David Shipley is seen at a newsroom gathering at the headquarters of The Washington Post in Washington, D.C. on May 6, 2024.
WaPo Opinion Editor Resigns After Bezos Orders Focus on Defending 'Free Markets' and Libertarianism
"Bezos no longer wants to own an independent news organization," wrote one columnist. "He wants a megaphone and a political tool that will benefit his own commercial interests."
Four months after Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos pulled an endorsement of former Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential race, with editors saying they wanted voters to "make up their own minds" about elections, the billionaire media and tech mogul announced Wednesday that the paper's opinion page would begin promoting a specific worldview—one that advocates for "personal liberties and free markets."
The announcement of the opinion page's new official angle was accompanied by the news, shared in a message from Bezos to the Post staff, that opinion editor David Shipley was resigning.
After weeks of discussions between Bezos, Shipley, and Post chief executive Will Lewis, the paper's owner told Shipley that "if the answer wasn't 'hell yes,' then it had to be 'no,'" Bezos wrote in his note to staffers.
The newspaper's opinion section has published views that represent both the political right and left under Shipley's leadership, though the editor refused to publish a cartoon that showed Bezos bowing to President Donald Trump last month—a move that led cartoonist Ann Telnaes to resign.
Bezos said Wednesday that going forward, viewpoints that oppose libertarian ideals and what the owner views as free markets "will be left to be published by others."
Lewis claimed in a note to staff members that the change to the opinion section is not meant to signal that the newspaper is "siding with any political party"—but with Bezos having recently attended Trump's inauguration and his company Amazon having donated $1 million to Trump, former Post columnist Margaret Sullivan wrote that Bezos' move is "all about getting on board with" the president.
"It's unclear what will happen to such excellent left-of-center columnists as Catherine Rampell, Eugene Robinson, and EJ Dionne," wrote Sullivan at The Guardian. "And it's unclear to what extent this ruling eventually will affect the paper's hard-news coverage, which so far has been unbowed in covering the chaotic rollout of the new Trump administration."
"What is clear is that Bezos no longer wants to own an independent news organization. He wants a megaphone and a political tool that will benefit his own commercial interests," she added.
At least two reporters for the venerated newspaper said that if Bezos' personal views begin interfering with journalists' ability to report on the Trump administration effectively, they plan to leave the Post.
My colleagues and I have been working to break news + write stories holding powerful people accountable. These are the top stories on our homepage right now, one of which I worked on. Our newsroom work is continuing. No one has ever told me what to write. If that changes, I’d speak out and leave.
[image or embed]
— Dan Diamond (@ddiamond.bsky.social) February 26, 2025 at 12:06 PM
Chief economics reporter Jeff Stein called Bezos' directive a "massive encroachment" into the opinion section.
"I still have not felt encroachment on my journalism on the news side of coverage, but if Bezos tries interfering with the news side I will be quitting immediately and letting you know," Stein said on the social media platform X.
Media critic Jeff Cohen told Common Dreams that Bezos' decision represents "the blatant and public intervention of a media owner into news content"—as well as "sheer hypocrisy" by a billionaire who purports to support "free markets."
"Amazon, Whole Foods, and other Bezos companies receive many billions in subsidies and contracts from government—federal, state, and local," Cohen pointed out.
While Bezos canceled plans to endorse Harris "so the paper would not take sides on the issues," said Matthew Chapman of Raw Story, "now the explicit rule is: The paper must take sides in favor of policy that makes Jeff Bezos rich."
"Bezos is not even hiding it anymore," said Chapman. "He wants The Washington Post to be a propaganda arm for his own personal opinions. Something he swore up and down when he bought the paper he would not be doing."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Four months after Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos pulled an endorsement of former Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential race, with editors saying they wanted voters to "make up their own minds" about elections, the billionaire media and tech mogul announced Wednesday that the paper's opinion page would begin promoting a specific worldview—one that advocates for "personal liberties and free markets."
The announcement of the opinion page's new official angle was accompanied by the news, shared in a message from Bezos to the Post staff, that opinion editor David Shipley was resigning.
After weeks of discussions between Bezos, Shipley, and Post chief executive Will Lewis, the paper's owner told Shipley that "if the answer wasn't 'hell yes,' then it had to be 'no,'" Bezos wrote in his note to staffers.
The newspaper's opinion section has published views that represent both the political right and left under Shipley's leadership, though the editor refused to publish a cartoon that showed Bezos bowing to President Donald Trump last month—a move that led cartoonist Ann Telnaes to resign.
Bezos said Wednesday that going forward, viewpoints that oppose libertarian ideals and what the owner views as free markets "will be left to be published by others."
Lewis claimed in a note to staff members that the change to the opinion section is not meant to signal that the newspaper is "siding with any political party"—but with Bezos having recently attended Trump's inauguration and his company Amazon having donated $1 million to Trump, former Post columnist Margaret Sullivan wrote that Bezos' move is "all about getting on board with" the president.
"It's unclear what will happen to such excellent left-of-center columnists as Catherine Rampell, Eugene Robinson, and EJ Dionne," wrote Sullivan at The Guardian. "And it's unclear to what extent this ruling eventually will affect the paper's hard-news coverage, which so far has been unbowed in covering the chaotic rollout of the new Trump administration."
"What is clear is that Bezos no longer wants to own an independent news organization. He wants a megaphone and a political tool that will benefit his own commercial interests," she added.
At least two reporters for the venerated newspaper said that if Bezos' personal views begin interfering with journalists' ability to report on the Trump administration effectively, they plan to leave the Post.
My colleagues and I have been working to break news + write stories holding powerful people accountable. These are the top stories on our homepage right now, one of which I worked on. Our newsroom work is continuing. No one has ever told me what to write. If that changes, I’d speak out and leave.
[image or embed]
— Dan Diamond (@ddiamond.bsky.social) February 26, 2025 at 12:06 PM
Chief economics reporter Jeff Stein called Bezos' directive a "massive encroachment" into the opinion section.
"I still have not felt encroachment on my journalism on the news side of coverage, but if Bezos tries interfering with the news side I will be quitting immediately and letting you know," Stein said on the social media platform X.
Media critic Jeff Cohen told Common Dreams that Bezos' decision represents "the blatant and public intervention of a media owner into news content"—as well as "sheer hypocrisy" by a billionaire who purports to support "free markets."
"Amazon, Whole Foods, and other Bezos companies receive many billions in subsidies and contracts from government—federal, state, and local," Cohen pointed out.
While Bezos canceled plans to endorse Harris "so the paper would not take sides on the issues," said Matthew Chapman of Raw Story, "now the explicit rule is: The paper must take sides in favor of policy that makes Jeff Bezos rich."
"Bezos is not even hiding it anymore," said Chapman. "He wants The Washington Post to be a propaganda arm for his own personal opinions. Something he swore up and down when he bought the paper he would not be doing."
- 'This Is Cowardice': Billionaire Owner Jeff Bezos Stops Washington Post From Endorsing Harris ›
- Here's the 'Fire Elon Musk' Ad the Washington Post Refuses to Run ›
- Renowned Washington Post Cartoonist Quits After Refusal to Publish Critique of Jeff Bezos ›
- Amazon Won't Display Tariff Costs After Trump Whines to Bezos | Common Dreams ›
- 'Democracy Dies in Oligarchy,' Says Sanders of Mass Layoffs at Washington Post | Common Dreams ›
Four months after Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos pulled an endorsement of former Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential race, with editors saying they wanted voters to "make up their own minds" about elections, the billionaire media and tech mogul announced Wednesday that the paper's opinion page would begin promoting a specific worldview—one that advocates for "personal liberties and free markets."
The announcement of the opinion page's new official angle was accompanied by the news, shared in a message from Bezos to the Post staff, that opinion editor David Shipley was resigning.
After weeks of discussions between Bezos, Shipley, and Post chief executive Will Lewis, the paper's owner told Shipley that "if the answer wasn't 'hell yes,' then it had to be 'no,'" Bezos wrote in his note to staffers.
The newspaper's opinion section has published views that represent both the political right and left under Shipley's leadership, though the editor refused to publish a cartoon that showed Bezos bowing to President Donald Trump last month—a move that led cartoonist Ann Telnaes to resign.
Bezos said Wednesday that going forward, viewpoints that oppose libertarian ideals and what the owner views as free markets "will be left to be published by others."
Lewis claimed in a note to staff members that the change to the opinion section is not meant to signal that the newspaper is "siding with any political party"—but with Bezos having recently attended Trump's inauguration and his company Amazon having donated $1 million to Trump, former Post columnist Margaret Sullivan wrote that Bezos' move is "all about getting on board with" the president.
"It's unclear what will happen to such excellent left-of-center columnists as Catherine Rampell, Eugene Robinson, and EJ Dionne," wrote Sullivan at The Guardian. "And it's unclear to what extent this ruling eventually will affect the paper's hard-news coverage, which so far has been unbowed in covering the chaotic rollout of the new Trump administration."
"What is clear is that Bezos no longer wants to own an independent news organization. He wants a megaphone and a political tool that will benefit his own commercial interests," she added.
At least two reporters for the venerated newspaper said that if Bezos' personal views begin interfering with journalists' ability to report on the Trump administration effectively, they plan to leave the Post.
My colleagues and I have been working to break news + write stories holding powerful people accountable. These are the top stories on our homepage right now, one of which I worked on. Our newsroom work is continuing. No one has ever told me what to write. If that changes, I’d speak out and leave.
[image or embed]
— Dan Diamond (@ddiamond.bsky.social) February 26, 2025 at 12:06 PM
Chief economics reporter Jeff Stein called Bezos' directive a "massive encroachment" into the opinion section.
"I still have not felt encroachment on my journalism on the news side of coverage, but if Bezos tries interfering with the news side I will be quitting immediately and letting you know," Stein said on the social media platform X.
Media critic Jeff Cohen told Common Dreams that Bezos' decision represents "the blatant and public intervention of a media owner into news content"—as well as "sheer hypocrisy" by a billionaire who purports to support "free markets."
"Amazon, Whole Foods, and other Bezos companies receive many billions in subsidies and contracts from government—federal, state, and local," Cohen pointed out.
While Bezos canceled plans to endorse Harris "so the paper would not take sides on the issues," said Matthew Chapman of Raw Story, "now the explicit rule is: The paper must take sides in favor of policy that makes Jeff Bezos rich."
"Bezos is not even hiding it anymore," said Chapman. "He wants The Washington Post to be a propaganda arm for his own personal opinions. Something he swore up and down when he bought the paper he would not be doing."
- 'This Is Cowardice': Billionaire Owner Jeff Bezos Stops Washington Post From Endorsing Harris ›
- Here's the 'Fire Elon Musk' Ad the Washington Post Refuses to Run ›
- Renowned Washington Post Cartoonist Quits After Refusal to Publish Critique of Jeff Bezos ›
- Amazon Won't Display Tariff Costs After Trump Whines to Bezos | Common Dreams ›
- 'Democracy Dies in Oligarchy,' Says Sanders of Mass Layoffs at Washington Post | Common Dreams ›