October, 14 2009, 10:37am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Ira Arlook, 202-822-5200,
ira@neweconomy.org
Leslie Getzinger,
American Federation of Teachers, 202Â 321 4034, lgetzing@aft.org
Teachers, Students, Labor Rights Watchdogs, Religious Leaders, Call on Uzbekistan to End Forced Child Labor in Cotton Fields
Major Human Rights Abuses Complicate U.S. Trade Relations with Central Asian Republic
WASHINGTON
Calling for an end to forced child labor in the cotton fields of
Uzbekistan, and carrying a quilt to which they pinned photos of children
picking cotton, over fifty demonstrators, representing American teachers,
students, religious and human rights organizations, and labor unions, dumped
petitions with thousands of signatures at the front door of the embassy of that
central Asian republic in Washington, DC today.
The demonstration comes at a critical moment in U.S.-Uzbekistan trade
relations:
The U.S.
government has just begun new talks with Uzbekistan this week for a trade
and investment agreement while a formal complaint filed by the International
Labor Rights Forum (ILRF) with the U.S. Trade Representative is pending.
Last month, the US Department of Labor included cotton
from Uzbekistan
on the List of Goods Produced by Child or Forced Labor that was required by the
Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005. US DOL also recommended that cotton from Uzbekistan be
included on an updated List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child
Labor as part of Executive Order 13126 of 1999.
Today, the government of Uzbekistan
opens the Fifth International Uzbek Cotton Fair to attract U.S. and other
cotton importers to buy Uzbek cotton.
International brands and retailers including Wal-Mart,
Target, Levi Strauss, GAP,
Limited Brands, Disney and Nike, among many others,
have agreed to ban Uzbek cotton from their supply chains until forced child
labor is ended.
Uzbekistan is the world's second
largest exporter of cotton and up to one third of the country's workforce
labors on cotton farms. While the cotton industry is very profitable for a few
large landowners and political elites, the vast majority of cotton farmers live
in dire poverty. Independent union representation is almost nonexistent for workers.
Thousands of children as young as seven are
forced, by government decree, to work in the cotton fields instead of attending
school in order to meet government-imposed cotton production quotas. Even
children who are enrolled in rural schools are often dispatched to work in the
fields when their schools are closed down during harvest time by government
officials. Some children are conscripted to work in remote areas where they are
forced to stay in dormitories while they pick cotton.
Speakers, representing
some of the demonstration's sponsoring organizations included:
Arlene Holt-Baker, Executive Vice President, AFL-CIO
Antonia Cortese, Secretary-Treasurer, American
Federation of Teachers
Amanda Formica, United Students for Fair Trade at George Washington
University
Bama Athreya, Executive Director,
International Labor Rights Forum
James E. Winkler, General Secretary, United Methodist Church, Board of Church and Society
Sally Greenberg, Executive Director, National Consumers
League
Additional sponsors included the Child Labor
Coalition, Communications Workers of America, Not for Sale Campaign, Service
Employees International Union, United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers,
"Credible reports indicate that up to a quarter
of a million children and youths become forced laborers in Uzbekistan's
cotton fields each year. This is one of the most widespread and shocking
examples of forced labor in the world today, it has been going on for decades,
and all of this cotton enters the global garment industry. We are wearing
the labor of these kids on our backs, and it is time once and for all for the
Government of Uzbekistan to stop this terrible human rights abuse."
- Bama Athreya, Executive
Director, International Labor Rights Forum
"For more than 2 million Uzbek students, going 'back to
school' also means going 'back to the fields,' as they and
their teachers are forced to leave school to perform long, hard and dangerous
work in the country's cotton fields. While the government and bosses reap
the profits, the children lose valuable learning time while toiling in the
fields for little more than meager meals. This state-sanctioned practice must
be denounced. All children belong in the classroom, and teachers must be free to
practice their craft." - Randi Weingarten, President,
American Federation of Teachers.
"The key to Uzbekistan's
future is not in the growth of its cotton, but in the growth of it's children's
minds, which cannot happen if they are forced to work. As a student and youth,
I stand in solidarity with young people in Uzbekistan in demanding that the
government stop these abusive policies." - Amanda Formica, George Washington
University member, United
Students for Fair Trade.
"The Uzbek government's use of forced child labor is
immoral and must be stopped. People of all faiths in the U.S. and around
the world want to be sure that the clothing they buy is made by workers who
enjoy ethical working conditions. We add our voices to those who are
calling for an end to abuses in the cotton fields of Uzbekistan." - Jim
Winkler, General Secretary, General Board of Church & Society, The United
Methodist Church
"Today, we are here to remind consumers that the cotton that goes into
the clothes they wear may have been harvested by school children in Uzbekistan,
where the government has replaced mechanical harvesters with the sometimes
bloody fingers of small children and teenagers, who are forced to leave school
and pick cotton. On behalf of American consumers, the National Consumers
League and the Child Labor Coalition demand that the government of Uzbekistan do
the right thing and stop forcing its school children to harvest cotton and
instead allow them to remain in school." - Sally Greenberg,
Executive Director, National Consumers League.
###
This
rally is sponsored by: AFL-CIO,
American Federation of Teachers (AFT), Child Labor Coalition, Communication
Workers of America (CWA), International Labor Rights Forum, Not for Sale
Campaign, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), United Electrical,
Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE), Workers United
LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular