

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"Ever since the people of Florida passed a constitutional amendment to grant people with felony convictions a new right to vote, the governor and the state have done everything in their power to prevent those 1.4 million new voters from actually voting," said one lawyer for the plaintiffs.
A voting rights group on Wednesday sued Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other officials for what it called "illegal intimidation" of voters by intentionally making it difficult for former felons to determine their voting eligibility and using "election police" to "mount an aggressive campaign" against people who did not know they were ineligible to cast ballots.
The lawsuit—filed in Miami federal court by Free and Fair Litigation Group, Arnold & Porter, and Weil Gotshal & Manges working pro bono on behalf of the Florida Rights Restoration Committee (FRRC) and individual voters—alleges that state election officials "have created such a bureaucratic system around the implementation of Amendment 4 that it prevents Florida citizens from voting."
"Florida's failure to accept responsibility in determining voter eligibility hurts every Florida citizen."
Amendment 4 is an FFRC-led 2018 referendum approved by nearly two-thirds of Florida voters reenfranchising 1.4 million people with past felony convictions. The stakes transcended Florida and criminal justice reform, as a botched state voter purge of purported former felons played what one federal civil rights commissioner called an "outcome determinative" role in the 2000 U.S. presidential election.
"Ever since the people of Florida passed a constitutional amendment to grant people with felony convictions a new right to vote, the governor and the state have done everything in their power to prevent those 1.4 million new voters from actually voting," Carey Dunne of the Free and Fair Litigation Group said in a statement.
Additionally, FFRC alleges that DeSantis' deployment of statewide "election police" constitutes illegal voter intimidation under the federal Voting Rights Act.
DeSantis—who is seeking the 2024 GOP presidential nomination—has faced widespread criticism for using Florida's Office of Election Crimes and Security to arrest 20 formerly incarcerated people who believed they were eligible to vote under Amendment 4 for alleged "voter fraud." Most of those arrested were Black and almost all were Democrats.
The new lawsuit alleges that DeSantis and Florida election officials failed to uphold their legal responsibilities by:
"Florida's failure to accept responsibility in determining voter eligibility hurts every Florida citizen," said FFRC executive director Desmond Meade.
"This is not a Black, white, Latino, Native American, Asian, or multiracial issue or a Republican or Democrat issue; this is an everybody issue," Meade added. "If Floridians cannot rely on the state to determine voter eligibility, then who can we rely on?"
The plaintiffs in the suit are seeking a declaration that "Florida's implementation of Amendment 4 is unconstitutional and illegal under the Voting Rights Act."
FRRC also requests the creation of a statewide database for prospective voters in order to determine their eligibility under Amendment 4, as well as the appointment of a federal compliance monitor.
"From the governor on down, state of Florida and local officials at every level have failed to reintegrate returning citizens who have served their time back into our democracy," Arnold & Porter pro bono counsel John A. Freedman said in a statement. "We are proud to stand with our clients and our co-counsel in this important fight."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A voting rights group on Wednesday sued Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other officials for what it called "illegal intimidation" of voters by intentionally making it difficult for former felons to determine their voting eligibility and using "election police" to "mount an aggressive campaign" against people who did not know they were ineligible to cast ballots.
The lawsuit—filed in Miami federal court by Free and Fair Litigation Group, Arnold & Porter, and Weil Gotshal & Manges working pro bono on behalf of the Florida Rights Restoration Committee (FRRC) and individual voters—alleges that state election officials "have created such a bureaucratic system around the implementation of Amendment 4 that it prevents Florida citizens from voting."
"Florida's failure to accept responsibility in determining voter eligibility hurts every Florida citizen."
Amendment 4 is an FFRC-led 2018 referendum approved by nearly two-thirds of Florida voters reenfranchising 1.4 million people with past felony convictions. The stakes transcended Florida and criminal justice reform, as a botched state voter purge of purported former felons played what one federal civil rights commissioner called an "outcome determinative" role in the 2000 U.S. presidential election.
"Ever since the people of Florida passed a constitutional amendment to grant people with felony convictions a new right to vote, the governor and the state have done everything in their power to prevent those 1.4 million new voters from actually voting," Carey Dunne of the Free and Fair Litigation Group said in a statement.
Additionally, FFRC alleges that DeSantis' deployment of statewide "election police" constitutes illegal voter intimidation under the federal Voting Rights Act.
DeSantis—who is seeking the 2024 GOP presidential nomination—has faced widespread criticism for using Florida's Office of Election Crimes and Security to arrest 20 formerly incarcerated people who believed they were eligible to vote under Amendment 4 for alleged "voter fraud." Most of those arrested were Black and almost all were Democrats.
The new lawsuit alleges that DeSantis and Florida election officials failed to uphold their legal responsibilities by:
"Florida's failure to accept responsibility in determining voter eligibility hurts every Florida citizen," said FFRC executive director Desmond Meade.
"This is not a Black, white, Latino, Native American, Asian, or multiracial issue or a Republican or Democrat issue; this is an everybody issue," Meade added. "If Floridians cannot rely on the state to determine voter eligibility, then who can we rely on?"
The plaintiffs in the suit are seeking a declaration that "Florida's implementation of Amendment 4 is unconstitutional and illegal under the Voting Rights Act."
FRRC also requests the creation of a statewide database for prospective voters in order to determine their eligibility under Amendment 4, as well as the appointment of a federal compliance monitor.
"From the governor on down, state of Florida and local officials at every level have failed to reintegrate returning citizens who have served their time back into our democracy," Arnold & Porter pro bono counsel John A. Freedman said in a statement. "We are proud to stand with our clients and our co-counsel in this important fight."
A voting rights group on Wednesday sued Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other officials for what it called "illegal intimidation" of voters by intentionally making it difficult for former felons to determine their voting eligibility and using "election police" to "mount an aggressive campaign" against people who did not know they were ineligible to cast ballots.
The lawsuit—filed in Miami federal court by Free and Fair Litigation Group, Arnold & Porter, and Weil Gotshal & Manges working pro bono on behalf of the Florida Rights Restoration Committee (FRRC) and individual voters—alleges that state election officials "have created such a bureaucratic system around the implementation of Amendment 4 that it prevents Florida citizens from voting."
"Florida's failure to accept responsibility in determining voter eligibility hurts every Florida citizen."
Amendment 4 is an FFRC-led 2018 referendum approved by nearly two-thirds of Florida voters reenfranchising 1.4 million people with past felony convictions. The stakes transcended Florida and criminal justice reform, as a botched state voter purge of purported former felons played what one federal civil rights commissioner called an "outcome determinative" role in the 2000 U.S. presidential election.
"Ever since the people of Florida passed a constitutional amendment to grant people with felony convictions a new right to vote, the governor and the state have done everything in their power to prevent those 1.4 million new voters from actually voting," Carey Dunne of the Free and Fair Litigation Group said in a statement.
Additionally, FFRC alleges that DeSantis' deployment of statewide "election police" constitutes illegal voter intimidation under the federal Voting Rights Act.
DeSantis—who is seeking the 2024 GOP presidential nomination—has faced widespread criticism for using Florida's Office of Election Crimes and Security to arrest 20 formerly incarcerated people who believed they were eligible to vote under Amendment 4 for alleged "voter fraud." Most of those arrested were Black and almost all were Democrats.
The new lawsuit alleges that DeSantis and Florida election officials failed to uphold their legal responsibilities by:
"Florida's failure to accept responsibility in determining voter eligibility hurts every Florida citizen," said FFRC executive director Desmond Meade.
"This is not a Black, white, Latino, Native American, Asian, or multiracial issue or a Republican or Democrat issue; this is an everybody issue," Meade added. "If Floridians cannot rely on the state to determine voter eligibility, then who can we rely on?"
The plaintiffs in the suit are seeking a declaration that "Florida's implementation of Amendment 4 is unconstitutional and illegal under the Voting Rights Act."
FRRC also requests the creation of a statewide database for prospective voters in order to determine their eligibility under Amendment 4, as well as the appointment of a federal compliance monitor.
"From the governor on down, state of Florida and local officials at every level have failed to reintegrate returning citizens who have served their time back into our democracy," Arnold & Porter pro bono counsel John A. Freedman said in a statement. "We are proud to stand with our clients and our co-counsel in this important fight."