To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
An indigene of Bodo, Ogoniland region in Rivers State, tries to separate with a stick crude oil from water in a boat in waterways polluted by oil spills attributed to Shell equipment failure on August 11, 2011. (Photo: Pius Utomi Ekpei/AFP via Getty Images)
Following decades of protests and demands over the damage done, Royal Dutch Shell on Wednesday finally agreed to pay $111 million for oil spills that have polluted Nigerian communities for more than a half-century.
"They ran out of tricks and decided to come to terms."
--Lucius Nwosa, lawyer for Ejama-Ebubu community
"They ran out of tricks and decided to come to terms," Lucius Nwosa, a lawyer representing a lawyer for the Ejama-Ebubu community in Ogoniland, Rivers State, toldAgence-France Presse. "The decision is a vindication of the resoluteness of the community for justice."
A spokesperson for the oil giant's Nigerian subsidiary, Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria, said that "the order for the payment... to the claimants is for full and final satisfaction of the judgment."
The case dates back to 1991. A Nigerian court ordered Shell to compensate the Ejama-Ebubu people in 2010, which the company repeatedly appealed, unsuccessfully.
After losing its appeals, Shell initiated arbitration proceedings against the Nigerian government at the World Bank's International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes in February. Bloomberg reports that the company has not said whether it will now withdraw the claim.
Shell plans to pay out the $111 million within the next three weeks. While the settlement was seen by some as a bit of justice, it is a relatively small amount of money for an oil giant whose reported adjusted earnings for 2020 were $4.85 billion. The previous year, before the coronavirus pandemic, the British-Dutch multinational saw a profit of $16.5 billion.
\u201cFor comparison, the Deepwater Horizon spill has cost BP at least $70 BILLION in cleanup costs, fines, legal settlements, etc., and some would argue that's not enough.\u201d— Tim McDonnell (@Tim McDonnell) 1628763077
Although Shell continues to blame "third parties" for the oil spills during a civil war in Nigeria, the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP) said that the settlement "is a confirmation of the issues we have raised about Shell's environmental devastation of Ogoni and the need for a proper remediation of the land."
According to German broadcaster Deutsche Welle:
Ogoni environmental activist Nnimmo Bassey... lauded the people affected by the oil spills for being "very persistent" in their case against Shell. "The extent of pollution in the Niger Delta is massive and having to wait for 30 years before the case is ended has tried the patience of the people. We really have to applaud the people for this."
Niger Delta environmental rights campaigner Kentebe Eberiado said he saw the outcome of the case as a "wake-up call" for multinationals. "It has opened the floodgate for more communities in the Niger Delta to seek redress for the environmental monstrosity that has devastated them in the past 50 years," he told DW.
The BBC noted that "earlier this year, in a separate case, a Dutch appeals court ruled that Shell's Nigerian branch was responsible for damage caused by leaks in the Niger Delta from 2004 to 2007."
\u201cNow do the leaks from the early 2000s. #MakePollutersPay https://t.co/sWG6d1SHJb\u201d— The YEARS Project (@The YEARS Project) 1628778203
The settlement news comes as Shell also faces global criticism for its contributions to the climate emergency. In a May decision that campaigners hailed as a "landslide victory for climate justice" that could also lead to similar rulings around the world, a Dutch court ordered the company to cut its carbon emissions 45% by 2030, compared with 2019 levels.
Shell confirmed its intention to appeal that order last month. In response, Friends of the Earth International climate justice and energy coordinator Sara Shaw said that "Shell should not waste time in appealing: history, science, and justice are on our side. There is no time to waste in tackling the climate crisis."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Following decades of protests and demands over the damage done, Royal Dutch Shell on Wednesday finally agreed to pay $111 million for oil spills that have polluted Nigerian communities for more than a half-century.
"They ran out of tricks and decided to come to terms."
--Lucius Nwosa, lawyer for Ejama-Ebubu community
"They ran out of tricks and decided to come to terms," Lucius Nwosa, a lawyer representing a lawyer for the Ejama-Ebubu community in Ogoniland, Rivers State, toldAgence-France Presse. "The decision is a vindication of the resoluteness of the community for justice."
A spokesperson for the oil giant's Nigerian subsidiary, Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria, said that "the order for the payment... to the claimants is for full and final satisfaction of the judgment."
The case dates back to 1991. A Nigerian court ordered Shell to compensate the Ejama-Ebubu people in 2010, which the company repeatedly appealed, unsuccessfully.
After losing its appeals, Shell initiated arbitration proceedings against the Nigerian government at the World Bank's International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes in February. Bloomberg reports that the company has not said whether it will now withdraw the claim.
Shell plans to pay out the $111 million within the next three weeks. While the settlement was seen by some as a bit of justice, it is a relatively small amount of money for an oil giant whose reported adjusted earnings for 2020 were $4.85 billion. The previous year, before the coronavirus pandemic, the British-Dutch multinational saw a profit of $16.5 billion.
\u201cFor comparison, the Deepwater Horizon spill has cost BP at least $70 BILLION in cleanup costs, fines, legal settlements, etc., and some would argue that's not enough.\u201d— Tim McDonnell (@Tim McDonnell) 1628763077
Although Shell continues to blame "third parties" for the oil spills during a civil war in Nigeria, the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP) said that the settlement "is a confirmation of the issues we have raised about Shell's environmental devastation of Ogoni and the need for a proper remediation of the land."
According to German broadcaster Deutsche Welle:
Ogoni environmental activist Nnimmo Bassey... lauded the people affected by the oil spills for being "very persistent" in their case against Shell. "The extent of pollution in the Niger Delta is massive and having to wait for 30 years before the case is ended has tried the patience of the people. We really have to applaud the people for this."
Niger Delta environmental rights campaigner Kentebe Eberiado said he saw the outcome of the case as a "wake-up call" for multinationals. "It has opened the floodgate for more communities in the Niger Delta to seek redress for the environmental monstrosity that has devastated them in the past 50 years," he told DW.
The BBC noted that "earlier this year, in a separate case, a Dutch appeals court ruled that Shell's Nigerian branch was responsible for damage caused by leaks in the Niger Delta from 2004 to 2007."
\u201cNow do the leaks from the early 2000s. #MakePollutersPay https://t.co/sWG6d1SHJb\u201d— The YEARS Project (@The YEARS Project) 1628778203
The settlement news comes as Shell also faces global criticism for its contributions to the climate emergency. In a May decision that campaigners hailed as a "landslide victory for climate justice" that could also lead to similar rulings around the world, a Dutch court ordered the company to cut its carbon emissions 45% by 2030, compared with 2019 levels.
Shell confirmed its intention to appeal that order last month. In response, Friends of the Earth International climate justice and energy coordinator Sara Shaw said that "Shell should not waste time in appealing: history, science, and justice are on our side. There is no time to waste in tackling the climate crisis."
Following decades of protests and demands over the damage done, Royal Dutch Shell on Wednesday finally agreed to pay $111 million for oil spills that have polluted Nigerian communities for more than a half-century.
"They ran out of tricks and decided to come to terms."
--Lucius Nwosa, lawyer for Ejama-Ebubu community
"They ran out of tricks and decided to come to terms," Lucius Nwosa, a lawyer representing a lawyer for the Ejama-Ebubu community in Ogoniland, Rivers State, toldAgence-France Presse. "The decision is a vindication of the resoluteness of the community for justice."
A spokesperson for the oil giant's Nigerian subsidiary, Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria, said that "the order for the payment... to the claimants is for full and final satisfaction of the judgment."
The case dates back to 1991. A Nigerian court ordered Shell to compensate the Ejama-Ebubu people in 2010, which the company repeatedly appealed, unsuccessfully.
After losing its appeals, Shell initiated arbitration proceedings against the Nigerian government at the World Bank's International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes in February. Bloomberg reports that the company has not said whether it will now withdraw the claim.
Shell plans to pay out the $111 million within the next three weeks. While the settlement was seen by some as a bit of justice, it is a relatively small amount of money for an oil giant whose reported adjusted earnings for 2020 were $4.85 billion. The previous year, before the coronavirus pandemic, the British-Dutch multinational saw a profit of $16.5 billion.
\u201cFor comparison, the Deepwater Horizon spill has cost BP at least $70 BILLION in cleanup costs, fines, legal settlements, etc., and some would argue that's not enough.\u201d— Tim McDonnell (@Tim McDonnell) 1628763077
Although Shell continues to blame "third parties" for the oil spills during a civil war in Nigeria, the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP) said that the settlement "is a confirmation of the issues we have raised about Shell's environmental devastation of Ogoni and the need for a proper remediation of the land."
According to German broadcaster Deutsche Welle:
Ogoni environmental activist Nnimmo Bassey... lauded the people affected by the oil spills for being "very persistent" in their case against Shell. "The extent of pollution in the Niger Delta is massive and having to wait for 30 years before the case is ended has tried the patience of the people. We really have to applaud the people for this."
Niger Delta environmental rights campaigner Kentebe Eberiado said he saw the outcome of the case as a "wake-up call" for multinationals. "It has opened the floodgate for more communities in the Niger Delta to seek redress for the environmental monstrosity that has devastated them in the past 50 years," he told DW.
The BBC noted that "earlier this year, in a separate case, a Dutch appeals court ruled that Shell's Nigerian branch was responsible for damage caused by leaks in the Niger Delta from 2004 to 2007."
\u201cNow do the leaks from the early 2000s. #MakePollutersPay https://t.co/sWG6d1SHJb\u201d— The YEARS Project (@The YEARS Project) 1628778203
The settlement news comes as Shell also faces global criticism for its contributions to the climate emergency. In a May decision that campaigners hailed as a "landslide victory for climate justice" that could also lead to similar rulings around the world, a Dutch court ordered the company to cut its carbon emissions 45% by 2030, compared with 2019 levels.
Shell confirmed its intention to appeal that order last month. In response, Friends of the Earth International climate justice and energy coordinator Sara Shaw said that "Shell should not waste time in appealing: history, science, and justice are on our side. There is no time to waste in tackling the climate crisis."
