September, 26 2008, 05:23am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
In Washington, DC, for Enough, Colin Thomas-Jensen (English): +1-202-682-6136
Renewed Fighting Displaces 100,000 More Civilians in Eastern Congo
WASHINGTON
Renewed combat in eastern
Democratic Republic of Congo has caused a drastic deterioration in the
humanitarian situation and immense suffering for civilians, the Congo
Advocacy Coalition, a group of 83 aid agencies and human rights groups,
said today. The coalition called for urgent action to improve
protection of civilians and an immediate increase in assistance to
vulnerable populations.
Since August 28, 2008, fighting has
resumed between the Congolese army and the forces of a renegade
general, Laurent Nkunda's National Congress for the Defense of the
People (CNDP), as well as other armed groups, breaking a fragile
ceasefire that had been in place since the Goma peace agreement was
signed on January 23.
100,000 civilians forced to flee
An
estimated 100,000 civilians were forced to flee in the most recent
violence, including many who had been displaced by earlier waves of
fighting. According to witnesses, some civilians were trapped in combat
zones and were killed, wounded, raped or illegally detained by soldiers
of the Congolese army and combatants of other armed groups.
The
situation for civilians is desperate, and it threatens to deteriorate
further if fighting continues," said Rebecca Feeley of the ENOUGH
Project. "All the parties who signed the Goma peace agreement should
adhere strictly to their obligations, including to protect civilians
and respect international humanitarian and human rights law."
Hundreds of ceasefire violations
The
heavy fighting, the worst since the ceasefire was signed, started in
Rutshuru territory in North Kivu province before spreading to Masisi
territory and then to Kalehe territory in South Kivu. Since January 23,
the UN peacekeeping mission, MONUC, has recorded more than 250
ceasefire violations in both North and South Kivu. Each round of
fighting resulted in fresh displacement of civilians. The exact numbers
are difficult to estimate as those returning home are frequently forced
to flee again, but the UN believes that more than 1.2 million people
are now displaced in North and South Kivu.
During the recent
fighting, many civilians were wounded or killed in the crossfire while
there are reports that others, including children, were abducted and
forcibly recruited into armed service. In Kirotshe, a female worker at
the local health center was shot in the stomach on September 11 while
the CNDP and soldiers from the Congolese army fought for control of the
town. Another woman who fled from Nyamubingwa village said she left
behind three women who had been raped by armed combatants. Much of her
village was looted.
"Again and again, we are attacked, we flee,
our houses are pillaged, and then we are displaced with nothing," said
one man, whose house was looted by two different militia groups after
he fled from Nyamubingwa on September 10.
Civilians' rights ignored
Roadblocks
erected by the Congolese army and militia groups prevented many
civilians from escaping to safety. In some cases, civilians fleeing
combat were only permitted to pass if they paid fines or handed over
their electoral cards (which serve as identification in Congo) and
other goods which they managed to carry from their homes.
Even
outside of combat zones, Congolese army soldiers, sent to the region in
increasing numbers, killed or injured civilians, often in the process
of pillaging their property. In Minova and neighboring villages of
South Kivu, for example, four civilians were killed by indiscriminate
fire from soldiers who were looting the area. In some areas, Congolese
army soldiers, as well as members of armed groups, are also involved in
illicit mining activities in the rich gold and tin mines across the
Kivu provinces, systematically extorting from civilians, in particular
through the imposition of illegal "taxes."
"Congolese army
officers and leaders of armed groups must take urgent steps to control
and discipline their troops," said Anneke Van Woudenberg, senior
researcher at Human Rights Watch. "They are responsible for keeping
their soldiers and combatants from killing, harassing and abusing the
population."
Aid workers attacked
Aid workers have
suffered attacks that have forced them to suspend activities in North
Kivu and parts of South Kivu, leaving many displaced persons without
assistance. Soldiers and combatants from armed groups have looted
health centers and hijacked trucks delivering humanitarian assistance,
diverting them for military purposes. Crowds have stoned aid workers
and refused to allow them to pass roadblocks, confusing their role with
that of the UN peacekeeping force, MONUC. The crowds said they were
angry about what they saw as MONUC's failure to end the conflict and
protect the population.
"The signatories to the Goma peace
agreement agreed to protect civilians, remove roadblocks and allow
humanitarian access to populations in need, yet communities have
witnessed them doing precisely the opposite," said Juliette Prodhan,
country director for Oxfam GB in DRC. "All parties must live up to
their commitments and cease such attacks immediately."
Ten years
ago this month, the United Nations Guiding Principles on Internal
Displacement were first presented to the Human Rights Commission,
officially recognizing the basic rights of all internally displaced
persons, including protection against arbitrary displacement, the right
to protection and assistance while displaced, and guarantees for safe
return.
"In eastern Congo many of the basic rights of displaced
people have been flagrantly violated," said Ulrika Blom Mondlane from
the Norwegian Refugee Council. "The UN's Guiding Principles should be
more than just lofty aspirations. The people of eastern Congo
desperately need the protection and basic standards of assistance
detailed in this groundbreaking document to become a reality."
The
Congo Advocacy Coalition calls on the parties to the Goma peace
agreement, international donors, and international facilitators to the
peace process (United States, European Union, African Union, and the
UN) to redouble efforts to implement the Goma peace agreement and to
ensure that the UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement are
respected in one of the world's worst humanitarian emergencies.
Specifically, the coalition calls on these actors to:
- Uphold the commitments to civilian protection and respect for human rights
set out in the Goma peace agreement and the Nairobi communique. Appoint
a special adviser on human rights for eastern Congo to help ensure that
human rights concerns are central to peace discussions. - Significantly and urgently increase and improve assistance for those displaced from their homes and for the families and communities who host them.
- Sanction those who incite violence against humanitarian and UN workers. Inform the population about the different roles and mandates of MONUC and humanitarian agencies.
- Ensure that MONUC's protection mandate is given priority in the resourcing and management of operations.
- Ensure
that the illegal exploitation of natural resources and the economic
interests of the parties to the conflict are addressed explicitly in bilateral and international dialogues.
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
LATEST NEWS
​State of Emergency Declared After Cargo Ship Destroys Baltimore Bridge
Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin said he was "deeply concerned for the safety and well-being of everyone affected by the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore."
Mar 26, 2024
This is a developing story... Please check back for possible updates...
A state of emergency was declared in Maryland early Tuesday morning after a large cargo ship slammed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore leading to its total collapse and sending a still unverified number of vehicles and people into the Patapsco River.
As the Baltimore Sunreports:
In a Tuesday morning news conference, just a few hours after the incident, Baltimore Fire Department Chief James Wallace said authorities are "still very much in an active search and rescue posture" noting they are searching for "upwards of seven individuals" and that sonar has detected the presence of vehicles in the water. There is no indication that the event was intentional, Wallace said.
"This is a tragedy that you could never imagine … It looked like something out of an action movie," Mayor Brandon Scott said.
The terrifying footage of the bridge's collapse—which CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez commented was "almost unbelievable" to watch—is circulating widely on news channels and social media:
This video is almost unbelievable. The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore literally collapsed this morning after it was struck by this large ship. pic.twitter.com/rYuy4U2r7H
— Omar Jimenez (@OmarJimenez) March 26, 2024
U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Tuesday that he had spoken with Mayor Scott and well as Maryland Governor Wes Moore and was helping to coordinate federal assistance.
"Rescue efforts remain underway and drivers in the Baltimore area should follow local responder guidance on detours and response," said Buttigieg.
Moore said in a statement he had declared a state of emergency and that work was underway to "quickly deploy federal resources" to the area.
"We are thankful for the brave men and women who are carrying out efforts to rescue those involved and pray for everyone's safety," said Moore. "We will remain in close contact with federal, state, and local entities that are carrying out rescue efforts as we continue to assess and respond to this tragedy."
Kevin Cartwright of the Baltimore Fire Department told CNN that the number of missing people may be higher than reported in other outlets. "Unfortunately," said Cartwright, "we understand that there were up to 20 individuals who may be in the Patapsco River right now as well as multiple vehicles."
Early reporting indicated that no crew members aboard the container ship, which sails under a Singapore flag, were injured or missing. A local harbor pilot was also said to be on board at the time of the crash.
"Deeply concerned for the safety and well-being of everyone affected by the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore," said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) following the accident. "I'm profoundly thankful to first responders on the scene and will track rescue efforts by local, state, and federal authorities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Grave 'Threat to Journalists' Remains as UK Court Delays Assange Extradition Ruling
"The Biden administration should take the opportunity to drop this dangerous case once and for all," said the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
Mar 26, 2024
The United Kingdom's High Court ruled Tuesday that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange cannot immediately be extradited to the United States and gave the Biden administration three weeks to provide "assurances" that the publisher's First Amendment rights will be protected and that he won't face the death penalty.
If the U.S. does not provide the requested assurances, Assange will be allowed to pursue a limited appeal of his extradition. Should the U.S. submit assurances by the April 16 deadline, a hearing will be held on May 20 to determine whether they are "satisfactory."
Assange, whose health has deteriorated badly during his five years in a high-security London jail, faces 17 counts of violating the Espionage Act and a possible 175-year prison sentence in the U.S. for publishing classified information—a common journalistic practice. WikiLeaks disclosures exposed grave U.S. and U.K. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Press freedom and human rights groups say the extradition of Assange to the U.S. would set a dangerous precedent and pose a dire threat to journalism everywhere.
Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said in a statement Tuesday that "we are glad Julian Assange is not getting extradited today."
"But this legal battle is far from over, and the threat to journalists and the news media from the Espionage Act charges against Assange remains," said Timm. "Assange's conviction in American courts would create a dangerous precedent that the U.S. government can and will use against reporters of all stripes who expose its wrongdoing or embarrass it. The Biden administration should take the opportunity to drop this dangerous case once and for all."
"It's long past time for the U.S. Justice Department to abandon the Espionage Act charges and resolve this case."
The U.S., which has been aggressively pursuing Assange's extradition for years, previously provided the U.K. government with assurances that Assange would not be held at a supermax prison that's notorious for its inhumane treatment of inmates.
Human rights groups have said such assurances from the U.S. government are "inherently unreliable" and should not be taken seriously by British authorities.
"While the U.S. has allegedly assured the U.K. that it will not violate Assange's rights, we know from past cases that such 'guarantees' are deeply flawed—and the diplomatic assurances so far in the Assange case are riddled with loopholes," noted Simon Crowther, legal adviser at Amnesty International.
"The U.S. must stop its politically motivated prosecution of Assange, which puts Assange and media freedom at risk worldwide," Crowther said Tuesday. "In trying to imprison him, the U.S. is sending an unambiguous warning to publishers and journalists everywhere that they too could be targeted and that it is not safe for them to receive and publish classified material—even if doing so is in the public interest."
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, echoed that message, saying in a statement that "prosecuting Assange for the publication of classified information would have profound implications for press freedom, because publishing classified information is what journalists and news organizations often need to do in order to expose wrongdoing by government."
"It's long past time for the U.S. Justice Department to abandon the Espionage Act charges and resolve this case," said Jaffer.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Rips 'Absurd' US Claim That Israel Is Not Violating International Law
"The State Department's position makes a mockery of U.S. law and assurances provided to Congress," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Mar 26, 2024
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday said the U.S. State Department's determination that Israel is not violating international law with its assault on the Gaza Strip is "absurd on its face," pointing to the mass death, destruction, and starvation that Israeli forces have inflicted on the territory's population over the past six months.
"Thirty-two thousand Palestinians in Gaza have been killed and almost 75,000 injured, two-thirds of whom are women and children," Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement. "Some 60% of the housing units have been damaged or destroyed, and almost all medical facilities have been made inoperable. Today, hundreds of thousands of Palestinian children are facing starvation because [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu won't let in sufficient humanitarian aid, while thousands of trucks are waiting to get into Gaza."
"The State Department's position," said Sanders, "makes a mockery of U.S. law and assurances provided to Congress."
The senator's statement came after State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller told reporters during a press briefing earlier Monday that the Biden administration has not found Israel "to be in violation of international humanitarian law, either when it comes to the conduct of the war or when it comes to the provision of humanitarian assistance."
Miller was responding to a question about assurances the administration has received from the Israeli government that its use of American weaponry has complied with international law and that it has permitted U.S. humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, where the entire population is facing acute hunger.
Under a new Biden administration policy known as NSM-20, recipients of American military aid are required to provide the U.S. government with "credible and reliable" written assurances that they are using such assistance "in a manner consistent with all applicable international and domestic law and policy."
Late last week, a group of U.S. senators—including Sanders—warned the Biden administration that deeming Israeli assurances credible would "be inconsistent with the letter and spirit of NSM-20" and "establish an unacceptable precedent" for the application of the policy "in other situations around the world."
"Until Biden is ready to impose real policy consequences on Netanyahu's government, the famine will continue."
It is a violation of U.S. law to continue sending military assistance to a country that is obstructing the delivery of American humanitarian aid. Last month, far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich blocked a U.S.-funded flour shipment from entering the Gaza Strip, and Israeli forces have repeatedly fired on convoys attempting to deliver aid to desperate Gazans.
Prominent human rights groups have been calling on the U.S. to impose an arms embargo on Israel for months, pointing to documented examples of the Israeli military using American weaponry to commit atrocities in Gaza.
But the Biden administration has refused to even apply concrete restrictions on American military aid. Over the weekend, U.S. President Joe Biden signed into law a measure that approves $3.8 billion in unconditional military assistance for the Israeli government and imposes a one-year ban on funding for the primary humanitarian aid organization in Gaza.
Jeremy Konyndyk, the president of Refugees International and a former USAID official, said Monday that Israel's assurances to the U.S. are "not remotely credible" and argued the Biden administration is undermining efforts to combat the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza by accepting the Israeli government's claims.
The U.S., he said, is "talking a big game about fighting the famine that its bombs and diplomatic cover have helped create." Resorting to "gimmicky" efforts such as airdrops and temporary ports while a U.S. ally obstructs humanitarian aid "is not how you fight a famine," Konyndyk argued.
"Fundamentally Biden must choose: between continuing to enable Netanyahu, or ending the famine. There's no way to split the difference," said Konyndyk. "Until Biden is ready to impose real policy consequences on Netanyahu's government, the famine will continue."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular