SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Part of a filtration system designed to filter out PFAS from the drinking water supply is seen at the Horsham Water and Sewer Authority facility in Pennsylvania, on August 22, 2019.
(Photo: Bastiaan Slabbers/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Nearly 42,000 Sources of Toxic 'Forever Chemicals' Put US Drinking Water at Risk: Study
"It is critical that the EPA start regulating PFAS—now," said one scientist.
Oct 12, 2021
Bolstering calls for stronger PFAS regulations and more testing, a new analysis released Tuesday finds nearly 42,000 potential sources of toxic "forever chemicals" that could contaminate drinking water in communities throughout the United States.
"Every community in the U.S. is likely affected by PFAS contamination, but those living near or downstream from industrial facilities may be more at risk."
In their peer-reviewed study, which was published in a special issue of Water Science, Environmental Working Group (EWG) scientists examined the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Enforcement and Compliance History Online database to identify potential sources of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pollution in the nation's surface and drinking water.
According to their investigation, solid waste landfills, wastewater treatment plants, electroplaters and metal finishers, and petroleum refiners were the facilities that appeared most often as possible sources of PFAS contamination.
Dubbed "forever chemicals" because they don't break down and can persist in the environment and bioaccumulate over time, PFAS are a class of synthetic compounds that have been linked to adverse health outcomes, including a weakened immune system, reproductive and developmental harms, and an increased susceptibility to cancer, among other negative effects.
EWG researchers point out that discharges of PFAS with industrial wastewater are a major driver of surface and drinking water pollution--putting the health of tens of millions of Americans in jeopardy. Despite these risks, the paper notes, the vast majority of water systems nationwide lack both the technology and the funds to filter out forever chemicals.
"It is critical that the EPA start regulating PFAS--now," David Andrews, the lead author of the study and a senior scientist at EWG, said in a statement. "Every community in the U.S. is likely affected by PFAS contamination, but those living near or downstream from industrial facilities may be more at risk."
"Our investigation identifies a huge number of potential sources of contamination," Andrews continued. "It also provides a framework for deciding where and what to test so we can end releases into the environment."
The paper includes case studies of data available from California and Michigan, which show that PFAS pollution is common at a variety of sites, heightening the importance of widespread testing for forever chemicals in wastewater.
"We need to turn off the tap of PFAS pollution from these industrial discharges, which affects more and more Americans every day."
"The results from states like Michigan show there is a wide variety of sources of PFAS in surface water," said Andrews. "Many landfills and industrial sites release PFAS at detectable concentrations that may exceed state limits or health guidelines for PFAS in water."
He added that "it is urgent that ongoing releases of PFAS be identified. We need to stop nonessential uses of PFAS and use filters to reduce these compounds from our water."
Getting forever chemicals out of the country's water supplies "remains a nationwide challenge," EWG stressed, "but it's one that can be met through comprehensive tests of surface water and drinking water, along with tests of wastewater from potential PFAS sources."
In July, the U.S. House passed the PFAS Action Act of 2021, which would improve the federal oversight and facilitate the cleanup of forever chemicals, but the U.S. Senate has yet to take up the legislation.
In the meantime, EWG implored the Biden administration to "use the EPA's powers to regulate as many industrial categories of PFAS discharges as possible," calling the agency's proposal to regulate just some releases of forever chemicals into the nation's drinking water inadequate "to end the pollution flowing from companies."
Scott Faber, EWG's senior vice president for government affairs, said that "we need to turn off the tap of PFAS pollution from these industrial discharges, which affects more and more Americans every day. That's the first step."
"The second step is for the EPA to set a national PFAS drinking water standard," said Farber. "And the third is to clean up legacy pollution."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
Bolstering calls for stronger PFAS regulations and more testing, a new analysis released Tuesday finds nearly 42,000 potential sources of toxic "forever chemicals" that could contaminate drinking water in communities throughout the United States.
"Every community in the U.S. is likely affected by PFAS contamination, but those living near or downstream from industrial facilities may be more at risk."
In their peer-reviewed study, which was published in a special issue of Water Science, Environmental Working Group (EWG) scientists examined the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Enforcement and Compliance History Online database to identify potential sources of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pollution in the nation's surface and drinking water.
According to their investigation, solid waste landfills, wastewater treatment plants, electroplaters and metal finishers, and petroleum refiners were the facilities that appeared most often as possible sources of PFAS contamination.
Dubbed "forever chemicals" because they don't break down and can persist in the environment and bioaccumulate over time, PFAS are a class of synthetic compounds that have been linked to adverse health outcomes, including a weakened immune system, reproductive and developmental harms, and an increased susceptibility to cancer, among other negative effects.
EWG researchers point out that discharges of PFAS with industrial wastewater are a major driver of surface and drinking water pollution--putting the health of tens of millions of Americans in jeopardy. Despite these risks, the paper notes, the vast majority of water systems nationwide lack both the technology and the funds to filter out forever chemicals.
"It is critical that the EPA start regulating PFAS--now," David Andrews, the lead author of the study and a senior scientist at EWG, said in a statement. "Every community in the U.S. is likely affected by PFAS contamination, but those living near or downstream from industrial facilities may be more at risk."
"Our investigation identifies a huge number of potential sources of contamination," Andrews continued. "It also provides a framework for deciding where and what to test so we can end releases into the environment."
The paper includes case studies of data available from California and Michigan, which show that PFAS pollution is common at a variety of sites, heightening the importance of widespread testing for forever chemicals in wastewater.
"We need to turn off the tap of PFAS pollution from these industrial discharges, which affects more and more Americans every day."
"The results from states like Michigan show there is a wide variety of sources of PFAS in surface water," said Andrews. "Many landfills and industrial sites release PFAS at detectable concentrations that may exceed state limits or health guidelines for PFAS in water."
He added that "it is urgent that ongoing releases of PFAS be identified. We need to stop nonessential uses of PFAS and use filters to reduce these compounds from our water."
Getting forever chemicals out of the country's water supplies "remains a nationwide challenge," EWG stressed, "but it's one that can be met through comprehensive tests of surface water and drinking water, along with tests of wastewater from potential PFAS sources."
In July, the U.S. House passed the PFAS Action Act of 2021, which would improve the federal oversight and facilitate the cleanup of forever chemicals, but the U.S. Senate has yet to take up the legislation.
In the meantime, EWG implored the Biden administration to "use the EPA's powers to regulate as many industrial categories of PFAS discharges as possible," calling the agency's proposal to regulate just some releases of forever chemicals into the nation's drinking water inadequate "to end the pollution flowing from companies."
Scott Faber, EWG's senior vice president for government affairs, said that "we need to turn off the tap of PFAS pollution from these industrial discharges, which affects more and more Americans every day. That's the first step."
"The second step is for the EPA to set a national PFAS drinking water standard," said Farber. "And the third is to clean up legacy pollution."
From Your Site Articles
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
Bolstering calls for stronger PFAS regulations and more testing, a new analysis released Tuesday finds nearly 42,000 potential sources of toxic "forever chemicals" that could contaminate drinking water in communities throughout the United States.
"Every community in the U.S. is likely affected by PFAS contamination, but those living near or downstream from industrial facilities may be more at risk."
In their peer-reviewed study, which was published in a special issue of Water Science, Environmental Working Group (EWG) scientists examined the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Enforcement and Compliance History Online database to identify potential sources of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pollution in the nation's surface and drinking water.
According to their investigation, solid waste landfills, wastewater treatment plants, electroplaters and metal finishers, and petroleum refiners were the facilities that appeared most often as possible sources of PFAS contamination.
Dubbed "forever chemicals" because they don't break down and can persist in the environment and bioaccumulate over time, PFAS are a class of synthetic compounds that have been linked to adverse health outcomes, including a weakened immune system, reproductive and developmental harms, and an increased susceptibility to cancer, among other negative effects.
EWG researchers point out that discharges of PFAS with industrial wastewater are a major driver of surface and drinking water pollution--putting the health of tens of millions of Americans in jeopardy. Despite these risks, the paper notes, the vast majority of water systems nationwide lack both the technology and the funds to filter out forever chemicals.
"It is critical that the EPA start regulating PFAS--now," David Andrews, the lead author of the study and a senior scientist at EWG, said in a statement. "Every community in the U.S. is likely affected by PFAS contamination, but those living near or downstream from industrial facilities may be more at risk."
"Our investigation identifies a huge number of potential sources of contamination," Andrews continued. "It also provides a framework for deciding where and what to test so we can end releases into the environment."
The paper includes case studies of data available from California and Michigan, which show that PFAS pollution is common at a variety of sites, heightening the importance of widespread testing for forever chemicals in wastewater.
"We need to turn off the tap of PFAS pollution from these industrial discharges, which affects more and more Americans every day."
"The results from states like Michigan show there is a wide variety of sources of PFAS in surface water," said Andrews. "Many landfills and industrial sites release PFAS at detectable concentrations that may exceed state limits or health guidelines for PFAS in water."
He added that "it is urgent that ongoing releases of PFAS be identified. We need to stop nonessential uses of PFAS and use filters to reduce these compounds from our water."
Getting forever chemicals out of the country's water supplies "remains a nationwide challenge," EWG stressed, "but it's one that can be met through comprehensive tests of surface water and drinking water, along with tests of wastewater from potential PFAS sources."
In July, the U.S. House passed the PFAS Action Act of 2021, which would improve the federal oversight and facilitate the cleanup of forever chemicals, but the U.S. Senate has yet to take up the legislation.
In the meantime, EWG implored the Biden administration to "use the EPA's powers to regulate as many industrial categories of PFAS discharges as possible," calling the agency's proposal to regulate just some releases of forever chemicals into the nation's drinking water inadequate "to end the pollution flowing from companies."
Scott Faber, EWG's senior vice president for government affairs, said that "we need to turn off the tap of PFAS pollution from these industrial discharges, which affects more and more Americans every day. That's the first step."
"The second step is for the EPA to set a national PFAS drinking water standard," said Farber. "And the third is to clean up legacy pollution."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.