SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Jeff Miller, Center for Biological Diversity, (510)
499-9185
The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency today proposed to formally evaluate the harmful
effects of 74 pesticides on 11 endangered and threatened species in the San
Francisco Bay Area over the next five years, and to impose interim restrictions
on use of these pesticides in and adjacent to endangered species habitats. The
proposal stems from a settlement agreement with the Center for Biological
Diversity, which sued the EPA in 2007 for violating the Endangered Species Act
by registering and allowing the use of toxic pesticides in Bay Area endangered
species habitats without determining whether the chemicals jeopardize those
species' existence.
"Tens of millions
of pounds of toxic and poisonous chemicals, known to be deadly to endangered
species and harmful to human health, including proven carcinogens and endocrine
disruptors, are applied in the Bay Area each year, and many of those find their
way through runoff or drift into our soil, creeks and rivers, San Francisco Bay,
and sensitive wildlife habitats," said Jeff Miller, conservation advocate with
the Center. "The toxic stew of pesticides in the Bay-Delta has played a major
role in the collapse of native fish populations, and pesticides are a leading
cause of the loss of native amphibians. This agreement is a positive step for
protection of some of the Bay Area's most endangered wildlife from
pesticides."
The
11 San Francisco Bay-area endangered species are the Alameda whipsnake,
bay checkerspot butterfly, California clapper rail, California
freshwater shrimp, California tiger salamander, delta smelt, salt marsh
harvest mouse, San Francisco garter snake, San Joaquin kit fox,
tidewater goby, and valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Similar
protections were obtained by the Center for the California red-legged frog under
a 2006 settlement that prohibited use of 66 pesticides in and adjacent to frog
habitats statewide.
The EPA is required under the
Endangered Species Act to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over
registration, re-registration and approved uses of pesticides that may endanger
listed species or adversely affect their designated critical habitat. The
consultation is designed to ensure that EPA avoids authorizing pesticide uses
that jeopardize the existence of endangered species. The EPA has consistently
failed to evaluate or adequately regulate pesticides harmful to endangered
species.
The EPA today published a proposed
settlement agreement with the Center and is taking public comment on a
stipulated injunction that would establish a series of deadlines for the EPA to
conduct formal consultations with the Service and make "effects determinations''
on 74 pesticides that may affect 11 Bay Area species listed under the Endangered
Species Act. The injunction would set aside the EPA's authorization of use for
each of the 74 pesticides in, and adjacent to, endangered species habitats
within eight Bay Area counties (Alameda, Contra
Costa, Marin, Napa, San
Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and
Sonoma) until
formal consultation is completed. The consultations should result in
cancellation of some pesticide uses and permanent use restrictions for harmful
pesticides. The EPA will make the effect determinations beginning October 20,
2009 and ending June 30, 2014.
The settlement includes interim
pesticide-use restrictions in habitat for the 11 Bay Area species, in order to
reduce the potential exposure of these species to harmful pesticides during the
consultation period and Fish and Wildlife Service assessments of pesticide
impacts.
Reported pesticide use in the Bay
Area is about 10 million pounds annually, but actual pesticide use is estimated
to be several times this amount since most home and commercial pesticide use is
not reported to the state. Pesticides have been implicated in the recent
collapse of Bay-Delta fish populations such as delta smelt, longfin smelt, and
chinook salmon. Toxic pulses of pesticides have been documented in Bay Area
streams and the Delta during critical stages in fish development, and many local
water bodies are listed as "impaired" for not meeting water-quality standards
due to high concentrations of extremely toxic pesticides such as chlorpyrifos
and diazinon.
Numerous studies have definitively
linked pesticides with significant developmental, neurological, and reproductive
damage to amphibians. Pesticide contamination can cause deformities, abnormal
immune system functions, diseases, injury, and death of frogs and salamanders.
Studies by Dr. Tyrone Hayes at the University of California have strengthened the case for
banning atrazine, a potent chemical that is the most common contaminant of
ground, surface, and drinking water nationwide. Dr. Hayes demonstrated that
atrazine is an endocrine disruptor that "assaults male sexual development,"
interfering with reproduction by chemically castrating and feminizing male
frogs. Atrazine has also been linked to increased prostate cancer, decreased
sperm count, and high risk of breast cancer in humans. Thousands of pounds of
atrazine are used each year in the Bay Area in proximity to amphibian
habitats.
In 2006 the Center published Poisoning
Our Imperiled Wildlife: San Francisco Bay Area Endangered Species at
Risk from Pesticides, a
report analyzing the EPA's dismal record in protecting endangered species
and the agency's ongoing refusal to reform pesticide registration and use in
accordance with scientific findings. In 2004 the
Center published Silent
Spring Revisited: Pesticide Use and Endangered Species, detailing the decades-long failure
of the EPA to regulate pesticides harmful to endangered species. The EPA still
has no meaningful plan to protect endangered species from pesticides.
The lawsuit, report on pesticide
impacts to Bay Area species, maps of pesticide use, and information about the
listed species are on the Center's
pesticides Web page.
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252"Every day the Pentagon makes a video of cool explosions from Iran for the president of the United States to watch, so he can bounce up and down in his high chair, clap his little hands, and cry 'Yay! Make it go boom again!'"
A Wednesday report from NBC News is raising concerns that President Donald Trump may be getting a rose-colored view of the unprovoked and unconstitutional war he started with Iran.
According to NBC News, US military officials show Trump a daily two-minute video montage of operations conducted in the Iran war, featuring "the biggest, most successful strikes on Iranian targets," with one official telling NBC that the video essentially consists of "stuff blowing up."
Two sources in the administration told NBC that "the video briefing is fueling concerns among some of Trump’s allies that he may not be receiving—or absorbing—the complete picture of the war," and one official told the network that "the information Trump gets about the war tends to emphasize US successes, with comparatively little detail about Iranian actions."
The video montages are also leaving the president confused about why the media is covering negative ramifications of the war, which he believes to be an unqualified success, NBC reported.
Critics of the president were quick to slam him and his administration over the reported war highlights montage.
"Sounds like Trump is getting a Centcom propaganda video briefing of things blowing up every day," commented foreign policy journalist Laura Rozen, "but not being briefed when things go wrong."
Anthony Zurcher, North America correspondent for BBC, wrote that it appears Trump is "getting an overly rosy picture from his generals of how an unpopular war is going."
MS NOW columnist Paul Waldman contended that the president's behavior as depicted in the NBC report was positively childlike.
"Every day the Pentagon makes a video of cool explosions from Iran for the president of the United States to watch," wrote Waldman, "so he can bounce up and down in his high chair, clap his little hands, and cry 'Yay! Make it go boom again!'"
National security attorney Bradley Moss summarized the NBC report with a single five-word sentence: "The emperor has no brains."
Even Trump's mail-in ballot was not enough to keep Democrat Emily Gregory from winning the seat over Republican Jon Maples in a district swing of more than 13 points.
A Democrat in Florida running to win a state house seat in the Palm Beach district that includes US President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate was declared the winner in a special election on Tuesday night, defeating the Trump-endorsed Republican in yet another powerful rebuke to the running of the country by the president and his party.
Emily Gregory flipped Florida's House District 87, defeating Republican Jon Maples, who Trump loudly endorsed and cast his vote for personally via mail-in ballot—something he wants to bar other voters nationwide from being able to do. Trump said on Monday that Maples, a financial planner who previously held office at the municipal level, was the choice of "so many of my Palm Beach County friends.”
But with almost all votes counted late Tuesday night, the Associated Press reported Gregory led by 2.4 percentage points, or 797 votes. In 2024, the district went to Republicans by 11 points.
"Republicans are vulnerable everywhere.”
Political strategist Sawyer Hackett named the obvious implication by saying, at least through November of 2026, "Trump will be represented by a Democrat in the Florida legislature."
“I think it demonstrates where the Florida voter is,” Gregory, who runs a fitness center for postpartum mothers, told Politico in an interview following her victory. “They want someone who is focused on solutions and the issues and not focused on the noise.”
“If Mar-a-Lago is vulnerable, imagine what’s possible this November,” said Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, in response to the victory. Williams noted that Gregory's win was the 29th seat that Democrats have flipped from GOP control since Trump returned to office last year.
“Gas prices are spiking, grocery costs are up, and families can’t get by," she said. "It’s clear voters at the polls are fed up with Republicans. A Trump +11 district in his own backyard shouldn’t be in play for Democrats, but tonight proves Republicans are vulnerable everywhere.”
"These massive facilities are sucking up precious water resources, paving over farmland, driving climate change, and disrupting the fabric of communities," said one supporter of the new legislation.
Two of the leading progressives in the US Congress, Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, announced legislation on Wednesday that would impose a nationwide moratorium on the construction of new artificial intelligence data centers amid mounting concerns over their insatiable consumption of power and water resources, impacts on the climate, and other harms.
Sanders' (I-Vt.) office said in a press release announcing the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act that the construction pause would remain in effect "until strong national safeguards are in place to protect workers, consumers, and communities, defend privacy and civil rights, and ensure these technologies do not harm our environment."
Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) are set to formally introduce their legislation at a press conference on Wednesday at 4 pm ET.
Food & Water Watch (FWW), which last year became the first national organization in the US to call for a total moratorium on the approval of new AI data centers, celebrated the first-of-its-kind bill and called on other members of Congress to "move quickly to sponsor, champion, and pass" it. FWW's groundbreaking call for a national AI data center moratorium was later echoed by hundreds of advocacy organizations at the state and national levels.
“We need a halt to the explosive growth of new AI data center construction now, because political and community leaders across the country have been caught completely off guard by this aggressive, profit-hungry industry," Mitch Jones, FWW's managing director of policy and litigation, said in a statement Wednesday. "It has yet to be determined if—not how—the industry can ever operate in a manner that sufficiently protects people and society from the profusion of inherent hazards and harms that data centers bring wherever they appear."
“Long before the recent spike in global oil prices, Americans throughout the country were dealing with skyrocketing electricity rates due to the egregious consumption and jolting grid impacts levied by Big Tech’s AI data centers," Jones added. "Meanwhile, these massive facilities are sucking up precious water resources, paving over farmland, driving climate change, and disrupting the fabric of communities. We mustn’t allow another unchecked Silicon Valley scheme to profit off our backs while sticking us with the bill."
In a detailed report released last week, titled The Urgent Case Against Data Centers, FWW pointed to some of the "documented harms caused by AI and data centers," including:
Those harms have fueled massive grassroots opposition to AI data centers, with communities organizing to prevent construction in their backyards. One report estimates that between May 2024 and March 2025, local opposition helped tank or delay $64 billion worth of data center projects across the US.
That opposition has pushed local lawmakers to act. According to a tracker maintained by Good Jobs First, "at least 63 local data-center moratorium actions have been introduced, considered, or adopted across dozens of towns and counties," and "some 54 have already passed."
At the state level, Good Jobs First counted "at least 12 in-session states with filed data center moratorium bills this cycle," and noted that some governors have taken or floated executive action to slow or pause AI data center build-outs.
But the Trump administration is trying to move in the opposite direction.
In a national policy framework document unveiled last week, the White House urged Congress to "streamline federal permitting for AI infrastructure construction and operation" and called for a prohibition on state regulation of AI.
Jim Walsh, FWW's policy director, slammed the White House framework as "more of the same nonsense we’ve been hearing for months" and warned that "more data centers mean more climate-killing fracked gas power plants poisoning our air and water, and more stress placed on local communities’ precious water resources."
"The only prudent course of action when it comes to AI," said Walsh, "is to halt the explosive growth of new data center construction now, so that states and communities have the time needed to properly consider their own futures."