Democratic Reps. Carolyn Maloney and Adam Schiff on Saturday asked federal intelligence officials to immediately review the top secret documents that FBI agents retrieved during last week\u0026#039;s search of former President Donald Trump\u0026#039;s resort in Florida and to provide a classified briefing on their findings as soon as possible.\r\n\r\n\u0022Former President Trump\u0026#039;s conduct has potentially put our national security at grave risk,\u0022 Maloney (N.Y.), chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and Schiff (Calif.), chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, wrote in a letter to Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines.\r\n\r\n\u0022The facts that are now public make clear that a damage assessment is appropriate,\u0022 the chairs added.\r\n\r\nThe unsealed warrant authorizing the FBI\u0026#039;s Monday night search of Mar-a-Lago shows that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is investigating Trump for potential violations of the Espionage Act, obstruction of justice, and unlawful removal of government records.\r\n\r\nThe Washington Post revealed late Thursday that the DOJ was seeking to recover classified information related to nuclear weapons. It remains unclear whether such documents were among the 27 boxes of material that FBI agents took from Trump\u0026#039;s Palm Beach palace on Monday.\r\n\r\nAs Maloney and Schiff summarized:\r\n\r\n\r\nThe recovered materials span 45 categories, including 11 sets of classified documents ranging from \u0022Confidential\u0022 to \u0022Secret\u0022 to \u0022Top Secret\u0022 and \u0022TS/SCI documents.\u0022 The unauthorized disclosure of Top Secret information would cause \u0022exceptionally grave damage to the national security.\u0022 In addition, at least one report indicates that FBI\u0026#039;s investigation focused in part on highly classified documents \u0022relating to nuclear weapons,\u0022 which are among our nation\u0026#039;s most closely guarded secrets. If this report is true, it is hard to overstate the national security danger that could emanate from the reckless decision to remove and retain this material.\r\n\r\n\r\n\u0022If you have not already done so,\u0022 the lawmakers wrote to Haines, \u0022we request that you instruct the National Counterintelligence Executive, in consultation with the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community and other inspectors general as appropriate, to conduct a damage assessment.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022In addition, we ask that you commit to providing an appropriate classified briefing on the conduct of the damage assessment as soon as possible,\u0022 the pair continued. \u0022Even as the Justice Department\u0026#039;s investigation proceeds, ensuring that we take all necessary steps to protect classified information and mitigate the damage to national security done by its compromise is critically important.\u0022\r\n\r\nAs Maloney and Schiff pointed out, the two committees they lead \u0022have conducted oversight of issues presented by the apparent mishandling of government records, both during and after the Trump administration.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022In February,\u0022 the letter notes, \u0022Chairwoman Maloney wrote to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) expressing serious concerns that records \u0026#039;appear to have been removed from the White House in violation of the Presidential Records Act\u0026#039; and that reports indicated that \u0026#039;President Trump repeatedly attempted to destroy presidential records.\u0026#039;\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022While the former President returned 15 boxes of records to NARA earlier this year, recent developments show he continued to retain sensitive and classified materials belonging to the U.S. government,\u0022 adds the letter.\r\n\r\nAs the New York Times reported Thursday, the DOJ sent Trump a subpoena for the documents in question this spring and only asked a federal judge to approve a search warrant after he refused to comply.\r\n\r\nAt least one member of Trump\u0026#039;s legal team \u0022signed a written statement in June asserting that all material marked as classified and held in boxes in a storage area [at Mar-a-Lago] had been returned to the government,\u0022 the Times reported Saturday.\r\n\r\nLast week\u0026#039;s recovery of additional classified documents suggests that the former president\u0026#039;s lawyer lied and may explain why the DOJ, in seeking the search warrant, cited criminal statutes related to concealment of public records and obstruction of justice, in addition to espionage.\r\n\r\nIn a statement posted to his so-called Truth Social platform on Friday, Trump claimed that the material he took to Florida \u0022was all declassified,\u0022 even though legal experts question whether he used the formal process required and say that it is unlikely to have any bearing on the charges brought by the DOJ.\r\n\r\nMeanwhile, amid heightened threats against federal law enforcement personnel and facilities, congressional Republicans on Sunday stepped up their calls for the DOJ to release the affidavit in support of the warrant, which so far has not been made public\u0026nbsp;in order to protect the ongoing investigation, sources, and classified information.\r\n\r\nAs Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) explained Friday on Twitter, \u0022That disclosure may come later, if Trump litigates the search, or to the defendant if/when someone is charged with an offense in this matter.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022Federal search warrant applications and affidavits are ordinarily not made public (a) to protect [the] reputations of uncharged persons and (b) to protect witnesses and [the] integrity of [an] investigation,\u0022 he continued. \u0022Lawsuits challenging a search as illegal and motions to suppress evidence as wrongly seized are the usual ways where applications and affidavits are made public.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022These policies protect individual liberties, so it ordinarily takes affirmative act by [an] individual—like [a] lawsuit or motion to suppress—for materials to become public,\u0022 he added.