Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) speaks at a press conference on July 22, 2020. (Photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)
24 House Dems Say Infrastructure Bill Must Not Be Used to 'Throw More Money at the Pentagon'
"Wasteful spending at the Pentagon will do nothing to help our country recover from this pandemic."
Two dozen Democratic lawmakers in the U.S. House sent a letter on Friday urging their party's leaders to prevent any funding in emerging infrastructure and jobs legislation from going to the Pentagon, which--if President Joe Biden gets his way--is set to receive a $715 billion budget for the next fiscal year.
"Each additional dollar poured into the defense industry's coffers is another dollar stripped away from the other urgent priorities in the American Jobs Plan."
--Letter
Spearheaded by Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Cori Bush (D-Mo.), and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), the new letter (pdf) states that "it makes poor economic and security sense" to use an infrastructure package "to funnel more money into the Pentagon, on top of the three quarters of a trillion dollars per year that it already receives."
"Doing so will not provide the jobs that Americans need; build a better, greener economy; or make people in this country safer," reads the letter, which is addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). "Specifically, as we consider how best to create well-paying jobs for the people of the United States, we must reject attempts to use the American Jobs Plan to fund military industrial facilities."
To make their economic case against boosting Pentagon funds for the purpose of job creation, the lawmakers point to a 2019 study by the Brown University Costs of War Project showing that while $1 billion in military spending creates roughly 11,200 jobs, the same amount of spending on clean energy yields 16,800 jobs. The study also shows that $1 billion in spending on healthcare and education would create 26,700 and 17,200 jobs, respectively.
"Each additional dollar poured into the defense industry's coffers is another dollar stripped away from the other urgent priorities in the American Jobs Plan," the lawmakers write. "We cannot ignore that weapons makers--some of the most profitable yet unaccountable corporations in the world--have demonstrated time and again a propensity to mismanage, squander, and profiteer off the large sums of taxpayer money they receive. This was made abundantly clear during the pandemic, as weapons contractors reaped ample revenues and massive profits."
"This bill must not be an excuse to line defense contractors' pockets," they add. "We should not throw more money at the Pentagon or weapons companies to continue the status quo."
The Democratic lawmakers' letter came as members of Congress continue to haggle over the details of a $579 billion bipartisan infrastructure deal that Biden has endorsed as well as a larger, separate package that Democrats hope to pass through the budget reconciliation process, which is exempt from the Senate's 60-vote filibuster.
As Politico reported last week, some Democratic and Republican lawmakers are clamoring for the inclusion of "funding for a host of defense industrial facilities into a potential multitrillion-dollar package."
"Reps. Cheri Bustos [D-Ill.] and Blake Moore [R-Utah], who co-chair the House Military Depot, Arsenal, Ammunition Plant, and Industrial Facilities Caucus, are gathering support for a planned letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging money for long-deferred upgrades for military industrial facilities as well as defense labs and test facilities and ranges be incorporated into an infrastructure proposal," Politico noted. "The latest move also comes after boosters of shipyards... pressed for including the Navy's $21 billion plan to modernize its four public shipyards over the next 20 years."
It's unclear whether such requests are gaining any traction with congressional leaders or Biden, whose original American Jobs Plan called for investments in research and development to "out-compete China"--funds that would, in part, go to the Pentagon.
In their letter on Friday, the 24 Democratic lawmakers write that "while we do not deny that in some cases the need for military infrastructure modernization exists, funding for these projects should be debated and determined through the regular defense budgeting process, as it is every year."
"Given that spending on the Pentagon is already at one of its highest levels since World War II," the letter reads, "there should be ample funding within the department's budget to address any issues with military facilities by cutting waste and eliminating unnecessary weapons systems, without tapping into the administration's infrastructure plan."
Writing for The Nation on Thursday, Mandy Smithberger of the Project on Government Oversight and William Hartung of the Center for International Policy echoed the House Democrats' support for prioritizing green-energy spending and other priorities over adding to the Pentagon's bloated coffers.
