

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers his inaugural address after being sworn in as the 47th president of the United States in the Rotunda of the US Capitol on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC.
"President Trump is dismantling checks on his power and paving the way for widespread corruption," Senator Elizabeth Warren warned.
U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly fired at least a dozen inspectors general at various federal agencies late Friday, according to multiple news outlets, in a move that may run afoul of federal law.
Outlets are listing different numbers for how many inspectors general—independent government watchdogs who conduct objective audits and seek to prevent abuse and waste—were terminated.
The New York Times reported at least 12 inspectors general were dismissed, citing "three people with knowledge of the matter"—but noted that as of Saturday morning, there were competing lists circulating about how many inspector generals had been notified of their termination. Other outlets, like Reuters and The Washington Post, put the count higher, citing unnamed sources.
Also according to the Times, "on Saturday morning, a White House official confirmed that 'some' inspectors general had been dismissed, but did not respond to a request for a list of those who had been terminated."
In response to the news, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) wrote on X: "It's a purge of independent watchdogs in the middle of the night. Inspectors general are charged with rooting out government waste, fraud, abuse, and preventing misconduct. President Trump is dismantling checks on his power and paving the way for widespread corruption."
The firings appear to violate federal law, which stipulates that the president must give Congress 30 days advance notice of intent to remove an inspector general, along with the reason for the removal, according to both the Times and the Post.
"It's a widespread massacre," one of the fired inspectors general told the Post. "Whoever Trump puts in now will be viewed as loyalists, and that undermines the entire system."
Hannibal Ware, chairperson of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, cast doubt on the legality of the firings in a Friday letter sent to Sergio Gor, director of the Presidential Personnel Office.
"I recommend that you reach out to White House Counsel to discuss your intended course of action. At this point, we do not believe the actions taken are legally sufficient to dismiss presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed inspectors general," Ware wrote in the letter, which was reported on by multiple outlets.
"White House will likely argue this is unconstitutional, but this will be a fight," wrote Kyle Cheney, a reporter at Politico, on X.
According to the Post, inspectors general who were ousted oversaw some of the federal government's largest agencies, including: The Defense Department, the State Department, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and others.
The news also engendered criticism from the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Jon Golinger, Public Citizen's democracy advocate, called the administration's actions "a watchdog wipeout cooked up by corporate lobbyists that knock down the walls that keep corruption from running rampant."
"Replacing nonpartisan, independent inspectors general with loyal political cronies opens the door to more government fraud, waste, and abuse," he said in a statement Saturday.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly fired at least a dozen inspectors general at various federal agencies late Friday, according to multiple news outlets, in a move that may run afoul of federal law.
Outlets are listing different numbers for how many inspectors general—independent government watchdogs who conduct objective audits and seek to prevent abuse and waste—were terminated.
The New York Times reported at least 12 inspectors general were dismissed, citing "three people with knowledge of the matter"—but noted that as of Saturday morning, there were competing lists circulating about how many inspector generals had been notified of their termination. Other outlets, like Reuters and The Washington Post, put the count higher, citing unnamed sources.
Also according to the Times, "on Saturday morning, a White House official confirmed that 'some' inspectors general had been dismissed, but did not respond to a request for a list of those who had been terminated."
In response to the news, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) wrote on X: "It's a purge of independent watchdogs in the middle of the night. Inspectors general are charged with rooting out government waste, fraud, abuse, and preventing misconduct. President Trump is dismantling checks on his power and paving the way for widespread corruption."
The firings appear to violate federal law, which stipulates that the president must give Congress 30 days advance notice of intent to remove an inspector general, along with the reason for the removal, according to both the Times and the Post.
"It's a widespread massacre," one of the fired inspectors general told the Post. "Whoever Trump puts in now will be viewed as loyalists, and that undermines the entire system."
Hannibal Ware, chairperson of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, cast doubt on the legality of the firings in a Friday letter sent to Sergio Gor, director of the Presidential Personnel Office.
"I recommend that you reach out to White House Counsel to discuss your intended course of action. At this point, we do not believe the actions taken are legally sufficient to dismiss presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed inspectors general," Ware wrote in the letter, which was reported on by multiple outlets.
"White House will likely argue this is unconstitutional, but this will be a fight," wrote Kyle Cheney, a reporter at Politico, on X.
According to the Post, inspectors general who were ousted oversaw some of the federal government's largest agencies, including: The Defense Department, the State Department, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and others.
The news also engendered criticism from the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Jon Golinger, Public Citizen's democracy advocate, called the administration's actions "a watchdog wipeout cooked up by corporate lobbyists that knock down the walls that keep corruption from running rampant."
"Replacing nonpartisan, independent inspectors general with loyal political cronies opens the door to more government fraud, waste, and abuse," he said in a statement Saturday.
U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly fired at least a dozen inspectors general at various federal agencies late Friday, according to multiple news outlets, in a move that may run afoul of federal law.
Outlets are listing different numbers for how many inspectors general—independent government watchdogs who conduct objective audits and seek to prevent abuse and waste—were terminated.
The New York Times reported at least 12 inspectors general were dismissed, citing "three people with knowledge of the matter"—but noted that as of Saturday morning, there were competing lists circulating about how many inspector generals had been notified of their termination. Other outlets, like Reuters and The Washington Post, put the count higher, citing unnamed sources.
Also according to the Times, "on Saturday morning, a White House official confirmed that 'some' inspectors general had been dismissed, but did not respond to a request for a list of those who had been terminated."
In response to the news, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) wrote on X: "It's a purge of independent watchdogs in the middle of the night. Inspectors general are charged with rooting out government waste, fraud, abuse, and preventing misconduct. President Trump is dismantling checks on his power and paving the way for widespread corruption."
The firings appear to violate federal law, which stipulates that the president must give Congress 30 days advance notice of intent to remove an inspector general, along with the reason for the removal, according to both the Times and the Post.
"It's a widespread massacre," one of the fired inspectors general told the Post. "Whoever Trump puts in now will be viewed as loyalists, and that undermines the entire system."
Hannibal Ware, chairperson of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, cast doubt on the legality of the firings in a Friday letter sent to Sergio Gor, director of the Presidential Personnel Office.
"I recommend that you reach out to White House Counsel to discuss your intended course of action. At this point, we do not believe the actions taken are legally sufficient to dismiss presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed inspectors general," Ware wrote in the letter, which was reported on by multiple outlets.
"White House will likely argue this is unconstitutional, but this will be a fight," wrote Kyle Cheney, a reporter at Politico, on X.
According to the Post, inspectors general who were ousted oversaw some of the federal government's largest agencies, including: The Defense Department, the State Department, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and others.
The news also engendered criticism from the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Jon Golinger, Public Citizen's democracy advocate, called the administration's actions "a watchdog wipeout cooked up by corporate lobbyists that knock down the walls that keep corruption from running rampant."
"Replacing nonpartisan, independent inspectors general with loyal political cronies opens the door to more government fraud, waste, and abuse," he said in a statement Saturday.