October, 13 2009, 10:43am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Dylan Blaylock,202.408.0034 ext. 137,dylanb@whistleblower.org
D.C. Firefighter Terminated For Whistleblowing
WASHINGTON
Firefighter
Vanessa Coleman, previously a Captain with the D.C. Fire &
Emergency Medical Services (F&EMS) Department and a 19-year veteran
of the force, has been fired from her position as a result of blowing
the whistle on wrongful actions taken against her by Department
officials.
"We
all should have the right to free speech and justice, but this is an
unjust action that I will continue to fight," stated Coleman. "High
level fire department officials, including Chief Dennis Rubin and Asst.
Chief Brian Lee, have sought to make me a scapegoat for a fire which
was proven not to be my fault in any way and have retaliated against me
for challenging their orders that I submit to psychological testing. I
have been terminated for blowing the whistle and standing up for what
is right."
The
termination follows last month's decision by the Fire Trial Board, the
Department's so-called internal justice system, that Coleman be demoted
two ranks for failing to acknowledge that an ordered, retaliatory
psychological evaluation, or "fitness for duty" exam, was voluntary. Lawyers for Coleman assert that the order to undergo psychological testing was illegal.
"The
'Trial Board' is a farce, and does not mirror any sort of proper
hearing procedure whatsoever," stated Richard Condit, GAP Senior
Counsel and co-counsel for Coleman. "It was obvious from the beginning
that the decision would not be favorable - this is a hearing process under
the direct control of Asst Chief Brian Lee and the Fire Chief. If you
are blowing the whistle on senior management at the Fire Department you
don't stand a chance of surviving the rigged Trial Board process."
added Condit.
Although
Coleman reported several times as ordered for the psych test, a
particularly heinous form of retaliation, she would not submit to
official pressure to state that she was taking the test "voluntarily."
"Its
common sense that if you are ordered to take a test, you can't
truthfully state that you're taking it voluntarily," stated Karen Gray,
GAP General Counsel and co-counsel for Coleman. "She is being penalized
through departmental actions that are clearly unsupported by law. Our client did nothing wrong - she told the truth about a botched investigation, and now she's paying an unacceptable price."
There
are multiple problems with the fitness-for-duty system involving FEMS.
Notably, Department officials are able to order firefighters to be
tested on a whim, and firefighters may not be given access to the
results and supporting information.
After the decision came down from the Fire Trial Board ordering a
two-rank demotion, Coleman's superiors again ordered her for a
fitness-for-duty examination, which again required an acknowledgement
of her 'voluntary' cooperation. Coleman instead chose to stand up
against this wrongful action and refused to abide the Chief's illegal
order. Coleman was delivered her official notification of termination
by the department last Friday, October 9th - just before a holiday weekend.
"This isn't over," stated Condit. "We will continue with our suit
against the department in federal court and are confident we will
prevail. The actions by departmental officials are palpably improper.
The DC Counsel should take a long look at the abuse of power and the
retaliation that Coleman has had to endure."
Background
Captain
Vanessa Coleman has been steadily retaliated against since March 2008,
stemming from the fallout of the Mt. Pleasant apartment fire in
Washington, D.C. Despite a history beginning as a fire cadet in 1990,
with subsequent promotions to Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain, and
annual performance reviews greater than "satisfactory," Coleman has
been singled out by department officials and made to bear the blame for
the problems stemming from the fire. At the fire, Coleman was directed
away from the basement of the apartment building to the third floor.
This diversion was later found to be of great importance, as fire
officials now believe the fire originated in the basement.
Audio of Coleman being ordered to the third floor can be found at this Web site: https://www.dcfirefeed.com/pleasant.htm
In the months following the Mt. Pleasant fire, then-Battalion chief
John Lee, who ordered Coleman and her crew to the third floor, retired
from the Department.
The retaliation against Coleman that has ensued since the filing is a
laundry list of unacceptable actions that include: citations, a
suspension, failure to support her authority as a Captain, stripped
duties, and a transfer. In July 2008, Coleman received a notice that
she was to report for a psychological evaluation, ordered by Assistant
Chief Brian Lee. Upon reporting for the exam, she requested legal
counsel, but was denied. Unwilling to submit to the exam under the
conditions presented to her, Coleman was directed not to go back to
work and to take sick leave until she was able to take a rescheduled
psychological evaluation.
Months later, in August, Coleman and GAP staff met with F&EMS
officials to discuss the order. At such meeting, according to a memo
written from EMS Deputy General Counsel, Thelma Chichester:
The
Department has offered to hold the pending Order for Cpt. Coleman to
take the Fitness for Duty Examination as well as any administrative
action which resulted from her failure to comply with a direct Order in
abeyance pending the conclusion of the investigation into the charges
of discrimination made by Cpt. Coleman.
After reaching this agreement, Coleman was finally allowed to return to
work. Shortly after this meeting, Coleman received a notice that she
was being charged with insubordination for failing to take the
"fitness-for-duty" exam, as ordered. After refusing to check the
"voluntary" box, Coleman was ordered to stand before the Trial Board
proceeding, which started this past June.
The Government Accountability Project (GAP) is a 30-year-old nonprofit public interest group that promotes government and corporate accountability by advancing occupational free speech, defending whistleblowers, and empowering citizen activists. We pursue this mission through our Nuclear Safety, International Reform, Corporate Accountability, Food & Drug Safety, and Federal Employee/National Security programs. GAP is the nation's leading whistleblower protection organization.
LATEST NEWS
‘Incompetence Everywhere’: Fury as US Embassy Says Americans Stuck in Israel Are On Their Own
"The strike itself is illegal and disastrous but their lack of readiness for what comes next is unforgivable as well," said Sen. Chris Murphy.
Mar 03, 2026
The US Embassy in Jerusalem sparked outrage on Tuesday when it said it was unable to help Americans stuck in Israel leave the country amid an escalating regional conflict with Iran.
In a message posted on social media, the embassy said it "is not in a position at this time to evacuate or directly assist Americans in departing Israel," and recommended seeking help from Israeli tourism officials.
"The Israeli Ministry of Tourism has begun operating shuttles to the Taba Border Crossing as of March 2," the embassy stated. "To be added to the passenger list for a shuttle, you must register via the Ministry’s evacuation form. The US Embassy cannot make any recommendation (for or against) the Ministry of Tourism's shuttle. If you choose to avail yourself of this option to depart, the US government cannot guarantee your safety."
The embassy's message came three days after the US and Israel launched an unprovoked attack on Iran, which has retaliated by launching drone strikes on US allies throughout the Middle East.
Many critics slammed the US embassy for being so unprepared to help its own citizens despite having advance knowledge that a large-scale attack on Iran was a real possibility.
"Mike Huckabee’s embassy is always ready to defend Israel," wrote Zeteo News editor-in-chief Mehdi Hasan, "but not to help American citizens, it seems."
US Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said that the Jerusalem embassy's helplessness in the face of an emergency was evidence of "incompetence everywhere."
"So the State Department is forcing everyone to immediately leave the region but is also refusing to help people leave the region," he wrote. "The strike itself is illegal and disastrous but their lack of readiness for what comes next is unforgivable as well."
Murphy's criticism was echoed by former US Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), a one-time ally of President Donald Trump who in recent months has become a staunch critic of the president's decisions.
"American tax payers are forced to give Israel $3.8 BILLION every single year," she wrote, "and here is our own US Embassy in Jerusalem telling Americans good luck getting out, you are on your own. The betrayal is unbelievable."
Tommy Vietor, former National Security Council staffer under President Barack Obama, expressed outrage at the Trump White House for leaving Americans out to dry.
"All those years demagoguing Benghazi and pretending to give a shit about Americans overseas," wrote Vietor, "and now the White House starts a reckless war with Iran and tells everyone trying to escape the chaos that you're on your own."
Sam Stein, a reporter at The Bulwark, observed that the US Department of State only put out an alert encouraging Americans to leave Israel and 13 other countries in the region on Monday, two days after the strikes against Iran began.
"This morning, the Embassy in Jerusalem says it can't help with that," Stein marveled.
Anti-gun violence activist Fred Guttenberg unleashed an angry tirade at the Trump administration upon seeing the US embassy's message.
"THEY HAD NO FUCKING PLAN!!!" he wrote. "Americans are at risk now because they had no FUCKING plan."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Calling Rules of Engagement ‘Stupid,’ Critics Warn, Opens Door to War Crimes in Iran
"We are a rogue murder state now, and positively proud of it," said one historian.
Mar 03, 2026
US Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth's dismissal on Monday of what he called "stupid rules of engagement" in the illegal war against Iran amounted to an invitation for American and allied forces to commit war crimes, human rights organizations and other critics warned.
Hegseth's remarks came during a press conference alongside the top US general, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine. The Pentagon chief boasted that the US is "unleashing the most lethal and precise air power campaign in history," "all on our terms with maximum authorities," unbound by "stupid rules of engagement," and undeterred by "what so-called international institutions say"—an apparent reference to the United Nations.
Hegseth, an accused war criminal who successfully lobbied President Donald Trump to pardon alleged or convicted war criminals during his first White House term, also praised Israel for its willingness to dispense with rules of engagement, "unlike so many of our traditional allies who wring their hands and clutch their pearls, hemming and hawing about the use of force."
Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in a statement Monday that "these remarks are concerning in light of Hegseth’s actions in the past year that have weakened US military posts and mechanisms intended to ensure compliance with international humanitarian law, also known as the laws of war."
"Rules of engagement are official military directives that tell military forces when, where, how, and against whom force may be used. They must always be in accordance with the laws of war," said HRW. "Hegseth abolished 'civilian environment teams' and other mechanisms intended to limit harm to civilians during operations. The 2026 National Defense Strategy omitted references to civilian protection and the Defense Department rolled back restrictions on its use of antipersonnel landmines and moved ahead with cluster munitions procurement despite these weapons' foreseeable immediate and long-term harm to civilians."
"Human Rights Watch will endeavor to assess whether these Defense Department actions unlawfully increase the risk of harm to civilians during US military operations," the group added. "US civilian and military officials should reaffirm US compliance with the laws of war and restore the personnel and oversight structures that help protect civilians during armed conflict."
Historian Seth Cotlar wrote on social media that Hegseth's comments underscored that "we are a rogue murder state now, and positively proud of it."
The Pentagon chief's remarks came days after a girls' school in Iran was bombed, allegedly by US or Israeli forces. The US Central Command said it was "looking into" the attack, which killed 165 people—most of them girls between the ages of 7 and 12. The Guardian notes that the school was "adjacent to a cluster of buildings that form the local Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) barracks and support buildings."
An Al Jazeera investigation concluded the school strike was likely "deliberate."
When Hegseth says "no stupid rules of engagement," this is what he means.
[image or embed]
— Scott Horton (@robertscotthorton.bsky.social) Mar 2, 2026 at 11:40 PM
The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor said in a statement over the weekend that "any deliberate attack on a school or on civilians, as well as any indiscriminate or disproportionate attack that violates the principles of distinction and proportionality, constitutes a grave breach and may amount to a war crime where intent to target the school is established or where the attack is indiscriminate or disproportionate."
Hegseth has previously derided limitations on US troops' conduct overseas as "stupid." During remarks to hundreds of generals last year, the Pentagon chief declared that we "untie the hands of our warfighters to intimidate, demoralize, hunt, and kill the enemies of our country."
"We unleash overwhelming and punishing violence on the enemy," Hegseth said at the time. "No more politically correct and overbearing rules of engagement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'No Safety in Appeasement': Law Firms That Fought Trump Vindicated as DOJ Drops Cases
"Another significant victory for the rule of law over Trump's reign of lawlessness," said Rep. Jamie Raskin.
Mar 03, 2026
Congressman Jamie Raskin said the US Department of Justice's decision Monday to abandon its legal cases against law firms that refused to capitulate to President Donald Trump should serve as "a reminder that those who fight back against authoritarianism are winning."
The DOJ asked the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to dismiss its cases against law firms including Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Susman Godfrey, and Jenner & Block, which won legal challenges they filed last year after Trump issued executive orders saying they should lose government contracts and their employees should be blocked from government buildings.
Those executive orders were signed because the firms represented and employed high-profile Democrats and other opponents of Trump.
Other law firms, including Skadden Arps and Paul Weiss, angered lawyers within their ranks and the larger legal community when they signed deals with Trump; the latter firm agreed to end its internal diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and provide $40 million in free legal work for the president and causes he supports.
The Trump administration's decision on Monday proved, said Raskin (D-Md.), that "there’s no safety in appeasement.”
“When the Trump administration tried to bully and silence law firms by banning them from federal buildings, courthouses and contracts, a handful—like Susman Godfrey, Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, and WilmerHale—fought back," said Raskin. "Today, those firms forced Trump to back down and abandon his blatantly unconstitutional effort to punish lawyers, clients, and causes because Trump disagrees with their speech. Meanwhile, the firms that chose to roll over saddled their associates and partners with doing billions of dollars-worth of free legal work for Trump, his twisted administration and his MAGA allies."
While other firms caved to Trump's demands last year, the companies that didn't quickly won legal victories, with one federal judge saying the executive order targeting Jenner & Block was “doubly violative of the Constitution" because it targeted the clients it represents as well as a lawyer it once employed—Andrew Weissman, who was part of former special counsel Robert Mueller's team that investigated Trump.
“This order, like the others, seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn’t like, thereby insulating the executive branch from the judicial check fundamental to the separation of powers," US District Judge John Bates wrote last May. "It thus violates the Constitution and the court will enjoin its operation in full.”
"This episode will be remembered as demonstrating the difference between institutions that had the ethical courage to uphold the Constitution and fight bullying and then won, and those that compromised their ethics and gained nothing."
Jenner & Block said Monday that "the government’s decision to withdraw its appeals makes permanent the rulings of four federal judges that the executive orders targeting law firms, including Jenner & Block, were unconstitutional."
"Our partnership is proud to have stood firm on behalf of its clients, and we look forward to continuing to serve them—guided by these bedrock values—for many decades to come," said the firm.
Brian Hauss, deputy director of the Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project at the ACLU, said the DOJ had finally admitted "what everyone knew on Day 1: There is no way to defend these unconstitutional executive orders."
“This shameful assault on the rule of law has failed, thanks to the brave lawyers who refused to compromise their integrity," said Hauss.
Vanita Gupta, former associate attorney general under the Biden administration, told NBC News that the law groups that struck deals with the White House had "undermined the rule of law and the legal profession in this country."
"This episode will be remembered as demonstrating the difference between institutions that had the ethical courage to uphold the Constitution and fight bullying and then won, and those that compromised their ethics and gained nothing," Gupta said. "Let’s hope that media companies, universities, and other organizations pay heed."
In addition to his attacks on law firms, the president has threatened universities with funding cuts and federal investigations into what the White House views as antisemitism and extremism on campus and the colleges' efforts to promote diversity and inclusion.
At least six universities have struck deals with Trump. The University of Pennsylvania agreed to ban transgender student athletes from participating on women's sports teams and Columbia University agreed to further crack down on campus protests like those that erupted in 2024 against US support for Israel's assault on Gaza—protests that both the Biden and Trump administrations claimed were antisemitic.
Harvard sued the administration over its decision to freeze $2.2 billion in research funding and was granted a restraining order last year to protect international students whom the White House had threatened with visa restrictions.
On Monday, Raskin said the DOJ's decision to back down from the attacks on law firms was "another significant victory for the rule of law over Trump's reign of lawlessness."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


