

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Firefighter
Vanessa Coleman, previously a Captain with the D.C. Fire &
Emergency Medical Services (F&EMS) Department and a 19-year veteran
of the force, has been fired from her position as a result of blowing
the whistle on wrongful actions taken against her by Department
officials.
"We
all should have the right to free speech and justice, but this is an
unjust action that I will continue to fight," stated Coleman. "High
level fire department officials, including Chief Dennis Rubin and Asst.
Chief Brian Lee, have sought to make me a scapegoat for a fire which
was proven not to be my fault in any way and have retaliated against me
for challenging their orders that I submit to psychological testing. I
have been terminated for blowing the whistle and standing up for what
is right."
The
termination follows last month's decision by the Fire Trial Board, the
Department's so-called internal justice system, that Coleman be demoted
two ranks for failing to acknowledge that an ordered, retaliatory
psychological evaluation, or "fitness for duty" exam, was voluntary. Lawyers for Coleman assert that the order to undergo psychological testing was illegal.
"The
'Trial Board' is a farce, and does not mirror any sort of proper
hearing procedure whatsoever," stated Richard Condit, GAP Senior
Counsel and co-counsel for Coleman. "It was obvious from the beginning
that the decision would not be favorable - this is a hearing process under
the direct control of Asst Chief Brian Lee and the Fire Chief. If you
are blowing the whistle on senior management at the Fire Department you
don't stand a chance of surviving the rigged Trial Board process."
added Condit.
Although
Coleman reported several times as ordered for the psych test, a
particularly heinous form of retaliation, she would not submit to
official pressure to state that she was taking the test "voluntarily."
"Its
common sense that if you are ordered to take a test, you can't
truthfully state that you're taking it voluntarily," stated Karen Gray,
GAP General Counsel and co-counsel for Coleman. "She is being penalized
through departmental actions that are clearly unsupported by law. Our client did nothing wrong - she told the truth about a botched investigation, and now she's paying an unacceptable price."
There
are multiple problems with the fitness-for-duty system involving FEMS.
Notably, Department officials are able to order firefighters to be
tested on a whim, and firefighters may not be given access to the
results and supporting information.
After the decision came down from the Fire Trial Board ordering a
two-rank demotion, Coleman's superiors again ordered her for a
fitness-for-duty examination, which again required an acknowledgement
of her 'voluntary' cooperation. Coleman instead chose to stand up
against this wrongful action and refused to abide the Chief's illegal
order. Coleman was delivered her official notification of termination
by the department last Friday, October 9th - just before a holiday weekend.
"This isn't over," stated Condit. "We will continue with our suit
against the department in federal court and are confident we will
prevail. The actions by departmental officials are palpably improper.
The DC Counsel should take a long look at the abuse of power and the
retaliation that Coleman has had to endure."
Background
Captain
Vanessa Coleman has been steadily retaliated against since March 2008,
stemming from the fallout of the Mt. Pleasant apartment fire in
Washington, D.C. Despite a history beginning as a fire cadet in 1990,
with subsequent promotions to Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain, and
annual performance reviews greater than "satisfactory," Coleman has
been singled out by department officials and made to bear the blame for
the problems stemming from the fire. At the fire, Coleman was directed
away from the basement of the apartment building to the third floor.
This diversion was later found to be of great importance, as fire
officials now believe the fire originated in the basement.
Audio of Coleman being ordered to the third floor can be found at this Web site: https://www.dcfirefeed.com/pleasant.htm
In the months following the Mt. Pleasant fire, then-Battalion chief
John Lee, who ordered Coleman and her crew to the third floor, retired
from the Department.
The retaliation against Coleman that has ensued since the filing is a
laundry list of unacceptable actions that include: citations, a
suspension, failure to support her authority as a Captain, stripped
duties, and a transfer. In July 2008, Coleman received a notice that
she was to report for a psychological evaluation, ordered by Assistant
Chief Brian Lee. Upon reporting for the exam, she requested legal
counsel, but was denied. Unwilling to submit to the exam under the
conditions presented to her, Coleman was directed not to go back to
work and to take sick leave until she was able to take a rescheduled
psychological evaluation.
Months later, in August, Coleman and GAP staff met with F&EMS
officials to discuss the order. At such meeting, according to a memo
written from EMS Deputy General Counsel, Thelma Chichester:
The
Department has offered to hold the pending Order for Cpt. Coleman to
take the Fitness for Duty Examination as well as any administrative
action which resulted from her failure to comply with a direct Order in
abeyance pending the conclusion of the investigation into the charges
of discrimination made by Cpt. Coleman.
After reaching this agreement, Coleman was finally allowed to return to
work. Shortly after this meeting, Coleman received a notice that she
was being charged with insubordination for failing to take the
"fitness-for-duty" exam, as ordered. After refusing to check the
"voluntary" box, Coleman was ordered to stand before the Trial Board
proceeding, which started this past June.
The Government Accountability Project (GAP) is a 30-year-old nonprofit public interest group that promotes government and corporate accountability by advancing occupational free speech, defending whistleblowers, and empowering citizen activists. We pursue this mission through our Nuclear Safety, International Reform, Corporate Accountability, Food & Drug Safety, and Federal Employee/National Security programs. GAP is the nation's leading whistleblower protection organization.
"Does anyone truly believe that caving in to Trump now will stop his unprecedented attacks on our democracy and working people?" asked Sen. Bernie Sanders.
US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday implored his Democratic colleagues in Congress not to cave to President Donald Trump and Republicans in the ongoing government shutdown fight, warning that doing so would hasten the country's descent into authoritarianism.
In an op-ed for The Guardian, Sanders (I-Vt.) called Trump a "schoolyard bully" and argued that "anyone who thinks surrendering to him now will lead to better outcomes and cooperation in the future does not understand how a power-hungry demagogue operates."
"This is a man who threatens to arrest and jail his political opponents, deploys the US military into Democratic cities, and allows masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to pick people up off the streets and throw them into vans without due process," Sanders wrote. "He has sued virtually every major media outlet because he does not tolerate criticism, has extorted funds from law firms and is withholding federal funding from states that voted against him."
If Democrats capitulate, Sanders warned, Trump "will utilize his victory to accelerate his movement toward authoritarianism."
"At a time when he already has no regard for our democratic system of checks and balances," the senator wrote, "he will be emboldened to continue decimating programs that protect elderly people, children, the sick and the poor while giving more tax breaks and other benefits to his fellow oligarchs."
Sanders' op-ed came as the shutdown continued with no end in sight, with Democrats standing by their demand for an extension of Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits as a necessary condition for any government funding deal. Republicans have so far refused to negotiate on the ACA subsidies even as health insurance premiums skyrocket nationwide.
The Trump administration, meanwhile, is illegally withholding Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funding from tens of millions of Americans—including millions of children—despite court rulings ordering him to release the money.
In a "60 Minutes" interview that aired Sunday, Trump again urged Republicans to nuke the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate to remove the need for Democratic support to reopen the government and advance other elements of their agenda unilaterally. Under the status quo, Republicans need the support of at least seven Democratic senators to advance a government funding package.
"The Republicans have to get tougher," Trump said. "If we end the filibuster, we can do exactly what we want. We're not going to lose power."
Congressional Democrats have faced some pressure from allies, most notably the head of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), to cut a deal with Republicans to end the shutdown and alleviate the suffering it has inflicted on federal workers and many others.
But Democrats appear unmoved by the AFGE president's demand, and other labor leaders have since voiced support for the minority party's effort to secure an extension of ACA subsidies.
"We're urging our Democratic friends to hold the line," said Jaime Contreras, executive vice president of the 185,000-member Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ.
In his op-ed on Sunday, Sanders asked, "Does anyone truly believe that caving in to Trump now will stop his unprecedented attacks on our democracy and working people?"
"If the Democrats cave now, it would be a betrayal of the millions of Americans who have fought and died for democracy and our Constitution," the senator wrote. "It would be a sellout of a working class that is struggling to survive in very difficult economic times. Democrats in Congress are the last remaining opposition to Trump's quest for absolute power. To surrender now would be an historic tragedy for our country, something that history will not look kindly upon."
"Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food," one lawyer said.
As the Trump administration continued its illegal freeze on food assistance, the US Department of Agriculture sent a warning to grocery stores not to provide discounts to the more than 42 million Americans affected.
Several grocery chains and food delivery apps have announced in recent days that they would provide substantial discounts to those whose Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits have been delayed. More than 1 in 8 Americans rely on the program, and 39% of them are children.
But on Sunday, Catherine Rampell, a reporter at the Washington Post published an email from the USDA that was sent to grocery stores around the country, telling them they were prohibited from offering special discounts to those at greater risk of food insecurity due to the cuts.
"You must offer eligible foods at the same prices and on the same terms and conditions to SNAP-EBT customers as other customers, except that sales tax cannot be charged on SNAP purchases," the email said. "You cannot treat SNAP-EBT customers differently from any other customer. Offering discounts or services only to SNAP-eligible customers is a SNAP violation unless you have a SNAP equal treatment waiver."
The email referred to SNAP's "Equal Treatment Rule," which prohibits stores from discriminating against SNAP recipients by charging them higher prices or treating them more favorably than other customers by offering them specialized sales or incentives.
Rampell said she was "aware of at least two stores that had offered struggling customers a discount, then withdrew it after receiving this email."
She added that it was "understandable why grocery stores might be scared off" because "a store caught violating the prohibition could be denied the ability to accept SNAP benefits in the future. In low-income areas where the SNAP shutdown will have the biggest impact, getting thrown off SNAP could mean a store is no longer financially viable."
While the rule prohibits special treatment in either direction, legal analyst Jeffrey Evan Gold argues that it was a "perverted interpretation of a rule that stops grocers from price gouging SNAP recipients... charging them more when they use food stamps."
The government also notably allows retailers to request waivers for programs that incentivize SNAP recipients to purchase healthy food.
Others pointed out that SNAP is currently not paying out to Americans because President Donald Trump is defying multiple federal court rulings issued Friday, requiring him to tap a $6 billion contingency fund to ensure benefit payments go out. Both courts, in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, have said his administration's refusal to pay out benefits is against the law.
One labor movement lawyer summed up the administration's position on social media: "Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food."
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy.
After failing to use the government's might to bully Jimmy Kimmel off the air earlier this fall, President Donald Trump is once again threatening to bring the force of law down on comedians for the egregious crime of making fun of him.
This time, his target was NBC late-night host Seth Meyers, whom the president said, in a Truth Social post Saturday, "may be the least talented person to 'perform' live in the history of television."
On Thursday, the comedian hosted a segment mocking Trump's bizarre distaste for the electromagnetic catapults aboard Navy ships, which the president said he may sign an executive order to replace with older (and less efficient) steam-powered ones.
Trump did not take kindly to Meyers' barbs: "On and on he went, a truly deranged lunatic. Why does NBC waste its time and money on a guy like this??? - NO TALENT, NO RATINGS, 100% ANTI TRUMP, WHICH IS PROBABLY ILLEGAL!!!"
It is, of course, not "illegal" for a late-night comedian, or any other news reporter or commentator, for that matter, to be "anti-Trump." But it's not the first time the president has made such a suggestion. Amid the backlash against Kimmel's firing in September, Trump asserted that networks that give him "bad publicity or press" should have their licenses taken away.
"I read someplace that the networks were 97% against me... I mean, they’re getting a license, I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said. "All they do is hit Trump. They’re licensed. They’re not allowed to do that.”
His FCC director, Brendan Carr, used a similar logic to justify his pressure campaign to get Kimmel booted by ABC, which he said could be punished for airing what he determined was "distorted” content.
Before Kimmel, Carr suggested in April that Comcast may be violating its broadcast licenses after MSNBC declined to air a White House press briefing in which the administration defended its wrongful deportation of Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on social media following Trump's tirade against Meyers. "Why? Because Trump believes he—not the people—decides the law. This is why we are in the middle of, not on the verge of, a totalitarian takeover."