis.
Yoon's gambit sparked immediate and sustained protests and was widely seen as a coup attempt.
Saturday's impeachment effort drew a massive number of people into the streets outside the National Assembly building despite below-freezing temperatures, and demonstrators voiced outrage when they learned that Yoon's allies thwarted the initial attempt to oust him. Just two PPP members returned to the National Assembly chamber to cast a ballot Saturday.
"I am so angry. I can't find the words to describe my frustration," 23-year-old Kim Hyo-lim toldThe New York Times. "I am devastated, but I feel honored to be a part of this historic moment for my country."
Another demonstrator said they intend to protest "every weekend" until Yoon is removed.
(Photo: Daniel Ceng/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Organizers said roughly a million people took part in demonstrations Saturday in support of Yoon's impeachment. Many also demanded his arrest.
The Financial Timesreported following the failed impeachment effort that Yoon—whose term expires in 2027—and PPP leaders "appeared to have reached a deal whereby the president would hand over political direction of the country to his party and agree to stand down at a time of the party's choosing, in return for support in the impeachment vote."
The Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU), which has over 1.1 million members, called PPP lawmakers who boycotted Saturday's vote "accomplices in treason."
"The People Power Party has turned its back on the people's wishes, effectively admitting their complicity," KCTU said in a statement posted to social media. "More than one million citizens gathered in front of the National Assembly. They came together because they cannot forgive a president who declared martial law and aimed weapons at his own people. Despite the cold winter weather, they took to the streets hoping desperately for the impeachment to pass."
"Today, citizens witnessed democracy taking a step backward," KCTU added. "They saw clearly who stands with those who would harm our democracy. The People Power Party must be dissolved. Those who protect Yoon must face consequences. It would be a grave mistake to think this can be resolved through compromise or constitutional amendments for an early resignation. Through the people's judgment, Yoon, his associates, and the People Power Party will face severe consequences."
Opposition lawmakers are expected to file a fresh impeachment motion next week as pressure mounts for Yoon to step down.
Additionally, as The Washington Postreported, "the national police have opened an investigation into Yoon on treason accusations by opposition parties and activists."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Top Democrat Issues Warning Over Trump Plot to 'Steal' From Federal Programs
"The Constitution provides no impoundment power to the president to unilaterally withhold funds appropriated by Congress," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro.
Dec 07, 2024
The top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee warned Friday that President-elect Donald Trump is planning to "steal from the programs and services that affect middle-class, working, and vulnerable families" by refusing to spend money appropriated by Congress.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said in a statement that Trump's strategy, known as "impoundment," is "uninformed and unconstitutional," adding that "the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Government Accountability Office are all in agreement—the Constitution provides no impoundment power to the president to unilaterally withhold funds appropriated by Congress."
"It is the sworn duty of the president of the United States to faithfully execute the law," DeLauro added, "and appropriations laws are no exception."
In a new fact sheet, Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee note that "the Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse, and nowhere does it give the president any unilateral power to either temporarily or permanently impound—steal, withhold, or prevent from being spent—funds appropriated by Congress."
"The Framers were right to give Congress the power of the purse," the fact sheet states. "If the president had the unilateral power to decline to spend resources as directed by Congress, then those who rely on Social Security, Medicare, Veterans Medical Care, and other federal spending programs would be subject to the whims of the executive branch. The American people would be unable to depend on promises made by Congress in appropriations laws."
Trump has explicitly vowed to use impoundment to "squeeze the bloated federal bureaucracy for massive savings," a plan endorsed by the billionaire pair tapped by the president-elect to run a new commission tasked with identifying spending and regulations to slash.
"With impoundment, we can simply choke off the money," Trump declared in a campaign ad.
"They have no authority. Does anybody get that?"
Following Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy's visit to Capitol Hill on Thursday to discuss their plans for the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) with GOP lawmakers, The Washington Postreported that Republicans are "keen on expanding the president's power to impound spending—or refuse to spend money Congress authorizes."
"Musk and Ramaswamy said they were eager to test the constitutional limits of Trump's ability to unilaterally control spending decisions," the Post reported, citing two unnamed lawmakers. "Republicans largely left the more than two-hour meeting giddy."
Analysts argue Trump's plan to withhold federal spending would run afoul of the 1974 Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act (ICA). The law, as Propublica's Molly Redden explained, "forbids presidents from blocking spending over policy disagreements."
"A similar power grab led to his first impeachment," Redden wrote. "During his first term, Trump held up nearly $400 million in military aid to Ukraine while he pressured President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to open a corruption investigation into Joe Biden and his family. The U.S. Government Accountability Office later ruled his actions violated the Impoundment Control Act."
Democrats on the House Budget Committee recently pointed out that "although decided after the ICA passed, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Train v. City of New York that even without the ICA, the president does not have unilateral authority to impound funds."
That hasn't stopped Trump, Musk, and Ramaswamy from exploring ways to cut or block spending without congressional approval.
In a Wall Street Journalop-ed published last month, Musk and Ramaswamy wrote that "even without relying on" the view that the ICA is unconstitutional, "DOGE will help end federal overspending by taking aim at the $500 billion-plus in annual federal expenditures that are unauthorized by Congress or being used in ways that Congress never intended, from $535 million a year to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and $1.5 billion for grants to international organizations to nearly $300 million to progressive groups like Planned Parenthood."
Housing assistance, childcare aid, student loan programs, and other spending would also be vulnerable under such an approach.
"They want [to cut] $2 trillion," DeLauro told reporters Thursday. "Think about the discretionary budget. It's $1.7 trillion. Where are they going for the money? Where are they going?"
"They have no authority," she added. "Does anybody get that?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Dirty and Dumb!' Trump May Cancel Contracts to Electrify USPS Fleet
"It's stuff like this that will cost us manufacturing jobs/opportunities," warned one critic.
Dec 06, 2024
As part of President-elect Donald Trump's mission to roll back the Biden administration's climate policies, the Republican may cancel contracts to electrify the U.S. Postal Service's fleet, Reutersrevealed Friday, citing unnamed sources familiar with transition team discussions.
"The sources told Reuters that Trump's transition team is now reviewing how it can unwind the Postal Service's multibillion-dollar contracts, including with Oshkosh and Ford for tens of thousands of battery-driven delivery trucks and charging stations," according to the news agency.
The USPS in December 2022 announced a five-year $9.6 billion investment that involved electrifying 75% of its next-generation delivery vehicles and installing modern charging infrastructure. That came just months after President Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act, which included $3 billion in funding for the endeavor.
Ford did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment on Friday, while Oshkosh said that it "is fully committed to our strong partnership with the USPS and looks forward to continuing to provide our postal carriers with reliable, safe, and sustainable modern delivery vehicles, even as USPS' needs continue to evolve."
The USPS also did not respond to requests for comment and Trump transition team spokesperson Karoline Leavitt declined to address his Postal Service plans, only saying that "President Trump will protect the freedom of Americans to drive whichever vehicle they choose, enhance his tough tariffs on Chinese-imported cars, and save the U.S. auto industry for generations to come. No policy should be deemed official unless it comes directly from President Trump."
During the campaign, Trump pledged to roll back Biden's climate policies if Big Oil poured $1 billion into getting him elected. He also attacked the Democrat's efforts to promote a shift to electric vehicles (EVs). Transportation accounts for the largest portion of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and the United States is the world's top historic emitter.
Even under Biden, U.S. plans to limit planet-heating pollution did not align with the country's contributions to the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency—but climate scientists and advocates widely backed his and later Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign leading up to last month's election, recognizing the threat posed by Trump.
John Hanger, a Democrat who previously held various envirnomental and energy positions in Pennsylvania's government, responded to the Reuters reporting on social media: "Ugh! Canceling contracts to electrify transportation of USPS would be dirty and dumb!"
Meanwhile, Scott Paul, president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, said that "it's stuff like this that will cost us manufacturing jobs/opportunities."
Some critics also speculated whether such contracts may be redone to benefit Tesla. The company's CEO is Elon Musk, who is the richest man in the world, dumped around $270 million into super political action committees backing Trump's reelection bid, and is set to co-lead his forthcoming Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with fellow billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy.
Last month, Reuters reported on the Trump transition team's plans to kill Biden's fuel efficiency standards and a $7,500 consumer tax credit for EV purchases, which Musk was asked about while he and Ramaswamy were on Capitol Hill Thursday to meet with Republican lawmakers.
"I think we should get rid of all credits," Musk told reporters—despite his own company's reliance on Biden's EV policies.
Responding to Musk's comment in a Friday statement, Will Anderson, EV policy advocate with Public Citizen's Climate Program, said that "as someone who's asking to work for the American people through his so-called DOGE, Musk should not perpetuate crony capitalism that only benefits himself and others with access to Trump."
"If we want the American automobile industry to stay competitive in a global market," he added, "then not only should Musk recognize the benefit of the EV tax credit for American-made vehicles, but he should also recognize the negative impact billions of dollars in continuing oil and gas subsidies will have on a society that needs to transition to a zero-emission and clean-energy future."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular