September, 21 2009, 10:30am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Alexis Baden-Mayer 202-744-0853, alexis@organicconsumers.org -
Ronnie Cummins 218-349-3836 ronnie@organicconsumers.org
This Holiday Season: Boycott of 'Organic Cheater' Brands - 'Buycott' of Certified Natural & Organic Personal Care
Leading Consumer Watch Dog Group Gives Organic Cheater Brands One Month to Commit to Stop Deceptive Branding
BOSTON
On
September 24, 2009 at the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center,
thousands of personal care products that claim to be "natural" and
"organic" will be on display as retail store buyers from across
the globe attend one of the most important natural products' trade
shows of the
year. This gathering will also mark the launch date of a new phase of
the Coming
Clean Campaign, led by the nation's largest organic consumer group, the
Organic
Consumers Association (OCA), in support of the recommendation by
the Certification, Accreditation, and Compliance Committee of the USDA
National
Organic Standards Board, "Solving the Problem of Mislabeled Organic
Personal Care Products." (To view
the recommendation, see OCA link at bottom of release.) The
recommendation
urges the USDA National Organic Program (NOP) to regulate personal care
products as they do food in order to clean up rampant organic fraud in
the
personal care marketplace. The full NOSB Board will be considering and
voting
on this recommendation at its Nov. 3-5 meeting in Washington D.C.
To encourage USDA NOP enforcement of organic personal care, the OCA
will launch a
full scale consumer boycott of all brands falsely labeled as Organic
who do not
contractually commit by October 26, 2009 to certification
of their natural and organic claims by October 31, 2009. Unlike organic
foods, many personal care products are falsely labeled as
organic, although their main cleansing and moisturizing ingredients are
made
from non-organic
pesticide-intensive agricultural and/or petrochemical material. The OCA
will also conduct a full-scale 'buy-cott' of all responsible brands
that already are certifying their natural and organic label claims.
"The organic retail store buyer's job is to think
like a fastidious organic consumer who pays a premium for organic
products
whose main ingredients benefit the earth and their health, by being
grown
without synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, and being free of
petrochemical
compounds," says Alexis Baden-Mayer, Political Director of the OCA.
"The
OCA wants these buyers to know misleadingly labeled brands are on their
way out
starting this holiday season, unless they formulate away from
ingredients made
entirely or partly of petrochemicals."
"One would think synthetic petroleum products would not
be accepted in the organic marketplace, but sadly they are everywhere," says
Baden-Mayer. "We will name the offending brands to boycott as well as the
responsible brands that people should buy. We are giving companies one last
opportunity to commit to clean up and certify their formulations and/or branding
labeling to comply with basic natural
and organic criteria," adds Baden-Mayer whose group
previously exposed 'natural' and 'organic' brands that contained the probable carcinogen 1,4 dioxane.
Starting
September 24, 2009 until October 2631, 2009 the OCA will
give all organic cheater brands the opportunity
to contractually commit to certification of their natural and organic claims in one
year's time, by November 1, 2010 to the following standards, or drop those claims including
the term "Organics" in branding. (The full contract is available through
the link to OCA's Coming Clean page at the bottom of this release.)
1) For "outright 'Organic" and "made with
Organic [specified ingredients]"' product claims (eg.
"Organic Lotion" or "Lotion made with Organic Oils")
products must be certified under the USDA National Organic ProgramOP 'Organic'.(See https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/NOP)
2) For a more restricted "made with Organic [specified
ingredients]" claim (eg. "Lotion made with Organic Aloe Vera"), or"Contains Organic
Ingredients" claim, products must certify to either:
preferably one, the USDA NOP O70 "made with Organic" or under the "NSF-ANSI
305 " "Contains Organic
Ingredients" standard. (See https://www.nsf.org/consumer/newsroom/fact_gl_personalcare.aspd; or two,
to another private standard of their choice such as NaTrueor BDIH, but
must nonetheless comply fully with NSF-ANSI 305 criteria for organic content
and allowed and disallowed processing of ingredients..)
3) For 'Natural' product claims, eg. "Natural
Lotion", products must be certified to one, preferably the Natural
Product's Association Natural Standard
Products certified under other foreign private
standards must cross-certify to the relevant US standard
and abide by the organic content requirement, processing
and preservative allowances, and
labeling restrictions, thereof. ; or two, to another natural
standard such as NaTrue or BDIH but which must nonetheless meet all criteria of
the NPA standard and not contain NPA disallowed ingredients which other
'natural' standards may permit.
The Coming Clean
Campaign has been working to clean up the natural and organic personal care
industry for the past six years. To view Certification Commitment Contract, the
NOSB Recommendation or for other information on the Coming Clean Campaign, go
to: https://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/index.cfm
The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) is an online and grassroots 501(c)3 nonprofit public interest organization, and the only organization in the U.S. focused exclusively on promoting the views and interests of the nation's estimated 50 million consumers of organically and socially responsibly produced food and other products. OCA educates and advocates on behalf of organic consumers, engages consumers in marketplace pressure campaigns, and works to advance sound food and farming policy through grassroots lobbying. We address crucial issues around food safety, industrial agriculture, genetic engineering, children's health, corporate accountability, Fair Trade, environmental sustainability, including pesticide use, and other food- and agriculture-related topics.
LATEST NEWS
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump-Musk Gutting of USAID Could Lead to More Than 14 Million Deaths Over Five Years: Study
"For many low and middle income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict," said the coordinator behind the study.
Jul 01, 2025
A study published Monday by the medical journal The Lancet found that deep funding cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development, a main target of the Department of Government Efficiency's government-slashing efforts, could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by the year 2030.
For months, humanitarian programs and experts have sounded the alarm on the impact of cutting funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is the largest funding agency for humanitarian and development aid around the globe, according to the study.
"Our analysis shows that USAID funding has been an essential force in saving lives and improving health outcomes in some of the world's most vulnerable regions over the past two decades," said Daniella Cavalcanti, postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Collective Health and an author of the study, according to a statement published Tuesday. Between 2001 and 2021, an estimated 91 million deaths were prevented in low and middle income countries thanks programs supported by USAID, according to the study.
The study was coordinated by researchers from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health with the help of the Institute of Collective Health of the Federal University of Bahia, the University of California Los Angeles, and the Manhiça Centre for Health Research, as well as others.
To project the future consequences of USAID funding cuts and arrive at the 14 million figure, the researchers used forecasting models to simulate the impact of two scenarios, continuing USAID funding at 2023 levels versus implementing the reductions announced earlier this year, and then comparing the two.
Those estimated 14 million additional deaths include 4.5 million deaths among children younger than five, according to the researchers.
The journalist Jeff Jarvis shared reporting about the study and wrote "murder" on X on Tuesday.
In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the 83% of the programs at USAID were being canceled. In the same post on X, he praised the Department of Government Efficiency, which at that point had already infiltrated the agency. "Thank you to DOGE and our hardworking staff who worked very long hours to achieve this overdue and historic reform," he wrote.
Davide Rasella, research professor at Barcelona Institute for Global Health and coordinator of the study, said in a statement Tuesday that "our projections indicate that these cuts could lead to a sharp increase in preventable deaths, particularly in the most fragile countries. They risk abruptly halting—and even reversing—two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations. For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict."
One country where USAID cuts have had a particularly deadly impact is Sudan, according to The Washington Post, which reported on Monday that funding shortages have led to lack of medical supplies and food in the war-torn nation.
"There's a largely unspoken and growing death toll of non-American lives thanks to MAGA," wrote Ishaan Tharoor, a Post columnist, of the paper's reporting on Sudan.
In reference to the reporting on Sudan, others laid blame on billionaire Elon Musk, the billionaire and GOP mega-donor who was initially tapped to lead the Department of Government Efficiency.
"In a less imperfect world, Musk and [President Donald] Trump would be forever cast as killers of children, and this would be front-page news for months and the subject of Sunday sermons in every church," wrote the journalist David Corn.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular