February, 17 2009, 12:19pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Loretta Kane,202-657-4159
Jeff Cappella, 202-730-7204
'King Size Combo:' New Report Reveals Broad Toll on Taxpayers by Bailed-Out Bank Goldman Sachs and Its Holdings in Burger King
Goldman paid nearly double the average bonus on Wall St ; Burger King costs taxpayers estimated $273 million a year
WASHINGTON
As
Congress and the Obama administration look to hold major banks that
have received billions in federal bailout funds better accountable for
their corporate practices, a report released today by the Service
Employees International Union (SEIU) on Goldman Sachs and its holdings
in Burger King finds that the true total of taxpayer subsidies some of
the banks are enjoying extends well beyond the monies they've taken
through the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP).
The report finds that one of
Goldman Sachs' major investments, Burger King, costs taxpayers more
than a quarter billion dollars a year as Burger King employees are
forced to rely on public health and income support programs as a result
of the lack of affordable employer health coverage and sub-poverty wage
levels at Burger King.
Meanwhile, Burger King chief
executive John Chidsey took home $5.4 million in 2008 and Goldman Sachs
accepted $10 billion in taxpayer bailout money 3/4
then paid out $6.5 billion in bonuses. Goldman paid the highest per
employee bonus average among top banks reporting so far, and the firm's
bonuses were nearly double the average bonus on Wall Street. If Goldman
Sachs had used the $6.5 billion it paid in corporate bonuses to help
Burger King's 360,000 workers instead, each worker would have received
$18,000.
"The misuse of
tax dollars we're seeing now by some of the bailed-out banks is no
one-shot deal," said SEIU President Andy Stern. "Year in and year out
companies that can easily afford to improve health care and wages for
workers simply aren't doing so and are making taxpayers pick up the
public assistance tab instead. It's drain on our economy we can't
afford ignore any longer."
A previous SEIU report on another
bailout recipient, Bank of America, found similar evidence of
employment costs being shifted to taxpayers 3/4 up to $50 million a yearbecause Bank of America workers lack affordable employer health benefits.
Service workers held a protest
today outside Burger King headquarters in Miami to call on Burger King
and Goldman Sachs to stop opposing efforts to rebuild the economy
through improvements for workers while taking billions of dollars from
taxpayers and rewarding CEOs and corporate staff. Additional public
outreach on the issue will take place throughout the week this week at
Burger King restaurants in other cities around the country.
While costing taxpayers billions,
both Burger King and Goldman Sachs are fighting legislation in the U.S.
Congress that could help all workers and the overall economy by broadly
increasing consumer purchasing power. Between 2006 and 2008 Burger King
has spent $319,648 on lobbying, including lobbying against the Employee
Free Choice Act, a measure that would ensure workers the freedom to
form a union for a voice for improved wages, benefits, and working
conditions. Burger King also spent $180,000 to hire lobbyists to fight
pro-worker legislation, including an increase in the minimum wage in
2006 and 2007.
Goldman Sachs is involved in
lobbying against workers' interests as a member of the Business
Roundtable, which spent $15,849,000 on lobbying in 2008according to the Center for Responsive Politics,including lobbying against the Employee Free Choice Act in the third and fourth quarters last year.
With the food service industry,
including fast food, expected to add one million new jobs to the
economy between 2006 and 2016, the SEIU report "King Size Combo: What
Burger King and Goldman Sachs Are Costing Our Country" looks at a wide
range of worker and consumer issues at Burger King to gain perspective
on the potential import of the growing fast food sector for the broader
U.S. economy.
The SEIU report concludes that in
addition to assuring sound banking practices on Wall St., Goldman Sachs
must take responsibility for its important economic holdings on Main
St., such as Burger King. The report recommends that regulators should
demand that bailout recipients stimulate the economy by increasing
lending and by committing to living wages, affordable health benefits,
freedom for workers to choose to form unions (the Employee Free Choice
Act), and other consumer and worker protections.
For a copy of the report, please visit https://action.seiu.org/bk.
To see Brave New Films' newly released video about business practices
at Burger King and the Goldman Sachs connection, please visit https://www.warongreed.org .
With 2 million members in Canada, the United States and Puerto Rico, SEIU is the fastest-growing union in the Americas. Focused on uniting workers in healthcare, public services and property services, SEIU members are winning better wages, healthcare and more secure jobs for our communities, while uniting their strength with their counterparts around the world to help ensure that workers--not just corporations and CEOs--benefit from today's global economy.
LATEST NEWS
EPA Bans Known Carcinogens Used in Dry Cleaning, Other Industries
"Both of these chemicals have caused too much harm for too long, despite the existence of safer alternatives," said one environmental campaigner.
Dec 09, 2024
The Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency on Monday announced a permanent ban on a pair of carcinogenic chemicals widely used in U.S. industries, including dry cleaning services and automative work.
According to the Washington Post:
The announcement includes the complete ban of trichloroethylene—also known as TCE—a substance found in common consumer and manufacturing products including degreasing agents, furniture care and auto repair products. In addition, the agency banned all consumer uses and many commercial uses of Perc—also known as tetrachloroethylene and PCE — an industrial solvent long used in applications such as dry cleaning and auto repair.
Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz, a senior attorney at Earthjustice, applauded the move but suggested to the Post that it should have come sooner.
"Both of these chemicals have caused too much harm for too long, despite the existence of safer alternatives," Kalmuss-Katz.
The EPA's decision, reports the New York Times, was "long sought by environmental and health advocates, even as they braced for what could be a wave of deregulation by the incoming Trump administration."
The Timesreports:
TCE is known to cause liver cancer, kidney cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and to damage the nervous and immune systems. It has been found in drinking water nationwide and was the subject of a 1995 book that became a movie, “A Civil Action,” starring John Travolta. The E.P.A. is banning all uses of the chemical under the Toxic Substances Control Act, which was overhauled in 2016 to give the agency greater authority to regulate harmful chemicals.
Though deemed "less harmful" than TCE, the Times notes how Perc has been shown to "cause liver, kidney, brain and testicular cancer," and can also damage the functioning of kidneys, the liver, and people's immune systems.
Environmentalists celebrated last year when Biden's EPA proposed the ban on TCE, as Common Dreamsreported.
Responding to the news at the time, Scott Faber, senior vice president for government affairs at the Environmental Working Group (EWG), said the EPA, by putting the ban on the table, was "once again putting the health of workers and consumers first."
While President-elect Donald Trump ran on a having an environmental agenda that would foster the "cleanest air" and the "cleanest water," the late approval of EPA's ban on TCE and Perc in Biden's term means the rule will be subject to the Congressional Review Act (CRA), meaning the Republican-control Senate could reverse the measure.
In his remarks to the Times, Kalmuss-Katz of Earthjustice said that if Trump and Senate Republicans try to roll back the ban, they will be certain to "encounter serious opposition from communities across the country that have been devastated by TCE, in both blue and red states."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Explains Why He's Voting Against the New $850 Billion Pentagon Budget
"We do not need to spend almost a trillion dollars on the military, while half a million Americans are homeless and children go hungry," Sen. Bernie Sanders writes in a new op-ed.
Dec 08, 2024
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday announced his opposition to an annual military policy bill that would authorize a Pentagon budget of nearly $850 billion, a sum that the progressive senator from Vermont characterized as outrageous—particularly as so many Americans face economic hardship.
"We do not need to spend almost a trillion dollars on the military, while half a million Americans are homeless and children go hungry," Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote in an op-ed for The Guardian after the House and Senate released legislative text for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2025.
Sanders continued:
In this moment in history, it would be wise for us to remember what Dwight D. Eisenhower, a former five-star general, said in his farewell address in 1961: "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." What Eisenhower said was true in 1961. It is even more true today.
I will be voting against the military budget.
The senator's op-ed came hours after lawmakers from both chambers of Congress unveiled the sprawling, 1,813-page NDAA for the coming fiscal year. The legislation's topline is just over $895 billion as lawmakers from both parties push annual U.S. military spending inexorably toward $1 trillion, even as the Pentagon fails to pass an audit.
The U.S. currently spends more on its military than the next nine countries combined, and military spending accounts for more than half of the nation's yearly discretionary spending, according to the National Priorities Project.
Sanders wrote Sunday that "very few people who have researched the military-industrial complex doubt that there is massive fraud, waste and cost over-runs in the system." One analysis estimates that over 50% of the Pentagon's annual budget, the subject of aggressive industry lobbying, goes to private contractors.
"Defense contractors routinely overcharge the Pentagon by 40%—and sometimes more than 4,000%," Sanders continued. "For example, in October, RTX (formerly Raytheon) was fined $950 million for inflating bills to the DoD, lying about labor and material costs, and paying bribes to secure foreign business. In June, Lockheed Martin was fined $70 million for overcharging the navy for aircraft parts, the latest in a long line of similar abuses. The F-35, the most expensive weapon system in history, has run up hundreds of billions in cost overruns."
The NDAA could have some trouble getting through the divided Congress—but not because of the proposed size of the Pentagon budget.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a statement that the legislation includes language that would "permanently ban transgender medical treatment for minors" and other provisions that are expected to draw Democratic opposition.
Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement Saturday that "anti-equality House Republican leaders are hijacking a defense bill to play politics with the healthcare of children of servicemembers."
"This cruel and hateful bill suddenly strips away access to medical care for families that members of our armed forces are counting on, and it could force servicemembers to choose between staying in the military or providing healthcare for their children," said Robinson. "Politicians have no place inserting themselves into decisions that should be between families and their doctors. We call on members of Congress to do what's right and vote against this damaging legislation."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'A Critical Situation': Gaza Doctor Warns of Catastrophe as Israel Assails Hospital
"We have called on the world to protect both the healthcare system and its workers, yet we have not received any response from anyone globally," said the director of Kamal Adwan Hospital.
Dec 08, 2024
The director of one of the few partially functioning hospitals in northern Gaza said Sunday that Israeli attacks have put the facility's remaining patients—including more than a dozen children—in grave danger and pleaded with the international community to intervene.
"Following the recent attack on Kamal Adwan Hospital, which involved over 100 shells and bombs indiscriminately targeting the facility, the damage has been severe," Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, the hospital's director, said in a statement. "As of now, one of the hospital buildings remains without electricity, oxygen, or water. The shelling continues to occur randomly in the vicinity, preventing us from conducting repairs on the oxygen, electricity, and water networks."
Abu Safiya said the overwhelmed and under-resourced hospital is currently treating 112 wounded patients, including six people in intensive care and 14 children.
"This is a critical situation," he said Sunday morning. "The bombardment and gunfire have not ceased; planes are dropping bombs around the clock. We are uncertain of what lies ahead and what the army wants from the hospital."
"We have called on the world to protect both the healthcare system and its workers, yet we have not received any response from anyone globally," Abu Safiya added. "This represents a humanitarian catastrophe unfolding against the healthcare workers and patients. Unfortunately, there seems to be no effort to halt this relentless assault on Kamal Adwan Hospital and the broader health system."
The hospital director's statement came after Israeli attacks near the facility killed scores of people on Friday. Photos taken from the scene showed bodies on the ground amid building ruins.
(Photo: AFP via Getty Images)
A day earlier, an Israeli airstrike on the Kamal Adwan Hospital compound killed a 16-year-old boy in a wheelchair and wounded a dozen others, The Associated Pressreported.
According toDrop Site, the boy "was struck as he entered the X-ray department."
Northern Gaza has been under intense Israeli assault for two months, and the humanitarian situation there and across the Palestinian enclave is worse than ever, according to U.N. agencies and aid organizations.
"The catastrophe in Gaza is nothing short of a complete breakdown of our common humanity," said U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres. "The nightmare must stop. We cannot continue to look away."
Abu Safiya said Sunday that his hospital is facing outages of electricity and water amid Israel's incessant attacks.
"We urgently appeal to the international community for assistance," he said. "The situation is extremely dangerous."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular