SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
March, 09 2010, 12:41pm EDT
Contact:
Phone: 218-226-4164
Procter & Gamble Agrees to Reformulate Herbal Essences Due to Toxic Contaminant
On Friday March 12, 2010, the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), a
watchdog group with over 850,000 members, and The Green Patriot Working
Group (GPWG), led by environmental health consumer advocate David
Steinman (in cooperation with The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (CSC), a
national coalition of health and environmental groups) will announce
the details of an agreement from Procter and Gamble (P&G) to
reformulate 18 products from its top-selling Herbal Essences brand to
reduce levels of the carcinogenic petrochemical 1,4-dioxane.
WASHINGTON
On Friday March 12, 2010, the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), a
watchdog group with over 850,000 members, and The Green Patriot Working
Group (GPWG), led by environmental health consumer advocate David
Steinman (in cooperation with The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (CSC), a
national coalition of health and environmental groups) will announce
the details of an agreement from Procter and Gamble (P&G) to
reformulate 18 products from its top-selling Herbal Essences brand to
reduce levels of the carcinogenic petrochemical 1,4-dioxane. In
addition, they will announce new results from a continuing study that
has tested over 150 consumer products for the toxic chemical, which is
a contaminant and therefore not listed on product labels. This year, 20
laundry detergents were tested, including major "natural" and
conventional brands. Ironically, the seven laundry detergent brands
from P&G had by far the highest levels of 1,4-dioxane overall. The
independent third-party laboratory, Exova, known for rigorous testing
and chain-of-custody protocols, performed all testing.
P&G's promise to reformulate its Herbal Essences line follows a
notice of intent to file a lawsuit filed by the GPWG against P&G
(as well as lawsuits filed by the California Attorney General's office
in June 2008 directed at other manufacturers) for dangerous levels of
1,4-dioxane as established by proposition 65. The OCA, CSC, and GPWG
consider cooperation from industry leader P&G (with a 40% share of
the hair care market in 2003) to be a significant step forward in the
campaign for all brands to remove unnecessary 1,4-dioxane and other
carcinogenic and harmful chemicals from consumer products.
Press Conference Details
WHO:
David Steinman, founder, the Green Patriot Working Group
Ronnie Cummins, executive director, Organic Consumers Association
In cooperation with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and Clean Water Action
WHEN: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:00am PST (prior to the opening of Natural Products Expo West)
WHERE: Ramada Plaza Hotel, 515 W. Katella Ave. Anaheim CA, 92802, California 1 Room
BACKGROUND
1,4-dioxane is generated as a byproduct of ethoxylation, a cheap
shortcut used by companies to provide mildness to harsh cleaning
ingredients, which requires use of the cancer-causing petrochemical
ethylene oxide. 1,4-dioxane is considered a chemical "known to the
State of California to cause cancer" under proposition 65, and is also
suspected as a kidney toxicant, neurotoxicant and respiratory toxicant,
among others, according to the California EPA. While previous press
conferences on this topic have revealed the presence of 1,4-dioxane in
personal care and household cleaning products (including products
targeted at babies and children) and tracked improvement as certain
"natural" and conventional brands reformulated, this year's press
conference will focus on the problem of groundwater and reclaimed water
contamination resulting from the toxin's presence in laundry
detergents, and health risks from the chemical's presence in drinking
water. David Steinman is the author of Diet for a Poisoned Planet and
formerly represented the public interest on a committee at the National
Academy of Sciences.
Further Resources
Green Patriot Working Group/History of Study, Definition and Scientific References: https://www.1-4dioxane.com
Campaign for Safe Cosmetics: https://safecosmetics.live.radicaldesigns.org/article.php?...
Environmental Working Group: www.ewg.org/chemindex/chemicals/23481
OCA/Myths and Facts about 1,4-dioxane: www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/DioxaneFacts080314.pdf
Lawsuits from the CA Attorney General's office: www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_12797.cfm
Clean Water Action: www.cleanwateraction.org/currents/summer2009/how-safe-you...
The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) is an online and grassroots 501(c)3 nonprofit public interest organization, and the only organization in the U.S. focused exclusively on promoting the views and interests of the nation's estimated 50 million consumers of organically and socially responsibly produced food and other products. OCA educates and advocates on behalf of organic consumers, engages consumers in marketplace pressure campaigns, and works to advance sound food and farming policy through grassroots lobbying. We address crucial issues around food safety, industrial agriculture, genetic engineering, children's health, corporate accountability, Fair Trade, environmental sustainability, including pesticide use, and other food- and agriculture-related topics.
LATEST NEWS
Suspect Arrested After Molotov Cocktail Thrown at Home of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman
A 20-year-old suspect was found at the company's headquarters, where he was threatening to burn down the building.
Apr 10, 2026
A suspect was arrested in San Francisco Friday after being accused of throwing a Molotov cocktail at the home of Sam Altman, the CEO of the artificial intelligence firm OpenAI.
The 20-year-old man was found at the OpenAI headquarters about three miles away from Altman's home, where he was threatening to burn down the building, San Francisco police said.
The device the suspect threw onto Altman's property in the Russian Hill neighborhood caused a fire on the exterior gate. It was unclear whether Altman and his family were at home.
The suspect was in custody Friday, with charges pending.
Altman's company and other companies have been under fire as AI has expanded rapidly at President Donald Trump's urging, with the president issuing an executive order attacking states' ability to regulate the industry.
Experts have warned the expansion of generative AI threatens jobs and democracy, with political campaigns already using the technology to create fraudulent media in advertisements.
Massive, energy-sucking AI data centers have also been blamed for higher household electricity bills and water consumption.
Protesters have rallied against Altman's company for agreeing to provide its technology to the Department of Defense.
In November, The New York Times reported, a person who had once been associated with the anti-AI group Stop AI "expressed interest in causing physical harm to OpenAI employees," causing the company to lock down its headquarters.
On Friday, Stop AI condemned the attack on Altman's house and emphasized that the group "seeks to protect human life."
"We do not condone any violence whatsoever," said the group. "We pray everyone involved in this situation puts aside violence and finds peace, and we continue to hope the AI industry stops the development of frontier AI systems in the interest of public safety and the preservation of humanity. To the best of our knowledge, this incident did not involve anyone who has ever been associated with our group. And this action is wholly inconsistent with our values."
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘People Can’t Afford Rent,' Critics Say as White House Boasts of Trump’s Plan for Gold-Covered Arch
"While Americans worry about skyrocketing costs and another endless war, President Trump is focused on a taxpayer-funded vanity project," said Rep. Don Beyer.
Apr 10, 2026
On the same day that the US Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that inflation spiked at its fastest monthly rate in four years, the Trump administration unveiled renderings of President Donald Trump's proposed gold-covered 250-foot-tall arch to be built at Memorial Circle in Washington, DC.
The renderings, which were produced by architecture firm Harrison Design and posted on social media by the White House's rapid response account, show a gigantic arch that would be flanked on its corners by four gold lions and topped by a 60-foot-tall gold statue of what appears to be an angel.
🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/zcH5TtaOu7
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 10, 2026
According to a Friday report in The Washington Post, some preservationists have expressed concerns that the arch, which would be more than twice the height of the Lincoln Monument, would disproportionately tower over the DC skyline, and would block views of Arlington National Cemetery.
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) slammed the president for pushing construction of a gaudy gold-covered arch at a time when Americans are struggling due to the cost-of-living crisis worsened by his war in Iran.
"While Americans worry about skyrocketing costs and another endless war," he wrote in a social media post, "President Trump is focused on a taxpayer-funded vanity project that would choke traffic, block our skyline, and tower over sacred ground where those who served our nation are buried, including my own parents and sister."
Beyer added that the arch is "about Donald Trump's ego," and vowed, "we're going to stop it."
Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) responded to the renderings by reminding the White House that "Americans can't afford groceries."
Progressive activist Nina Turner had a similar reaction to Clark, posting that "people can’t afford rent" in response to the renderings.
Podcaster Brian Taylor Cohen contrasted the renderings of the arch with a statement Trump made earlier this month when he said "it’s not possible" for the federal government "to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things," because it needs to fund wars instead.
University of Missouri English professor Karen Piper also remarked on the opportunity cost of building the arch, along with other assorted Trump projects.
"This is why they're going to take away your Social Security, saying we can't afford it," she wrote. "Ballrooms, arches, and Don Jr. draining the Treasury."
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has been named as a contender for the Democratic Party's 2028 presidential nomination, responded to the arch renderings by accusing Trump of "doing everything he can to wreck this country—this time with our nation's capital."
Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) took issue with the decision to inscribe the phrase "one nation under God" at the top of the arch.
"That phrase came from Cold War propaganda, not our Founders," observed Huffman. "Trump stamping it on his vanity arch tells you everything about what this project is: a Christian nationalist monument, paid for with your tax dollars."
Keep ReadingShow Less
DNC Half-Measures Condemning Dark Money Won’t Cut It, Says Sanders as He Demands Total Ban
"Billionaire-funded super PACs—AIPAC, AI, crypto, and others—are spending hundreds of millions to defeat any candidate who crosses them. They should be banned from Democratic primaries. Period."
Apr 10, 2026
Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders on Friday called for a total ban on dark money a day after the Democratic National Committee voted down a resolution that would have condemned the leading US pro-Israel lobby, which has spent nine figures on US elections over the past five years.
The DNC Resolutions Committee rejected the resolution, which condemned “the growing influence” of dark money and corporate-backed outside spending on Democratic races, specifically calling out the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee. United Democracy Project, AIPAC's dark money arm, unleashed a $100 million blitz targeting progressives during the 2024 election cycle.
When combined with other pro-Israel lobby groups, like GOP megadonor Miriam Adelson's Preserve America PAC, that figure soars to over $200 million, according to the public interest group AIPAC Tracker.
Instead, the DNC panel opted for a broader resolution decrying the influence of dark money—defined as undisclosed independent campaign contributions—in the 2026 Democratic primaries.
"The DNC just passed a resolution condemning dark money," Sanders (Vt.) said Friday on X. "That’s a start, but not enough."
"Billionaire-funded super PACs—AIPAC, AI, crypto, and others—are spending hundreds of millions to defeat any candidate who crosses them," the senator added. "They should be banned from Democratic primaries. Period."
Sanders campaigned twice for president, centering his opposition to the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, which effectively ushered in the modern era of secret unlimited political spending.
According to the Brennan Center for Justice, dark money spending in federal elections has skyrocketed from negligible amounts before 2010 to over $1.9 billion in the 2024 cycle alone, with over $4 billion in total undisclosed outside financing following the high court's contentious ruling.
Polling has repeatedly affirmed that support for Israel—which stands accused in the International Court of Justice of committing genocide in Gaza and has already been found by the ICJ to be illegally occupying Palestine under apartheid rule—is detrimental to Democrats.
The DNC's own suppressed postmortem of the 2024 presidential election also showed that former President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' unconditional support for Israel cost Harris votes.
As AIPAC has grown more toxic to US voters amid a litany of Israeli atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank under the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza—a growing number of Democrats, including some who once welcomed the group's support, are turning their backs on the lobby.
“AIPAC really is not an organization that I think today I would want any part of," Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said last month after affiliated groups poured $22 million into House races in his state.
While AIPAC cash was instrumental in unseating congressional progressives including former Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Cori Bush (D-Mo.), its largesse failed to oust others, including Reps. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.).
Sanders wasn't the only one to criticize the DNC's rejection of the anti-AIPAC resolution.
“The American people are clear: They want our government to invest in life and stop funding the bombs that are destroying lives in Palestine, Lebanon, and Iran," Jewish Voice for Peace political director Beth Miller said Friday.
"The DNC’s failure to pass this simple resolution condemning the outsized spending of an extremist and Republican-funded group like AIPAC in Democratic primaries shows how wildly out of touch the party is with its base," Miller added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular