September, 29 2008, 09:52am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Sarah Anderson, saraha@igc.org, tel: 202 234 9382 x 227
Chuck Collins, chuckcollins7@mac.com, 617 308 4433
Sam Pizzigati, editor@toomuchonline.org, 301 933 2710
See more information below.
Executive Pay Experts Critique Financial Bailout Bill
Institute for Policy Studies analysts say bill falls short on CEO pay
WASHINGTON
The draft bailout bill
released
yesterday contains several historic provisions that represent positive
steps
toward ending taxpayer subsidies for executive pay. But the bailout
bill ultimately
falls short on CEO pay - by failing to set a specific limit on the
compensation
of top executives at bailed-out companies.
The bill applies two different sets of executive compensation criteria,
depending on whether the government negotiates directly with the
institution to
purchase troubled assets or whether it purchases them through auction.
SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE PAY PROVISIONS:
|
|
| No limits on pay |
| No criteria on clawbacks. |
|
|
| |
DETAILED ANALYSIS:
Major shortcoming: No set limits
on compensation
The key
bailout
bill provision on executive pay merely directs Treasury Secretary Henry
Paulson
to prevent "incentives" that encourage executives "to take unnecessary
and
excessive risks that threaten the value of the financial institution."
In other words, a bailed-out bank board of directors would be perfectly
free to
funnel $10 million into its CEO's pockets - unless Paulson decides that
reward
poses an excessive risk to the institution. The draft legislation, the "Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008," does not define what might
constitute
an "unnecessary and excessive risk."
"Congress missed a golden opportunity to use the leverage of the
bailout to put
tough controls on an out-of-control executive pay system," says IPS
Global
Economy Project Director Sarah Anderson. "Without clear limits on pay,
the
public is being asked to put their trust in Secretary Paulson, a man
who made
hundreds of millions of dollars as a Wall Street CEO, to decide what's
'excessive.'"
Several members of Congress had proposed fixed limits on pay. Sen. John
McCain
(D-Az.)
and Sen. Diane Feinstein
(D-Calif.) had called for capping compensation for bailed-out
executives at the
current compensation level of the U.S. President: $400,000. Rep. Henry
Waxman
(D-Calif.) had proposed a $2 million cap,
while Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) had advocated a $1
million cap on "plain vanilla" salary compensation.
The Institute for Policy Studies favors a lid on CEO pay set at 25
times the
pay of a bailed-out company's lowest-paid worker. The
current top federal paycheck - the
President's $400,000 annual compensation - represents about 25 times
the pay of
the federal government's lowest-paid employee.
"The most respected business thinker of the 20th century,
Peter
Drucker, considered the 25-to-1 ratio be the appropriate standard for
the
private sector as well," notes IPS Associate Fellow Sam Pizzigati. "Pay
gaps
too wide, management experts like Drucker believe, undermine enterprise
effectiveness and efficiency."
The Institute will be urging the Congress and President who take office
in
January to better define the bailout bill's limits on executive pay.
THE BAILOUT'S POSITIVES ON CEO PAY
Ban on "golden parachutes": Senior executive officers will not
receive any
severance payment if they leave the company that's getting bailout
dollars.
Congress is right to ensure that executives who drove the country into
this
mess should not be allowed to walk away with massive payoffs.
Cap on tax deductibility: Firms that participate in the bailout
will not
be allowed to deduct executive pay that exceeds $500,000 per year from
their
corporate income taxes. The current tax code places a $1 million cap on
tax
deductibility for executive compensation, but this provision has been
meaningless in practice because it allows exceptions for
"performance-based"
pay. Most companies simply limit top executive salaries to around $1
million
and then add on to that total various assortments of
"performance-based"
bonuses, stock awards, and other long-term compensation. The draft
bailout bill
attempts to close this loophole by eliminating that exception for
executives of
bailed-out firms.
Clawback: Executives of bailed-out firms who receive bonuses or
other
awards that later turn out to be based on "materially inaccurate"
financial
reports will need to give that money back.This hardly seems
like
something that would need to be legislated, but when it comes to
today's
corporate America,
Congress is right to not rely on executives to voluntarily give up
unearned
gains.
BROADER CRITIQUE OF THE BAILOUT BILL
For additional IPS analysis on the broader aspects of the bailout bill,
see: www.ips-dc.org.
These materials include an IPS
Plan to Pay for Recovery.
***
Sarah Anderson is the Director of the Global Economy Project at the Institute for Policy Studies and a co-author of 15 IPS annual reports on executive compensation. Contact: saraha@igc.org, tel: 202 234 9382 x 227.
Chuck Collins is a senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies where he directs the Program on Inequality and the Common Good. He was a co-founder of United for a Fair Economy, and his latest book, the co-authored The Moral Measure of the Economy, appeared earlier this year. Contact: chuckcollins7@mac.com, 617 308 4433.
Sam Pizzigati is an Associate Fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies and the author of Greed and Good: Understanding and Overcoming the Inequality That Limits Our Lives (Apex Press, 2004). He edits Too Much, on online weekly on excess and inequality. Contact: editor@toomuchonline.org, 301 933 2710.
Institute for Policy Studies turns Ideas into Action for Peace, Justice and the Environment. We strengthen social movements with independent research, visionary thinking, and links to the grassroots, scholars and elected officials. I.F. Stone once called IPS "the think tank for the rest of us." Since 1963, we have empowered people to build healthy and democratic societies in communities, the US, and the world. Click here to learn more, or read the latest below.
LATEST NEWS
Israeli Anti-Government Protests Hit New Heights as 200,000 March in Tel Aviv
"There's a great danger that Israel will turn into a dictatorship," warned one protester.
Mar 05, 2023
Ongoing protests against the far-right Israeli government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyhu were larger than ever on Saturday night as an estimated 200,000 people or more took to the streets in Tel Aviv and other cities to denounce judicial reforms they warn put the nation on a path towards dictatorship.
For over two months, weekly protests—mostly on the weekends but increasingly during the workweek as well—large demonstrations have taken place in response to Netanyahu and his coalition government pushing a judicial takeover that critics say would curtail democracy.
Haaretzreported Saturday's turnout as a record since the movement started in early January.
"There's a great danger that Israel will turn into a dictatorship," Ophir Kubitsky, a 68-year-old high school teacher at the demonstration, toldReuters. "We came here to demonstrate over and over again until we win."
\u201cAn incredible photo. \n\nDowntown Tel Aviv is flooded with Israelis protesting the government\u2019s judicial reform package.\u201d— Aviva Klompas (@Aviva Klompas) 1677972433
The demonstrations in Tel Aviv and other locations "began peacefully," reports Reuters. "However, footage released by police later showed protesters breaking down barriers in Tel Aviv and igniting fires as they blocked roads. Police sprayed water cannons at the protesters."
While Israeli liberals increasingly register fear and discomfort over the direction of its government's growing autocratic tendencies, Palestinian rights advocates have noted that the right-wing slide is a direct and predictable continuation of a system that denies its Palestinian citizens full rights under the law while overseeing a brutal and repressive apartheid regime.
As American-Palestinian scholar Yousef Munayyer recently wrote in a column about the protest movement for +972 Magazine:
As tens of thousands of Israelis protest the reforms that Netanyahu’s government seeks to ram through in hopes of “saving the essence” of Israeli democracy, they are largely avoiding a confrontation with the foundational problem, namely that the essence of the Israeli system is to put settler colonialism ahead of any liberal principles around democracy, equality, or human rights.
A key question for many concerned not only about Israel's increasingly autocratic and right-wing lurch, but its ever-worsening treatment of the Palestinians living under hostile military occupation is this: "Does this loose group oppose the settler-colonial system that these legal reforms would further enable, or does it simply seek a return to the settler-colonial system, but without Netanyahu at its head?"
Munayyer believes all evidence thus far indicates the latter is the unfortunate answer, which is why Palestinians are noticeably absent from celebrating the display of dissent and opposition in Tel Aviv and elsewhere.
"For all Palestinians, including those with Israeli citizenship, there is little urgency to try to 'save' Israeli democracy, primarily because for them it has never existed," Munayyer concluded. "Not only is a political system that is constructed to be democratic toward some, but not all, not a democracy, it is also not going to seem worth saving to those it disadvantages."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Biggest Conservation Victory Ever!' Global Treaty to Protect Oceans Reached
"This is a historic day for conservation and a sign that in a divided world, protecting nature and people can triumph over geopolitics," said Greenpeace in response to an agreement to protect world's marine biodiversity.
Mar 05, 2023
Ocean conservationists expressed elation late Saturday after it was announced—following nearly two decades of consideration and effort—that delegates from around the world had agreed to language for a far-reaching global treaty aimed at protecting the biodiversity on the high seas and in the deep oceans of the world.
"This is a historic day for conservation and a sign that in a divided world, protecting nature and people can triumph over geopolitics," declared Dr. Laura Meller, the oceans campaigner for Greenpeace Nordic.
"We praise countries for seeking compromises, putting aside differences, and delivering a Treaty that will let us protect the oceans, build our resilience to climate change and safeguard the lives and livelihoods of billions of people," Meller added.
The final text of the Global Ocean Treaty, formally referred to as the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction treaty (BBNJ), was reached after a two-week round of talks that concluded with a 48-hour marathon push between delegations at the United Nations headquarters in New York.
"The High Seas Treaty opens the path for humankind to finally provide protection to marine life across our one ocean."
"This is huge," said Greenpeace in a social media post, calling the agreement "the biggest conservation victory ever!"
Rena Lee of Singapore, the U.N Ambassador for Oceans and president of the conference hosting the talks, received a standing ovation after announcing a final deal had been reached. "The shipped has reached the shore," Lee told the conference.
\u201cBBNJ President Rena Lee: "The ship has reached the shore."\n\nThe BBNJ Agreement is agreed.\u201d— Duncan Currie (@Duncan Currie) 1677984046
"Following a two-week-long rollercoaster ride of negotiations and super-hero efforts in the last 48 hours, governments reached agreement on key issues that will advance protection and better management of marine biodiversity in the High Seas," said Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance, a coalition of over 40 ocean-focused NGOs that also includes the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Minna Epps, director of the Global Marine and Polar Programme at the IUCN, said the agreement represents a new opportunity.
"The High Seas Treaty opens the path for humankind to finally provide protection to marine life across our one ocean," Epps said in a statement. "Its adoption closes essential gaps in international law and offers a framework for governments to work together to protect global ocean health, climate resilience, and the socioeconomic wellbeing and food security of billions of people."
Protecting the world's high seas, which refers to areas of the oceans outside the jurisdiction of any country, is part of the larger push to protect planetary biodiversity and seen as key if nations want to keep their commitment to the UN-brokered Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework—also known as the known as the 30x30 pledge—that aims protect 30 percent of the world's natural habitat by 2030.
"With currently just over 1% of the High Seas protected," said the High Seas Alliance in a statement, "the new Treaty will provide a pathway to establish marine protected areas in these waters." The group said the treaty will make acheiving the goals of the Kunming-Montreal agreement possible, but that "time is of the essence" for the world's biodiversity.
"The new Treaty will bring ocean governance into the 21st century," said the group, "including establishing modern requirements to assess and manage planned human activities that would affect marine life in the High Seas as well as ensuring greater transparency. This will greatly strengthen the effective area-based management of fishing, shipping, and other activities that have contributed to the overall decline in ocean health."
According to Greenpeace's assessment of the talks:
The High Ambition Coalition, which includes the EU, US and UK, and China were key players in brokering the deal. Both showed willingness to compromise in the final days of talks, and built coalitions instead of sowing division. Small Island States have shown leadership throughout the process, and the G77 group led the way in ensuring the Treaty can be put into practice in a fair and equitable way.
The fair sharing of monetary benefits from Marine Genetic Resources was a key sticking point. This was only resolved on the final day of talks. The section of the Treaty on Marine Protected Areas does away with broken consensus-based decision making which has failed to protect the oceans through existing regional bodies like the Antarctic Ocean Commission. While there are still major issues in the text, it is a workable Treaty that is a starting point for protecting 30% of the world’s oceans.
The group said it is now urgent for governments around the world to take the final step of ratifying the treaty.
"We can now finally move from talk to real change at sea. Countries must formally adopt the Treaty and ratify it as quickly as possible to bring it into force, and then deliver the fully protected ocean sanctuaries our planet needs," Meller said. "The clock is still ticking to deliver 30×30. We have half a decade left, and we can't be complacent."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Calls US Democracy a 'Very Dangerous System' at CPAC
Former U.S. president headlines ousted autocrat double-header by following Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro at annual far-right convention.
Mar 04, 2023
The former presidents of Brazil and the United States took the stage CPAC on Saturday where both fascist politicians continued to sow doubt about their respective electoral defeats as they received standing ovations from the annual convention's far-right attendees.
Brazil's disgraced former leader Jair Bolsonaro—whose supporters stormed government offices in January after his successor, leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, was sworn into office—was brought onto the stage this year's "diminished" CPAC gathering to blaring rock music and loud cheers from the crowd.
Addressing the American audience, Bolsonaro indicated once more his doubts that he lost the Brazilian election fairly, saying, "I had way more support in 2022 than I had in 2018, and I don't understand why the numbers said the opposite."
"I thank God for the mission of being president of Brazil for one term," he said, but hinted at a possible third run for president by adding: "But I feel deep inside that this mission is still not over."
When Trump took the podium as the convention's keynote appearance, there again was raucous applause.
During his speech, he singled out Bolsonaro in the audience and said it was a "great honor" to be appearing with the "very popular" former president.
\u201cBolsonaro \ud83e\udd1d Trump\nCPAC Washington\u201d— Patriota (@Patriota) 1677972787
"Our getting back in the White House is their worst nightmare," Trump said of Democrats and his other political opponents. "But it is our country's only hope."
Trump went on to call the electoral process in the United States a "very bad" and a "very dangerous system" that only he and the far-right attendees at CPAC can overcome.
\u201cTrump claims the 2020 election was so bad, that instead of Biden serving four years, people he talked to in early 2021 were saying "you'll be back [in office] in six weeks, sir"\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1677970747
During the speech, Trump vowed to "finish what we started" as the enthusiastic crowd chanted "Four more years! Four more years!"
In the traditional straw poll taken each year by CPAC attendees, Trump won in a landslide, the convention's organizers announced on Saturday, with the former president taking 65 percent of the vote.
The second-place finisher was Florida's far-right Gov. Ron DeSantis, who did not attend the gathering this year despite many viewing him as the strongest GOP challenger to Trump in a possible 2024 primary matchup.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
SUPPORT OUR WORK.
We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100%
reader supported.
reader supported.