Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Follow us:

A family is taken to an immigration processing center after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.

A family seeking asylum prepares to be taken to a border patrol processing facility after crossing into the U.S. on June 16, 2021 in La Joya, Texas. (Photo: Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

'Vile': Biden DHS to Turn Away Migrant Families Under 'Expedited Removal' Policy

"This administration continues to seek efficiency over safety and due process for migrant families."

Julia Conley

Immigrant rights advocates are decrying what some called an "appalling" Monday night announcement by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that the Biden administration will return to the use of an "expedited removal" process to send families seeking asylum back over the U.S.-Mexico border if they can't convince immigration agents that they need refuge in the United States.
 

"The expedited removal 'procedure' involves sitting across a desk from a government agent signing a deportation order. There is no ability to see a judge... or otherwise understand the process. This is not due process."
—Camille Mackler, Immigrant ARC

Groups including Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and the ACLU had hoped the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would revoke Title 42, under which the federal government has had the authority to send to Mexico any undocumented immigrants who attempt to cross the southern U.S. border.
 
Instead, DHS on Monday said that some families, many of whom Mexican officials have refused to accept under Title 42, "will be placed in expedited removal proceedings" to provide "a lawful, more accelerated procedure to remove those family units who do not have a basis under U.S. law to be in the United States. "
 
"The announcement we had been hoping for was about an end to Title 42," Linda Rivas, executive director of Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center in El Paso, Texas, told the New York Times. "This administration continues to seek efficiency over safety and due process for migrant families."
 
Under the policy, immigrant families who are intercepted by immigration agents at the border will be screened promptly to determine if they have a "credible fear" of persecution or violence in their home country which led them to seek asylum. 
 
If an agent determines there is no credible fear, families will be expelled from the country without an immigration judge hearing their case.
 
The policy has been used by both Democratic and Republican administrations in the past. 
 
Before Monday's announcement, thousands of families who Mexico would not accept under Title 42 have been sent by U.S. Border Patrol agents to stay in shelters while they wait to appear in immigration court.
 
The departure from that system "is not due process," tweeted Camille Mackler, founder and executive director of Immigrant ARC, which provides legal services to immigrants and was formed after legal advocates descended on John F. Kennedy International Airport to provide support to immigrants when the Trump administration announced its travel ban in January 2017.
 
Robyn Barnard, senior advocacy counsel at Human Rights First, described "how due process is run roughshod by expedited removal."
 
"There is no 'right' or 'wrong' way to seek asylum," Barnard tweeted. "It is a legal right to be able to do so however you get here. When you block the ports [under Title 42] and leave people in desperate and dangerous situations, what other options do they have?"
 
Heidi Altman, policy director at the National Immigrant Justice Center, called the DHS announcement "vile."
 
"Expedited removal sends asylum seekers back to harm," said Altman. "End it."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Comments

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

Related

A U.S. border agent detains asylum seekers

Physicians Group Documents 'Severe' Health and Human Rights Impacts of US Expulsion Policy

Jake Johnson ·

ICE Deportation

UN Official Decries Biden's 'Troubling' Deportations Under Pretext of Pandemic

Brett Wilkins ·

A DHS agent talks to a woman and her child after they crossed into the U.S. from Mexico

Lawsuit Initiated Against Trump for 'Illegal' Deportations Resumes Against Biden

Julia Conley ·

Greg Abbott

ACLU Sues Over 'Illegal and Inhumane' Migrant Transportation Order in Texas

Jessica Corbett ·

Latest News

See all
Biden

Biden Decries 'Outrageous' Treatment of Haitians at Border—But Keeps Deporting Them

"I'm glad to see President Biden speak out about the mistreatment of Haitian asylum-seekers. But his administration's use of Title 42 to deny them the right to make an asylum claim is a much bigger issue."

Jessica Corbett ·

Quad leaders

Global Peace Activists Warn of Dangers of US-Led Anti-China Pacts

"No to military alliances and preparation for catastrophic wars," anti-war campaigners from over a dozen nations write in a letter decrying the new AUKUS agreement. "Yes to peace, disarmament, justice, and the climate."

Brett Wilkins ·

Zogg Fire

PG&E Charged With 11 Felony Counts—Including Manslaughter—Over 2020 Zogg Fire

"PG&E has a history with a repeated pattern of causing wildfires that is not getting better," said Shasta County District Attorney Stephanie Bridgett. "It's only getting worse."

Brett Wilkins ·

Dingell on the U.S. Capitol Steps

'Hold My Pearls': Debbie Dingell Lets Marjorie Taylor Green Have It Over Abortion Rights

The Michigan Democrat engaged in a verbal altercation with the far-right Republican lawmaker from Georgia on the steps of the U.S. Capitol Building.

Jon Queally ·

pentagon

Dems Who Opposed Pentagon Cuts Received Nearly 4x More Donations From Weapons Makers

The latest passage of the NDAA "is particularly strong evidence that Pentagon contractors' interests easily take precedence over national security and the public interest for too many members of Congress," said one critic.

Kenny Stancil ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo

To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.