Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Follow us:

We know how much you value the nonprofit, independent journalism of Common Dreams. The only thing that keeps us going is support from readers like you. As some have been forced to cut back on giving, your contribution becomes even more important. So please, join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Help fill the gap created by those who have been forced to cancel their monthly recurring donations. Without your help, we won’t survive.

To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

free assange

The U.K. High Court on Wednesday began considering the U.S. government's appeal regarding the extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. (Photo: Jack Taylor/Getty Images)

As US Makes Case for Extradition, Global Demand Rises For Assange's Immediate Freedom

"Virtually no one responsible for alleged U.S. war crimes committed in the course of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars has been held accountable... and yet a publisher who exposed such crimes is potentially facing a lifetime in jail."

Julia Conley

Press freedom defenders on Wednesday intensified demands for the release of WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange as the United Kingdom's High Court began its consideration of the U.S. government's attempt to extradite the journalist and prosecute him under the Espionage Act.
 
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) was among the groups warning that allowing the U.S. to pursue charges against Assange—and potentially imprison him for the rest of his life—would "have severe and long-lasting implications for journalism and press freedom around the world" in addition to harming Assange's mental and physical health.

"The U.S. government's unrelenting pursuit of Julian Assange makes it clear that this prosecution is a punitive measure, but the case involves concerns which go far beyond the fate of one man and put media freedom and freedom of expression in peril."

 
"As we return to court for yet more proceedings in the U.S.' never-ending legal battle against Julian Assange, we again emphasize our position: that Assange has been targeted for his contributions to journalism... and that the case should be closed and he should be immediately released," said RSF Secretary-General Christophe Deloire.
 
The U.S. was granted the appeal at the High Court on five specific grounds, including that Magistrate Judge Vanessa Baraitser made an error when she ruled on January 4 that Assange should not be extradited due to harsh conditions in U.S. prisons and their possible impact on his fragile mental state, and that the U.S. provided assurances that Assange would not be subject to harsh "special administrative measures" to keep him from speaking publicly.
 
Amnesty International, which has called the U.S. government's diplomatic assurances "inherently unreliable," said recent reports that the CIA considered kidnapping or assassinating Assange while he was confined to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London "cast even more doubt on the reliability of U.S. promises and further expose the political motivation behind this case."
 
"The U.S. government's unrelenting pursuit of Julian Assange makes it clear that this prosecution is a punitive measure, but the case involves concerns which go far beyond the fate of one man and put media freedom and freedom of expression in peril," said Agnès Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International.
 

"Journalists and publishers are of vital importance in scrutinizing governments, exposing their misdeeds, and holding perpetrators of human rights violations to account," Callamard said. "This disingenuous appeal should be denied, the charges should be dropped, and Julian Assange should be released."

 
If Assange is extradited and found guilty of 18 counts under the Espionage Act, he could face a sentence of up to 175 years in prison. The government is pursuing the charges due to WikiLeaks' publication in 2010 of classified military documents and diplomatic cables, accusing Assange of conspiring with his source, former military intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, to obtain the secret documents which revealed U.S. war crimes.
 
"It is a damning indictment that nearly 20 years on, virtually no one responsible for alleged U.S. war crimes committed in the course of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars has been held accountable, let alone prosecuted, and yet a publisher who exposed such crimes is potentially facing a lifetime in jail," said Callamard.
 
The actions Assange is accused of taking, wrote journalist Stefan Simanowitz at Al Jazeera on Wednesday, "is conduct that journalists and publishers engage in on a daily basis."
 
"Were his extradition to be allowed it would set a precedent that would effectively criminalize common journalistic practices," Simanowitz added.
 
If he is extradited, Assange would be the first publisher pursued under the Espionage Act.
 
 
The case will be considered by the High Court on Wednesday and Thursday, and a decision is not expected for several weeks.
 
RSF noted that the court has harmed press freedom by placing significant barriers before organizations wishing to cover and observe the proceedings.
 
As of Tuesday morning, the group said, journalists, NGOs, and political observers were still waiting to learn if they had approval from the court to attend the hearing either in person or remotely. Deloire was ultimately able to attend Wednesday's proceedings, but only heard back from the court about accreditation the day prior.
 
"We have faced more difficulties in accessing proceedings in the case of Julian Assange than we have in any other case, in any other country," said Rebecca Vincent, director of international campaigns for the group, on Tuesday. "We are extremely frustrated by the barriers to access we continue to face on the eve of the most important hearing to date in this case. These proceedings are overwhelmingly in the public interest and must be open to scrutiny."
 
RSF, Amnesty, and the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), and nearly two dozen other press freedom groups called on U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland earlier this month to drop the charges against Assange.
 
"As the appeals process continues in Julian Assange's extradition trial, it's important to remember what it would mean if the WikiLeaks founder was tried in the U.S.," said CPJ on Wednesday.
 
 
"The Biden administration's relentless pursuit of Julian Assange should send a chill down the spine of journalists around the world," added CPJ deputy executive director Robert Mahoney.
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Comments

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.

 

To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

Related

Latest News

See all
Abortion rights activists hoist their signs outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. on June 24, 2022.

80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·

House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC), chairman of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, speaks during a hearing on September 23, 2020 in Washington, DC. Powell yesterday said the U.S. economy has a long way to go before fully recovering from the coronavirus pandemic and will need further support. (Photo by Stefani Reynolds-Pool/Getty Images)

Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·

John Fetterman

In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·

Bernie Sanders

Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·

Shayla, who has made the five-hour drive from Texas to Louisiana twice, sits in the waiting room of the Hope Medical Group for Women in Shreveport, Louisiana on April 19, 2022.

Patients in Trigger-Ban States Immediately Denied Abortion Care in Post-Roe US

Some people scheduled to receive abortions were turned away within minutes of the right-wing Supreme Court's decision to strike down Roe v. Wade.

Kenny Stancil ·

Most Popular

 
  1. Citing 'Deluge of New Evidence,' House Jan. 6 Committee Delays Hearings
  2. 'Unconscionable': House Committee Adds $37 Billion to Biden's $813 Billion Military Budget
  3. The Right-Wing Supreme Court Readies to Help Destroy the Planet
  4. Why Do Tens of Millions in US Support an Economic System That Doesn't Benefit Them?
  5. Study Shows Excess Corporate Profits in the US Have Become 'Widespread'
  6. Demanding Prosecution, Legal Experts Say This Is the 'Smoking Gun' to Nail Trump
  7. 'He Must Resign': Staff Texts Over Fake Elector Slates Implicate Ron Johnson
  8. Supreme Court Ruling Turns Separation of Church and State Into 'Constitutional Violation,' Warns Sotomayor
  9. As Right-Wing Majority Shows Its Face, Confidence in Supreme Court Hits All-Time Low
  10. 'Poverty Is Violence!' Thousands of Demonstrators in DC Demand Economic Justice
Common Dreams Logo

To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.