November, 18 2009, 11:16am EDT
Cuba: Raul Castro Imprisons Critics, Crushes Dissent
Obama Should Replace Failed Embargo With Effective Multilateral Policy
WASHINGTON
Raul Castro's government has locked up scores of people for
exercising their fundamental freedoms and allowed scores more political
prisoners arrested during Fidel Castro's rule to languish in detention,
Human Rights Watch says in a report released today. Rather than dismantle Cuba's repressive machinery, Raul Castro has kept it firmly in place and fully active, the report says.
The 123-page report, "New Castro, Same Cuba,"
shows how the Raul Castro government has relied in particular on the
Criminal Code offense of "dangerousness," which allows authorities to
imprison individuals before they have committed any crime, on the
suspicion that they are likely to commit an offense in the future. This
"dangerousness" provision is overtly political, defining as "dangerous"
any behavior that contradicts Cuba's socialist norms.
"In his three years in power, Raul Castro has been just as brutal as
his brother," said Jose Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human
Rights Watch. "Cubans who dare to criticize the government live in
perpetual fear, knowing they could wind up in prison for merely
expressing their views."
Based on a fact-finding mission to Cuba and more than 60 in-depth
interviews, Human Rights Watch documented more than 40 cases in which
the government has imprisoned individuals under the "dangerousness"
provision for exercising their basic rights.
Ramon Velasquez Toranzo, who set out on a peaceful march across Cuba
to call for respect for human rights and freedom for all political
prisoners, was arrested and sentenced to three years in prison for
"dangerousness" in January 2007.
Raymundo Perdigon Brito, a journalist who wrote articles documenting
abuses by the government and published them on foreign websites, was
sentenced to four years in prison for "dangerousness" in December 2006.
He has endured repeated beatings by guards and solitary confinement
during his incarceration.
The Raul Castro government also uses a range of other draconian laws
to silence free speech, quash labor rights, and criminalize all forms
of dissent. Human rights defenders, journalists, and other civil
society members tried under these laws are subjected to systematic due
process violations, including abusive interrogations, the denial of
legal counsel, and sham trials.
Alexander Santos Hernandez, a political activist who was sentenced
to four years for "dangerousness" in 2006, told Human Rights Watch,
"[The police] picked me up at 5:50 a.m. while I was at home sleeping,
and by 8:30 that morning they were already reading me my sentence."
Santos was denied a lawyer, and the sentence he was given was dated two
days before his trial took place.
Political prisoners are subjected to widespread abuses, including
forced ideological re-education, extended solitary confinement, and the
denial of medical treatment for serious illnesses.
In addition to imprisoning dissenters, Raul Castro's government also
enforces political conformity using beatings, short-term detention,
public acts of repudiation, and the denial of work, among other
tactics. Taken together, these everyday forms of repression create a
climate of fear that has a profound chilling effect on the exercise of
fundamental freedoms in Cuban society.
As a human rights defender, Rodolfo Bartelemi Coba, told Human
Rights Watch in March 2009, "We live 24 hours a day ready to be
detained." Ten days after making that statement, Bartelemi was arrested
and taken to prison, where he remains.
Efforts by the US government to press for change by imposing a
sweeping embargo have proven to be a costly and misguided failure,
Human Rights Watch said. The embargo has inflicted severe hardship on
the Cuban population as a whole, while doing nothing to improve the
human rights situation in Cuba. Rather than isolating Cuba, the policy
has isolated the United States, alienating Washington's potential
allies on this issue.
"Despite new leadership in Havana and Washington, Cuba continues to
crush dissent, while the US pursues the same failed embargo policy,"
said Vivanco. "As always, it is the Cuban people who are paying the
price."
"New Castro, Same Cuba" recommends that the Obama administration
secure commitments from the European Union, Canada, and Latin American
allies to unite to press Cuba to meet a single, concrete demand: the
immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners within
six months.
Those include the 53 prisoners who have been languishing in prison
since a 2003 crackdown by Fidel Castro, as well as all scores of
individuals incarcerated for "dangerousness" under Raul Castro.
Once this joint commitment is in place, the US government should end its failed embargo policy, Human Rights Watch said.
If the Raul Castro government does not meet this demand, members of
the multilateral coalition should impose targeted, punitive measures,
such as travel bans on government officials or withholding new forms of
foreign investment. These measures should be significant enough to bear
real consequences for the Cuban government, while being careful not to
impose suffering on the Cuban population as a whole, Human Rights Watch
said.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Why Can't We Fund Universal Public Goods? Blame the Tax-Dodging Billionaire Nepo Babies
"In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta," reads a new report.
Dec 13, 2024
The children of the richest families in the U.S. are well-known for spending their vast wealth on frivolous luxuries—constructing a replica of a medieval church on their acres of property, in the case of banking heir Timothy Mellon, or starting a brand of T-shirts described by one critic as "terrible beyond your wildest imagination," as Wyatt Koch, nephew of Republican megadonors Charles and David, did.
But a report released by Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) on Thursday shows how "billionaire nepo babies" don't just waste their families' fortunes. They also benefit from "a rigged system" that allows them to "pass that wealth down over generations without being properly taxed–often without being taxed at all."
In addition, the heirs of the country's biggest fortunes spend vast sums "to elect politicians who protect their unearned wealth and manipulate the country's economy in their favor," said ATF.
Along with Mellon and Koch, the report profiles Samuel Logan of the Scripps media dynasty; Nicola Peltz-Beckham, daughter of billionaire investor Nelson Peltz; Gabrielle Rubenstein, whose family has made its fortune in private equity; and President-elect Donald Trump's son, Eric Trump.
The nepo babies are part of a small group of billionaire families in the U.S. who benefit from tax loopholes that ensure little of their immense wealth ever goes to benefit the public good.
At least 90 billionaires have passed away over the last decade, leaving their beneficiaries $455 billion in collective wealth.
But according to ATF, "$255 billion (56%) of that amount was likely entirely exempt from the capital gains tax because of a special break called 'stepped up basis.'"
"Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations."
Without loopholes included the stepped up basis tax cut, the current estate tax on billionaires and centimillionaires would yield enough revenue to fund universal childcare, preschool, and paid family leave for U.S. workers, with hundreds of billions of dollars left over, according to ATF's report.
The wealthy heirs profiled in the report and their families are some of the Republican Party's top donors—contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to candidates including Trump in the hopes of securing even more tax cuts.
Mellon, for example, is Trump's "biggest supporter, giving $140 million to a pro-Trump PAC in 2024 alone," reads the report.
A previous analysis by ATF found that as of late October, just 150 billionaire families had spent $1.9 billion on the 2024 elections.
As the Center for American Progress found earlier this year, Trump's plan to extend the tax cuts that he pushed through in 2017 would cost $4 trillion over the next decade.
"The vast wealth inherited by centuries-old billionaire families is staggering. While these heirs and their billions go undertaxed, enormous sums are squandered on lavish mansions, private jets, and vanity projects instead of funding crucial public investments," said ATF executive director David Kass. "In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta. Now, Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations—all while advocating for cuts to vital programs that working and middle-class Americans depend on."
The report calls for Congress to pass "proven, pragmatic proposals to unrig the tax system that enjoy high levels of popular support," such as the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act that was proposed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) this year. The bill would tax fortunes between $50 million and $1 billion at 2% and wealth above $1 billion at $1 billion.
The small tax on enormous wealth would generate "a whopping $3 trillion over 10 years," said ATF.
The estate tax could also be "restored so that it can play a meaningful role in promoting fairness and equal opportunities" through the passage of the For the 99.5% Act, which was introduced in 2023 by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.).
Under the bill, the estate tax exemption would be lowered to $7 million per couple and the current 40% flat rate would be replaced with a sliding scale that would charge higher rates as a family's wealth grows.
"None of these tax reforms would impoverish the ultra wealthy, nor even inconvenience them in any meaningful way–but they would reduce the concentration of wealth that is so corrosive to society," reads the report. "At the same time, they would raise trillions of dollars that could be used to reduce inequality and improve the lives of families that can only dream of the kind of security and opportunity enjoyed by the nation’s richest clans."
"And if rich families ever did need to tighten their belts a bit to pay their taxes," the report continues, "the economizing might begin by reducing the flow of money funding the extravagant lifestyles of America's Billionaire Nepo Babies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Next Recession Starts Here': Trump Team Weighs Abolishing Bank Regulators
The president-elect's advisers are reportedly discussing plans to shrink or eliminate key bank watchdogs, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dec 13, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump and his advisers are reportedly considering plans to weaken—or abolish altogether—top bank regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The Wall Street Journalreported Thursday that members of Trump's transition team and the new Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency have asked nominees under consideration to head the FDIC and OCC if the bank watchdogs could be eliminated and have their functions absorbed by the Treasury Department, which is set to be run by a billionaire hedge fund manager and crypto enthusiast.
"Bank executives are optimistic President-elect Donald Trump will ease a host of regulations on capital cushions and consumer protections, as well as scrutiny of consolidation in the industry," the Journal reported. "But FDIC deposit insurance is considered near sacred. Any move that threatened to undermine even the perception of deposit insurance could quickly ripple through banks and in a crisis might compound customer fears."
The Trump team's internal and fluid discussions about the fate of the key bank regulators broadly aligns with Project 2025's proposal to "merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions."
The FDIC, which is primarily funded by bank insurance premiums, was established during the Great Depression to restore public trust in the nation's banking system, and the agency played a central role in navigating the 2023 bank failures that threatened a systemic crisis.
Observers warned that gutting the FDIC and OCC could catalyze another economic meltdown.
"The next recession starts here," tech journalist Jacob Silverman warned in response to the Journal's reporting.
Eric Rauchway, a historian of the New Deal, wrote that "even Milton Friedman appreciated the FDIC," underscoring the extreme nature of the incoming Trump administration's deregulatory ambitions.
Musk, the world's wealthiest man, is also pushing for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Journal noted Thursday that "Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican from Kentucky and Trump ally on the House Financial Services Committee, has backed the plan to eliminate or drastically alter the CFPB and said he wants to get rid of what he calls 'one-size-fits-all' regulation for banks."
Barr has received millions of dollars in campaign donations from the financial sector and "introduced many pieces of pro-industry legislation, including significant rollbacks of protections stemming from the 2008 financial crisis," according to the watchdog group Accountable.US.
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular