SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
April, 29 2009, 10:08am EDT
Contact:
Brad Luna | Phone: 202/216.1514 | Cell: 202/812.8140
Trevor Thomas | Phone: 202/216.1547 | Cell: 202/250.9758
Maine Legislative Committee Votes in Favor of Marriage for Same-Sex Couples
Joint Judiciary Committee votes to recognize marriage for lesbian and gay couples in the state; bill now moves to Senate floor
WASHINGTON
The
Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, praised Maine's Joint
Committee on Judiciary for its vote on Tuesday in favor of legislation
that would permit same-sex couples to marry under state law. The
committee voted 11-2-1 in favor of the legislation; one committee
member voted for the legislation with a proposed amendment that would
place the measure before voters if it is enacted into law.
Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, praised Maine's Joint
Committee on Judiciary for its vote on Tuesday in favor of legislation
that would permit same-sex couples to marry under state law. The
committee voted 11-2-1 in favor of the legislation; one committee
member voted for the legislation with a proposed amendment that would
place the measure before voters if it is enacted into law.
"This
is an exciting vote, and it's great to see strong support for the
principle that all loving, committed couples in Maine ought to have the
equal right to marry," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe
Solmonese. "We congratulate the committee, as well as Equality Maine
for its great work to build support for equality. We hope that this
bill will soon pass the Senate and House and be enacted into law.
April has been a great month for equality, and we're thrilled to see
Maine take action to become the latest state to move toward recognizing
marriage equality for same-sex couples."
is an exciting vote, and it's great to see strong support for the
principle that all loving, committed couples in Maine ought to have the
equal right to marry," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe
Solmonese. "We congratulate the committee, as well as Equality Maine
for its great work to build support for equality. We hope that this
bill will soon pass the Senate and House and be enacted into law.
April has been a great month for equality, and we're thrilled to see
Maine take action to become the latest state to move toward recognizing
marriage equality for same-sex couples."
The
Human Rights Campaign has had a field organizer on the ground in Maine
for the past three months working with Equality Maine to build support
for the marriage legislation. The full Senate is expected to vote on
the marriage bill soon, and the House could take action in May.
Human Rights Campaign has had a field organizer on the ground in Maine
for the past three months working with Equality Maine to build support
for the marriage legislation. The full Senate is expected to vote on
the marriage bill soon, and the House could take action in May.
A new
CBS/New York Times poll released Tuesday shows that support for
marriage equality across the country has risen nine points in the last
month. The new poll, conducted April 22-26, 2009, shows that 42% of
Americans now say that same-sex couples should be allowed to legally
marry. That number is up nine points from the month earlier when only
33% support marriage equality for same-sex couples. More information
on the poll can be read by going here: https://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/04/27/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry4972643.shtml.
CBS/New York Times poll released Tuesday shows that support for
marriage equality across the country has risen nine points in the last
month. The new poll, conducted April 22-26, 2009, shows that 42% of
Americans now say that same-sex couples should be allowed to legally
marry. That number is up nine points from the month earlier when only
33% support marriage equality for same-sex couples. More information
on the poll can be read by going here: https://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/04/27/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry4972643.shtml.
Four
states have recognized marriage for same-sex couples under state law:
Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, and Vermont (effective September 1,
2009). Earlier this month, Iowa's state supreme court unanimously
ruled that the state constitution guarantees same-sex couples the equal
right to marry. On April 7, Vermont's legislature overrode Gov.
Douglas' veto, making Vermont the first state to recognize marriage
equality through the legislative process. Last week, Connecticut
enacted a bill codifying the state supreme court's October 2008
decision recognizing marriage for same-sex couples.
states have recognized marriage for same-sex couples under state law:
Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, and Vermont (effective September 1,
2009). Earlier this month, Iowa's state supreme court unanimously
ruled that the state constitution guarantees same-sex couples the equal
right to marry. On April 7, Vermont's legislature overrode Gov.
Douglas' veto, making Vermont the first state to recognize marriage
equality through the legislative process. Last week, Connecticut
enacted a bill codifying the state supreme court's October 2008
decision recognizing marriage for same-sex couples.
New
York recognizes marriages by same-sex couples legally entered into in
another jurisdiction. California recognized marriage by same-sex
couples between June and November of 2008, before voters approved
Proposition 8, which purports to amend the state constitution to
prohibit marriage equality. The Proposition 8 vote has been challenged
in court; a decision by the state supreme court is expected by June.
York recognizes marriages by same-sex couples legally entered into in
another jurisdiction. California recognized marriage by same-sex
couples between June and November of 2008, before voters approved
Proposition 8, which purports to amend the state constitution to
prohibit marriage equality. The Proposition 8 vote has been challenged
in court; a decision by the state supreme court is expected by June.
Legislatures
in New Hampshire and New York are considering legislation that would
permit same-sex couples to marry under state law. Maine currently
provides same-sex couples with access to limited rights and benefits
through a domestic partner registry. Lesbian and gay couples do not
receive federal rights and benefits in any state. To learn more about
state by state legislation visit:www.hrc.org/state_laws.
in New Hampshire and New York are considering legislation that would
permit same-sex couples to marry under state law. Maine currently
provides same-sex couples with access to limited rights and benefits
through a domestic partner registry. Lesbian and gay couples do not
receive federal rights and benefits in any state. To learn more about
state by state legislation visit:www.hrc.org/state_laws.
The Human Rights Campaign represents a grassroots force of over 750,000 members and supporters nationwide. As the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, HRC envisions an America where LGBT people are ensured of their basic equal rights, and can be open, honest and safe at home, at work and in the community.
LATEST NEWS
Green Groups Organizing 'All Out on Earth Day' Protests Against Trump Authoritarianism
"Trump is dismantling critical environmental safeguards, putting lives at risk, and leaving working people to suffer the devastating consequences," said one campaigner.
Apr 14, 2025
A coalition of green groups on Monday promoted plans for nationwide "All Out on Earth Day" rallies "to confront rising authoritarianism and defend our environment, democracy, and future" against the Trump administration's gutting of government agencies and programs tasked with environmental protection and combating the climate emergency.
Organizers of the protests—which are set to take place from April 18-30—are coalescing opposition to President Donald Trump's attacks on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other agencies, which include efforts to rescind or severely curtail regulations aimed at protecting the public from pollution, oil spills, and other environmental and climate harms.
"This Earth Day, we fight for everything: for our communities, our democracy, and the future our children deserve."
The Green New Deal Network, one of the event's organizers, decried Trump's "massive rollbacks" to the EPA and noted that funds "for critical programs have been frozen and federal workers have been unjustly fired" as Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, takes a wrecking ball to government agencies.
"This Earth Day, we fight for everything: for our communities, our democracy, and the future our children deserve," Green New Deal Network national director Kaniela Ing said in a statement.
"Trump, Musk, and their billionaire allies are waging an all-out assault on the agencies that keep our air clean, our water safe, and our families healthy," Ing continued. "They're gutting the programs and projects we fought hard to win—programs that bring down energy costs and create good-paying jobs in towns across America, especially in red states."
"So, we need to make sure the pressure continues and our protests aren't just a flash in the pan," Ing added. "When we stand together—workers, environmentalists, everyday folks—we can not only stop them, but we can build the world we deserve."
All Out on Earth Day participants include Sunrise Movement, Climate Power, Third Act, Popular Democracy, Climate Defenders, the Democratic National Committee Council on Environment and Climate, Unitarian Universalists, NAACP, Dayenu, Evergreen, United to End Polluter Handouts Coalition, Climate Hawks Vote, and the Center of Biological Diversity (CBD).
Last month, CBD sued five Cabinet-level agencies in a bid to ensure that DOGE teams tasked with finding ways to cut costs—including via workforce reductions—fully comply with federal transparency law. This, after DOGE advised the termination of thousands of probationary staffers at the EPA, Department of the Interior, and other agencies.
Although a federal judge last month ordered the Trump administration to reinstate thousands of government workers fired from half a dozen agencies based on the "lie" that their performance warranted termination, the right-wing U.S. Supreme Court subsequently sided with the White House, finding that plaintiffs in the case lacked the legal standing to sue.
Bill McKibben, co-founder of 350.org and founder of the elder-led Third Act, harkened back to the historic first Earth Day in 1970.
"Fifty-five years ago, a massive turnout on the first Earth Day forced a corrupt Republican administration to pass the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, and create the EPA," he said on Monday, referring to the presidency of Richard Nixon. "Let's do it again!"
Aru Shiney-Ajay, executive director of the youth-led Sunrise Movement, highlighted the need for action now, noting that Trump "is giving oil and gas billionaires the green light to wreck our planet and put millions of lives at risk, all so they can pad their bottom line."
"Just three months into the Trump presidency, the damage has already been catastrophic," she added. "Trump is dismantling critical environmental safeguards, putting lives at risk, and leaving working people to suffer the devastating consequences. "This Earth Day, we stand united in defiance of their greed and fight for a future that prioritizes people and the planet over profits."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Small Businesses Sue Trump Over 'Devastating' Tariffs
"No one person should have the power to impose taxes that have such vast global economic consequences," said a Liberty Justice Center lawyer, stressing that the Constitution empowers Congress to set tax rates.
Apr 14, 2025
Though U.S. President Donald Trump temporarily paused some of his "Liberation Day" tariffs for negotiations, a nonprofit firm and legal scholar still sued him and other officials on Monday on behalf of five import-reliant small businesses, asking the U.S. Court of International Trade to "declare the president's unprecedented power grab illegal."
Ilya Somin, a Cato Institute chair and George Mason University law professor, announced earlier this month on a legal blog hosted by the outlet Reason that he and the Liberty Justice Center—which has a record of representing libertarian positions in court battles—were "looking for appropriate plaintiffs to bring this type of case."
Monday's complaint was filed on behalf of FishUSA, Genova Pipe, MicroKits, Terry Precision Cycling, and VOS Selections. It argues that "the statute the president invokes—the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)—does not authorize the president to unilaterally issue across-the-board worldwide tariffs."
"And the president's justification does not meet the standards set forth in the IEEPA," the complaint continues. "His claimed emergency is a figment of his own imagination: trade deficits, which have persisted for decades without causing economic harm, are not an emergency. Nor do these trade deficits constitute an 'unusual and extraordinary threat.' The president's attempt to use IEEPA to impose sweeping tariffs also runs afoul of the major questions doctrine."
"It's devastating. The government shouldn't be able to make sweeping economic decisions like this without any checks or accountability."
Somin said in a Monday statement that "if starting the biggest trade war since the Great Depression based on a law that doesn't even mention tariffs is not an unconstitutional usurpation of legislative power, I don't know what is."
Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, stressed that "no one person should have the power to impose taxes that have such vast global economic consequences... The Constitution gives the power to set tax rates—including tariffs—to Congress, not the president."
Just hours after Trump's taxes on imports took effect last week, he paused what he is misleadingly calling "reciprocal" tariffs—except for those on China, which now faces a minimum rate of 145%. However, his 10% baseline rate is in effect. As experts fret over a possible recession, the business leaders involved in the new legal challenge shared how they are already struggling because of the evolving policy.
"Instead of focusing on growing our business, creating more jobs in our region, and developing new products that our customers want, we are spending countless hours trying to navigate the tariff chaos that the president is causing for us and all our vendors," said FishUSA president and co-founder Dan Pastore. "It takes years working with factories to design and build our products, and we cannot just shift that business to the U.S. without starting the whole process over again."
Andrew Reese, president of Genova Pipe in Salt Lake City, Utah, explained that "we operate seven manufacturing facilities across the United States and are committed to producing high-quality products in America. With limited domestic sources, we rely on imports to meet our production needs. The newly imposed tariffs are increasing our raw material costs and hindering our ability to compete in the export market."
David Levi of MicroKits in Charlottesville, Virginia, similarly said that "we build as much as we can in the U.S. We're proud of that, but these surprise tariffs are crushing us. It's devastating. The government shouldn't be able to make sweeping economic decisions like this without any checks or accountability."
Critics of Trump's tariff policy have blasted not only how sweeping his levies have been but also the chaotic speed. Terry Precision Cycling president Nik Holm noted that "even before this year's increases, we were already paying tariffs of up to 39.5%. With the additional 145% now imposed, we can't survive long enough to shift course."
"Twenty years ago, we made all our apparel in the U.S. but gradually moved production overseas to sustain our business," the Vermonter detailed. "Bringing manufacturing back would require a long-term strategy supported by consistent government policies, investment in factories with skilled sewers, and access to raw materials that are not subject to high tariffs. Many of our products rely on raw materials that are simply not produced in the U.S."
Victor Owen Schwartz, whose New York-based VOS Selections specializes in imported alcohol, said that "as a heavily regulated business, we cannot turn on a dime... We are required to post our prices with the State Liquor Authority a full month in advance, so we're locked into pricing decisions that don't account for these sudden, unpredictable tariffs. This is devastating to our ability to operate and support the farmers and producers we work with around the world."
Trump is also facing a suit filed earlier this month in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. That case involves Emily Ley, whose company Simplified makes home management products, including planners, and relies on imports from China.
As The New York Timesreported last week:
Her lawyers are from the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a libertarian-leaning nonprofit that counts among its financial backers Donors Trust, a group with ties to Leonard A. Leo, who is a co-chairman of the Federalist Society.
The Federalist Society is an influential legal group that advised Mr. Trump through the confirmation of justices he appointed to form the current conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court, though some in Mr. Trump's circle came to believe that its leaders were out of step with the president's political movement.
Another donor to New Civil Liberties Alliance is Charles Koch, the billionaire industrialist and Republican megadonor.
Additionally, as The Hill pointed out Monday, "four members of the Blackfeet Nation previously sued over Trump's Canada tariffs, including the Canadian aspects of his April 2 announcement."
Along with arguments over the legality of the duties, Trump's tariff announcement and pause sparked concerns about potential stock market manipulation and insider trading, triggering calls for investigation, including from members of Congress.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Immoral, Inhumane, and Illegal': ICE Arrests Palestinian Columbia Protest Leader
"He came to this country hoping to be free to speak out about the atrocities he has witnessed, only to be punished for such speech," said Mohsen Mahdawi's lawyer.
Apr 14, 2025
A month after the international far-right pro-Israel group Betar named Columbia University student Mohsen Mahdawi as the next target in its campaign to push for the deportation of Palestinian rights defenders, Mahdawi was arrested Monday at an immigration office in Colchester, Vermont, where he had arrived to complete a test to be a naturalized U.S. citizen.
Mahdawi, who had held a green card for 10 years, was a leader of protests at Columbia last year where students called for the school to divest from companies that benefit from Israel's policies in the occupied Palestinian territories.
As The Interceptreported, immigration authorities scheduled Mahdawi's citizenship test around the time that Mahmoud Khalil, another leader of campus protests at Columbia, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in March.
The appointment, said media critic Sana Saeed, was "a trap to abduct him."
Vermont's three members of Congress—Democrats Sen. Peter Welch and Rep. Becca Balint and Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders—called the arrest of the White River Junction resident "immoral, inhumane, and illegal."
"He was arrested and removed in handcuffs by plain-clothed, armed, individuals with their faces covered," said the lawmakers. "These individuals refused to provide any information as to where he was being taken or what would happen to him... Mr. Mahdawi, a legal resident of the United States, must be afforded due process under the law and immediately released from detention."
Khalil, Mahdawi, and several other Columbia students have been targeted for deportation under President Donald Trump's executive orders that purport to be aimed at ridding U.S. college campuses of what the administration deems "antisemitism," and Secretary of State Marco Rubio's "catch and revoke" program.
In an interview with "60 Minutes" on CBS in December 2023, Mahdawi spoke about how campus protests the previous month in support of Palestinian rights had been infiltrated by someone who was not affiliated with Columbia and who shouted antisemitic chants.
"I was shocked, and I walked directly to the person, and I told him, 'You don't represent us,' because this is not something that we agree with," he said. "To be antisemitic is unjust. And the fight for the freedom of Palestine and the fight against antisemitism go hand in hand, because injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
After Betar began posting on social media about Mahdawi, he went into hiding and corresponded with Columbia asking officials to move him to a safe location. Mahdawi's lawyer told The Intercept that the school said it could not move him to housing where he would be protected from ICE.
Mahdawi suspected that an email last month from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), stating that his citizenship test was being moved up by several months, was a sign that immigration authorities were planning to "trap" him in order to detain him and try to deport him to the West Bank, where he is from.
He called the three members of Congress from Vermont, and spoke to Welch personally, asking them to intervene if he was targeted by ICE. The three lawmakers and their offices said at the time that they "would remain on standby pending news of Mahdawi's status after the [immigration] interview," according to The Intercept.
"We strongly condemn the Trump administration for abducting Mohsen Mahdawi, a lawful permanent resident, because he exercised his constitutional right to criticize the Israeli government's war crimes," said Edward Ahmed Mitchell, national deputy director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. "By abducting and imprisoning college students for engaging in free speech, the Trump administration is acting like an arm of the Israeli government, which regularly censors free speech and imprisons its critics. We demand the release of Mohsen and every other student who has been wrongly abducted."
"All Americans should be alarmed at the speed of attacks on basic constitutional freedoms of lawful residents in the U.S.," Mitchell added.
Lawyers for Mahdawi filed a habeus corpus petition on Monday, saying the government had violated his statutory and due process rights by punishing him for speech.
"Mohsen Mahdawi was unlawfully detained today for no reason other than his Palestinian identity," Mahdawi's attorney, Luna Droubi, told The Intercept. "He came to this country hoping to be free to speak out about the atrocities he has witnessed, only to be punished for such speech."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular