

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The Los Angeles Times office in El Segundo, California was photographed on November 10, 2020.
In a pioneering move for a major U.S. newspaper, the Los Angeles Times' editorial board on Thursday joined growing global demands for a cease-fire in Israel's war on the Gaza Strip.
"It has become impossible to distinguish between Israel's decidedly nonsurgical operation against Hamas militants in Gaza and the indiscriminate killing of Palestinian civilians," the editorial board wrote. "When so-called humanitarian pauses in the bombardment and ground operations are too brief to realistically permit innocents to flee, or when there is no place for noncombatants to go that is not also in the line of fire, such pauses are so deficient as to be meaningless."
"It is time for a cease-fire," the board declared, urging U.S. President Joe Biden to pressure Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop attacks on the besieged enclave that have killed more than 11,400 Palestinians, including at least 4,710 children, and displaced over 1.5 million. "The world cannot stand by to witness more slaughter of civilians."
"Remaining mindful of America's mistakes, it is incumbent upon the Biden administration now to avoid complicity with Israel's."
The editorial stresses that "no one should harbor illusions about Hamas, the radical militant organization that serves as the de facto Gaza government and began the current hostilities" with the October 7 attack on Israel in which about 1,200 people were killed and around 240 more were taken hostage. It also warns that "the trauma inflicted on Palestinian survivors only increases the recruiting ability of Israel's enemies, whether they be Hamas, Hezbollah, or any successors bent on destruction of Israel."
Since Netanyahu declared what he has called a "war to the end," Biden has expressed his "unwavering" support and asked Congress for an extra $14.3 billion in military assistance, on top of the nearly $4 billion that Israel already gets annually. Rather than a cease-fire, Biden—like many on Capitol Hill—has advocated for humanitarian pauses.
In a departure from previous action, the United States on Wednesday night declined to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution urging humanitarian pauses in Gaza—a development that Human Rights Watch U.N. director Louis Charbonneau said "should be a wake-up call to Israeli authorities that global concern, even among its allies, is strong."
While vising Israel after Hamas' attack last month, Biden urged the nation to learn from U.S. mistakes post-9/11. As the LA Times editorial summarizes: "The statement was a clear message to Israel: Don't blunder as we did. Don't squander the goodwill of the rest of the world by killing civilians. Don't mimic your enemy's cruelty. Don't leave a power vacuum that can be filled by other, even more potent enemies. Have an exit strategy."
"Remaining mindful of America's mistakes, it is incumbent upon the Biden administration now to avoid complicity with Israel's," the board argued. "We are past the time to excuse the horror in Gaza. Biden has to press Netanyahu hard to stop the indiscriminate killing. That starts with a call for a cease-fire."
While the LA Times' call does follow the editorial board of the U.K.-based Financial Times advocating for a humanitarian cease-fire on October 30, several journalists and other observers noted that this appeared to be the first major U.S. newspaper to join people around the world in making the demand—including with massive demonstrations and civil disobedience.
Welcoming the "strong" editorial, University of Pennsylvania professor Victor Pickard said Thursday, "Let's hope others follow."
The Los Angeles chapter of Democratic Socialists of America similarly declared that "it's time for Los Angeles congressional representatives to join the call."
Investigative journalist Kamala Kelkar highlighted that the editorial's publication coincided with Semafor revealing that the LA Times "is prohibiting staff from covering the Gaza war for at least three months if they signed a strongly worded open letter criticizing Israel's military operations in the region."
Semafor's Max Tani reported that the newspaper "did not respond to a request for comment. But earlier this week, LA Times top editor Kevin Merida reminded staff of the company's ethics and fairness policy, which stated that a 'fair-minded reader of the Times news coverage should not be able to discern the private opinions of those who contributed to that coverage, or to infer that the organization is promoting any agenda."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a pioneering move for a major U.S. newspaper, the Los Angeles Times' editorial board on Thursday joined growing global demands for a cease-fire in Israel's war on the Gaza Strip.
"It has become impossible to distinguish between Israel's decidedly nonsurgical operation against Hamas militants in Gaza and the indiscriminate killing of Palestinian civilians," the editorial board wrote. "When so-called humanitarian pauses in the bombardment and ground operations are too brief to realistically permit innocents to flee, or when there is no place for noncombatants to go that is not also in the line of fire, such pauses are so deficient as to be meaningless."
"It is time for a cease-fire," the board declared, urging U.S. President Joe Biden to pressure Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop attacks on the besieged enclave that have killed more than 11,400 Palestinians, including at least 4,710 children, and displaced over 1.5 million. "The world cannot stand by to witness more slaughter of civilians."
"Remaining mindful of America's mistakes, it is incumbent upon the Biden administration now to avoid complicity with Israel's."
The editorial stresses that "no one should harbor illusions about Hamas, the radical militant organization that serves as the de facto Gaza government and began the current hostilities" with the October 7 attack on Israel in which about 1,200 people were killed and around 240 more were taken hostage. It also warns that "the trauma inflicted on Palestinian survivors only increases the recruiting ability of Israel's enemies, whether they be Hamas, Hezbollah, or any successors bent on destruction of Israel."
Since Netanyahu declared what he has called a "war to the end," Biden has expressed his "unwavering" support and asked Congress for an extra $14.3 billion in military assistance, on top of the nearly $4 billion that Israel already gets annually. Rather than a cease-fire, Biden—like many on Capitol Hill—has advocated for humanitarian pauses.
In a departure from previous action, the United States on Wednesday night declined to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution urging humanitarian pauses in Gaza—a development that Human Rights Watch U.N. director Louis Charbonneau said "should be a wake-up call to Israeli authorities that global concern, even among its allies, is strong."
While vising Israel after Hamas' attack last month, Biden urged the nation to learn from U.S. mistakes post-9/11. As the LA Times editorial summarizes: "The statement was a clear message to Israel: Don't blunder as we did. Don't squander the goodwill of the rest of the world by killing civilians. Don't mimic your enemy's cruelty. Don't leave a power vacuum that can be filled by other, even more potent enemies. Have an exit strategy."
"Remaining mindful of America's mistakes, it is incumbent upon the Biden administration now to avoid complicity with Israel's," the board argued. "We are past the time to excuse the horror in Gaza. Biden has to press Netanyahu hard to stop the indiscriminate killing. That starts with a call for a cease-fire."
While the LA Times' call does follow the editorial board of the U.K.-based Financial Times advocating for a humanitarian cease-fire on October 30, several journalists and other observers noted that this appeared to be the first major U.S. newspaper to join people around the world in making the demand—including with massive demonstrations and civil disobedience.
Welcoming the "strong" editorial, University of Pennsylvania professor Victor Pickard said Thursday, "Let's hope others follow."
The Los Angeles chapter of Democratic Socialists of America similarly declared that "it's time for Los Angeles congressional representatives to join the call."
Investigative journalist Kamala Kelkar highlighted that the editorial's publication coincided with Semafor revealing that the LA Times "is prohibiting staff from covering the Gaza war for at least three months if they signed a strongly worded open letter criticizing Israel's military operations in the region."
Semafor's Max Tani reported that the newspaper "did not respond to a request for comment. But earlier this week, LA Times top editor Kevin Merida reminded staff of the company's ethics and fairness policy, which stated that a 'fair-minded reader of the Times news coverage should not be able to discern the private opinions of those who contributed to that coverage, or to infer that the organization is promoting any agenda."
In a pioneering move for a major U.S. newspaper, the Los Angeles Times' editorial board on Thursday joined growing global demands for a cease-fire in Israel's war on the Gaza Strip.
"It has become impossible to distinguish between Israel's decidedly nonsurgical operation against Hamas militants in Gaza and the indiscriminate killing of Palestinian civilians," the editorial board wrote. "When so-called humanitarian pauses in the bombardment and ground operations are too brief to realistically permit innocents to flee, or when there is no place for noncombatants to go that is not also in the line of fire, such pauses are so deficient as to be meaningless."
"It is time for a cease-fire," the board declared, urging U.S. President Joe Biden to pressure Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop attacks on the besieged enclave that have killed more than 11,400 Palestinians, including at least 4,710 children, and displaced over 1.5 million. "The world cannot stand by to witness more slaughter of civilians."
"Remaining mindful of America's mistakes, it is incumbent upon the Biden administration now to avoid complicity with Israel's."
The editorial stresses that "no one should harbor illusions about Hamas, the radical militant organization that serves as the de facto Gaza government and began the current hostilities" with the October 7 attack on Israel in which about 1,200 people were killed and around 240 more were taken hostage. It also warns that "the trauma inflicted on Palestinian survivors only increases the recruiting ability of Israel's enemies, whether they be Hamas, Hezbollah, or any successors bent on destruction of Israel."
Since Netanyahu declared what he has called a "war to the end," Biden has expressed his "unwavering" support and asked Congress for an extra $14.3 billion in military assistance, on top of the nearly $4 billion that Israel already gets annually. Rather than a cease-fire, Biden—like many on Capitol Hill—has advocated for humanitarian pauses.
In a departure from previous action, the United States on Wednesday night declined to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution urging humanitarian pauses in Gaza—a development that Human Rights Watch U.N. director Louis Charbonneau said "should be a wake-up call to Israeli authorities that global concern, even among its allies, is strong."
While vising Israel after Hamas' attack last month, Biden urged the nation to learn from U.S. mistakes post-9/11. As the LA Times editorial summarizes: "The statement was a clear message to Israel: Don't blunder as we did. Don't squander the goodwill of the rest of the world by killing civilians. Don't mimic your enemy's cruelty. Don't leave a power vacuum that can be filled by other, even more potent enemies. Have an exit strategy."
"Remaining mindful of America's mistakes, it is incumbent upon the Biden administration now to avoid complicity with Israel's," the board argued. "We are past the time to excuse the horror in Gaza. Biden has to press Netanyahu hard to stop the indiscriminate killing. That starts with a call for a cease-fire."
While the LA Times' call does follow the editorial board of the U.K.-based Financial Times advocating for a humanitarian cease-fire on October 30, several journalists and other observers noted that this appeared to be the first major U.S. newspaper to join people around the world in making the demand—including with massive demonstrations and civil disobedience.
Welcoming the "strong" editorial, University of Pennsylvania professor Victor Pickard said Thursday, "Let's hope others follow."
The Los Angeles chapter of Democratic Socialists of America similarly declared that "it's time for Los Angeles congressional representatives to join the call."
Investigative journalist Kamala Kelkar highlighted that the editorial's publication coincided with Semafor revealing that the LA Times "is prohibiting staff from covering the Gaza war for at least three months if they signed a strongly worded open letter criticizing Israel's military operations in the region."
Semafor's Max Tani reported that the newspaper "did not respond to a request for comment. But earlier this week, LA Times top editor Kevin Merida reminded staff of the company's ethics and fairness policy, which stated that a 'fair-minded reader of the Times news coverage should not be able to discern the private opinions of those who contributed to that coverage, or to infer that the organization is promoting any agenda."