

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) speaks during a May 5, 2022 press conference in the U.S. Senate in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Thursday delivered an impassioned appeal to men who might oppose reproductive rights and a barbed blow to the five right-wing Supreme Court justices who she said lied about their jurisprudential stance on Roe v. Wade.
"It is an outrage that we have five justices on the Supreme Court who lied."
"I would like to speak to America's men for one minute," Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) said during a press conference on the Senate's effort to codify reproductive rights via the Women's Health Protection Act (WHPA). "Imagine you do not have authority over your own body for 10 months."
"I don't think a man in America could actually imagine not having control of his body, his bodily functions, what happens to him, and what life would be like for 10 months," she added.
Taking aim at the five conservative high court justices who, according to a leaked draft opinion, are set to overturn Roe, Gillibrand said that "it is an outrage that we have five justices on the Supreme Court who lied--lied--at their confirmation hearings in order to be confirmed."
"It is an outrage in America today that our judicial system is so corrupted, so politicized, and no longer representative of the will of the people," she fumed. "Five justices said they respect precedent. Five said that Roe v. Wade was established precedent. Five said that they would never undermine established precedent."
"It is barbaric, it is inhumane, it is unacceptable," Gillibrand said of Roe's likely reversal, "and I hope every human being in this country understands that when you take away a woman's right to make her decisions about her health and well-being, she is no longer a full citizen. She no longer has freedom, she no longer has bodily autonomy, she no longer has basic civil rights or civil liberties. That is what this decision would do in America today."
Related Content

Gillibrand has called upon her colleagues to repeal the filibuster so that Senate Democrats can pass the House-approved WHPA.
"We must pass federal laws to protect the right to safe, legal abortion," she tweeted last September. "We must pass the Women's Health Protection Act to put an end to these cruel state bans on our rights. And we can't let the filibuster stand in our way."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Thursday delivered an impassioned appeal to men who might oppose reproductive rights and a barbed blow to the five right-wing Supreme Court justices who she said lied about their jurisprudential stance on Roe v. Wade.
"It is an outrage that we have five justices on the Supreme Court who lied."
"I would like to speak to America's men for one minute," Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) said during a press conference on the Senate's effort to codify reproductive rights via the Women's Health Protection Act (WHPA). "Imagine you do not have authority over your own body for 10 months."
"I don't think a man in America could actually imagine not having control of his body, his bodily functions, what happens to him, and what life would be like for 10 months," she added.
Taking aim at the five conservative high court justices who, according to a leaked draft opinion, are set to overturn Roe, Gillibrand said that "it is an outrage that we have five justices on the Supreme Court who lied--lied--at their confirmation hearings in order to be confirmed."
"It is an outrage in America today that our judicial system is so corrupted, so politicized, and no longer representative of the will of the people," she fumed. "Five justices said they respect precedent. Five said that Roe v. Wade was established precedent. Five said that they would never undermine established precedent."
"It is barbaric, it is inhumane, it is unacceptable," Gillibrand said of Roe's likely reversal, "and I hope every human being in this country understands that when you take away a woman's right to make her decisions about her health and well-being, she is no longer a full citizen. She no longer has freedom, she no longer has bodily autonomy, she no longer has basic civil rights or civil liberties. That is what this decision would do in America today."
Related Content

Gillibrand has called upon her colleagues to repeal the filibuster so that Senate Democrats can pass the House-approved WHPA.
"We must pass federal laws to protect the right to safe, legal abortion," she tweeted last September. "We must pass the Women's Health Protection Act to put an end to these cruel state bans on our rights. And we can't let the filibuster stand in our way."
U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Thursday delivered an impassioned appeal to men who might oppose reproductive rights and a barbed blow to the five right-wing Supreme Court justices who she said lied about their jurisprudential stance on Roe v. Wade.
"It is an outrage that we have five justices on the Supreme Court who lied."
"I would like to speak to America's men for one minute," Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) said during a press conference on the Senate's effort to codify reproductive rights via the Women's Health Protection Act (WHPA). "Imagine you do not have authority over your own body for 10 months."
"I don't think a man in America could actually imagine not having control of his body, his bodily functions, what happens to him, and what life would be like for 10 months," she added.
Taking aim at the five conservative high court justices who, according to a leaked draft opinion, are set to overturn Roe, Gillibrand said that "it is an outrage that we have five justices on the Supreme Court who lied--lied--at their confirmation hearings in order to be confirmed."
"It is an outrage in America today that our judicial system is so corrupted, so politicized, and no longer representative of the will of the people," she fumed. "Five justices said they respect precedent. Five said that Roe v. Wade was established precedent. Five said that they would never undermine established precedent."
"It is barbaric, it is inhumane, it is unacceptable," Gillibrand said of Roe's likely reversal, "and I hope every human being in this country understands that when you take away a woman's right to make her decisions about her health and well-being, she is no longer a full citizen. She no longer has freedom, she no longer has bodily autonomy, she no longer has basic civil rights or civil liberties. That is what this decision would do in America today."
Related Content

Gillibrand has called upon her colleagues to repeal the filibuster so that Senate Democrats can pass the House-approved WHPA.
"We must pass federal laws to protect the right to safe, legal abortion," she tweeted last September. "We must pass the Women's Health Protection Act to put an end to these cruel state bans on our rights. And we can't let the filibuster stand in our way."