An election official demonstrates part of the ballot sorting process in Philadelphia on October 27, 2022. (Photo: Ryan Collerd/AFP via Getty Images)
PA Supreme Court Ruling Could Toss Thousands of Ballots Over 'Irrelevant Technicality'
Siding with a coalition of Republican groups, Pennsylvania's high court ruled a week before the midterms that mail-in ballots received without a correct date on the outer envelope cannot be counted.
Just a week before the midterms, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that state election officials cannot count ballots submitted without a correct date on the outer envelope, siding with a coalition of Republican groups that sued to block undated mail-in ballots.
In a two-page order, the six-judge high court ordered election officials to "refrain from counting any absentee and mail-in ballots received for the November 8, 2022 general election that are contained in undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes" even if they were received on time, pointing to two specific Pennsylvania statutes.
The judges--four Democrats and two Republicans--were divided on the question of whether excluding ballots inside improperly dated envelopes would violate federal law, as Acting Secretary of the Commonwealth Leigh Chapman has argued. The court was left with an even number of judges following the recent death of Democratic Chief Justice Max Baer.
In a recent filing, Chapman warned the GOP coalition was pursuing "an order that will disenfranchise thousands of qualified Pennsylvania voters, predominantly older citizens, because the voter omitted (or incorrectly wrote) a date that serves no function in the administration of Pennsylvania's elections."
"As a matter of both state and federal law, county boards may not disqualify ballots based on an omission of, or error in, the handwritten date," the brief contended.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling to the contrary could have huge implications for midterm races in the battleground state, which could decide which party controls the U.S. Senate next year. The Wall Street Journal noted Tuesday that "the case has been one of the most closely watched voting law battles heading into the 2022 midterm elections."
"More than 1.4 million voters in Pennsylvania have applied to vote by mail or absentee ballot this election," the newspaper observed. "Experts on voting said the decision could affect tight races, including the U.S. Senate contest between Democrat John Fetterman and Republican Mehmet Oz... Some 70% of mail-in ballot requests as of November 1 were from Democrats."
The ACLU of Pennsylvania, which sought to intervene in the case brought by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and other GOP organizations, expressed disappointment in the state court's ruling on social media.
"No one should be disenfranchised for an irrelevant technicality," the group tweeted. "Voters, sign and date your return envelope."
\u201cWe'll keep fighting to make sure every valid vote counts.\n\nIn the meantime, here's how to be sure that your mail or absentee ballot will be counted. \u2705\nhttps://t.co/xGYcSghaVy\u201d— ACLU of Pennsylvania (@ACLU of Pennsylvania) 1667340340
Republicans, meanwhile, hailed the ruling as a major victory as they work to suppress votes nationwide.
Ronna McDaniel, chair of the RNC, called the decision a "massive election integrity win," a sentiment that Doug Mastriano--the GOP's election-denying gubernatorial nominee in Pennsylvania--echoed.
It's not clear whether Pennsylvania officials will be able to appeal the ruling.
Amy Gulli, a spokeswoman for Chapman, told The New York Times that "we are reviewing, but the order underscores the importance of the state's consistent guidance that voters should carefully follow all instructions on their mail ballot and double-check before returning it."
Chapman's office has been working in recent days to combat election lies peddled by state Republicans and amplified by former President Donald Trump, who is backing Mastriano and Dr. Oz.
In a recent post on Truth Social, Trump wrote that "over 240,000 'unverified' ballots have already been sent out in Pennsylvania, a total mess."
Pennsylvania's Department of State responded with a notice pointing out that "this misinformation incorrectly conflates an application for a mail ballot and an approved mail ballot."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Just a week before the midterms, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that state election officials cannot count ballots submitted without a correct date on the outer envelope, siding with a coalition of Republican groups that sued to block undated mail-in ballots.
In a two-page order, the six-judge high court ordered election officials to "refrain from counting any absentee and mail-in ballots received for the November 8, 2022 general election that are contained in undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes" even if they were received on time, pointing to two specific Pennsylvania statutes.
The judges--four Democrats and two Republicans--were divided on the question of whether excluding ballots inside improperly dated envelopes would violate federal law, as Acting Secretary of the Commonwealth Leigh Chapman has argued. The court was left with an even number of judges following the recent death of Democratic Chief Justice Max Baer.
In a recent filing, Chapman warned the GOP coalition was pursuing "an order that will disenfranchise thousands of qualified Pennsylvania voters, predominantly older citizens, because the voter omitted (or incorrectly wrote) a date that serves no function in the administration of Pennsylvania's elections."
"As a matter of both state and federal law, county boards may not disqualify ballots based on an omission of, or error in, the handwritten date," the brief contended.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling to the contrary could have huge implications for midterm races in the battleground state, which could decide which party controls the U.S. Senate next year. The Wall Street Journal noted Tuesday that "the case has been one of the most closely watched voting law battles heading into the 2022 midterm elections."
"More than 1.4 million voters in Pennsylvania have applied to vote by mail or absentee ballot this election," the newspaper observed. "Experts on voting said the decision could affect tight races, including the U.S. Senate contest between Democrat John Fetterman and Republican Mehmet Oz... Some 70% of mail-in ballot requests as of November 1 were from Democrats."
The ACLU of Pennsylvania, which sought to intervene in the case brought by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and other GOP organizations, expressed disappointment in the state court's ruling on social media.
"No one should be disenfranchised for an irrelevant technicality," the group tweeted. "Voters, sign and date your return envelope."
\u201cWe'll keep fighting to make sure every valid vote counts.\n\nIn the meantime, here's how to be sure that your mail or absentee ballot will be counted. \u2705\nhttps://t.co/xGYcSghaVy\u201d— ACLU of Pennsylvania (@ACLU of Pennsylvania) 1667340340
Republicans, meanwhile, hailed the ruling as a major victory as they work to suppress votes nationwide.
Ronna McDaniel, chair of the RNC, called the decision a "massive election integrity win," a sentiment that Doug Mastriano--the GOP's election-denying gubernatorial nominee in Pennsylvania--echoed.
It's not clear whether Pennsylvania officials will be able to appeal the ruling.
Amy Gulli, a spokeswoman for Chapman, told The New York Times that "we are reviewing, but the order underscores the importance of the state's consistent guidance that voters should carefully follow all instructions on their mail ballot and double-check before returning it."
Chapman's office has been working in recent days to combat election lies peddled by state Republicans and amplified by former President Donald Trump, who is backing Mastriano and Dr. Oz.
In a recent post on Truth Social, Trump wrote that "over 240,000 'unverified' ballots have already been sent out in Pennsylvania, a total mess."
Pennsylvania's Department of State responded with a notice pointing out that "this misinformation incorrectly conflates an application for a mail ballot and an approved mail ballot."
Just a week before the midterms, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that state election officials cannot count ballots submitted without a correct date on the outer envelope, siding with a coalition of Republican groups that sued to block undated mail-in ballots.
In a two-page order, the six-judge high court ordered election officials to "refrain from counting any absentee and mail-in ballots received for the November 8, 2022 general election that are contained in undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes" even if they were received on time, pointing to two specific Pennsylvania statutes.
The judges--four Democrats and two Republicans--were divided on the question of whether excluding ballots inside improperly dated envelopes would violate federal law, as Acting Secretary of the Commonwealth Leigh Chapman has argued. The court was left with an even number of judges following the recent death of Democratic Chief Justice Max Baer.
In a recent filing, Chapman warned the GOP coalition was pursuing "an order that will disenfranchise thousands of qualified Pennsylvania voters, predominantly older citizens, because the voter omitted (or incorrectly wrote) a date that serves no function in the administration of Pennsylvania's elections."
"As a matter of both state and federal law, county boards may not disqualify ballots based on an omission of, or error in, the handwritten date," the brief contended.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling to the contrary could have huge implications for midterm races in the battleground state, which could decide which party controls the U.S. Senate next year. The Wall Street Journal noted Tuesday that "the case has been one of the most closely watched voting law battles heading into the 2022 midterm elections."
"More than 1.4 million voters in Pennsylvania have applied to vote by mail or absentee ballot this election," the newspaper observed. "Experts on voting said the decision could affect tight races, including the U.S. Senate contest between Democrat John Fetterman and Republican Mehmet Oz... Some 70% of mail-in ballot requests as of November 1 were from Democrats."
The ACLU of Pennsylvania, which sought to intervene in the case brought by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and other GOP organizations, expressed disappointment in the state court's ruling on social media.
"No one should be disenfranchised for an irrelevant technicality," the group tweeted. "Voters, sign and date your return envelope."
\u201cWe'll keep fighting to make sure every valid vote counts.\n\nIn the meantime, here's how to be sure that your mail or absentee ballot will be counted. \u2705\nhttps://t.co/xGYcSghaVy\u201d— ACLU of Pennsylvania (@ACLU of Pennsylvania) 1667340340
Republicans, meanwhile, hailed the ruling as a major victory as they work to suppress votes nationwide.
Ronna McDaniel, chair of the RNC, called the decision a "massive election integrity win," a sentiment that Doug Mastriano--the GOP's election-denying gubernatorial nominee in Pennsylvania--echoed.
It's not clear whether Pennsylvania officials will be able to appeal the ruling.
Amy Gulli, a spokeswoman for Chapman, told The New York Times that "we are reviewing, but the order underscores the importance of the state's consistent guidance that voters should carefully follow all instructions on their mail ballot and double-check before returning it."
Chapman's office has been working in recent days to combat election lies peddled by state Republicans and amplified by former President Donald Trump, who is backing Mastriano and Dr. Oz.
In a recent post on Truth Social, Trump wrote that "over 240,000 'unverified' ballots have already been sent out in Pennsylvania, a total mess."
Pennsylvania's Department of State responded with a notice pointing out that "this misinformation incorrectly conflates an application for a mail ballot and an approved mail ballot."