February, 10 2010, 12:14pm EDT
Descendants File Protest with United Nations over Israeli Plans to Build on 12th Century Muslim Cemetery
Simon Wiesenthal Center Intends “Museum of Tolerance” for Site Despite Desecration
WASHINGTON
Today, parties defending a 12th Century Muslim cemetery and holy
site from desecration by Israeli authorities and a U.S. developer
brought their case to the United Nations and held press conferences in
Geneva, Jerusalem and Los Angeles. The filing of the "Petition for
Urgent Action on Human Rights Violations by Israel: Desecration of
Ma'man Allah (Mamilla) Muslim Cemetery in the Holy City of Jerusalem."
took place in Geneva; the cemetery, Ma'man Allah (also known as
Mamilla), is in Jerusalem; and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which has
plans to build a Museum of Tolerance on the site, is based in Los
Angeles. The Center for Constitutional Rights in New York is
representing descendants, including 60 signatories from 15 of the
oldest Jerusalem families with ancestors going back to the 12th
century. The Petition may be consulted at www.mamillacampaign.org.
"The callous disregard for the most basic values of tolerance
involved in building this museum in the most ancient and revered Muslim
cemetery in Jerusalem is not just an affront by the Simon Wiesenthal
Center to the many Jerusalemites whose families, like my own, have had
ancestors buried there for many centuries," said Rashid Khalidi, Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies Department of History at Columbia University in New York.
"It is also a blatant violation of the ethical, moral and legal
responsibilities of the Israeli government, which itself repeatedly
protested the desecration of ancient Jewish cemeteries in Jerusalem
between 1948 and 1967."
The construction project has resulted in the disinterment and
disposal of hundreds of graves and human remains, the whereabouts of
which are currently unknown. Frank Gehry, the original architect for
the museum, has withdrawn his designs and his participation in the
project.
This will be the first known time Palestinian individuals have taken
collective action against Israel to bring such an issue before a UN
forum and comes after all remedies in Israel were exhausted. The
families, NGO's and attorneys argue the desecration of the cemetery
violates international conventions protecting cultural heritage, the
manifestation of religious beliefs, and the right to family.
Said Maria LaHood, Center for Constitutional Rights Senior Attorney, "Left
with no recourse in Israel, families of people buried in Mamilla
cemetery have come together to petition the United Nations to safeguard
their international human rights to be free from discrimination, to
manifest religious beliefs, and to have their cultural heritage
protected. We call on the international community to denounce this
shameful desecration of a historic Muslim cemetery in Jerusalem."
The plan to build a "Center for Human Dignity - Museum of Tolerance"
on the remains of important Muslim figures and men, women and children
buried there over the course of a thousand years has faced widespread
opposition from Muslim, Christian and Jewish personalities in Israel,
Palestine and around the world. Nonetheless, the Israeli Supreme Court
has ruled in favor of construction of the Museum, and the Israeli
government has refused to halt the disinterment of human remains and
the destruction of the ancient cemetery.
The Center for Constitutional Rights and others are petitioning the
United Nations Special Rapporteurs on Freedom of Religion and Belief
and on Contemporary Forms of Racism; the Independent Expert on Culture;
the High Commissioner for Human Rights; and the Director General of
UNESCO on behalf of Palestinian families whose ancestors are buried in
the cemetery. The parties are asking these international bodies to act
urgently to demand that the government of Israel halt further
construction of the "Center for Human Dignity - Museum of Tolerance" on
the Mamilla Cemetery site, investigate human rights violations,
document and reveal to petitioners the whereabouts of all human remains
and artifacts, recover and rebury all human remains where they were
originally found in coordination with the proper Muslim authorities,
and declare the Mamilla Cemetery an antiquity to be preserved and
protected.
Said Stanley Sheinbaum, Jewish leader in Los Angeles and former President of the Los Angeles Police Commission,
"In regard to the proposed construction of a new Simon Wiesenthal
Center on the ancient Mamilla Cemetery, I would with great respect for
both Palestinians and Israelis suggest that Israeli governmental
authorities seek out an alternative building site upon which to build
the Museum of Tolerance. It seems to me that to desecrate hundreds of
human remains on this sacred burial site in order to build a center
dedicated to tolerance is particularly ironic."
The Mamilla Cemetery has been a Muslim burial ground and holy site
since as early as the 7th century, when companions of the Prophet
Muhammad were reputedly buried there. In addition, numerous Sufi saints
and thousands of other officials, scholars, notables, and Jerusalemite
families have been buried in the cemetery over the last 1000 years. The
Muslim Supreme Council declared the cemetery an historical site in
1927, and the British Mandate authorities pronounced it an antiquities
site in 1944. It was an active burial ground until 1948, when the new
State of Israel seized the western part of Jerusalem and the cemetery
fell under Israeli control.
Read more about the Mamilla Cemetery on CCR's case page.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
(212) 614-6464LATEST NEWS
Why Can't We Fund Universal Public Goods? Blame the Tax-Dodging Billionaire Nepo Babies
"In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta," reads a new report.
Dec 13, 2024
The children of the richest families in the U.S. are well-known for spending their vast wealth on frivolous luxuries—constructing a replica of a medieval church on their acres of property, in the case of banking heir Timothy Mellon, or starting a brand of T-shirts described by one critic as "terrible beyond your wildest imagination," as Wyatt Koch, nephew of Republican megadonors Charles and David, did.
But a report released by Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) on Thursday shows how "billionaire nepo babies" don't just waste their families' fortunes. They also benefit from "a rigged system" that allows them to "pass that wealth down over generations without being properly taxed–often without being taxed at all."
In addition, the heirs of the country's biggest fortunes spend vast sums "to elect politicians who protect their unearned wealth and manipulate the country's economy in their favor," said ATF.
Along with Mellon and Koch, the report profiles Samuel Logan of the Scripps media dynasty; Nicola Peltz-Beckham, daughter of billionaire investor Nelson Peltz; Gabrielle Rubenstein, whose family has made its fortune in private equity; and President-elect Donald Trump's son, Eric Trump.
The nepo babies are part of a small group of billionaire families in the U.S. who benefit from tax loopholes that ensure little of their immense wealth ever goes to benefit the public good.
At least 90 billionaires have passed away over the last decade, leaving their beneficiaries $455 billion in collective wealth.
But according to ATF, "$255 billion (56%) of that amount was likely entirely exempt from the capital gains tax because of a special break called 'stepped up basis.'"
"Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations."
Without loopholes included the stepped up basis tax cut, the current estate tax on billionaires and centimillionaires would yield enough revenue to fund universal childcare, preschool, and paid family leave for U.S. workers, with hundreds of billions of dollars left over, according to ATF's report.
The wealthy heirs profiled in the report and their families are some of the Republican Party's top donors—contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to candidates including Trump in the hopes of securing even more tax cuts.
Mellon, for example, is Trump's "biggest supporter, giving $140 million to a pro-Trump PAC in 2024 alone," reads the report.
A previous analysis by ATF found that as of late October, just 150 billionaire families had spent $1.9 billion on the 2024 elections.
As the Center for American Progress found earlier this year, Trump's plan to extend the tax cuts that he pushed through in 2017 would cost $4 trillion over the next decade.
"The vast wealth inherited by centuries-old billionaire families is staggering. While these heirs and their billions go undertaxed, enormous sums are squandered on lavish mansions, private jets, and vanity projects instead of funding crucial public investments," said ATF executive director David Kass. "In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta. Now, Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations—all while advocating for cuts to vital programs that working and middle-class Americans depend on."
The report calls for Congress to pass "proven, pragmatic proposals to unrig the tax system that enjoy high levels of popular support," such as the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act that was proposed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) this year. The bill would tax fortunes between $50 million and $1 billion at 2% and wealth above $1 billion at $1 billion.
The small tax on enormous wealth would generate "a whopping $3 trillion over 10 years," said ATF.
The estate tax could also be "restored so that it can play a meaningful role in promoting fairness and equal opportunities" through the passage of the For the 99.5% Act, which was introduced in 2023 by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.).
Under the bill, the estate tax exemption would be lowered to $7 million per couple and the current 40% flat rate would be replaced with a sliding scale that would charge higher rates as a family's wealth grows.
"None of these tax reforms would impoverish the ultra wealthy, nor even inconvenience them in any meaningful way–but they would reduce the concentration of wealth that is so corrosive to society," reads the report. "At the same time, they would raise trillions of dollars that could be used to reduce inequality and improve the lives of families that can only dream of the kind of security and opportunity enjoyed by the nation’s richest clans."
"And if rich families ever did need to tighten their belts a bit to pay their taxes," the report continues, "the economizing might begin by reducing the flow of money funding the extravagant lifestyles of America's Billionaire Nepo Babies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Next Recession Starts Here': Trump Team Weighs Abolishing Bank Regulators
The president-elect's advisers are reportedly discussing plans to shrink or eliminate key bank watchdogs, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dec 13, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump and his advisers are reportedly considering plans to weaken—or abolish altogether—top bank regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The Wall Street Journalreported Thursday that members of Trump's transition team and the new Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency have asked nominees under consideration to head the FDIC and OCC if the bank watchdogs could be eliminated and have their functions absorbed by the Treasury Department, which is set to be run by a billionaire hedge fund manager and crypto enthusiast.
"Bank executives are optimistic President-elect Donald Trump will ease a host of regulations on capital cushions and consumer protections, as well as scrutiny of consolidation in the industry," the Journal reported. "But FDIC deposit insurance is considered near sacred. Any move that threatened to undermine even the perception of deposit insurance could quickly ripple through banks and in a crisis might compound customer fears."
The Trump team's internal and fluid discussions about the fate of the key bank regulators broadly aligns with Project 2025's proposal to "merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions."
The FDIC, which is primarily funded by bank insurance premiums, was established during the Great Depression to restore public trust in the nation's banking system, and the agency played a central role in navigating the 2023 bank failures that threatened a systemic crisis.
Observers warned that gutting the FDIC and OCC could catalyze another economic meltdown.
"The next recession starts here," tech journalist Jacob Silverman warned in response to the Journal's reporting.
Eric Rauchway, a historian of the New Deal, wrote that "even Milton Friedman appreciated the FDIC," underscoring the extreme nature of the incoming Trump administration's deregulatory ambitions.
Musk, the world's wealthiest man, is also pushing for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Journal noted Thursday that "Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican from Kentucky and Trump ally on the House Financial Services Committee, has backed the plan to eliminate or drastically alter the CFPB and said he wants to get rid of what he calls 'one-size-fits-all' regulation for banks."
Barr has received millions of dollars in campaign donations from the financial sector and "introduced many pieces of pro-industry legislation, including significant rollbacks of protections stemming from the 2008 financial crisis," according to the watchdog group Accountable.US.
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular