SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A village official evacuates a child from a flooded area following heavy rains in Dazhou in China's southwestern Sichuan province on July 12, 2021. (Photo: STR/AFP via Getty Images)
As governments meet this week to approve a summary of part three of the United Nations' landmark climate assessment, which focuses on mitigation, hundreds of environmental justice groups from around the globe shared an open letter Monday imploring reviewers to emphasize the need for a rapid phaseout of fossil fuels to avert the climate emergency's most disastrous outcomes.
"The stakes could not be any higher, the science any clearer, or the imperative for immediate action any greater."
Last month, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned--in part two of its tripartite report, which U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described as an "atlas of human suffering and a damning indictment of failed climate leadership"--that humanity has a "brief and rapidly closing window" to avoid the worst effects of the planetary crisis, which is on track to exacerbate deadly extreme weather, with especially catastrophic consequences for the world's poorest and most marginalized.
"The stakes could not be any higher, the science any clearer, or the imperative for immediate action any greater," states Monday's letter, which is addressed to the co-chairs of the IPCC's Working Group III as well as national representatives and signed by nearly 350 organizations, including the Center for International Environmental Law, Food & Water Watch, Friends of the Earth International, Greenpeace, Heinrich Boll Foundation, and the Indigenous Environmental Network.
"Current levels of warming are already causing permanent loss and damage, especially for the populations most vulnerable to, and least responsible for, the climate crisis," wrote the coalition. "Surpassing 1.5degC of warming--even temporarily--will unleash further irreparable harm taking the planet into a point of no return."
"States have a responsibility to translate this scientific consensus into the concrete actions necessary to avert climate catastrophe," the coalition continued. "The urgency of the climate crisis demands a rapid reorientation of our societies and economies away from fossil fuels, the key driver of global warming."
Last August, out of concern that their conclusions would be diluted by policymakers, a group of scientists leaked a draft of the forthcoming IPCC report. It asserted at the time that global carbon emissions must peak by 2025 and all fossil fuel plants worldwide must be shuttered by the end of the decade to meet the Paris agreement's more ambitious target of limiting global warming to 1.5degC above preindustrial levels by the end of the 21st century.
One day after Guterres warned last week that the 1.5degC goal is "on life support" and at risk of being killed by an ongoing "addiction to fossil fuels," researchers at the United Kingdom-based Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research estimated that rich countries must end oil and gas production entirely by 2034 to give the world a 50% chance of achieving it.
"There is no time or justification for policy scenarios that fail to center an immediate halt to oil, gas, and coal expansion and the managed phaseout of all fossil fuels," says the coalition's new letter, echoing these earlier warnings. "Planning for overshoot on the premise that geoengineering techno-fixes and carbon trading can reverse temperature rise or mitigate its effects is indefensible."
Stressing that the so-called "Summary for Policymakers" (SPM) of the IPCC's latest findings, expected to be published on April 4, will shape "how the consensus science is understood and in turn, how it is acted upon by policymakers, investors, and the public," the coalition urged the co-chairs of Working Group III and national representatives to ensure that the SPM:
"The IPCC's Summary for Policymakers should not conceal the stark scientific realities that the full report lays bare," Nikki Reisch, director of the Climate & Energy Program at the Center for International Environmental Law, said in a statement. "The climate crisis is accelerating and fossil fuels are the overwhelming cause. Any report on mitigation that fails to emphasize that fact is denying the very science to which the IPCC is committed."
"To avoid the irreversible harm of overshooting 1.5degC, we must end dependence on fossil fuels and phase out their production and use as rapidly and equitably as possible," Reisch added. "Governments have a responsibility to ensure this truth is front and center in the summary of the IPCC's findings on mitigation. They also must convey the danger of relying on technologies like large-scale carbon dioxide removal and carbon offset schemes that threaten to push warming beyond 1.5degC, triggering irreversible harm to people and nature."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As governments meet this week to approve a summary of part three of the United Nations' landmark climate assessment, which focuses on mitigation, hundreds of environmental justice groups from around the globe shared an open letter Monday imploring reviewers to emphasize the need for a rapid phaseout of fossil fuels to avert the climate emergency's most disastrous outcomes.
"The stakes could not be any higher, the science any clearer, or the imperative for immediate action any greater."
Last month, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned--in part two of its tripartite report, which U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described as an "atlas of human suffering and a damning indictment of failed climate leadership"--that humanity has a "brief and rapidly closing window" to avoid the worst effects of the planetary crisis, which is on track to exacerbate deadly extreme weather, with especially catastrophic consequences for the world's poorest and most marginalized.
"The stakes could not be any higher, the science any clearer, or the imperative for immediate action any greater," states Monday's letter, which is addressed to the co-chairs of the IPCC's Working Group III as well as national representatives and signed by nearly 350 organizations, including the Center for International Environmental Law, Food & Water Watch, Friends of the Earth International, Greenpeace, Heinrich Boll Foundation, and the Indigenous Environmental Network.
"Current levels of warming are already causing permanent loss and damage, especially for the populations most vulnerable to, and least responsible for, the climate crisis," wrote the coalition. "Surpassing 1.5degC of warming--even temporarily--will unleash further irreparable harm taking the planet into a point of no return."
"States have a responsibility to translate this scientific consensus into the concrete actions necessary to avert climate catastrophe," the coalition continued. "The urgency of the climate crisis demands a rapid reorientation of our societies and economies away from fossil fuels, the key driver of global warming."
Last August, out of concern that their conclusions would be diluted by policymakers, a group of scientists leaked a draft of the forthcoming IPCC report. It asserted at the time that global carbon emissions must peak by 2025 and all fossil fuel plants worldwide must be shuttered by the end of the decade to meet the Paris agreement's more ambitious target of limiting global warming to 1.5degC above preindustrial levels by the end of the 21st century.
One day after Guterres warned last week that the 1.5degC goal is "on life support" and at risk of being killed by an ongoing "addiction to fossil fuels," researchers at the United Kingdom-based Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research estimated that rich countries must end oil and gas production entirely by 2034 to give the world a 50% chance of achieving it.
"There is no time or justification for policy scenarios that fail to center an immediate halt to oil, gas, and coal expansion and the managed phaseout of all fossil fuels," says the coalition's new letter, echoing these earlier warnings. "Planning for overshoot on the premise that geoengineering techno-fixes and carbon trading can reverse temperature rise or mitigate its effects is indefensible."
Stressing that the so-called "Summary for Policymakers" (SPM) of the IPCC's latest findings, expected to be published on April 4, will shape "how the consensus science is understood and in turn, how it is acted upon by policymakers, investors, and the public," the coalition urged the co-chairs of Working Group III and national representatives to ensure that the SPM:
"The IPCC's Summary for Policymakers should not conceal the stark scientific realities that the full report lays bare," Nikki Reisch, director of the Climate & Energy Program at the Center for International Environmental Law, said in a statement. "The climate crisis is accelerating and fossil fuels are the overwhelming cause. Any report on mitigation that fails to emphasize that fact is denying the very science to which the IPCC is committed."
"To avoid the irreversible harm of overshooting 1.5degC, we must end dependence on fossil fuels and phase out their production and use as rapidly and equitably as possible," Reisch added. "Governments have a responsibility to ensure this truth is front and center in the summary of the IPCC's findings on mitigation. They also must convey the danger of relying on technologies like large-scale carbon dioxide removal and carbon offset schemes that threaten to push warming beyond 1.5degC, triggering irreversible harm to people and nature."
As governments meet this week to approve a summary of part three of the United Nations' landmark climate assessment, which focuses on mitigation, hundreds of environmental justice groups from around the globe shared an open letter Monday imploring reviewers to emphasize the need for a rapid phaseout of fossil fuels to avert the climate emergency's most disastrous outcomes.
"The stakes could not be any higher, the science any clearer, or the imperative for immediate action any greater."
Last month, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned--in part two of its tripartite report, which U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described as an "atlas of human suffering and a damning indictment of failed climate leadership"--that humanity has a "brief and rapidly closing window" to avoid the worst effects of the planetary crisis, which is on track to exacerbate deadly extreme weather, with especially catastrophic consequences for the world's poorest and most marginalized.
"The stakes could not be any higher, the science any clearer, or the imperative for immediate action any greater," states Monday's letter, which is addressed to the co-chairs of the IPCC's Working Group III as well as national representatives and signed by nearly 350 organizations, including the Center for International Environmental Law, Food & Water Watch, Friends of the Earth International, Greenpeace, Heinrich Boll Foundation, and the Indigenous Environmental Network.
"Current levels of warming are already causing permanent loss and damage, especially for the populations most vulnerable to, and least responsible for, the climate crisis," wrote the coalition. "Surpassing 1.5degC of warming--even temporarily--will unleash further irreparable harm taking the planet into a point of no return."
"States have a responsibility to translate this scientific consensus into the concrete actions necessary to avert climate catastrophe," the coalition continued. "The urgency of the climate crisis demands a rapid reorientation of our societies and economies away from fossil fuels, the key driver of global warming."
Last August, out of concern that their conclusions would be diluted by policymakers, a group of scientists leaked a draft of the forthcoming IPCC report. It asserted at the time that global carbon emissions must peak by 2025 and all fossil fuel plants worldwide must be shuttered by the end of the decade to meet the Paris agreement's more ambitious target of limiting global warming to 1.5degC above preindustrial levels by the end of the 21st century.
One day after Guterres warned last week that the 1.5degC goal is "on life support" and at risk of being killed by an ongoing "addiction to fossil fuels," researchers at the United Kingdom-based Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research estimated that rich countries must end oil and gas production entirely by 2034 to give the world a 50% chance of achieving it.
"There is no time or justification for policy scenarios that fail to center an immediate halt to oil, gas, and coal expansion and the managed phaseout of all fossil fuels," says the coalition's new letter, echoing these earlier warnings. "Planning for overshoot on the premise that geoengineering techno-fixes and carbon trading can reverse temperature rise or mitigate its effects is indefensible."
Stressing that the so-called "Summary for Policymakers" (SPM) of the IPCC's latest findings, expected to be published on April 4, will shape "how the consensus science is understood and in turn, how it is acted upon by policymakers, investors, and the public," the coalition urged the co-chairs of Working Group III and national representatives to ensure that the SPM:
"The IPCC's Summary for Policymakers should not conceal the stark scientific realities that the full report lays bare," Nikki Reisch, director of the Climate & Energy Program at the Center for International Environmental Law, said in a statement. "The climate crisis is accelerating and fossil fuels are the overwhelming cause. Any report on mitigation that fails to emphasize that fact is denying the very science to which the IPCC is committed."
"To avoid the irreversible harm of overshooting 1.5degC, we must end dependence on fossil fuels and phase out their production and use as rapidly and equitably as possible," Reisch added. "Governments have a responsibility to ensure this truth is front and center in the summary of the IPCC's findings on mitigation. They also must convey the danger of relying on technologies like large-scale carbon dioxide removal and carbon offset schemes that threaten to push warming beyond 1.5degC, triggering irreversible harm to people and nature."