Postmaster General Louis DeJoy testifies during a hearing before the House Oversight and Reform Committee on August 24, 2020. (Photo: Tom Williams-Pool/Getty Images)
'DeJoy Has to Go Right Now': Fury Over Postal Service Failure to Electrify Truck Fleet
Rep. Gerry Connolly warned that DeJoy is aiming to "spend billions on gas-powered vehicles despite clear goals set by President Biden and Congress to electrify the federal fleet."
A leading House Democrat on Wednesday demanded the ouster of Postmaster General Louis DeJoy over his push to spend $11 billion on a new fleet of largely gasoline-powered USPS delivery trucks, a plan that flies in the face of President Joe Biden's proposed shift to zero-emission government vehicles.
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), chair of the House subcommittee that oversees the USPS, warned in a social media post late Wednesday that DeJoy is aiming to "spend billions on gas-powered vehicles despite clear goals set by President Biden and Congress to electrify the federal fleet."
"I would love for him to resign, and if he won't resign, I want the board of governors to fire him."
"I want a full examination of this contract, and I am pursuing a legislative remedy," wrote Connolly. "But DeJoy has to go right now."
Last February, the DeJoy-led USPS awarded a 10-year contract to Oshkosh Defense--a Wisconsin-based manufacturing company--to produce up to 165,000 trucks, the largest effort in decades to replace the Postal Service's aging fleet. Oshkosh plans to produce the vehicles in South Carolina, a state with some of the most anti-union labor laws in the country.
The lucrative contract--which Oshkosh won over Workhorse Group, an electric truck maker--drew scrutiny from lawmakers at the time it was awarded, and Connolly is demanding that Congress take a closer look given the significant climate implications.
Transportation represents the biggest single source of U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which Biden has pledged to cut in half by the end of the decade. Postal Service delivery trucks make up about a third of the federal government's vehicle fleet.
"The average age of the postal fleet is 30 years," Connolly told the New York Times in an interview Wednesday. "They're spewing pollution and they are guzzling gas. There is no question we have to replace the fleet, and it is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to take electric vehicle technology to the next level with the second-largest vehicle fleet in America."
"If we miss this opportunity it sets back the whole thrust of the electric vehicle agenda," warned the Virginia Democrat warned, who argued that DeJoy's plan for new gas-powered trucks is an "enormous example" of why he should step down or be removed from his post.
"I would love for him to resign, and if he won't resign, I want the board of governors to fire him," said Connolly.
As currently constituted, however, the USPS board does not appear willing to oust DeJoy, with former President Donald Trump's nominees outnumbering Biden's picks 5-3. Last month, Biden announced his nominees--one Democrat and one Republican--to replace two Trump-appointed members of the board.
Even if the latest Biden picks are confirmed by the Senate, it's not clear the board will have enough votes to remove DeJoy, a major Trump donor who has come under fire for slowing mail delivery and hiking prices.
DeJoy has previously dismissed calls for his resignation, telling lawmakers last February that he intends to remain head of the Postal Service for "a long time."
Shortly ahead of Connolly's comments, the Biden administration requested that DeJoy hold up the $11 billion truck contract, arguing that the Postal Service's environmental analysis of the deal was deeply flawed and incomplete, in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act.
"The environmental analysis from the USPS is bad--almost eighth-grade science report bad--and misleading."
In a letter to the USPS on Wednesday, Biden's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) noted that--among other failures--"the Postal Service chose not to consider in detail even a single feasible alternative to its proposal that would be more environmentally protective, evaluating only alternatives the Postal Service itself considered to be infeasible."
"The Postal Service's proposal as currently crafted represents a crucial lost opportunity to more rapidly reduce the carbon footprint of one of the largest government fleets in the world," the EPA argued. "A 10% commitment to clean vehicles, with virtually no fuel efficiency gains for the other 90% is plainly inconsistent with international, national, and many state GHG emissions reduction targets, as well as specific national policies to move with deliberate speed toward clean, zero-emitting vehicles."
If the USPS--which is independent of the executive branch--brushes off the Biden administration's concerns, environmental groups could have the option of suing to block the contract, the Washington Post noted Wednesday.
Adrian Martinez, an attorney for Earthjustice, told the Post that climate groups would have a good chance of winning in court, given the shoddiness of the Postal Service's environmental review.
"It is hard to predict what courts will do, but the Postal Service's work here is just so embarrassingly flimsy," Martinez said. "They don't reveal the source of the information for many of their conclusions, instead dismissing electrification outright."
In a blog post earlier this week, Martinez urged the Biden administration to "play hardball over this contract."
"The environmental analysis from the USPS is bad--almost eighth-grade science report bad--and misleading," Martinez argued. "Agencies like the EPA and the White House Council on Environmental Quality not only can, but have a moral obligation to push the postal service to do an analysis that is honest and lawful. They should avail themselves of every opportunity under bedrock environmental laws like National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Air Act in this fight for clean air and our climate."
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A leading House Democrat on Wednesday demanded the ouster of Postmaster General Louis DeJoy over his push to spend $11 billion on a new fleet of largely gasoline-powered USPS delivery trucks, a plan that flies in the face of President Joe Biden's proposed shift to zero-emission government vehicles.
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), chair of the House subcommittee that oversees the USPS, warned in a social media post late Wednesday that DeJoy is aiming to "spend billions on gas-powered vehicles despite clear goals set by President Biden and Congress to electrify the federal fleet."
"I would love for him to resign, and if he won't resign, I want the board of governors to fire him."
"I want a full examination of this contract, and I am pursuing a legislative remedy," wrote Connolly. "But DeJoy has to go right now."
Last February, the DeJoy-led USPS awarded a 10-year contract to Oshkosh Defense--a Wisconsin-based manufacturing company--to produce up to 165,000 trucks, the largest effort in decades to replace the Postal Service's aging fleet. Oshkosh plans to produce the vehicles in South Carolina, a state with some of the most anti-union labor laws in the country.
The lucrative contract--which Oshkosh won over Workhorse Group, an electric truck maker--drew scrutiny from lawmakers at the time it was awarded, and Connolly is demanding that Congress take a closer look given the significant climate implications.
Transportation represents the biggest single source of U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which Biden has pledged to cut in half by the end of the decade. Postal Service delivery trucks make up about a third of the federal government's vehicle fleet.
"The average age of the postal fleet is 30 years," Connolly told the New York Times in an interview Wednesday. "They're spewing pollution and they are guzzling gas. There is no question we have to replace the fleet, and it is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to take electric vehicle technology to the next level with the second-largest vehicle fleet in America."
"If we miss this opportunity it sets back the whole thrust of the electric vehicle agenda," warned the Virginia Democrat warned, who argued that DeJoy's plan for new gas-powered trucks is an "enormous example" of why he should step down or be removed from his post.
"I would love for him to resign, and if he won't resign, I want the board of governors to fire him," said Connolly.
As currently constituted, however, the USPS board does not appear willing to oust DeJoy, with former President Donald Trump's nominees outnumbering Biden's picks 5-3. Last month, Biden announced his nominees--one Democrat and one Republican--to replace two Trump-appointed members of the board.
Even if the latest Biden picks are confirmed by the Senate, it's not clear the board will have enough votes to remove DeJoy, a major Trump donor who has come under fire for slowing mail delivery and hiking prices.
DeJoy has previously dismissed calls for his resignation, telling lawmakers last February that he intends to remain head of the Postal Service for "a long time."
Shortly ahead of Connolly's comments, the Biden administration requested that DeJoy hold up the $11 billion truck contract, arguing that the Postal Service's environmental analysis of the deal was deeply flawed and incomplete, in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act.
"The environmental analysis from the USPS is bad--almost eighth-grade science report bad--and misleading."
In a letter to the USPS on Wednesday, Biden's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) noted that--among other failures--"the Postal Service chose not to consider in detail even a single feasible alternative to its proposal that would be more environmentally protective, evaluating only alternatives the Postal Service itself considered to be infeasible."
"The Postal Service's proposal as currently crafted represents a crucial lost opportunity to more rapidly reduce the carbon footprint of one of the largest government fleets in the world," the EPA argued. "A 10% commitment to clean vehicles, with virtually no fuel efficiency gains for the other 90% is plainly inconsistent with international, national, and many state GHG emissions reduction targets, as well as specific national policies to move with deliberate speed toward clean, zero-emitting vehicles."
If the USPS--which is independent of the executive branch--brushes off the Biden administration's concerns, environmental groups could have the option of suing to block the contract, the Washington Post noted Wednesday.
Adrian Martinez, an attorney for Earthjustice, told the Post that climate groups would have a good chance of winning in court, given the shoddiness of the Postal Service's environmental review.
"It is hard to predict what courts will do, but the Postal Service's work here is just so embarrassingly flimsy," Martinez said. "They don't reveal the source of the information for many of their conclusions, instead dismissing electrification outright."
In a blog post earlier this week, Martinez urged the Biden administration to "play hardball over this contract."
"The environmental analysis from the USPS is bad--almost eighth-grade science report bad--and misleading," Martinez argued. "Agencies like the EPA and the White House Council on Environmental Quality not only can, but have a moral obligation to push the postal service to do an analysis that is honest and lawful. They should avail themselves of every opportunity under bedrock environmental laws like National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Air Act in this fight for clean air and our climate."
- 'Supervillain Stuff': DeJoy Accused of Exploiting Loophole to Buy Gas Trucks ›
- House Dems Urge Biden to 'Swiftly' Appoint Postal Board Governors ›
- 'We Won't Be Silenced!' Protesters Decry DeJoy at USPS Meeting ›
- As DeJoy Quits, Critics Fear GOP-Led Postal Board Will 'Find Someone Worse' | Common Dreams ›
A leading House Democrat on Wednesday demanded the ouster of Postmaster General Louis DeJoy over his push to spend $11 billion on a new fleet of largely gasoline-powered USPS delivery trucks, a plan that flies in the face of President Joe Biden's proposed shift to zero-emission government vehicles.
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), chair of the House subcommittee that oversees the USPS, warned in a social media post late Wednesday that DeJoy is aiming to "spend billions on gas-powered vehicles despite clear goals set by President Biden and Congress to electrify the federal fleet."
"I would love for him to resign, and if he won't resign, I want the board of governors to fire him."
"I want a full examination of this contract, and I am pursuing a legislative remedy," wrote Connolly. "But DeJoy has to go right now."
Last February, the DeJoy-led USPS awarded a 10-year contract to Oshkosh Defense--a Wisconsin-based manufacturing company--to produce up to 165,000 trucks, the largest effort in decades to replace the Postal Service's aging fleet. Oshkosh plans to produce the vehicles in South Carolina, a state with some of the most anti-union labor laws in the country.
The lucrative contract--which Oshkosh won over Workhorse Group, an electric truck maker--drew scrutiny from lawmakers at the time it was awarded, and Connolly is demanding that Congress take a closer look given the significant climate implications.
Transportation represents the biggest single source of U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which Biden has pledged to cut in half by the end of the decade. Postal Service delivery trucks make up about a third of the federal government's vehicle fleet.
"The average age of the postal fleet is 30 years," Connolly told the New York Times in an interview Wednesday. "They're spewing pollution and they are guzzling gas. There is no question we have to replace the fleet, and it is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to take electric vehicle technology to the next level with the second-largest vehicle fleet in America."
"If we miss this opportunity it sets back the whole thrust of the electric vehicle agenda," warned the Virginia Democrat warned, who argued that DeJoy's plan for new gas-powered trucks is an "enormous example" of why he should step down or be removed from his post.
"I would love for him to resign, and if he won't resign, I want the board of governors to fire him," said Connolly.
As currently constituted, however, the USPS board does not appear willing to oust DeJoy, with former President Donald Trump's nominees outnumbering Biden's picks 5-3. Last month, Biden announced his nominees--one Democrat and one Republican--to replace two Trump-appointed members of the board.
Even if the latest Biden picks are confirmed by the Senate, it's not clear the board will have enough votes to remove DeJoy, a major Trump donor who has come under fire for slowing mail delivery and hiking prices.
DeJoy has previously dismissed calls for his resignation, telling lawmakers last February that he intends to remain head of the Postal Service for "a long time."
Shortly ahead of Connolly's comments, the Biden administration requested that DeJoy hold up the $11 billion truck contract, arguing that the Postal Service's environmental analysis of the deal was deeply flawed and incomplete, in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act.
"The environmental analysis from the USPS is bad--almost eighth-grade science report bad--and misleading."
In a letter to the USPS on Wednesday, Biden's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) noted that--among other failures--"the Postal Service chose not to consider in detail even a single feasible alternative to its proposal that would be more environmentally protective, evaluating only alternatives the Postal Service itself considered to be infeasible."
"The Postal Service's proposal as currently crafted represents a crucial lost opportunity to more rapidly reduce the carbon footprint of one of the largest government fleets in the world," the EPA argued. "A 10% commitment to clean vehicles, with virtually no fuel efficiency gains for the other 90% is plainly inconsistent with international, national, and many state GHG emissions reduction targets, as well as specific national policies to move with deliberate speed toward clean, zero-emitting vehicles."
If the USPS--which is independent of the executive branch--brushes off the Biden administration's concerns, environmental groups could have the option of suing to block the contract, the Washington Post noted Wednesday.
Adrian Martinez, an attorney for Earthjustice, told the Post that climate groups would have a good chance of winning in court, given the shoddiness of the Postal Service's environmental review.
"It is hard to predict what courts will do, but the Postal Service's work here is just so embarrassingly flimsy," Martinez said. "They don't reveal the source of the information for many of their conclusions, instead dismissing electrification outright."
In a blog post earlier this week, Martinez urged the Biden administration to "play hardball over this contract."
"The environmental analysis from the USPS is bad--almost eighth-grade science report bad--and misleading," Martinez argued. "Agencies like the EPA and the White House Council on Environmental Quality not only can, but have a moral obligation to push the postal service to do an analysis that is honest and lawful. They should avail themselves of every opportunity under bedrock environmental laws like National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Air Act in this fight for clean air and our climate."
- 'Supervillain Stuff': DeJoy Accused of Exploiting Loophole to Buy Gas Trucks ›
- House Dems Urge Biden to 'Swiftly' Appoint Postal Board Governors ›
- 'We Won't Be Silenced!' Protesters Decry DeJoy at USPS Meeting ›
- As DeJoy Quits, Critics Fear GOP-Led Postal Board Will 'Find Someone Worse' | Common Dreams ›