

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Amazon Founder and then-CEO Jeff Bezos addresses the audience during a keynote session at the Amazon Re:MARS conference on robotics and artificial intelligence at the Aria Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada on June 6, 2019. (Photo: Mark Ralston/AFP via Getty Images)
Privacy, antitrust, and other advocates on Thursday sounded the alarm over Amazon's purchase of boutique healthcare company One Medical, a move that one group said "opens a terrifying new frontier in surveillance of Americans by private corporations."
"You don't need to play glitchy PC games to experience the cyberpunk capitalist dystopia. The real world got real bad, and we didn't stop it."
CNBC reports Amazon is acquiring One Medical, a San Francisco-based private health services provider with 188 locations whose 767,000 members pay around $200 in annual concierge fees, for about $3.9 billion, or $18 per share.
Neil Lindsay, Amazon's senior vice president of health services, told The Washington Post--which is owned by Amazon multi-billionaire founder and executive chairman Jeff Bezos--that "we think healthcare is high on the list of experiences that need reinvention."
However, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) tweeted: "The function of a rational healthcare system is to provide quality care to all in a cost-effective way, not make billionaires like Jeff Bezos even richer. At a time of growing concentration of ownership, the Justice Department must deny Amazon's acquisition of One Medical."
Barry Lynn, executive director of the Open Markets Institute (OMI), an anti-monopoly think tank, asserted in a statement that "U.S. enforcement agencies should block this deal."
"They should also move swiftly to establish a basic set of rules to protect every corner of America's health industry from the power of the manipulation platforms," he added.
If the One Medical deal is completed, it would mark Amazon's third-biggest acquisition after Whole Foods ($13.7 billion) and MGM Studios ($8.5 billion).
While One Medical CEO Amir Dan Rubin said the Amazon acquisition presents "an immense opportunity to make the healthcare experience more accessible, affordable, and even enjoyable," critics warned of the dangers to public health in a nation that spends far more per capita on healthcare than other developed countries while experiencing overall inferior outcomes.
"This will be a blow to the fight for universal healthcare," opined journalist Aaron T. Rose. "Imagine all the money Amazon will pour into lobbying to stop Medicare for All now that they have a dog in the fight."
Others expressed concerns about the threats to privacy and competition. OMI's Lynn wrote:
Amazon's takeover of One Medical is the latest shot in a terrifying new stage in the business model of the world's largest corporations. The deal will expand Amazon's ability to collect the most intimate and personal of information about individuals, in order to track, target, manipulate, and exploit people in ever more intrusive ways.
Amazon is not the only dangerous actor here. Google's recent takeover of the fitness tracker Fitbit poses similar threats. Every American should stand against this radical extension of corporate power into our lives. In addition to manipulating how we talk to one another and do business with one another, Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Apple are moving fast to manipulate our perceptions of our own health and well-being.
In light of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent reversal of Roe v. Wade and Republican-led states' moves to criminalize people who have, perform, or "abet" abortions, reproductive rights advocates feared the implications of Amazon's purchase.
"One Medical currently has healthcare locations in Georgia, Texas, Ohio, and Arizona--all states we can expect will prosecute pregnant people for abortions or adverse pregnancy outcomes," tweeted Robyn Swirling, founder and executive director of the progressive advocacy group Works in Progress. "So you can maybe see why Amazon having their medical data is, perhaps, not going to be safe!"
Related Content

This isn't Amazon's first foray into the healthcare services sector. It bought online pharmacy PillPack in 2018 for $750 million, launched Amazon Pharmacy in 2020, and earlier this year expanded its Amazon Care telehealth program nationwide.
"Is there anything," asked NPR correspondent David Gura in response to Amazon's latest acquisition, "this corporation won't know about your day-to-day life?"
This post has been updated with comment from Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Privacy, antitrust, and other advocates on Thursday sounded the alarm over Amazon's purchase of boutique healthcare company One Medical, a move that one group said "opens a terrifying new frontier in surveillance of Americans by private corporations."
"You don't need to play glitchy PC games to experience the cyberpunk capitalist dystopia. The real world got real bad, and we didn't stop it."
CNBC reports Amazon is acquiring One Medical, a San Francisco-based private health services provider with 188 locations whose 767,000 members pay around $200 in annual concierge fees, for about $3.9 billion, or $18 per share.
Neil Lindsay, Amazon's senior vice president of health services, told The Washington Post--which is owned by Amazon multi-billionaire founder and executive chairman Jeff Bezos--that "we think healthcare is high on the list of experiences that need reinvention."
However, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) tweeted: "The function of a rational healthcare system is to provide quality care to all in a cost-effective way, not make billionaires like Jeff Bezos even richer. At a time of growing concentration of ownership, the Justice Department must deny Amazon's acquisition of One Medical."
Barry Lynn, executive director of the Open Markets Institute (OMI), an anti-monopoly think tank, asserted in a statement that "U.S. enforcement agencies should block this deal."
"They should also move swiftly to establish a basic set of rules to protect every corner of America's health industry from the power of the manipulation platforms," he added.
If the One Medical deal is completed, it would mark Amazon's third-biggest acquisition after Whole Foods ($13.7 billion) and MGM Studios ($8.5 billion).
While One Medical CEO Amir Dan Rubin said the Amazon acquisition presents "an immense opportunity to make the healthcare experience more accessible, affordable, and even enjoyable," critics warned of the dangers to public health in a nation that spends far more per capita on healthcare than other developed countries while experiencing overall inferior outcomes.
"This will be a blow to the fight for universal healthcare," opined journalist Aaron T. Rose. "Imagine all the money Amazon will pour into lobbying to stop Medicare for All now that they have a dog in the fight."
Others expressed concerns about the threats to privacy and competition. OMI's Lynn wrote:
Amazon's takeover of One Medical is the latest shot in a terrifying new stage in the business model of the world's largest corporations. The deal will expand Amazon's ability to collect the most intimate and personal of information about individuals, in order to track, target, manipulate, and exploit people in ever more intrusive ways.
Amazon is not the only dangerous actor here. Google's recent takeover of the fitness tracker Fitbit poses similar threats. Every American should stand against this radical extension of corporate power into our lives. In addition to manipulating how we talk to one another and do business with one another, Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Apple are moving fast to manipulate our perceptions of our own health and well-being.
In light of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent reversal of Roe v. Wade and Republican-led states' moves to criminalize people who have, perform, or "abet" abortions, reproductive rights advocates feared the implications of Amazon's purchase.
"One Medical currently has healthcare locations in Georgia, Texas, Ohio, and Arizona--all states we can expect will prosecute pregnant people for abortions or adverse pregnancy outcomes," tweeted Robyn Swirling, founder and executive director of the progressive advocacy group Works in Progress. "So you can maybe see why Amazon having their medical data is, perhaps, not going to be safe!"
Related Content

This isn't Amazon's first foray into the healthcare services sector. It bought online pharmacy PillPack in 2018 for $750 million, launched Amazon Pharmacy in 2020, and earlier this year expanded its Amazon Care telehealth program nationwide.
"Is there anything," asked NPR correspondent David Gura in response to Amazon's latest acquisition, "this corporation won't know about your day-to-day life?"
This post has been updated with comment from Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Privacy, antitrust, and other advocates on Thursday sounded the alarm over Amazon's purchase of boutique healthcare company One Medical, a move that one group said "opens a terrifying new frontier in surveillance of Americans by private corporations."
"You don't need to play glitchy PC games to experience the cyberpunk capitalist dystopia. The real world got real bad, and we didn't stop it."
CNBC reports Amazon is acquiring One Medical, a San Francisco-based private health services provider with 188 locations whose 767,000 members pay around $200 in annual concierge fees, for about $3.9 billion, or $18 per share.
Neil Lindsay, Amazon's senior vice president of health services, told The Washington Post--which is owned by Amazon multi-billionaire founder and executive chairman Jeff Bezos--that "we think healthcare is high on the list of experiences that need reinvention."
However, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) tweeted: "The function of a rational healthcare system is to provide quality care to all in a cost-effective way, not make billionaires like Jeff Bezos even richer. At a time of growing concentration of ownership, the Justice Department must deny Amazon's acquisition of One Medical."
Barry Lynn, executive director of the Open Markets Institute (OMI), an anti-monopoly think tank, asserted in a statement that "U.S. enforcement agencies should block this deal."
"They should also move swiftly to establish a basic set of rules to protect every corner of America's health industry from the power of the manipulation platforms," he added.
If the One Medical deal is completed, it would mark Amazon's third-biggest acquisition after Whole Foods ($13.7 billion) and MGM Studios ($8.5 billion).
While One Medical CEO Amir Dan Rubin said the Amazon acquisition presents "an immense opportunity to make the healthcare experience more accessible, affordable, and even enjoyable," critics warned of the dangers to public health in a nation that spends far more per capita on healthcare than other developed countries while experiencing overall inferior outcomes.
"This will be a blow to the fight for universal healthcare," opined journalist Aaron T. Rose. "Imagine all the money Amazon will pour into lobbying to stop Medicare for All now that they have a dog in the fight."
Others expressed concerns about the threats to privacy and competition. OMI's Lynn wrote:
Amazon's takeover of One Medical is the latest shot in a terrifying new stage in the business model of the world's largest corporations. The deal will expand Amazon's ability to collect the most intimate and personal of information about individuals, in order to track, target, manipulate, and exploit people in ever more intrusive ways.
Amazon is not the only dangerous actor here. Google's recent takeover of the fitness tracker Fitbit poses similar threats. Every American should stand against this radical extension of corporate power into our lives. In addition to manipulating how we talk to one another and do business with one another, Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Apple are moving fast to manipulate our perceptions of our own health and well-being.
In light of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent reversal of Roe v. Wade and Republican-led states' moves to criminalize people who have, perform, or "abet" abortions, reproductive rights advocates feared the implications of Amazon's purchase.
"One Medical currently has healthcare locations in Georgia, Texas, Ohio, and Arizona--all states we can expect will prosecute pregnant people for abortions or adverse pregnancy outcomes," tweeted Robyn Swirling, founder and executive director of the progressive advocacy group Works in Progress. "So you can maybe see why Amazon having their medical data is, perhaps, not going to be safe!"
Related Content

This isn't Amazon's first foray into the healthcare services sector. It bought online pharmacy PillPack in 2018 for $750 million, launched Amazon Pharmacy in 2020, and earlier this year expanded its Amazon Care telehealth program nationwide.
"Is there anything," asked NPR correspondent David Gura in response to Amazon's latest acquisition, "this corporation won't know about your day-to-day life?"
This post has been updated with comment from Sen. Bernie Sanders.