"If managed properly, President Biden's initiatives on rebuilding domestic infrastructure and combating climate change would be far more central to keeping people safe than throwing more money at the Pentagon and related agencies," Smithberger and Hartung argued. "A shift in spending toward these and other urgent priorities like addressing the possibility of future pandemics would clearly be a far better investment in 'national security' than the present proposed Pentagon budget."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Two dozen Democratic lawmakers in the U.S. House sent a letter on Friday urging their party's leaders to prevent any funding in emerging infrastructure and jobs legislation from going to the Pentagon, which--if President Joe Biden gets his way--is set to receive a $715 billion budget for the next fiscal year.
"Each additional dollar poured into the defense industry's coffers is another dollar stripped away from the other urgent priorities in the American Jobs Plan."
--Letter
Spearheaded by Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Cori Bush (D-Mo.), and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), the new letter (pdf) states that "it makes poor economic and security sense" to use an infrastructure package "to funnel more money into the Pentagon, on top of the three quarters of a trillion dollars per year that it already receives."
"Doing so will not provide the jobs that Americans need; build a better, greener economy; or make people in this country safer," reads the letter, which is addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). "Specifically, as we consider how best to create well-paying jobs for the people of the United States, we must reject attempts to use the American Jobs Plan to fund military industrial facilities."
To make their economic case against boosting Pentagon funds for the purpose of job creation, the lawmakers point to a 2019 study by the Brown University Costs of War Project showing that while $1 billion in military spending creates roughly 11,200 jobs, the same amount of spending on clean energy yields 16,800 jobs. The study also shows that $1 billion in spending on healthcare and education would create 26,700 and 17,200 jobs, respectively.
"Each additional dollar poured into the defense industry's coffers is another dollar stripped away from the other urgent priorities in the American Jobs Plan," the lawmakers write. "We cannot ignore that weapons makers--some of the most profitable yet unaccountable corporations in the world--have demonstrated time and again a propensity to mismanage, squander, and profiteer off the large sums of taxpayer money they receive. This was made abundantly clear during the pandemic, as weapons contractors reaped ample revenues and massive profits."
"This bill must not be an excuse to line defense contractors' pockets," they add. "We should not throw more money at the Pentagon or weapons companies to continue the status quo."
The Democratic lawmakers' letter came as members of Congress continue to haggle over the details of a $579 billion bipartisan infrastructure deal that Biden has endorsed as well as a larger, separate package that Democrats hope to pass through the budget reconciliation process, which is exempt from the Senate's 60-vote filibuster.
As Politico reported last week, some Democratic and Republican lawmakers are clamoring for the inclusion of "funding for a host of defense industrial facilities into a potential multitrillion-dollar package."
"Reps. Cheri Bustos [D-Ill.] and Blake Moore [R-Utah], who co-chair the House Military Depot, Arsenal, Ammunition Plant, and Industrial Facilities Caucus, are gathering support for a planned letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging money for long-deferred upgrades for military industrial facilities as well as defense labs and test facilities and ranges be incorporated into an infrastructure proposal," Politico noted. "The latest move also comes after boosters of shipyards... pressed for including the Navy's $21 billion plan to modernize its four public shipyards over the next 20 years."
It's unclear whether such requests are gaining any traction with congressional leaders or Biden, whose original American Jobs Plan called for investments in research and development to "out-compete China"--funds that would, in part, go to the Pentagon.
In their letter on Friday, the 24 Democratic lawmakers write that "while we do not deny that in some cases the need for military infrastructure modernization exists, funding for these projects should be debated and determined through the regular defense budgeting process, as it is every year."
"Given that spending on the Pentagon is already at one of its highest levels since World War II," the letter reads, "there should be ample funding within the department's budget to address any issues with military facilities by cutting waste and eliminating unnecessary weapons systems, without tapping into the administration's infrastructure plan."
Writing for The Nation on Thursday, Mandy Smithberger of the Project on Government Oversight and William Hartung of the Center for International Policy echoed the House Democrats' support for prioritizing green-energy spending and other priorities over adding to the Pentagon's bloated coffers.
"If managed properly, President Biden's initiatives on rebuilding domestic infrastructure and combating climate change would be far more central to keeping people safe than throwing more money at the Pentagon and related agencies," Smithberger and Hartung argued. "A shift in spending toward these and other urgent priorities like addressing the possibility of future pandemics would clearly be a far better investment in 'national security' than the present proposed Pentagon budget."
Two dozen Democratic lawmakers in the U.S. House sent a letter on Friday urging their party's leaders to prevent any funding in emerging infrastructure and jobs legislation from going to the Pentagon, which--if President Joe Biden gets his way--is set to receive a $715 billion budget for the next fiscal year.
"Each additional dollar poured into the defense industry's coffers is another dollar stripped away from the other urgent priorities in the American Jobs Plan."
--Letter
Spearheaded by Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Cori Bush (D-Mo.), and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), the new letter (pdf) states that "it makes poor economic and security sense" to use an infrastructure package "to funnel more money into the Pentagon, on top of the three quarters of a trillion dollars per year that it already receives."
"Doing so will not provide the jobs that Americans need; build a better, greener economy; or make people in this country safer," reads the letter, which is addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). "Specifically, as we consider how best to create well-paying jobs for the people of the United States, we must reject attempts to use the American Jobs Plan to fund military industrial facilities."
To make their economic case against boosting Pentagon funds for the purpose of job creation, the lawmakers point to a 2019 study by the Brown University Costs of War Project showing that while $1 billion in military spending creates roughly 11,200 jobs, the same amount of spending on clean energy yields 16,800 jobs. The study also shows that $1 billion in spending on healthcare and education would create 26,700 and 17,200 jobs, respectively.
"Each additional dollar poured into the defense industry's coffers is another dollar stripped away from the other urgent priorities in the American Jobs Plan," the lawmakers write. "We cannot ignore that weapons makers--some of the most profitable yet unaccountable corporations in the world--have demonstrated time and again a propensity to mismanage, squander, and profiteer off the large sums of taxpayer money they receive. This was made abundantly clear during the pandemic, as weapons contractors reaped ample revenues and massive profits."
"This bill must not be an excuse to line defense contractors' pockets," they add. "We should not throw more money at the Pentagon or weapons companies to continue the status quo."
The Democratic lawmakers' letter came as members of Congress continue to haggle over the details of a $579 billion bipartisan infrastructure deal that Biden has endorsed as well as a larger, separate package that Democrats hope to pass through the budget reconciliation process, which is exempt from the Senate's 60-vote filibuster.
As Politico reported last week, some Democratic and Republican lawmakers are clamoring for the inclusion of "funding for a host of defense industrial facilities into a potential multitrillion-dollar package."
"Reps. Cheri Bustos [D-Ill.] and Blake Moore [R-Utah], who co-chair the House Military Depot, Arsenal, Ammunition Plant, and Industrial Facilities Caucus, are gathering support for a planned letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging money for long-deferred upgrades for military industrial facilities as well as defense labs and test facilities and ranges be incorporated into an infrastructure proposal," Politico noted. "The latest move also comes after boosters of shipyards... pressed for including the Navy's $21 billion plan to modernize its four public shipyards over the next 20 years."
It's unclear whether such requests are gaining any traction with congressional leaders or Biden, whose original American Jobs Plan called for investments in research and development to "out-compete China"--funds that would, in part, go to the Pentagon.
In their letter on Friday, the 24 Democratic lawmakers write that "while we do not deny that in some cases the need for military infrastructure modernization exists, funding for these projects should be debated and determined through the regular defense budgeting process, as it is every year."
"Given that spending on the Pentagon is already at one of its highest levels since World War II," the letter reads, "there should be ample funding within the department's budget to address any issues with military facilities by cutting waste and eliminating unnecessary weapons systems, without tapping into the administration's infrastructure plan."
Writing for The Nation on Thursday, Mandy Smithberger of the Project on Government Oversight and William Hartung of the Center for International Policy echoed the House Democrats' support for prioritizing green-energy spending and other priorities over adding to the Pentagon's bloated coffers.
"If managed properly, President Biden's initiatives on rebuilding domestic infrastructure and combating climate change would be far more central to keeping people safe than throwing more money at the Pentagon and related agencies," Smithberger and Hartung argued. "A shift in spending toward these and other urgent priorities like addressing the possibility of future pandemics would clearly be a far better investment in 'national security' than the present proposed Pentagon budget."