February, 17 2010, 01:11pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Andy Baker, Dushanbe, abaker@oxfam.org.uk, +992 91 898 56 20
Elena Akhmedova, Dushanbe, eakhmedova@oxfam.org.uk, +992 98 526 86 50
Yulia Yevtushok, Moscow, yyevtushok@oxfam.org.uk, +74992464944
Jennifer Abrahamson, UK, jabrahamson@oxfam.org.uk, +44(0)7810814980
Climate Change and Water Shortages Closing in on Tajikistan and Central Asia
New Oxfam report says retreating glaciers and more extreme weather could dangerously erode food security, livelihoods and even regional stability by 2050
WASHINGTON
The people of Tajikistan, many already feeling the
strains of climate change, will be increasingly afflicted over the next
40 years unless immediate action is taken to mitigate the effects,
according to a new report released today by Oxfam.
The report, Reaching Tipping Point? Climate Change and Poverty in Tajikistan,
says that the country's glaciers - mainly found in the Pamir Mountains
that make up part of the Trans-Himalayan range - are retreating and
could lead to greater water shortages and disputes in the wider region
in the future.
The painful blow of climate change has been sharply felt in rural
areas of Tajikistan in recent years where 1.4 million people are
already food insecure. Last summer's good rains brought some relief to
rural communities across Tajikistan that had previously suffered from
three consecutive years of drought, failed harvests and one of the
harshest winters on record. But the long-term trends are clear - and
ominous.
"It is indisputable that glaciers in Tajikistan are retreating. It
is also indisputable that if glaciers continue to retreat, and the
country experiences more extreme weather, countless people will be
dealt an even harder blow. Nearly one and a half million people are
already food insecure and that figure will likely rise if climate
change is not addressed. There could even be a dangerous ripple effect
across Central Asia, with countries throughout the region potentially
wrestling over dwindling water resources in coming decades," said Andy
Baker, Oxfam Tajikistan's Country Director.
Tajikistan's plight highlights the international injustice of
climate change, as it is one of the countries least responsible for the
greenhouse gas emissions that are causing climate change. This
mountainous, poverty-stricken, Central Asian country ranks 109th in the
world for all greenhouse gas emissions, 129th in emissions per capita,
and its people emit less than one tonne of carbon dioxide per head per
year as compared to nearly 20 tonnes by North Americans.
Some key data disclosed in the report:
- There has been a rise by 1.0-1.2 degrees C in parts of the country over the past 60 years
- The number of days per year the temperature has reached 40 degrees C has increased
- Droughts will likely be more intense and frequent
in the future; in 2008 Tajikistan suffered one of its worst droughts on
record while the winter of 2008 saw temperatures of minus 20 degrees C
for more than a month, causing serious crop loss - According to cited scientists, 20 percent of the country's glaciers have retreated and up to 30 percent more are likely to retreat or disappear by 2050
- Fedchenko Glacier, the country's largest, has melted at a rate of 16-20 metres per year
- The consequences of climate change could overstretch many countries' adaptive capacity in the region, contributing to political destabilization and triggering migration
The report is based on interviews conducted in the Vose, Fakhor, and
Temurmalik rural areas of the Khatlon region bordering Afghanistan in
the country's south. Oxfam helps poor farming communities cope with
increasingly frequent droughts, flooding and other disasters throughout
Khatlon, known as Tajikistan's 'bread basket' during Soviet times.
Additional interviews were conducted in the Ferghana Valley
agricultural areas of Spitamen and Ganchi in the Sugd region of
northern Tajikistan. Seventy percent of the Tajik population live in
agricultural areas - there are very few other means to a livelihood
outside the capital - the majority in Khatlon and Sugd.
Those interviewed spoke of the unusual hardships they have faced in
recent years. Many farmers experienced widespread crop loss caused
both by searing summers and bitter cold in the winter. During the
drought of 2008, grain harvest totals were down between 30-40 percent
compared to the previous year.
Many farming communities in Tajikistan largely rely on
over-stretched irrigation systems and on rainfall to cultivate and reap
a harvest, and are so poor that they are forced send male family
members to Russia to work as labourers to help support the family. Any
shocks - like repeated droughts or flooding caused by climate change -
can push families over the edge. A local Oxfam partner explained to
the report's author that previously droughts lasted for one year only,
but now they can last for four or five consecutive years. As one
farmer explained, "When rain starts, it's good, it's like humanitarian
aid."
Andy Baker added:
"Droughts are increasing and temperatures are rising. Harvests are
failing for lack of water. Entire swathes of the rural population of
Tajikistan have already suffered greatly in recent years, barely able
to feed their families. Imagine what their situation will be in 2050
if adaptation measures are not put into place soon and if global green
house gas emissions are not adequately reined in. It could be
calamitous."
The Report - Oxfam's Key Recommendations:
- At a community level: improve access to water and methods of food storage and preservation. Provide more support and training in agriculture. Scale up better insulation of houses, use of energy efficient stoves, biogas, solar power and use of passive solar greenhouses
- At a national level: support farmers to adapt
and have more resilient livelihood strategies; integrate climate change
responses across government departments and into national planning;
strengthen disaster risk reduction programmes; implement research
programmes on climate change and its impacts - At regional and international level: negotiations must get straight back on track to achieve a fair, ambitious, and binding deal to tackle climate change,
which is now overdue. To deliver their fair share of global efforts,
rich countries would need to provide $200 billion per year by 2020 to
help developing countries adapt and reduce their own emissions.
They need to commit to reduce their own emissions with at least 40%
below 1990 levels by 2020 to have a decent chance to keep global
warming below 2degC. In Central Asia, institutions for regional
co-operation must be strengthened, in particular to monitor and manage
water resources in the light of glacial melt, higher temperatures and
increases in water scarcity.
Read more
Read the report: Reaching Tipping Point? Climate Change and Poverty in Tajikistan
On the frontlines of climate change: Tajikstan - Jennifer Abrahamson blogs
Join the global call for a fair, ambitious and binding climate deal.
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
LATEST NEWS
EPA Bans Known Carcinogens Used in Dry Cleaning, Other Industries
"Both of these chemicals have caused too much harm for too long, despite the existence of safer alternatives," said one environmental campaigner.
Dec 09, 2024
The Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency on Monday announced a permanent ban on a pair of carcinogenic chemicals widely used in U.S. industries, including dry cleaning services and automative work.
According to the Washington Post:
The announcement includes the complete ban of trichloroethylene—also known as TCE—a substance found in common consumer and manufacturing products including degreasing agents, furniture care and auto repair products. In addition, the agency banned all consumer uses and many commercial uses of Perc—also known as tetrachloroethylene and PCE — an industrial solvent long used in applications such as dry cleaning and auto repair.
Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz, a senior attorney at Earthjustice, applauded the move but suggested to the Post that it should have come sooner.
"Both of these chemicals have caused too much harm for too long, despite the existence of safer alternatives," Kalmuss-Katz.
The EPA's decision, reports the New York Times, was "long sought by environmental and health advocates, even as they braced for what could be a wave of deregulation by the incoming Trump administration."
The Timesreports:
TCE is known to cause liver cancer, kidney cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and to damage the nervous and immune systems. It has been found in drinking water nationwide and was the subject of a 1995 book that became a movie, “A Civil Action,” starring John Travolta. The E.P.A. is banning all uses of the chemical under the Toxic Substances Control Act, which was overhauled in 2016 to give the agency greater authority to regulate harmful chemicals.
Though deemed "less harmful" than TCE, the Times notes how Perc has been shown to "cause liver, kidney, brain and testicular cancer," and can also damage the functioning of kidneys, the liver, and people's immune systems.
Environmentalists celebrated last year when Biden's EPA proposed the ban on TCE, as Common Dreamsreported.
Responding to the news at the time, Scott Faber, senior vice president for government affairs at the Environmental Working Group (EWG), said the EPA, by putting the ban on the table, was "once again putting the health of workers and consumers first."
While President-elect Donald Trump ran on a having an environmental agenda that would foster the "cleanest air" and the "cleanest water," the late approval of EPA's ban on TCE and Perc in Biden's term means the rule will be subject to the Congressional Review Act (CRA), meaning the Republican-control Senate could reverse the measure.
In his remarks to the Times, Kalmuss-Katz of Earthjustice said that if Trump and Senate Republicans try to roll back the ban, they will be certain to "encounter serious opposition from communities across the country that have been devastated by TCE, in both blue and red states."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Explains Why He's Voting Against the New $850 Billion Pentagon Budget
"We do not need to spend almost a trillion dollars on the military, while half a million Americans are homeless and children go hungry," Sen. Bernie Sanders writes in a new op-ed.
Dec 08, 2024
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday announced his opposition to an annual military policy bill that would authorize a Pentagon budget of nearly $850 billion, a sum that the progressive senator from Vermont characterized as outrageous—particularly as so many Americans face economic hardship.
"We do not need to spend almost a trillion dollars on the military, while half a million Americans are homeless and children go hungry," Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote in an op-ed for The Guardian after the House and Senate released legislative text for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2025.
Sanders continued:
In this moment in history, it would be wise for us to remember what Dwight D. Eisenhower, a former five-star general, said in his farewell address in 1961: "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." What Eisenhower said was true in 1961. It is even more true today.
I will be voting against the military budget.
The senator's op-ed came hours after lawmakers from both chambers of Congress unveiled the sprawling, 1,813-page NDAA for the coming fiscal year. The legislation's topline is just over $895 billion as lawmakers from both parties push annual U.S. military spending inexorably toward $1 trillion, even as the Pentagon fails to pass an audit.
The U.S. currently spends more on its military than the next nine countries combined, and military spending accounts for more than half of the nation's yearly discretionary spending, according to the National Priorities Project.
Sanders wrote Sunday that "very few people who have researched the military-industrial complex doubt that there is massive fraud, waste and cost over-runs in the system." One analysis estimates that over 50% of the Pentagon's annual budget, the subject of aggressive industry lobbying, goes to private contractors.
"Defense contractors routinely overcharge the Pentagon by 40%—and sometimes more than 4,000%," Sanders continued. "For example, in October, RTX (formerly Raytheon) was fined $950 million for inflating bills to the DoD, lying about labor and material costs, and paying bribes to secure foreign business. In June, Lockheed Martin was fined $70 million for overcharging the navy for aircraft parts, the latest in a long line of similar abuses. The F-35, the most expensive weapon system in history, has run up hundreds of billions in cost overruns."
The NDAA could have some trouble getting through the divided Congress—but not because of the proposed size of the Pentagon budget.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a statement that the legislation includes language that would "permanently ban transgender medical treatment for minors" and other provisions that are expected to draw Democratic opposition.
Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement Saturday that "anti-equality House Republican leaders are hijacking a defense bill to play politics with the healthcare of children of servicemembers."
"This cruel and hateful bill suddenly strips away access to medical care for families that members of our armed forces are counting on, and it could force servicemembers to choose between staying in the military or providing healthcare for their children," said Robinson. "Politicians have no place inserting themselves into decisions that should be between families and their doctors. We call on members of Congress to do what's right and vote against this damaging legislation."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'A Critical Situation': Gaza Doctor Warns of Catastrophe as Israel Assails Hospital
"We have called on the world to protect both the healthcare system and its workers, yet we have not received any response from anyone globally," said the director of Kamal Adwan Hospital.
Dec 08, 2024
The director of one of the few partially functioning hospitals in northern Gaza said Sunday that Israeli attacks have put the facility's remaining patients—including more than a dozen children—in grave danger and pleaded with the international community to intervene.
"Following the recent attack on Kamal Adwan Hospital, which involved over 100 shells and bombs indiscriminately targeting the facility, the damage has been severe," Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, the hospital's director, said in a statement. "As of now, one of the hospital buildings remains without electricity, oxygen, or water. The shelling continues to occur randomly in the vicinity, preventing us from conducting repairs on the oxygen, electricity, and water networks."
Abu Safiya said the overwhelmed and under-resourced hospital is currently treating 112 wounded patients, including six people in intensive care and 14 children.
"This is a critical situation," he said Sunday morning. "The bombardment and gunfire have not ceased; planes are dropping bombs around the clock. We are uncertain of what lies ahead and what the army wants from the hospital."
"We have called on the world to protect both the healthcare system and its workers, yet we have not received any response from anyone globally," Abu Safiya added. "This represents a humanitarian catastrophe unfolding against the healthcare workers and patients. Unfortunately, there seems to be no effort to halt this relentless assault on Kamal Adwan Hospital and the broader health system."
The hospital director's statement came after Israeli attacks near the facility killed scores of people on Friday. Photos taken from the scene showed bodies on the ground amid building ruins.
(Photo: AFP via Getty Images)
A day earlier, an Israeli airstrike on the Kamal Adwan Hospital compound killed a 16-year-old boy in a wheelchair and wounded a dozen others, The Associated Pressreported.
According toDrop Site, the boy "was struck as he entered the X-ray department."
Northern Gaza has been under intense Israeli assault for two months, and the humanitarian situation there and across the Palestinian enclave is worse than ever, according to U.N. agencies and aid organizations.
"The catastrophe in Gaza is nothing short of a complete breakdown of our common humanity," said U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres. "The nightmare must stop. We cannot continue to look away."
Abu Safiya said Sunday that his hospital is facing outages of electricity and water amid Israel's incessant attacks.
"We urgently appeal to the international community for assistance," he said. "The situation is extremely dangerous."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular