

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Ali Bay, Communications Manager
PHONE: (916) 284-9187
EMAIL: ali@eqca.org
On the second day
of the new 2009-10 legislative session, lawmakers in both the Senate
and Assembly introduced resolutions that support the overturning of
Proposition 8. Senator Mark Leno, D-San Francisco and Assemblymember
Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, today introduced measures to put the
Legislature on record opposing Prop 8 and declaring that the initiative
is an improper revision to the Constitution.
Both
resolutions are sponsored by Equality California and were drafted by
EQCA and the National Center for Lesbian Rights, plaintiff and lead
counsel, respectively, in the marriage case brought before the
California Supreme Court.
Leno's Senate Resolution 7 and Ammiano's Assembly Resolution (number to
be assigned) specify that significant revisions to the Constitution
mandate distinct procedures and require a two-thirds vote of each house
of the Legislature before going to voters. The resolutions are
co-authored by Sen. Christine Kehoe and Assemblymember John A. Perez,
both members of the LGBT Legislative Caucus, and Senate Pro Tem Speaker
Darrell Steinberg.
"Prop 8 eliminates the fundamental right to marry from same-sex couples
and allows a slim majority to take away the equal protections of a
single minority group, which violates one of the fundamental and
founding principles of our Constitution," said EQCA Executive Director
Geoff Kors. "That type of unprecedented change to the Constitution puts
the rights of all Californians at risk, and it's critical in our system
of checks and balances that the Legislature weigh in on such
fundamental revisions to the Constitution."
The California Supreme Court is reviewing the validity of Prop 8, which
passed by a narrow margin of 52 percent on November 4. Several lawsuits
have challenged the initiative, including one filed on behalf of EQCA
and several same-sex couples. That lawsuit was filed by the National
Center for Lesbian Rights, American Civil Liberties Union and Lambda
Legal. Earlier this year, the California Supreme Court held that
barring same-sex couples from marriage violates the equal protection
clause of the California Constitution and violates the fundamental
right to marry.
"Proposition 8's revision to the California Constitution violates key
structural checks and balances built into our legal system," said Sen.
Leno. "Overnight, the constitutional protections of thousands of tax
paying, law abiding California citizens were stripped from them by a
simple majority vote, without a prior two-thirds vote by both houses of
the legislature, thereby trampling on their fundamental right to equal
protection."
"Any major revision to the state Constitution should not be allowed to
circumvent the legal system," said Assemblymember Ammiano. "The fact
is, Proposition 8 was improperly instituted through the ballot process
without legislative involvement. I am proud to author this crucial
resolution urging the courts to right the social travesty of
Proposition 8 and ensure any similar future measures are approached in
an appropriate and legal manner."
If it stands, Prop 8 would be the only California initiative to
successfully change the California Constitution to take away a right
from a targeted minority group.
"Equality California is working to ensure there is broad support for
both resolutions within the Legislature," Kors said. "Additionally, we
need people who support equality to take action immediately and
encourage their representatives to support these resolutions. They can
email their lawmakers directly at eqca.org."
Equality California is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, grassroots-based, statewide advocacy organization whose mission is to achieve equality and civil rights for all lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Californians.
"In a scenario where this administration is trying to sow division," said one local organizer, "we see an organic movement of community members trying to provide support and assistance.”
In Charlotte, North Carolina, the Trump administration's latest anti-immigration crackdown garnered headlines over the weekend both for "how inhumane and aggressive" the operations by US Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement were, as one journalist said, and the action that local residents immediately took to protect their neighbors from arrests and raids.
"I just started recording them," said Rheba Hamilton after federal agents pulled up to her house in a vehicle and intimidated two Latino men who were decorating the trees in her yard. "They left."
As the agents pulled away, she yelled, "Get the hell out of my yard, you assholes!"
Hamilton, who told The New York Times she had tried to warn the workers against hanging the Christmas lights due to the deportation operations, said it was "terrifying" to see Border Patrol agents on her property.
"I was concerned about this happening," Hamilton said. "We've got great people here... Nobody's going to regret moving here if you come here with the right kind of heart, and that includes our immigrants."
Hamilton filmed the Border Patrol agents after North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein, a Democrat, called on Charlotte residents to "bear witness" to ICE arrests and raids at businesses and homes as the Trump administration launched "Operation Charlotte's Web"—the latest stop on its nationwide attack on immigrant and Latino communities, which has also unfolded in Chicago and other cities.
“If you see any inappropriate behavior, use your phones to record and notify local law enforcement, who will continue to keep our communities safe long after these federal agents leave,” said Stein last week.
Operation Charlotte's Web began as the administration released the names of more than 600 people detained in the Chicago area whose arrests may have violated a court order, and revealed that just 16 of them had an alleged criminal history.
More than 3,000 people in all have been arrested in the Chicago area since ICE and other federal agencies began "Operation Midway Blitz" in September.
Border Patrol Commander-at-large Gregory Bovino reported that at least 81 people were arrested in Charlotte by the end of the weekend, with the mass arrests completed in about five hours, and claimed that those who were taken into custody had “significant criminal and immigration history"—similar claims that have been made about the operations in Chicago.
The local advocacy group Siembra NC said “the most immigrants were arrested in a single day in state history" on Saturday.
The community development group CharlotteEast told the Guardian on Sunday that it had received an "overwhelming" number of reports from residents about Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents in the area, including at places that were previously protected under the Biden administration from immigration enforcement.
“The past two hours we’ve received countless reports of CBP activity at churches, apartment complexes, and a hardware store,” executive director Greg Asciutto told the outlet.
The Charlotte Observer reported that congregants at a church in east Charlotte "scattered into the woods" after masked federal agents arrived and detained a member while the church community was doing yard work.
"The agents asked no questions and showed no identification before taking one man away, whose wife and child were inside at the time," the newspaper reported. "Inside the church, women and children sobbed as they wondered whether their loved ones had been taken."
Sam Stein of the Bulwark noted that community members "got the heads up and ran to the woods to confront ICE agents with, among other things, deafening whistles. ICE responded by threatening to throw gas canisters at them."
Advocates handed out whistles—like those used by many in Chicago in recent weeks—to local residents on Sunday, and hundreds of people packed a training session on Friday night where Carolina Migrant Network advised them on banding together to stop ICE from raiding their communities.
Charlotte NC: Activists are handing out whistles to community members to alert their neighbors to the presence of ICE and Federal Agents pic.twitter.com/0lranCzuip
— Oliya Scootercaster 🛴 (@ScooterCasterNY) November 16, 2025
A grocery store, Compare Foods, also announced it would be offering free delivery to keep people from having to venture out while federal agents are in the city.
"For all those customers who don't feel comfortable coming to the store in person, they can shop online, and then we will have it delivered through our delivery service to their home," said Omar Jorge, owner of the local chain.
Manolo's Bakery, meanwhile, closed over the weekend for the first time in its 28-year history, with owner Manolo Betancur telling the Observer, "We need to protect our families [from] family separation."
Stefania Arteaga of the Carolina Migrant Network told the Guardian that the grassroots weekend efforts show "allies are learning how to help their neighbors" in the city.
"In a scenario where this administration is trying to sow division," she said, "we see an organic movement of community members trying to provide support and assistance.”
Daniel Nichanian of Bolts magazine said Charlotte—which is not near a US border—likely was chosen as President Donald Trump's latest target because of a "war" between ICE and Mecklenburg County Sheriff Gary McFadden, going back to 2018 when McFadden was among five Black Democrats who won sheriff elections in the state on the promise of ending cooperation with ICE.
The agency targeted Charlotte two years later, posting billboards that showed mugshots of immigrants arrested in the area.
As with other cities Trump has targeted for mass deportation operations this year, crime has been falling in Charlotte, with an 8% decrease in overall crime last month compared to a year prior, and a 20% reduction in violent crimes.
"He’s pretending he was always good with this vote—as he and his lackeys keep scheming to prevent it from going any further," said a former Republican congressman.
President Donald Trump has spent months doing everything in his power to downplay and dismiss calls to release the government’s files about his former friend, the powerful sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. But as he faces a mutiny within his own party and a steady drip of new scandalous details about his relationship with the disgraced financier, Trump abruptly changed course on Sunday, calling for House Republicans to hold a vote on releasing the files.
" House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files because we have nothing to hide," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "And it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party."
Trump claimed that his Department of Justice "has already turned over tens of thousands of pages to the Public on 'Epstein.'" But while the DOJ has released small tranches of heavily redacted files, most of the nearly 60,000 pages of emails and documents released to the public have come through the House Oversight Committee, which has subpoenaed DOJ files and records from Epstein’s estate.
Last week, a new batch of documents shed new light on Trump's relationship with Epstein. In one 2019 email to author Michael Wolff, Epstein said Trump "knew about the girls" he'd trafficked. In earlier emails to his co-conspirator Ghislane Maxwell, Epstein described Trump as a "dog that hasn’t barked” and said that one of his victims had "spent hours at my house" with Trump.
And far from his claims of transparency, Trump aggressively tried last week to pressure GOP Reps. Lauren Boebert (Colo.) and Nancy Mace (SC) to abandon their support for a bipartisan petition to force a House vote on the release of the files, which reportedly included pulling Boebert into the Situation Room.
In one “last-ditch” effort to defuse the full release of the files, Trump also called on Attorney General Pam Bondi, to open an investigation specifically into Epstein’s ties to prominent Democrats. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), one of the co-sponsors of the House resolution, described the investigations as a "smokescreen" because "if they have ongoing investigations in certain areas, those documents can’t be released."
None of Trump's obstruction efforts appear to have worked. With the resolution almost sure to pass, perhaps as soon as Tuesday, dozens more Republicans have hopped on the bandwagon and appear poised to vote for it. Faced with losing more trust within his party and among his voters—who have been largely dissatisfied with his handling of the Epstein firestorm—Trump's comments on Truth Social suggested he had recognized the need for a strategic retreat.
In a post that dripped with sarcasm, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), the resolution's co-sponsor, said he was "glad to see Donald Trump's complete and total endorsement of my bill."
But while Trump appeared to hope his gesture would help to quell suspicions that he’s covering up the files, Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), a member of the Oversight Committee, pointed out that it was hardly a demonstration of his transparency.
"Trump is dodging again," she wrote on social media. "There’s already a congressional subpoena for the full Epstein Files. If Trump means this, then he should release them himself right now."
The president has struggled to formulate an answer when asked why he won't simply release the files. On Friday, aboard Air Force One, a reporter asked him: "If there is nothing incriminating in the files, why not—"
Trump cut her off, shouting: "Quiet! Quiet!"
Aaron Fritschner, the deputy chief of staff for Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), pointed out that while Trump has now endorsed passing the bill to release the files, "the only reason this bill is under discussion to begin with is that the Trump administration blocked the release. They’re still blocking it!"
A resolution to release all the files would still need to be passed through the Senate, which is controlled by a 53-47 Republican majority. It would also need to be signed by Trump himself.
Justin Amash, a former Republican member of Congress, said the president's retreat was being done "in classic Trump fashion."
"He’s pretending he was always good with this vote—as he and his lackeys keep scheming to prevent it from going any further," Amash said.
Others have warned that even if the DOJ is compelled to release all its files on Epstein, there is no guarantee their integrity will be preserved.
Journalist Zaid Jilani asked, "What assurance do we have that the Trump administration isn’t selectively destroying Epstein files in anticipation of being forced to release them?"
This week's House vote comes after several survivors of Epstein's abuse published a video over the weekend calling for the full release of the files.
"Five administrations and we're still in the dark," the video says. "Call your Congress member and demand they release ALL of the Epstein files."
In a statement sent to Common Dreams following Trump's pivot, Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) said: "Donald Trump is leading a White House cover-up and has tried everything to kill our Jeffrey Epstein investigation. He’s failed. And now he’s panicking and has realized he is about to lose this Epstein vote to force the Department of Justice to release the files."
"Let’s be crystal clear: Trump has the power to release all the files today. And he is under subpoena to do so," Garcia continued. "But instead, he wants to continue this cover-up and launch bogus new investigations to deflect and slow down our investigation. It won’t work. We will get justice for the survivors."
"I wouldn’t even call it the Justice Department anymore. It’s become Trump’s personal law firm."
Dozens of former US Department of Justice attorneys have now gone on record to describe the unprecedented corruption of federal law enforcement taking place during President Donald Trump's second term.
In a lengthy story published on Sunday by the New York Times, the former DOJ attorneys described rampant politicization of prosecutions, directives to dig up evidence on Trump's political foes, and orders to drop investigations into potential terrorist plots and white-collar crimes.
Several attorneys told the paper that the corruption of the DOJ began on Trump's very first day in office when he issued a blanket pardon to everyone who had been convicted of rioting at the US Capitol building on his behalf on January 6, 2021, in a last-ditch effort to prevent the certification of former President Joe Biden's electoral victory.
Gregory Rosen, who oversaw the unit at the DOJ that prosecuted January 6 rioters, told the Times that he felt "numb" seeing the pardons of the rioters, but he nonetheless facilitated the pardons because he understood they were within the president's constitutional powers.
Mike Romano, a prosecutor who worked on January 6 cases, said that he had to resign as soon as he saw the broad scope of the pardons, which included rioters who were guilty of assaulting police officers.
"It’s incredibly demoralizing to see something you worked on for four years wiped away by a lie—I mean the idea that prosecution of the rioters was a grave national injustice," he said. "We had strong evidence against every person we prosecuted."
The mass pardon of the Capitol rioters was only the beginning, as prosecutors said that this politicization soon swept over the entire department.
In early March, for instance, Trump signed an executive order targeting law firms that had in the past represented prominent Democrats. Among other things, the order demanded federal agencies cancel government contracts with the firms and strip the firms' employees of their security clearances.
The orders also accused some of the firms in engaging in supposed racial discrimination for maintaining policies related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
Dena Robinson, a former attorney at the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, told the Times that the DEI investigation into law firm Perkins Coie was a particularly extreme example of the department's politicization under Trump.
"The idea of the investigation was that Perkins Coie supposedly engaged in illegal discrimination against white men," she explained. "But Perkins Coie is an extremely white firm—only 3% of the partners are Black. When my colleague pointed that out, the leadership didn’t care. They’d already reached their conclusion."
Robinson said that this attitude was emblematic of how Trump appointees conducted investigations: They begin with desired conclusions and systematically ignore evidence that undermines them.
"I wouldn’t even call it the Justice Department anymore," she said. "It’s become Trump’s personal law firm. I think Americans should be enraged."
Another aspect of the DOJ under Trump that has drawn scrutiny has been his use of pardons for political allies, including his decision last month to pardon Changpeng Zhao, the founder of cryptocurrency exchange Binance, who pleaded guilty to money-laundering charges in 2023, and who had helped boost the value of the Trump family's own cryptocurrency venture.
A new investigation from ProPublica found that Trump's use of the pardon hasn't just been relegated to prosecutions that took place during Democratic administrations.
The ProPublica report found Trump had wiped out convictions in "at least a dozen criminal cases that originated during his first term," many of which involved politicians convicted of taking bribes or engaging in kickback schemes.
Frank O. Bowman III, a professor emeritus of law at the University of Missouri, told Pro Publica that the Trump pardons taken together are part of what he described as "the systematic destruction of the Justice Department as an objective agency that seeks to uphold the law and fight crime."
In addition to this, Joseph Tirrell, former director of the Departmental Ethics Office, told the Times that the Trump DOJ has been hacking away at rules that bar law-enforcement officials from accepting gifts.
In one instance, Tirrell said he tried to intervene to stop DOJ employees from accepting cigars given by mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor and a soccer ball from the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA).
"I felt like I really had to go to the mattress to convince the AG’s office: You can pay for the item or you can return the item or you can throw the item away," he said. "There’s no other way to do this."
Shortly after this, Tirrell said he got a call from the FBI general counsel inquiring "about changing exceptions to the gift rules because his boss, [FBI Director] Kash Patel, felt like he should be able to accept more expensive gifts."
Tirrell said that he then reminded the counsel that "his client was not Mr. Patel, but the United States."
Patel in recent weeks has come under scrutiny for some of the perks he's taken during his time as FBI director, including using the FBI's private jet to fly to a wrestling event where his girlfriend, country music singer Alexis Wilkins, was performing the national anthem.
MS NOW reported on Monday that Patel has also given Wilkins "a security detail made up of elite FBI agents usually assigned to a SWAT team in the FBI field office in Nashville," an unprecedented arrangement for the girlfriend of the FBI director.
Christopher O’Leary, a former senior FBI agent and MS NOW law enforcement contributor, said that there is "no legitimate justification" for granting Wilkins this level of security.
"This is a clear abuse of position and misuse of government resources," he said. "She is not his spouse, does not live in the same house or even the same city."