

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

In Washington, DC, for Enough, Colin Thomas-Jensen (English): +1-202-682-6136
Renewed combat in eastern
Democratic Republic of Congo has caused a drastic deterioration in the
humanitarian situation and immense suffering for civilians, the Congo
Advocacy Coalition, a group of 83 aid agencies and human rights groups,
said today. The coalition called for urgent action to improve
protection of civilians and an immediate increase in assistance to
vulnerable populations.
Since August 28, 2008, fighting has
resumed between the Congolese army and the forces of a renegade
general, Laurent Nkunda's National Congress for the Defense of the
People (CNDP), as well as other armed groups, breaking a fragile
ceasefire that had been in place since the Goma peace agreement was
signed on January 23.
An
estimated 100,000 civilians were forced to flee in the most recent
violence, including many who had been displaced by earlier waves of
fighting. According to witnesses, some civilians were trapped in combat
zones and were killed, wounded, raped or illegally detained by soldiers
of the Congolese army and combatants of other armed groups.
The
situation for civilians is desperate, and it threatens to deteriorate
further if fighting continues," said Rebecca Feeley of the ENOUGH
Project. "All the parties who signed the Goma peace agreement should
adhere strictly to their obligations, including to protect civilians
and respect international humanitarian and human rights law."
The
heavy fighting, the worst since the ceasefire was signed, started in
Rutshuru territory in North Kivu province before spreading to Masisi
territory and then to Kalehe territory in South Kivu. Since January 23,
the UN peacekeeping mission, MONUC, has recorded more than 250
ceasefire violations in both North and South Kivu. Each round of
fighting resulted in fresh displacement of civilians. The exact numbers
are difficult to estimate as those returning home are frequently forced
to flee again, but the UN believes that more than 1.2 million people
are now displaced in North and South Kivu.
During the recent
fighting, many civilians were wounded or killed in the crossfire while
there are reports that others, including children, were abducted and
forcibly recruited into armed service. In Kirotshe, a female worker at
the local health center was shot in the stomach on September 11 while
the CNDP and soldiers from the Congolese army fought for control of the
town. Another woman who fled from Nyamubingwa village said she left
behind three women who had been raped by armed combatants. Much of her
village was looted.
"Again and again, we are attacked, we flee,
our houses are pillaged, and then we are displaced with nothing," said
one man, whose house was looted by two different militia groups after
he fled from Nyamubingwa on September 10.
Roadblocks
erected by the Congolese army and militia groups prevented many
civilians from escaping to safety. In some cases, civilians fleeing
combat were only permitted to pass if they paid fines or handed over
their electoral cards (which serve as identification in Congo) and
other goods which they managed to carry from their homes.
Even
outside of combat zones, Congolese army soldiers, sent to the region in
increasing numbers, killed or injured civilians, often in the process
of pillaging their property. In Minova and neighboring villages of
South Kivu, for example, four civilians were killed by indiscriminate
fire from soldiers who were looting the area. In some areas, Congolese
army soldiers, as well as members of armed groups, are also involved in
illicit mining activities in the rich gold and tin mines across the
Kivu provinces, systematically extorting from civilians, in particular
through the imposition of illegal "taxes."
"Congolese army
officers and leaders of armed groups must take urgent steps to control
and discipline their troops," said Anneke Van Woudenberg, senior
researcher at Human Rights Watch. "They are responsible for keeping
their soldiers and combatants from killing, harassing and abusing the
population."
Aid workers have
suffered attacks that have forced them to suspend activities in North
Kivu and parts of South Kivu, leaving many displaced persons without
assistance. Soldiers and combatants from armed groups have looted
health centers and hijacked trucks delivering humanitarian assistance,
diverting them for military purposes. Crowds have stoned aid workers
and refused to allow them to pass roadblocks, confusing their role with
that of the UN peacekeeping force, MONUC. The crowds said they were
angry about what they saw as MONUC's failure to end the conflict and
protect the population.
"The signatories to the Goma peace
agreement agreed to protect civilians, remove roadblocks and allow
humanitarian access to populations in need, yet communities have
witnessed them doing precisely the opposite," said Juliette Prodhan,
country director for Oxfam GB in DRC. "All parties must live up to
their commitments and cease such attacks immediately."
Ten years
ago this month, the United Nations Guiding Principles on Internal
Displacement were first presented to the Human Rights Commission,
officially recognizing the basic rights of all internally displaced
persons, including protection against arbitrary displacement, the right
to protection and assistance while displaced, and guarantees for safe
return.
"In eastern Congo many of the basic rights of displaced
people have been flagrantly violated," said Ulrika Blom Mondlane from
the Norwegian Refugee Council. "The UN's Guiding Principles should be
more than just lofty aspirations. The people of eastern Congo
desperately need the protection and basic standards of assistance
detailed in this groundbreaking document to become a reality."
The
Congo Advocacy Coalition calls on the parties to the Goma peace
agreement, international donors, and international facilitators to the
peace process (United States, European Union, African Union, and the
UN) to redouble efforts to implement the Goma peace agreement and to
ensure that the UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement are
respected in one of the world's worst humanitarian emergencies.
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
“What happens if everyone who is Hispanic thinks they’re at risk?”
Communities in two red states that voted for President Donald Trump in the 2024 election have found themselves being unexpectedly hurt by his mass deportation agenda.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that construction trade groups in southern Texas have been sounding the alarm about aggressive immigration raids on work sites that are leading to serious delays of projects, which in turn are raising prices for buyers and lowering profit margins for sellers.
Things have gotten so severe, wrote the Journal, that materials suppliers have started laying off workers and one concrete company filed for bankruptcy due to a drop off in sales that it blamed on the immigration raids.
Mario Guerrero, chief executive of the South Texas Builders Association, said that the raids were "terrorizing job sites," and grinding economic activity to a halt.
"They are basically taking everyone in there working, whether they have proper documentation or not," said Guerrero, who acknowledged backing Trump in the 2024 election.
Luis Rodriguez, a manager at a tile supplier called Materiales El Valle, confirmed to the Journal that immigration enforcement agents have started targeting all immigrants in the area, whereas in the past they would only detain specific people for whom they had an arrest warrant.
With workers afraid to come to their jobs, Rodriguez said he's started trying to recruit employees at local community colleges, where he has offered classes on installing tiles.
So far, he said, "nobody is coming forward" to fill the gap left by immigrant workers.
A Monday report in the New York Times similarly found that Trump's mass deportation policies have rocked the tiny town of Wilder, Idaho, which is still reeling from a federal raid that took place last year at a race track frequented by the local immigrant community.
As a result, 75 immigrants living in Wilder—just over 4% of its total population—have so far been deported.
Wilder resident David Lincoln told the Times that the raid "nearly destroyed" the community, and he said that it could have devastating impact on the town's agricultural economy once planting season begins this year.
“What happens if everyone who is Hispanic thinks they’re at risk?” Lincoln told the Times. “There’s fear now that didn’t exist here before. I don’t know how you make that go away.”
Chris Gross, a farmer in the town, expressed shock that so many members of the community have simply vanished in such a short time.
"We rely on Hispanic labor,” said Gross. "Nobody thought something like this could happen here."
Federal officials targeted Wilder for a raid after they were sent a tip from an informant about an alleged illegal gambling ring being operated at the local race track.
However, immigration attorney Neal Dougherty told the Times that the focus of the raid was clearly on immigration rather than trying to bust up an unlawful gambling operation.
“The one thing everyone got asked was, ‘Where were you born?’” Dougherty explained. “Not, ‘Did you see gambling?’ Not, ‘Did you participate in gambling?’ Just, ‘Where were you born?’”
The reporting came after a self-professed three-time Trump voter, identified only as “John in New Mexico, Republican,” called in to C-SPAN last week to apologize for previously supporting the president, whom he called a "rotten, rotten man," citing his immigration operations and racist post about the Obamas.
Next American Era will be headed by Cheri Bustos, former chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee who has lobbied for powerful corporations.
Centrist Democrats led by Cheri Bustos, a corporate lobbyist who previously headed her party's campaign arm in the US House, are launching a policy and advocacy organization aimed at pressuring Democrats to embrace the kind of "pro-growth" deregulatory agenda associated with the so-called "abundance" movement.
The new organization, named Next American Era, was formed "with an eye toward 2028" as Democrats work to recover from their crushing defeat to President Donald Trump in the 2024 elections, Axios reported Sunday, noting that the group describes itself as a "hub for center-left policy and advocacy."
Bustos, whose lobbying client list in 2025 included OpenAI and Larry Ellison's Oracle, said Next American Era plans to "air issue-focused ads during the midterm elections and the 2028 presidential campaign, but it won't endorse candidates," Axios reported.
Bustos said the founders of Next American Era share "many of the same principles as the Abundance movement," a loose assortment of organizations and individuals—including large corporations and prominent billionaires—broadly supporting views expressed by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson in their 2025 book Abundance.
"She said cutting red tape, streamlining regulations, and supporting workforce training are among the top policy goals of her group, which is structured as a 501(c)(4) political nonprofit," Axios reported.
Lindsay Owens, executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative, a progressive think tank, called those proposed objectives "some of the weakest economic policies we've polled in the last 18 months."
"Not sure why you’d want to put ads out on these for candidates unless it’s an opp," Owens added.
pic.twitter.com/eWbdnyiNig
— Alex Jacquez (@AlexSJacquez) February 9, 2026
Abundance takes aim at what Klein and Thompson characterize as an overly burdensome regulatory approach that is purportedly hindering progress toward more affordable housing, public transportation systems, and a renewable energy revolution. Critics, such as antitrust advocate Zephyr Teachout, have criticized the so-called abundance agenda as far too ambiguous.
"I still can’t tell after reading Abundance whether Klein and Thompson are seeking something fairly small-bore and correct (we need zoning reform) or nontrivial and deeply regressive (we need deregulation) or whether there is room within abundance for anti-monopoly politics and a more full-throated unleashing of American potential," Teachout wrote in her review of the book for Washington Monthly.
Critics have also noted the enthusiasm with which corporations and billionaires have glommed onto the abundance narrative.
"The ambiguity of the abundance agenda’s policy proposals, strategic or otherwise, allows private interests to leverage 'abundance' as a Trojan Horse for their preferences," the Revolving Door Project observed last year. "The growing abundance movement has institutional support from fossil fuel and Big Tech affiliates, including the sprawling Koch network and crypto and AI industry players."
Axios observed that Next American Era is one of "several center-left groups" that "have popped up or expanded in the past 18 months, including the think tank Searchlight Institute, Majority Democrats, and WelcomePAC."
"Just one more billionaire front group. Just one more neoliberal policy shop," reporter and political analyst Austin Ahlman wrote mockingly on social media in response to the launch of Next American Era. "Just one more polling outfit cooking the numbers on behalf of corporate interests and we’ll win bro, I promise."
"The Religious Liberty Commission isn't about protecting religious liberty for all; it's about rejecting our nation's religious diversity and prioritizing one narrow set of conservative 'Judeo-Christian' beliefs," said one critic.
"Religious freedom for some is religious freedom for none."
That's what Rev. Paul Brandeis Raushenbush, president and CEO of Interfaith Alliance, said in a Monday statement as faith groups filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of New York over President Donald Trump's so-called Religious Liberty Commission.
Since Trump launched the commission last year, critics have warned that its true intent is to advance a Christian nationalist agenda. Brandeis Raushenbush, his alliance, Hindus for Human Rights, Muslims for Progressive Values, and the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund renewed that argument in the complaint, which names Trump, US Attorney General Pam Bondi, the Department of Justice, the commission, and its leader, Mary Margaret Bush, as defendants.
"The government has no right to pick and choose which religious beliefs to promote, and which to marginalize," said Brandeis Raushenbush. "The Trump administration has failed to uphold our country's proud religious freedom tradition, and we will hold them accountable. Today's lawsuit is our recommitment to fight for religious liberty for all with every tool available to us."
The complaint argues that "the composition and operations of the commission violate the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)," which Congress enacted in 1972 "to curb the executive branch's reliance on superfluous, secretive, and biased 'advisory committees.'" Under the law, "every advisory committee must meet public transparency requirements, be in the public interest, be fairly balanced among competing points of view, and be structured to avoid inappropriate influence by special interests."
"While this body is ostensibly designed to defend 'religious liberty for all Americans' and celebrate 'religious pluralism' it actually represents only a single 'Judeo-Christian' viewpoint," the complaint states. "It held its first three meetings at the Museum of the Bible and has closed its meetings with a Christian prayer 'in Jesus' name.'"
"Only one of its members is not Christian, and the Christian members do not represent the full diversity of the Christian faith," the filing continues. "The commission's meetings have repeatedly referenced the belief that the United States was founded as a 'Judeo-Christian nation' and the membership reflects that viewpoint. All members of the commission advocate for increased religiosity, and specifically their brand of 'Judeo-Christian' religiosity, in public life."
"The commission's members have promoted the primacy of a Judeo-Christian worldview in the public sphere, advocated for discrimination against minority groups under the guise of 'religious liberty,' and otherwise supported policies that threaten religious freedom for all those who do not conform to their particular worldview," the document details.
Ria Chakrabarty, senior policy director of Hindus for Human Rights, said Monday that "by stacking this Religious Liberty Commission with a narrow set of voices and hiding the commission's work from the public eye, the Trump administration is evading the transparency and balance that federal law requires."
"Hindus for Human Rights is proud to stand with our multifaith partners to defend a pluralistic democracy where Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, and nonreligious people all belong as equals," she added.
A commission that claims “religious liberty” while excluding Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs—and nonreligious Americans—isn’t protecting freedom. It’s narrowing it.We’re challenging this commission in court. democracyforward.org/news/press-r...
[image or embed]
— Hindus For Human Rights (@hfhr.bsky.social) February 9, 2026 at 10:21 AM
Ani Zonneveld, president and founder of Muslims for Progressive Values, noted that "as a Muslim American organization, we have seen firsthand how elevating a singular religion above others, especially in a country as religiously diverse as the United States, leads to the oppression and possible persecution of minority faiths."
The plaintiffs are represented by Democracy Forward, which has filed over 150 lawsuits against the Trump administration since the president returned to power last year, and the decades-old Americans United for Separation of Church and State—whose president and CEO, Rachel Laser, stressed that "the Religious Liberty Commission isn't about protecting religious liberty for all; it's about rejecting our nation's religious diversity and prioritizing one narrow set of conservative 'Judeo-Christian' beliefs."
Blasting the commission's public meetings as "a vivid example of this favoritism," Laser added that its "true purpose and operations can't be squared with America's constitutional promise of church-state separation."
Specifically, Laser's group and other advocates of church-state separation have long pointed to the establishment clause of the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which bars government from making any "law respecting an establishment of religion."
"Since the nation's founding, the values of religious liberty and pluralism have been central to the American identity. These values are now under accelerated attack," declared Perryman, who's also on the Interfaith Alliance board. "The fatally flawed way this commission was assembled makes clear that the outcome isn't just un-American, it's against the law."