

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

An abortion rights activist holds a placard saying, "Abortion bans replace freedom with force," in Bloomington, Indiana on September 15, 2022.
"Once again, Republicans are proving how dangerously out of touch they are with mainstream America," said Sen. Chuck Schumer.
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Wednesday said two pro-forced pregnancy proposals put forward by House Republicans would be "doomed" in the upper chamber of Congress, as advocates warned that even though the bills stand no chance currently of being passed into law, the misinformation contained in the legislation will still endanger pregnant people and providers.
The Republicans introduced one resolution to condemn acts of violence against "crisis pregnancy centers" and other facilities where pregnant people are pressured out of seeking abortion care—but not abortion clinics, where dozens of bombings, acts of arson, and assaults have taken place since 1977, according to the National Abortion Federation.
"The GOP is using these dangerous lies to try to pass anti-choice bills that harm pregnant people and their families."
Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-Fla.) said on social media Wednesday that he was "heading to the House floor right now to debate an anti-choice bill that fails to condemn violence against abortion clinics, providers, staff, and patients."
To counter the proposed resolution, Reps. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) and Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) introduced a resolution condemning all acts of political violence, warning that singling out attacks on anti-abortion facilities sends "a very dangerous signal to extremists across this country" and "will only embolden those who are spreading the hate-filled rhetoric that's tearing this country apart."
The second Republican proposal will also endanger medical providers and pregnant people across the U.S., said advocates as they spoke out against the so-called "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act," which was first introduced in early 2019.
The proposal would threaten medical providers with up to five years in prison if they are accused of failing to try to save infants who continue to live outside the womb after an abortion that takes place later in pregnancy—which make up roughly 1% of abortions in the U.S. and are often administered in cases involving fetal anomalies and endangerment of the pregnant patient's life.
When the bill was first introduced on the House floor in 2019, Robin Marty, author of The New Handbook for a Post-Roe America, wrote that Republicans' rhetoric regarding the proposal made it seem "like the most serious threat facing the nation is a rampage of violent and unethical medical professionals pressuring pregnant people into post-viability abortions, mismanaging the process, and then murdering those now-delivered infants with the express permission of the new parents."
"The 'Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act' isn't just an unnecessary and burdensome answer to a fictitious scenario that has no bearing in the way abortion has been provided for the last three decades," she added. "It's a political tool meant to keep the Republican Party in power after the 2020 elections."
Now, said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Republicans' goal in introducing the bill is to begin "a march towards criminalizing abortion care, a nationwide ban."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, denounced the bill as "absurd," noting, "it is obviously ALREADY illegal to kill a baby."
"For years the anti-choice movement has spread disinformation—including wild lies about abortion—as part of their campaign to curtail and ultimately end access," said NARAL Pro-Choice America. "Now, the GOP is using these dangerous lies to try to pass anti-choice bills that harm pregnant people and their families."
The GOP proposed the legislation less than two months after the midterm elections, in which Americans across the country resoundingly rejected attacks on abortion rights. In Montana, more than 52% of voters rejected a ballot measure similar to the federal "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act."
"Just months after a historically disappointing midterm election, the MAGA Republican-controlled House is putting on full display their truly extreme views on women's health with legislation that does not have the support of the American people," Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. "Once again, Republicans are proving how dangerously out of touch they are with mainstream America."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Wednesday said two pro-forced pregnancy proposals put forward by House Republicans would be "doomed" in the upper chamber of Congress, as advocates warned that even though the bills stand no chance currently of being passed into law, the misinformation contained in the legislation will still endanger pregnant people and providers.
The Republicans introduced one resolution to condemn acts of violence against "crisis pregnancy centers" and other facilities where pregnant people are pressured out of seeking abortion care—but not abortion clinics, where dozens of bombings, acts of arson, and assaults have taken place since 1977, according to the National Abortion Federation.
"The GOP is using these dangerous lies to try to pass anti-choice bills that harm pregnant people and their families."
Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-Fla.) said on social media Wednesday that he was "heading to the House floor right now to debate an anti-choice bill that fails to condemn violence against abortion clinics, providers, staff, and patients."
To counter the proposed resolution, Reps. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) and Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) introduced a resolution condemning all acts of political violence, warning that singling out attacks on anti-abortion facilities sends "a very dangerous signal to extremists across this country" and "will only embolden those who are spreading the hate-filled rhetoric that's tearing this country apart."
The second Republican proposal will also endanger medical providers and pregnant people across the U.S., said advocates as they spoke out against the so-called "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act," which was first introduced in early 2019.
The proposal would threaten medical providers with up to five years in prison if they are accused of failing to try to save infants who continue to live outside the womb after an abortion that takes place later in pregnancy—which make up roughly 1% of abortions in the U.S. and are often administered in cases involving fetal anomalies and endangerment of the pregnant patient's life.
When the bill was first introduced on the House floor in 2019, Robin Marty, author of The New Handbook for a Post-Roe America, wrote that Republicans' rhetoric regarding the proposal made it seem "like the most serious threat facing the nation is a rampage of violent and unethical medical professionals pressuring pregnant people into post-viability abortions, mismanaging the process, and then murdering those now-delivered infants with the express permission of the new parents."
"The 'Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act' isn't just an unnecessary and burdensome answer to a fictitious scenario that has no bearing in the way abortion has been provided for the last three decades," she added. "It's a political tool meant to keep the Republican Party in power after the 2020 elections."
Now, said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Republicans' goal in introducing the bill is to begin "a march towards criminalizing abortion care, a nationwide ban."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, denounced the bill as "absurd," noting, "it is obviously ALREADY illegal to kill a baby."
"For years the anti-choice movement has spread disinformation—including wild lies about abortion—as part of their campaign to curtail and ultimately end access," said NARAL Pro-Choice America. "Now, the GOP is using these dangerous lies to try to pass anti-choice bills that harm pregnant people and their families."
The GOP proposed the legislation less than two months after the midterm elections, in which Americans across the country resoundingly rejected attacks on abortion rights. In Montana, more than 52% of voters rejected a ballot measure similar to the federal "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act."
"Just months after a historically disappointing midterm election, the MAGA Republican-controlled House is putting on full display their truly extreme views on women's health with legislation that does not have the support of the American people," Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. "Once again, Republicans are proving how dangerously out of touch they are with mainstream America."
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Wednesday said two pro-forced pregnancy proposals put forward by House Republicans would be "doomed" in the upper chamber of Congress, as advocates warned that even though the bills stand no chance currently of being passed into law, the misinformation contained in the legislation will still endanger pregnant people and providers.
The Republicans introduced one resolution to condemn acts of violence against "crisis pregnancy centers" and other facilities where pregnant people are pressured out of seeking abortion care—but not abortion clinics, where dozens of bombings, acts of arson, and assaults have taken place since 1977, according to the National Abortion Federation.
"The GOP is using these dangerous lies to try to pass anti-choice bills that harm pregnant people and their families."
Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-Fla.) said on social media Wednesday that he was "heading to the House floor right now to debate an anti-choice bill that fails to condemn violence against abortion clinics, providers, staff, and patients."
To counter the proposed resolution, Reps. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) and Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) introduced a resolution condemning all acts of political violence, warning that singling out attacks on anti-abortion facilities sends "a very dangerous signal to extremists across this country" and "will only embolden those who are spreading the hate-filled rhetoric that's tearing this country apart."
The second Republican proposal will also endanger medical providers and pregnant people across the U.S., said advocates as they spoke out against the so-called "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act," which was first introduced in early 2019.
The proposal would threaten medical providers with up to five years in prison if they are accused of failing to try to save infants who continue to live outside the womb after an abortion that takes place later in pregnancy—which make up roughly 1% of abortions in the U.S. and are often administered in cases involving fetal anomalies and endangerment of the pregnant patient's life.
When the bill was first introduced on the House floor in 2019, Robin Marty, author of The New Handbook for a Post-Roe America, wrote that Republicans' rhetoric regarding the proposal made it seem "like the most serious threat facing the nation is a rampage of violent and unethical medical professionals pressuring pregnant people into post-viability abortions, mismanaging the process, and then murdering those now-delivered infants with the express permission of the new parents."
"The 'Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act' isn't just an unnecessary and burdensome answer to a fictitious scenario that has no bearing in the way abortion has been provided for the last three decades," she added. "It's a political tool meant to keep the Republican Party in power after the 2020 elections."
Now, said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Republicans' goal in introducing the bill is to begin "a march towards criminalizing abortion care, a nationwide ban."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, denounced the bill as "absurd," noting, "it is obviously ALREADY illegal to kill a baby."
"For years the anti-choice movement has spread disinformation—including wild lies about abortion—as part of their campaign to curtail and ultimately end access," said NARAL Pro-Choice America. "Now, the GOP is using these dangerous lies to try to pass anti-choice bills that harm pregnant people and their families."
The GOP proposed the legislation less than two months after the midterm elections, in which Americans across the country resoundingly rejected attacks on abortion rights. In Montana, more than 52% of voters rejected a ballot measure similar to the federal "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act."
"Just months after a historically disappointing midterm election, the MAGA Republican-controlled House is putting on full display their truly extreme views on women's health with legislation that does not have the support of the American people," Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. "Once again, Republicans are proving how dangerously out of touch they are with mainstream America."