April, 28 2009, 12:28pm EDT

UN: Punish Abuse of Children in War
Known Child Recruiters Promoted to Key Government, Military Posts
NEW YORK
The United Nations Security Council should impose sanctions on
governments and armed groups for using child soldiers, sexual violence
against children, and attacks on schools, and should promote effective
prosecution of the commanders responsible, Human Rights Watch said
today. The Security Council will hold an open debate on children and
armed conflict on Wednesday, April 29, 2009.
On April 22, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon identified 56 governments
and armed groups from 14 countries that are violating international
laws prohibiting the recruitment and use of child soldiers. Sixteen of
these parties have been included in each of the lists published by the
secretary-general since he began making the names of violators public
in 2002.
"The Security Council has said that it will consider sanctions
against governments and armed groups that refuse to end their use of
child soldiers," said Jo Becker, children's rights advocate at Human
Rights Watch. "Instead, it has allowed these crimes against children to
continue for years."
Governments that have been listed in six consecutive reports from
the secretary-general to the Security Council include the government
forces of Burma, Chad, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the
armed groups include the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri
Lanka, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the
National Liberation Army (ELN) in Colombia, and the Lord's Resistance
Army (LRA) in Uganda.
Human Rights Watch highlighted several cases in which military
commanders in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Sri Lanka who are
well-known for their use of child soldiers are now in government or
senior military positions.
- In Congo, Jean-Pierre Biyoyo was recently appointed a colonel in
the Congolese army despite being convicted by a military court in March
2006 of recruiting children as soldiers while a leader of the Mudundu
40 militia. He was sentenced to five years in prison, but escaped three
months later, in June 2006. - Bosco Ntaganda was made a general in the Congolese army in January,
despite being wanted on an arrest warrant by the International Criminal
Court (ICC) for the war crime of enlisting child soldiers and using
them in hostilities. In addition to the ICC charges, Ntaganda has been
accused of commanding troops that massacred 150 civilians at Kiwanja in
North Kivu province in November 2008. - In Sri Lanka, Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan (known as Colonel
Karuna) became the minister of national integration and reconciliation
in April. Prior to April 2004, he was the commander of the LTTE's
eastern division and was responsible for recruiting thousands of
children into LTTE ranks. He subsequently broke with the LTTE and
formed an armed force known as the Karuna Group, which allied with the
government and then abducted hundreds of children for use as soldiers
under Karuna's command.
"For a state to appoint a known child recruiter to a senior
government or military position is simply outrageous," said Becker.
"Governments should be prosecuting these individuals for war crimes,
not rewarding them."
Human Rights Watch called on the Security Council to impose
sanctions, including arms embargoes, travel bans, and asset freezes
against individuals and parties that have persistently recruited and
used child soldiers in violation of international law. It also called
for criminal prosecution of individual child recruiters by national
courts or through referral to the ICC, which has jurisdiction to try
individuals who have enlisted children under 15 years old or used them
in hostilities for war crimes. To date, seven individuals have been
issued arrest warrants by the court for such crimes.
Human Rights Watch also called on the Security Council to take
stronger action to stop sexual violence against children and attacks
affecting education. In Congo alone, tens of thousands of women and
girls have been subject to sexual violence since the war began in 1996,
with no sign this violence is decreasing. Nearly one-third of those
brutalized by rape are children.
According to UNESCO, the number of attacks on schools, teachers, and
students increased sixfold between 2003 and 2006. In Afghanistan,
roughly 600 schools remained closed as of March following attacks by
anti-government forces. In southern Thailand, insurgents have burned
down more than 280 schools.
An assessment by Human Rights Watch found that in 2008 the Security
Council's working group on children and armed conflict issued 83
recommendations related to the use of child soldiers, but only 13
related to sexual violence and only three regarding attacks affecting
education.
"Children who have been raped or are denied an education because of
attacks on schools also deserve strong Security Council action," Becker
said.
On April 22, 62 nongovernmental organizations representing parents
in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo appealed to the Security
Council in a letter
to end abuses against children in the conflict. The groups cited
continued killings, rape and sexual violence, attacks on schools, and
recruitment of child soldiers in the conflict areas of eastern Congo.
"We deplore the guilty silence that has prevailed until now among
our leaders and the international community," the groups stated. "All
of these crimes, whose perpetrators are often well-known, take place in
a context of total impunity."
The organizations called on the Security Council to impose sanctions
on perpetrators, develop an action plan for Congo that addresses sexual
violence and violence affecting education, and strengthen efforts to
demobilize child soldiers and reintegrate them into their communities.
The Security Council has required the UN to negotiate action plans
with governments and armed groups to end their use of child soldiers.
Human Rights Watch called on the Security Council to expand these
action plans to address sexual violence against children and attacks on
education. It also called for the Security Council to impose targeted
sanctions against perpetrators of these crimes.
To read Human Rights Watch's recommendations to the Security Council on sexual violence and attacks on education, please visit:
https://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/04/20/taking-next-step
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Israeli Raid on UNRWA Compound Slammed as 'Dangerous Precedent'
"This latest action represents a blatant disregard of Israel’s obligation as a United Nations member state to protect and respect the inviolability of UN premises," said UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini.
Dec 08, 2025
United Nations officials and others strongly condemned Monday's raid by Israeli authorities on a facility run by the UN's office for Palestinian refugees in occupied East Jerusalem—an act one rights group decried as part of an ongoing effort "to undermine and ultimately eliminate" the lifesaving agency.
Israeli police and other officials forcibly entered the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) compound early Monday, pulling down a UN flag on the facility's roof and replacing it with an Israeli one. Israeli officials said the raid was ordered over unpaid taxes.
"They call it 'debt collection'—we call it erasure," Claudia Webbe, a socialist former member of British Parliament, said on social media. "Over 70,000 dead in Gaza, they now seek to kill the memory of the living. The occupation must end."
Police vehicles including motorcycles, trucks, and forklifts entered the compound, while communications were cut and furniture, computer equipment, and other property were seized from the facility, according to UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini.
"This latest action represents a blatant disregard of Israel’s obligation as a United Nations member state to protect and respect the inviolability of UN premises," Lazzarini said in a statement.
"To allow this represents a new challenge to international law, one that creates a dangerous precedent anywhere else the UN is present across the world," he added.
Secretary-General António Guterres was among the other senior UN officials who condemned Monday's raid.
“This compound remains United Nations premises and is inviolable and immune from any other form of interference,” he said.
“I urge Israel to immediately take all necessary steps to restore, preserve, and uphold the inviolability of UNRWA premises and to refrain from taking any further action with regard to UNRWA premises, in line with its obligations under the charter of the United Nations and its other obligations under international law," Guterres added.
In late 2024, Israeli lawmakers approved a ban on UNRWA in Israel over disproven allegations that some of its staffers were Hamas members who took part in the October 7, 2023 attack. Those accusations led to numerous nations suspending financial support for UNRWA, although most of the countries have since restored funding. Israel has also sought to ban UNRWA from Gaza since early 2024.
Israeli forces have killed more than 370 UNRWA staff members since October 2023 and destroyed or damaged over 300 of the agency's facilities in Gaza. Lazzarini and others have also accused Israeli forces of torturing UNRWA staffers in a bid to force false confessions of Hamas involvement.
In October, the International Court of Justice—which is currently weighing a genocide case against Israel—found that UNRWA has not been infiltrated by Hamas as claimed by Israeli leaders.
Others also condemned Monday's raid, including Human Rights Watch (HRW), which called the action part of an effort "to undermine and ultimately eliminate a United Nations agency providing vital services to millions of Palestinian refugees."
"Governments should condemn Israel's unlawful moves against UNRWA and urgently act to stop further abuses," HRW added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Report Tracks Trump 'War on Free Speech' and Urges Systemic Resistance
“Trump’s censorship playbook," said the report's author, "is to lie, distort reality for the public, and deploy a cadre of henchmen to carry out Trump’s threats of reprisal.”
Dec 08, 2025
The US advocacy group Free Press on Monday released a report examining how President Donald Trump and "his political enablers have worked to undermine and chill the most basic freedoms protected under the First Amendment" since the Republican returned to the Oval Office in January, and called on all Americans to fight back.
For Chokehold: Donald Trump's War on Free Speech & the Need for Systemic Resistance, Free Press analysed "more than 500 reports of verbal threats, executive orders, presidential memoranda, statements from the White House, actions by regulators and agencies, military and law enforcement deployment and activities, litigation, removal of website language on .gov websites, removal of official history and information at national parks and museums, and discontinued data collection by the federal government."
"While the US government has made efforts throughout this nation's history to censor people's expression and association—be it the exercise of freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress—the Trump administration's incessant attacks on even the most tentatively oppositional speech are uniquely aggressive, pervasive, and escalating," the report states.
The five recurring attack methods that Free Press identified are: making threats of retribution against would-be opponents; emboldening regulators to exact penalties; supercharging the militarized police state; leveraging heavyweight corporate capitulation; and ignoring facts, removing information, rewriting history, and lying on the record.
"Trump's censorship playbook is responsible for the administration's central retaliatory ethos and inspires a set of strategies that loyal actors in government use to silence dissent and chill free expression," said the report's author, Free Press senior counsel Nora Benavidez, in a statement. "This playbook is to lie, distort reality for the public, and deploy a cadre of henchmen to carry out Trump’s threats of reprisal."
Big new report out today @freepress.bsky.social chronicling the Trump regime's war on free speech and free expression. Heroic and harrowing work by @attorneynora.bsky.social and the team. Seeing all of the attacks together is astounding.
[image or embed]
— Craig Aaron (@notaaroncraig.bsky.social) December 8, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Free Press compiled a timeline of "nearly 200 of the most potent examples," including Trump's blanket pardon for the January 6, 2021, insurrectionists shortly after beginning his second term, the White House taking control of the presidential press pool in February, the president's alarming speech to the US Department of Justice in March, and the administration blocking the Associated Press from the Oval Office in April over its refusal to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.
In May, Trump, among other things, signed an executive order to defund National Public Radio and Public Broadcasting Service. In June, he deployed the National Guard in Los Angeles. In July, he sued Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal for $10 billion over reporting on the president's ties to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In August, he deployed the National Guard in Washington, DC.
In September, under pressure from Brendan Carr, Trump's Federal Communications Commission chair, ABC temporarily suspended late-night host Jimmy Kimmel. In October, the Pentagon's new press policy—which journalists across the political spectrum refused to sign—took effect (the New York Times, which faces a defamation lawsuit from Trump, sued over it last week). In November, Trump threatened to sue to BBC over its documentary about January 6, 2021.
The administration has also targeted foreign scholars and journalists for criticizing US policy, from federal support for Israel's genocidal assault on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip to the president's pursuit of mass deportations. The report stresses that "no one is safe from attack in Trump’s quest to control the message, though the administration targets the press most of all."
Today Free Press released a report examining the Trump's efforts to weaken the First Amendment.Analyzing nearly 200 attacks on free speech, it's sobering. But the report also charts a path to resist the censorship campaign w/ collective action. Our statement: www.freepress.net/news/report-...
[image or embed]
— Free Press (@freepress.bsky.social) December 8, 2025 at 2:45 PM
The publication also pushes back against "Trump's claims that he's protecting people and defending free speech," and acknowledges that "the administration's censorial tactics are amassing tremendous resistance across political and geographic lines, with a majority of people worried about the government's attacks on free speech."
Benavidez emphasized that "if only one person speaks out against injustice, their speech is notable, but it is also more vulnerable to attack and subversion under this administration."
"If more people speak out against injustice, the collective drumbeat can more easily withstand government reprisals," she continued. "Democracies erode little by little; would-be dictators need to scare only some of us, and the rest will follow. The very reason we must speak out together is so we can leverage our collective power."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Envoy Ripped for Claim That 'Benevolent Monarchy' Is Best for Middle East
"The US labels dictators and monarchies benevolent when their behavior is aligned with US interest and when their behavior isn’t aligned with US interest they are despots," said one critic.
Dec 08, 2025
Tom Barrack, President Donald Trump's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria, faced backlash Monday after arguing that US-backed Middle Eastern monarchies—most of which are ruled by prolific human rights violators—offer the best model for governing nations in the tumultuous region.
Speaking at the Doha Forum in Qatar on Sunday, Barrack, who is also a billionaire real estate investor, cautioned against trying to impose democratic governance on the Middle East, noting that efforts to do so—sometimes by war or other military action—have failed.
“Every time we intervene, whether it's in Libya, Iraq, or any of the other places where we've tried to create a colonized mandate, it has not been successful," he said. "We end up with paralysis."
"I don’t see a democracy," Barrack said of the Middle East. "Israel can claim to be a democracy, but in this region, whether you like it or not, what has worked best is, in fact, a benevolent monarchy."
Addressing Syria's yearlong transition from longtime authoritarian rule under the Assad dynasty, Barrack added that the Syrian people must determine their political path "without going in with Western expectations of, 'We want a democracy in 12 months.'"
While Barrack's rejection of efforts to force democracy upon Middle Eastern countries drew praise, some Israelis bristled at what they claimed is the suggestion that their country is not a democracy, while other observers pushed back on the envoy's assertion regarding regional monarchies and use of what one Palestinian digital media platform called "classic colonial rhetoric."
"The reality on the ground is the opposite of his claim: It is the absence of democratic rights, accountable governance, and inclusive federal structures that has fueled Syria’s fragmentation, empowered militias, and pushed communities toward separatism," Syrian Kurdish journalist Ronahi Hasan said on social media.
Ronahi continued:
When an American official undermines the universal principles the US itself claims to defend, it sends a dangerous message: that Syrians do not deserve the same political rights as others and that minority communities should simply accept centralized authoritarianism as their fate.
Syria doesn’t need another foreign lecture romanticizing monarchy. It needs a political system that protects all its people—Druze, Alawite, Kurdish, Sunni, Christian—through genuine power-sharing, decentralization, and guarantees of equality.
"Federalism is not the problem," Ronahi added. "The problem is denying Syrians the right to shape their own future."
Abdirizak Mohamed, a lawmaker and former foreign minister in Somalia, said on social media: "Tom Barrack made public what is already known. The US labels dictators and monarchies benevolent when their behavior is aligned with US interest, and when their behavior isn’t aligned with US interest they are despots. Labeling dictators benevolent is [an] oxymoron that shows US hypocrisy."
For nearly a century, the US has supported Middle Eastern monarchies as successive administrations sought to gain and maintain control over the region's vast oil resources. This has often meant propping up monarchs in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iran (before 1979), the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Qatar—regardless of their often horrific human rights records.
While nothing new in terms of US policy and practice in the region, the Trump administration's recently published National Security Strategy prioritizes "flexible realism" over human rights and democracy and uses more candid language than past presidents have in explaining Washington's support for repressive monarchs.
"The [US] State Department will likely need to clarify whether Barrack’s comments represent official policy or personal opinion," argued an editorial in Middle East 24. "Regardless, his words have exposed an uncomfortable truth about US foreign policy in the Middle East: the persistent gap between democratic ideals and strategic realities."
"Perhaps the most troubling aspect of this episode is what it reveals about American confidence in its own values," the editorial added. "If US diplomats no longer believe democracy can work in challenging environments, what does this say about America’s faith in the universal appeal of its founding principles?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


